fun fact: this is the 16th game in a row that i have been town. last game i was scum was in XLVII when i requested it. not counting requests (requested town in election mafia too i think) then i'm on like a 20 game town streak. beat that. always town never not town QED.
Liar Game Mini Mafia - Page 2
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
fun fact: this is the 16th game in a row that i have been town. last game i was scum was in XLVII when i requested it. not counting requests (requested town in election mafia too i think) then i'm on like a 20 game town streak. beat that. always town never not town QED. | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
![]() i made some illegal votes because i had like no idea what i was doing, showed up for like 20 mins and i asked who i should vote and only one person PMd me with advice that i just followed and then i spread my votes across players i thought were town and then i went to bed. i honestly had no idea that some of them were in minority so you should just treat me as if my intentions were to save those five (cause that was what my intentions were). also, the illegal vote for sandroba was actually for syllogism, i can ask protactinium if they will fix that if you don't believe me. and thanks to radfield for saving my ass. | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On May 02 2012 19:28 Palmar wrote: Can anyone explain the illegal votes? uh i just did i voted 1 palmar 1 syllogism 1 wiggles 1 radfield 1 gonzaw and three of those votes were for people in the minority, not eligible for votes. illegal votes. it says that i voted for sandroba but i actually voted for syllogism. | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On May 03 2012 07:11 Ace wrote: I could post the playerlist of the game and come to the same conclusion. Bullshit post with no reasoning on to how you got this. Scum. it's the minority list kiddo are you even reading the game? | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On May 03 2012 07:23 BloodyC0bbler wrote: It doesn't change the point of the post -_-. well at the very least it changes the part where he says "with no reasoning on to how you got this." also, i wanted to call ace "kiddo" and i think it was funny because i PM'd foolishness the same question and because i didn't read half the thread yet. i'm at page 15 with and then i read again from nightpost and then i read a few filters. i think it's pretty rude of you that you're ignoring my PM. could you please tell me who your two comfortable scum reads are? you are even alluding that you already said it in the thread, why wont you repeat it to me when i'm asking you so nicely? ![]() | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On May 03 2012 10:17 Ace wrote: good post. Quality assured. Moving you to my most likely town list after that one. this seems rather hypocritical considering that On May 01 2012 06:57 Ace wrote: Aye aye Captain! *salutes* On May 01 2012 08:24 Ace wrote: I haven't even read my role PM, what makes you think I'm gonna give your posts any attention? ![]() On May 01 2012 08:47 Ace wrote: I am actively committed to finding booze. Type ##DRINK! if you are with me! On May 01 2012 08:51 Ace wrote: I don't need to stand up for myself though - people know I'm invincible to being lynched. #FinalBossStatus On May 01 2012 11:22 Ace wrote: lmao On May 02 2012 10:55 Ace wrote: Very pleased the way this game is going. On May 03 2012 04:17 Ace wrote: *yawn* People are still alive in this game? What's taking so long to kill everyone? and i've been pretty conservative with your quotes here. | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
![]() | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
i also asked radfield why he voted for me but he didn't answer (before he /out'ed) so i'm not gonna post those + Show Spoiler [pms with RADFIELD] + Original Message From Radfield: I don't know what you signed up for either, so lets figure it out ![]() I'm just thinking that given the unwillingness of town right to work together right now, I see no reason for them to be willing to co-operate in round 2. So we need to gather up townies who are willing to work together, and use our votes in an intelligent fashion. If everyone is just helter skelter voting in round 2, mafia have already won. subject was "you know i am" and it was in response to his post where he asked people to pm him if they wanted to cooperate. also i + Show Spoiler [stumbled upon this] + On May 01 2012 09:24 chaoser wrote: here, let me ask a question to you radfield. What's the difference between people in the minority and the majority? Minority can't die right? Why would you take away a threat to a player like that? It makes no sense. If you have a system in place to make it so that round 2 proceeds in an orderly manner then everything works out perfectly. I sent this to WBG already but I'll post it here as well. for round two, it's based on whoever has the lowest points will be lynched right? so I was thinking of basing it on a gradient system. Most scummy, no points. We then have the rest pass points in a system following the player order. so lets say it's like 5 people in the majority and 1 person in the minority. that's 25 points. lets say we think a is mafia. so the players are a, b, c, d, e, f we think f is townie so he's in minority cause we need one. we move onto round 2. b gives all his points to c, c gives all his points to d, d gives to e, e gives to b. If we all circle then a will have zero points. even if mafia was trying to save a, the two teams members would have to give 6 points total to save him. Because of the circle system, there's no way a can make back the deficient with his 5 points for both his teammates; one of his teammates will be adjacent to someone without 5 votes. That person is also mafia then. f will be giving his votes, spread as evenly as possible, into the crowd of b, c, d, e. If things look wrong then f is suspicious. WBG suggested to me that we do it so that everyone only cycles 4 votes and they give their one vote to whomever they want so that accountability would be an element and I agree. There's no way a would be able to get out of this situation unless his teammates out themselves. and thought i'd comment even though it's old if there's only 1 guy in minority then at least 2 of any scum team is in majority. say A is mafia but so is his mate, C. so A trades 4 votes to D so that they're not missing, C trades his 4 votes that was meant for D to A and now everybody has 4 votes, which is clearly not desirable. now people are going to die unless they get more votes and with a 1 person minority that's somewhat unlikely to happen. if chaoser had only suggested the 5 votes vote circle then we would have been even more screwed, everybody would die except the people F decided to trade and F himself. in short, this strategy is broken/crazy isn't it? or did i miss something i'm bad with plans. it seems like it only appears to be working because he chose a rather small example, with 17 player majority and 1 player minority this strategy would be crazy. with 10/8 i'm a little unsure why it would be desirable to take so much accountability and power away from majority and give it to minority, when you are the same time don't want to try to implement a plan that would make it more likely that the minority was mostly town aligned. seems like a 10/8 split would kind of ruin the idea of circle trading since everybody would die if A has a scum buddy in the minority is there any voting plan for round A today? i'm catching up! | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On May 04 2012 07:00 sandroba wrote: It actually doesn't matter what I post in this tread. I made my suspicons clear and it doesn't matter how much I "explain" myself here. People are still dumb enough to think I'm mafia when evidence to the contrary is thrown in their faces. I'll do my best to get into minority so jubjubs + scum can't kill me. Then we proceed to kill sheth/mz/bc. i don't get this the case on you is that you are not contributing, and that this is in contrast to your meta your excuse is a little odd!, while people would usually say "it's because i have too little spare time" you're actually saying "i've decided to do something else because i've got a lot of spare time" might very well be true!... but i'm still a little worried as you might understand. i thought it was weird that you'd vote for me as scum when i was looking to get no votes but that was before i read the thread and now it looks like a couple of people vouched to vote me before deadline so you already know i probably wasn't dying. | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On May 04 2012 06:50 Palmar wrote: you guys, I'm just gonna announce right now that I'll be voting "No". Do whatever you please with this information. gonna put it on a tshirt and make billions | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
i don't know what my conclusion is, i'm asking you if i'm seeing this right but nobody is answering so i guess it's irrelevant at best. | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
Alright, 5 guys in the majority we want to save so lets vote like this: Cephiro EchelonTee (1 gonzaw, 1 Katina, 1 Mr. Wiggles, 1 slOosh, 1 syllogism) Palmar (1 gonzaw, 1 Katina, 1 Mr. Wiggles, 1 slOosh, 1 syllogism) prplhz (1 gonzaw, 1 Katina, 1 Mr. Wiggles, 1 slOosh, 1 syllogism) sandroba wherebugsgo (1 gonzaw, 1 Katina, 1 Mr. Wiggles, 1 slOosh, 1 syllogism) chaoser gonzaw (2 Katina, 1 Mr. Wiggles, 1 slOosh, 1 syllogism) Katina (1 gonzaw, 2 Mr. Wiggles, 1 slOosh, 1 syllogism) Liquid`Sheth Meapak_Ziphh Mr. Wiggles (1 gonzaw, 1 Katina, 2 slOosh, 1 syllogism) slOosh (1 gonzaw, 1 Katina, 1 Mr. Wiggles, 2 syllogism) syllogism (2 gonzaw, 1 Katina, 1 Mr. Wiggles, 1 slOosh) Which gives us these votes in majority: chaoser 0 gonzaw 9 Katina 9 Liquid`Sheth 0 Meapak_Ziphh 0 Mr. Wiggles 9 slOosh 9 syllogism 9 Unaccounted for: Cephiro, sandroba, chaoser, Liquid`Sheth, Meapak_Ziphh The 2 person scum team can't save the scum in the minority and the three person scum team will have to seriously out themselves to do that. I mean it's just taking out 3 players and nothing else but I think it looks worth it. Even if the two scum teams join up, they only have 25 votes and 3 people in the majority so they can't fuck everything up and what they can fuck up comes at a great cost of outing themselves. If some of these reads are wrong then any other townie, minority or majority, should just split his votes evenly over the greens in the majority. This is really just a plan with the purpose of killing 3 people, there's probably not much else to get from it. So what about it? | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On May 07 2012 22:05 Cephiro wrote: + Show Spoiler + On May 07 2012 21:20 prplhz wrote: Word EchelonTee. Alright, 5 guys in the majority we want to save so lets vote like this: Cephiro EchelonTee (1 gonzaw, 1 Katina, 1 Mr. Wiggles, 1 slOosh, 1 syllogism) Palmar (1 gonzaw, 1 Katina, 1 Mr. Wiggles, 1 slOosh, 1 syllogism) prplhz (1 gonzaw, 1 Katina, 1 Mr. Wiggles, 1 slOosh, 1 syllogism) sandroba wherebugsgo (1 gonzaw, 1 Katina, 1 Mr. Wiggles, 1 slOosh, 1 syllogism) chaoser gonzaw (2 Katina, 1 Mr. Wiggles, 1 slOosh, 1 syllogism) Katina (1 gonzaw, 2 Mr. Wiggles, 1 slOosh, 1 syllogism) Liquid`Sheth Meapak_Ziphh Mr. Wiggles (1 gonzaw, 1 Katina, 2 slOosh, 1 syllogism) slOosh (1 gonzaw, 1 Katina, 1 Mr. Wiggles, 2 syllogism) syllogism (2 gonzaw, 1 Katina, 1 Mr. Wiggles, 1 slOosh) Which gives us these votes in majority: chaoser 0 gonzaw 9 Katina 9 Liquid`Sheth 0 Meapak_Ziphh 0 Mr. Wiggles 9 slOosh 9 syllogism 9 Unaccounted for: Cephiro, sandroba, chaoser, Liquid`Sheth, Meapak_Ziphh The 2 person scum team can't save the scum in the minority and the three person scum team will have to seriously out themselves to do that. I mean it's just taking out 3 players and nothing else but I think it looks worth it. Even if the two scum teams join up, they only have 25 votes and 3 people in the majority so they can't fuck everything up and what they can fuck up comes at a great cost of outing themselves. If some of these reads are wrong then any other townie, minority or majority, should just split his votes evenly over the greens in the majority. This is really just a plan with the purpose of killing 3 people, there's probably not much else to get from it. So what about it? Lol for suggesting a plan according to your reads, I'm very sure that you figured the remaining 5 scum out already. And you're cocky enough to go for a 3-kill at once? So naive.... You do realize how easy it would be even for me as a townie to mess that up just to piss you off, or if I felt you were scum? I think you're painting a wrong picture of this situation when you say that it's according to "my reads", sounds like we're just doing whatever I feel like, which is not really true. I'm not claiming to have figured out the remaining 5 scum, I read the thread and listened to people and general consensus appears to be that those 5 are likely scum (and everybody else is likely town), so why not lynch them? Yea, my plan actually accounts for how you, as a townie, might mess it up just to piss me off. You're in red. I don't really see why any townie would mess stuff up just to piss someone else off though. If you feel like somebody is scum or whatever then there are clearly better ways to go about than to just try to mess everything up. | ||
| ||