• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:10
CEST 06:10
KST 13:10
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic3Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL47
Community News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0
StarCraft 2
General
Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO8 - Group A RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
NA Team League 6/8/2025 [ASL19] Grand Finals [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 27787 users

Pick Your Power: Redux - Page 11

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 9 10 11 12 13 87 Next
talismania
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United States2364 Posts
May 09 2012 22:34 GMT
#201
Alright cool, that's exactly how I see it too.
Toadesstern
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
Germany16350 Posts
May 09 2012 22:34 GMT
#202
On May 10 2012 07:29 GMarshal wrote:
Bleh, looking at it, I disagree with the logic used in PYP:I, I'd place the numbers as so

[19,19]
[1,1]
[1,1]
[6,9]
[6,20]
[7,1]
[7,4]
[7,2]
[7,2]

Basically, the uniqueness of the leading number trumps ties in the second number. I think this is a more logical way to handle it, that doesn't require complex rulings.


exactly what I thought as well. I like that way more than the other one :p
<Elem> >toad in charge of judging lewdness <Elem> how bad can it be <Elem> also wew, that is actually p lewd.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-09 23:03:50
May 09 2012 23:03 GMT
#203
why would 6 : 9 and 6:20 be placed ahead of 1:1?

If the first number is the same then they're put to the back and the second number is counted. What's the purpose of the second number then?

Like, 6 : 9 should be second, 6:20 should be third, and 7:4 should be fourth. Then comes 1:1, 7:1, and 7:2 last.
ghost_403
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1825 Posts
May 09 2012 23:25 GMT
#204
Look, I'm not saying your method for players picking powers is complicated and convoluted, but I've met linear algebra theorems that make more sense.
They say great science is built on the shoulders of giants. Not here. At Aperture, we do all our science from scratch, no hand holding. Step aside, REAL SCIENCE coming through.
Mattchew
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States5684 Posts
May 09 2012 23:58 GMT
#205
On May 10 2012 08:03 wherebugsgo wrote:
why would 6 : 9 and 6:20 be placed ahead of 1:1?

If the first number is the same then they're put to the back and the second number is counted. What's the purpose of the second number then?

Like, 6 : 9 should be second, 6:20 should be third, and 7:4 should be fourth. Then comes 1:1, 7:1, and 7:2 last.

the uniqueness..

the example has
two 1:1
two 6:#

the two 1:1's go last automatically (unless there is like a pair of another numbers)
There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
Qatol
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
United States3165 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-10 00:12:26
May 09 2012 23:59 GMT
#206
On May 10 2012 08:03 wherebugsgo wrote:
why would 6 : 9 and 6:20 be placed ahead of 1:1?

If the first number is the same then they're put to the back and the second number is counted. What's the purpose of the second number then?

Like, 6 : 9 should be second, 6:20 should be third, and 7:4 should be fourth. Then comes 1:1, 7:1, and 7:2 last.

Agreed. It makes no sense that a selection that double clashes is placed above a selection that single clashes. Otherwise, the second number holds no meaning except as a tiebreaker between people with the same first number.

Edit: To be clear, I think the numbers should be arranged as follows:
[19,19]
[6,9]
[6,20]
[7,1]
[7,4]
[1,1]
[1,1]
[7,2]
[7,2]

First you have numbers where the first number doesn't clash. Then you have numbers with a clash of the first number, ordered first by number of players clashing and then numerically by first number. Next you have the numbers which clash on both numbers, ordered first by number of players clashing and then numerically by first number.

That seems to be the way that makes the most sense and makes both numbers meaningful.

If you think some other way makes more sense, that's fine (just please explain it one more time - I'm still confused from your example earlier).
Uff Da
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
May 10 2012 00:14 GMT
#207
On May 10 2012 08:59 Qatol wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2012 08:03 wherebugsgo wrote:
why would 6 : 9 and 6:20 be placed ahead of 1:1?

If the first number is the same then they're put to the back and the second number is counted. What's the purpose of the second number then?

Like, 6 : 9 should be second, 6:20 should be third, and 7:4 should be fourth. Then comes 1:1, 7:1, and 7:2 last.

Agreed. It makes no sense that a selection that double clashes is placed above a selection that single clashes. Otherwise, the second number holds no meaning except as a tiebreaker between people with the same first number.

Edit: To be clear, I think the numbers should be arranged as follows:
[19,19]
[6,9]
[6,20]
[7,1]
[7,4]
[1,1]
[1,1]
[7,2]
[7,2]

First you have numbers where the first number doesn't clash. Then you have numbers with a clash of the first number, ordered first by number of players clashing and then numerically by first number. Next you have the numbers which clash on both numbers, ordered first by number of players clashing and then numerically by first number.

That seems to be the way that makes the most sense and makes both numbers meaningful.

If you think some other way makes more sense, that's fine (just please explain it one more time - I'm still confused from your example earlier).


the 7:1's second number clashes with 1:1 which why I think 7:4 should come before it
gonzaw
Profile Joined December 2011
Uruguay4911 Posts
May 10 2012 00:24 GMT
#208
wbg has a point.

If not, everybody would just put [1,1],[2,1],[3,1],[4,1], etc.

I mean, imagine you put 1 as the 1st number.
By what GMarshal posted, then you'll be one of the 1st after the unique 1st numbers no matter what your 2nd number is. Then why even bother choosing the 2nd number other than 1? If you choose [1,2] and everybody else (that had 1 as the 1st number) chooses 1 you'll end up last, so you'll just put [1,1]; and everybody else will too.

So basically there is no point in choosing anything but 1 as the 2nd number.

To change that, you make it so that the ones that clash on both are sent to the bottom, so people choose wisely instead of just 1 as the 2nd number as well.
Probulous
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Australia3894 Posts
May 10 2012 00:30 GMT
#209
But [7],[1] and [7],[4] don't have a second clash?

Surely it works in a filter situation where people are grouped on how their first number clashes? Ie all those with 7 as their first number are put together. For example if you had

[7][1]
[7][1]
[7][4]

The order would be
[7][4]
[7][1]
[7][1]

Because their second number clashed. That seems most logical to me.
"Dude has some really interesting midgame switches that I wouldn't have expected. "I violated your house" into "HIHO THE DAIRY OH!" really threw me. You don't usually expect children's poetry harass as a follow up " - AmericanUmlaut
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-10 00:35:37
May 10 2012 00:34 GMT
#210
On May 10 2012 09:30 Probulous wrote:
But [7],[1] and [7],[4] don't have a second clash?

Surely it works in a filter situation where people are grouped on how their first number clashes? Ie all those with 7 as their first number are put together. For example if you had

[7][1]
[7][1]
[7][4]

The order would be
[7][4]
[7][1]
[7][1]

Because their second number clashed. That seems most logical to me.


again, then everyone would pick 1 as the second number.

Then all that matters is first number uniqueness.

e: think about it this way.

one guy picks 2/2.

Everyone else picks X/1. The one person with a unique X appears first, 2/2 appears second. Is that fair?
talismania
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United States2364 Posts
May 10 2012 00:38 GMT
#211
Qatol, what's wrong with just having a second number be a tiebreaker? I think that's way simpler. To be honest, what's wrong with having no second number at all?

ordered first by number of players clashing and then numerically by first number.


My problem is that this double-ranking is NOT in the listed rules (specifically the part about the number of players clashing).

I guess the only point from all of this is that GM just needs to spell out completely explicitly what algorithm he will be using so that there is no confusion.

Gonzaw, you're exactly right. I thought it was stupid for anyone to pick anything but 1 from my reading of the rules the first time. The only reason you pick 2 as a second number is if you're sure that two other people are both picking the same first number, meaning the only reason you'd ever pick 20 as second number is if there were 39 people in the game and you were sure they were all picking the same first number.
Ace
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States16096 Posts
May 10 2012 00:45 GMT
#212
I love this part of the game.
Math me up, scumboi. - Acrofales
Snarfs
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada1006 Posts
May 10 2012 00:47 GMT
#213
The game hasn't even started >.>
GMarshal
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States22154 Posts
May 10 2012 00:48 GMT
#214
I'll clarify the formula tomorrow, ironically I have Linear Algebra homework to do now.
Moderator
Probulous
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Australia3894 Posts
May 10 2012 00:51 GMT
#215
On May 10 2012 09:34 wherebugsgo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2012 09:30 Probulous wrote:
But [7],[1] and [7],[4] don't have a second clash?

Surely it works in a filter situation where people are grouped on how their first number clashes? Ie all those with 7 as their first number are put together. For example if you had

[7][1]
[7][1]
[7][4]

The order would be
[7][4]
[7][1]
[7][1]

Because their second number clashed. That seems most logical to me.


again, then everyone would pick 1 as the second number.

Then all that matters is first number uniqueness.

e: think about it this way.

one guy picks 2/2.

Everyone else picks X/1. The one person with a unique X appears first, 2/2 appears second. Is that fair?




Why would you pick 1 as your second number when it is likely to clash and put you at the bottom of whatever group you end up in? In the example above picking 1 made you come last. In your example the [2],[2] would be first. Remember you evaluate the first number first.

Your example:
[1,1]
[1,2]
[2,2]
[5,1]
[1,4]
[1,1]

This would be ordered into groups based on the first number. So you would have
[1,1],[1,2],[1,4],[1,1]
[2,2]
[5,1]
as the groups

The order when then be
[2,2]
[5,1]
[1,2]
[1,4]
[1,1]
[1,1]

Why is that not fair?
"Dude has some really interesting midgame switches that I wouldn't have expected. "I violated your house" into "HIHO THE DAIRY OH!" really threw me. You don't usually expect children's poetry harass as a follow up " - AmericanUmlaut
sandroba
Profile Joined April 2006
Canada4998 Posts
May 10 2012 00:53 GMT
#216
Hey GM, when is this going to start? I'll probably have to travel over the weekend.
Barbiero
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Brazil5259 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-10 00:56:21
May 10 2012 00:56 GMT
#217
On May 10 2012 09:53 sandroba wrote:
Hey GM, when is this going to start? I'll probably have to travel over the weekend.


I second that. I'd love if you'd start it only on Monday since this was delayed so much already, and it requires a lot of activity

Although you could start it a bit sooner for the power picking I guess.
♥ The world needs more hearts! ♥
Radfield
Profile Joined September 2009
Canada2720 Posts
May 10 2012 00:58 GMT
#218
On May 10 2012 09:45 Ace wrote:
I love this part of the game.




PYP is the best
Qatol
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
United States3165 Posts
May 10 2012 01:04 GMT
#219
On May 10 2012 09:45 Ace wrote:
I love this part of the game.

You're just happy it's GMarshal I'm debating this with and not you any more.
Uff Da
Ace
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States16096 Posts
May 10 2012 01:08 GMT
#220
I dont even remember how the original # picking thing worked :D
Math me up, scumboi. - Acrofales
Prev 1 9 10 11 12 13 87 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
02:00
LiuLi 40 / Enki Pro Series 5
Liquipedia
Online Event
00:00
LATAM SC2 League: Semifinals
Liquipedia
GSL
23:00
Replay Cast
Rogue vs GuMiho
Maru vs Solar
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 241
ROOTCatZ 220
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 2512
Sea 2001
PianO 322
Leta 80
Noble 43
Terrorterran 18
Icarus 9
Dota 2
monkeys_forever468
LuMiX1
League of Legends
JimRising 804
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K727
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor136
Other Games
summit1g11314
C9.Mang01025
hungrybox661
WinterStarcraft306
ToD163
ViBE162
Maynarde117
Mew2King71
CosmosSc2 22
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1099
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH300
• Hupsaiya 85
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki15
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift5479
• Lourlo1044
• Stunt281
Upcoming Events
GSL Code S
5h 20m
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Bunny
The PondCast
5h 50m
Replay Cast
19h 50m
WardiTV Invitational
1d 6h
OSC
1d 8h
Korean StarCraft League
1d 22h
SOOP
2 days
sOs vs Percival
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
Cheesadelphia
2 days
[ Show More ]
CSO Cup
2 days
GSL Code S
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
6 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.