• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:48
CEST 21:48
KST 04:48
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy4Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3
Community News
Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)10BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13
StarCraft 2
General
Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2) feardragon: Blizzards biggest blunder with SC was… TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation How herO can make history in the Code S S2 finals
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group A [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group B SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Recent recommended BW games FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 4
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 27759 users

TL Mafia LIV - Page 55

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 53 54 55 56 57 79 Next
PaqMan
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States1475 Posts
May 08 2012 23:22 GMT
#1081
ebwop: throw in the fact that you were hard-defending your scumbuddy KP. Which is weird because the same reasons that you wanted BM lynched could have been applied to KP.
t(ツ)t
layabout
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
United Kingdom2600 Posts
May 08 2012 23:32 GMT
#1082
On May 09 2012 07:00 papapanda wrote:
BH,
I have made cases before against both marvellosity and layabout. For marvellosity, he hasn't been making further actions that link him to scum except his mention of Kepachi (dismiss-able) and maybe his hard defense for layabout (who is scum IMO). That said, layabout is the better lynch option because of his support of katina, kenpachi(kinda), and just his general lynch the easy guy attitude. Wish he would actually defend himself instead of telling me to go read the thread:<

Your question was asking me to explain a post that i had already explained in another post after somebody else asked me to explain it. Of course i told you to go read the thread.

You "question":
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=14614175
"..layabout your defense is saying katina was talking sense....
Please further clarify your defense for me."


From my posts:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=14591880
Katina has made posts indicative of intelligence.

I do not think we should lynch katina.

psst, Paq! look up

How is " i think that a player is intelligent i don't think we should lynch them" a hard defence?

Does giving evidence as to why you think they are intelligent when asked and then saying that you felt something they did something scummy constitute a hard defence?



On May 06 2012 00:52 layabout wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 05 2012 11:17 PaqMan wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On May 05 2012 05:43 layabout wrote:
Katina few posts have been critical of the disruptive play at the beginning, and acted to stamp out the bad.

Show nested quote +
On May 03 2012 08:00 Katina wrote:
On May 03 2012 07:22 SomethingAwesome wrote:
On May 03 2012 07:18 blubbdavid wrote:
Haha, we have two scumslips already.

Maybe you don't know but the role PM's for vanilla townie were sent in normal font.

modkill for role PM shit?

idk how to answer this without breaking rules..

you are scum... all townies will know this

-mattchew


You are pretty quick be calling people scum

Katina Implies that the "blub scumslip affair" is stupid (it was) by implying that the accusations are rather hastily made (which further implies that they are poorly thought out)

Show nested quote +
On May 03 2012 08:11 Katina wrote:
On May 03 2012 08:02 Blazinghand wrote:
On May 03 2012 08:00 Katina wrote:
On May 03 2012 07:22 SomethingAwesome wrote:
On May 03 2012 07:18 blubbdavid wrote:
Haha, we have two scumslips already.

Maybe you don't know but the role PM's for vanilla townie were sent in normal font.

modkill for role PM shit?

idk how to answer this without breaking rules..

you are scum... all townies will know this

-mattchew


You are pretty quick be calling people scum


Is that your whole contribution to the thread? Please, so overwhelming! Stop contributing so much! I am being sarcastic because this sentence alone that is vaguely, VAGUELY criticizering SA is far less than he has done all game for town.


Game just started honey. You are so quick to run to his defense...

katina points out that BH is being a big drama queen.

Show nested quote +
On May 03 2012 08:32 Katina wrote:
On May 03 2012 08:15 Blazinghand wrote:
On May 03 2012 08:14 blubbdavid wrote:
Btw, I sense some kind of BlazingKenpachi party.


Didn't work out so great in Aperture Mafia.

On May 03 2012 08:11 Katina wrote:
On May 03 2012 08:02 Blazinghand wrote:
On May 03 2012 08:00 Katina wrote:
On May 03 2012 07:22 SomethingAwesome wrote:
On May 03 2012 07:18 blubbdavid wrote:
Haha, we have two scumslips already.

Maybe you don't know but the role PM's for vanilla townie were sent in normal font.

modkill for role PM shit?

idk how to answer this without breaking rules..

you are scum... all townies will know this

-mattchew


You are pretty quick be calling people scum


Is that your whole contribution to the thread? Please, so overwhelming! Stop contributing so much! I am being sarcastic because this sentence alone that is vaguely, VAGUELY criticizering SA is far less than he has done all game for town.


Game just started honey. You are so quick to run to his defense...


You're still not contributing, and being indirect. You're scum.

##unvote
##vote: Katina


come at me bro


Not contributing? The game started a couple hours ago.... There hasn't been time. Indirect? Last I checked I was pretty direct with SA.

Katina points out that the game is hours old and that there has not been time to contribute in response to BH's vote on her for not contributing.

Show nested quote +
On May 04 2012 05:05 Katina wrote:
On May 04 2012 04:15 grush57 wrote:
On May 04 2012 03:39 blubbdavid wrote:
I am still waiting for grush to be useful. But going through his filter in other games, my hopes will be smited.
Palmar looks like a good lynch candidate too, because he 1) isn't townielike, 2) isn't making much sense 3) voted for me without reasoning.

I assume we still have 24h+ for voting?


Common atleast my useless posts are funny unlike yours. Plus, you didn't understand the situation of that game I played(I'm the same role this game too).

Anyways, I'm not sure what to make of the last 3 pages. It is full of useless posts and spam and Bill Murray didn't even start yet.
Several posts saying nothing except that "I'm town, trust me i gotta go.... eat?" (Like this post except im not hungry atm :D)

For my reasoning of Katina vote, the game just started and blazinghand was accusing Katina for his scumminess, and I agreed so I voted for him, plus I wanted to get the ball rolling. Granted, I realize now this was a dumbshit move that was scummy,and that is my horrible reasoning for it. If you don't like it, Sorry.

I would vote you blubbdavid, but I have enough people witchhunting me now.(And I didn't even rage on ladder how unlucky am I?)
Though, I could just filter and quote everything and that would get the job done.



I like that. BH throws around empty accusations and you jump right on board with this. Looks like a case of something called "Sheeping" Don't worry, it's curable!

BM has been not been his usual posting self lately. He likes to lurk when he is Mafia. He made a few brief posts early on then disappeared into La La land. So that is something to keep an eye on.

I don't like the whole idea of all the vote switching that has been going on here. It's not helpful to the town and brings nothing but confusion and chaos to everyone else. I know it's only day one but at least try to have more than one sentence before getting voting happy.

Criticises grush for sheeping a baseless vote.

Points out how destructive the "lets all vote for no real reason" is and tells the perpetrators to stop.

If Katrina does anything suspicious it is the way in which she puts attention on BM. She tells us that he tend to lurk when he is mafia that he posted earlier and is now lurking. He isn't lurking at the moment. Lurking is playing passively, posting infrequently or posting with consistently low content. BM is inactive in this game since these are his only posts:

+ Show Spoiler +

On May 03 2012 06:46 Bill Murray wrote:
I will extend the day and shorten the next night by one hour. Good luck and have fun.
Nobody died yet.
But don't worry.
what


and yet....
On May 03 2012 06:46 Bill Murray wrote:
extended days?!
hurray!


Both of which of from the very beginning of the game




Just curious, but what was the point of that post layabout? Nobody was discussing her so it seemed kind of random for you to make that analysis.




Show nested quote +
On May 05 2012 05:15 slOosh wrote:
On May 05 2012 05:10 layabout wrote:
Katina has made posts indicative of intelligence.

I do not think we should lynch katina.

Do other people think that this is BS?
On May 05 2012 04:46 SomethingAwesome wrote:
I don't really like layabout much. His inconsistency and lacking response to why his policy lynch is now a good option compared to earlier. The generic first post as pointed out by myself and better pointed out by DoYouHas. If he want to kill us why not vote us instead of steering town towards a werd policy lynch on BM.

(I'm not defending BM. Don't care if he live or die so far)

##Vote Layabout


//Dirk

Why is SA's post BS? And where does katina make posts indicative of intelligence and how does it show a town alignment?

discussion of katina:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=14591170
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=14591786
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=14591832
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=14592117

My post doesn't say why i thought she was town in fact i just wanted to say that her posts made sense and i didn't want to kill somebody that was making sense when there were so many players that weren't making sense or even playing the game.


The "defence" was literally: "I think this person is intelligent, let's not kill them day1" there was some evidence too as i was asked for it
Be the Best You Can Be ! Play MAFIA II http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/ II Dragonsound Best Band
layabout
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
United Kingdom2600 Posts
May 08 2012 23:33 GMT
#1083
On May 09 2012 08:22 PaqMan wrote:
ebwop: throw in the fact that you were hard-defending your scumbuddy KP. Which is weird because the same reasons that you wanted BM lynched could have been applied to KP.

Hence the "for fuck sake".
Be the Best You Can Be ! Play MAFIA II http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/ II Dragonsound Best Band
PaqMan
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States1475 Posts
May 08 2012 23:54 GMT
#1084
You're avoiding my case.
t(ツ)t
marvellosity
Profile Joined January 2011
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 08 2012 23:55 GMT
#1085
Ok, here goes.

layabout

Alright, for reference I spoiler Paqman's case against layabout below. There are some points I agree with, others a bit less so.

+ Show Spoiler +
On May 08 2012 11:56 PaqMan wrote:
layabout, and why he's getting my Finger of Suspicion.

#1
I'll begin with a link to his case against blubby: here
In that post, layabout makes no mention whatsoever of DYH's case against blubb. Not even a little comment, even though he made it 4 hours after DYH. I think that it's pretty obvious DYH's case on blubb influenced layabout to make his own. So I looked into it more.

What struck me as really odd, was the fact that he had no FoS, no read, nothing at all on blubb prior to DYH's case.
In fact, layabout's only mention of blubb is when SA asks him what he thinks about blubb, seen here: + Show Spoiler +
On May 07 2012 03:18 layabout wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2012 03:10 SomethingAwesome wrote:
I'm beginnging to like you Lay. Now find me scum! =)

What do you think about blubb? I think he is fishy...

here:
Show nested quote +
On May 06 2012 19:50 blubbdavid wrote:
I see, Blazinghand is switching cases so it looks like he doesn't sheep l10f.
Well, jdup has made a good post regarding layabout's behaviour

On May 06 2012 08:46 johnnywup wrote:
I think it is condemning, scum over-reacts to things like that (at least i think, ive never actually played scum). Of course laya didn't know kat would be modkilled, which is why it is condemning. If we didn't know kat's flip, it wouldn't be bad for either of them. It's just a townie pushing his reads on another person he thinks is townie, right? Since kat flipped, no. I don't know, the flip makes me think laya is more scummy.

It took scum by surprise that Kat was modkilled.

This is a strange thing to assert when as a townie you do not know who scum are and if they thought that Katina was coming back or not.

Also when he votes for me he emphasises that it is to get me to answer his question.
Show nested quote +
On May 06 2012 20:32 blubbdavid wrote:
layabout is scum. The question is: why would scum push BM?
layabout was pushing BM so hard it was not even funny.

Ok: layabaout, why were you so fucking desperate in pushing BM?
till then, ##vote layabout

On May 06 2012 19:51 Blazinghand wrote:
On May 06 2012 19:50 blubbdavid wrote:
I see, Blazinghand is switching cases so it looks like he doesn't sheep l10f.


you wanna mess

+ Show Spoiler +

He begins by saying that i am scum. If he believes this then surely that should be the reason for his vote. By saying that he wants a response he gives himself a way to back out of pushing me. If he truly believes that i am scum then he would have no reason to do this.



In which he makes no opinion and takes no stance whatsoever.


#2
And here are two little points that need to be noted:
+ Show Spoiler [P1] +
On May 04 2012 07:35 layabout wrote:
BH you are just bitter because you blew your own leg off after you tried to rocket jump with the wrong boots on.

I think killing something awesome could be a good move. If we still have no candidates when i get up then i think we should just lynch BM.


What he's saying is that he wants to kill SomethingAwesome, but he's too damn lazy to build a case or make a push on him.
He's also practically asking everyone to do the scumhunting for him while he sits back and chills.

He doesn't make a read, take a stance, or form an opinion on SA. The only time he ever mentions SA is if he is defending himself.


+ Show Spoiler [P2] +
On May 06 2012 00:55 layabout wrote:
we should kill Palmar tomorrow


Later on, he posts this little baby. Again, just like with SomethingAwesome, he makes the suggestion of wanting to kill Palmar. He made no case on Palmar besides the little comment.
When asked why, he posts this:
On May 06 2012 09:23 layabout wrote:
@Mementoss i thought we should lynch Palmar over "any other lurker" because he showed basically no interest in the lynch at all. Palmar is lazy as scum but when he town he usually bothers to do ... "stuff".


Of course, he had his reasons for it: + Show Spoiler +
On May 07 2012 03:50 layabout wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2012 03:28 Blazinghand wrote:
On May 07 2012 03:00 layabout wrote:
BH is also criticising me for saying that we should kill the player that he decided to shoot.


False. I am criticizing you for saying we should kill Palmar, and not posting a case against him until 9 hours, after daybreak. Did you actually read my case?

On May 07 2012 03:00 layabout wrote:
have i missed anything?


Yes, my criticism is based on HOW you did what you did, not what you did. Is it really typical layabout play to make a 1-sentence accusation halfway through the night then not follow up with a case until after daybreak? Cause I had some respect for your town play...

Yesterday, between the hours of (UK time) 5pm and 1 am i was otherwise engaged.+ Show Spoiler +
the FA cup final was on
. I posted that "we should kill Palmar" when i heard a knock at the door.

Now try think of a way to write that without it sounding lame.



And I'm willing to give him benefit of the doubt, mainly because there are other reasons to think he is scum.



#3
Just about more than half of layabout's posts consist only defending himself. His only other notable thing is when he puts attention and calls out jdub: + Show Spoiler +
On May 07 2012 10:00 layabout wrote:
@papapanda,
The number of players that make sense is far smaller than you appear to think it is. You should treasure the ones that do.

Johnnywub:
skim through his filter from Area 53 mafia
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=329128&user=99700

These are some of his comments (+1 from host) after the game.
+ Show Spoiler +
On May 05 2012 09:18 iGrok wrote:
Johnny is probably town MVP. Matt is scum MVP.

Also, well done by scum not to give up when St.Daniel got modkilled.


On May 05 2012 09:06 johnnywup wrote:
it was too late, i was away and it was 5:01. also fml i feel so shitty now. I had decent reads but I can't convey reads for shit.


On May 05 2012 09:28 johnnywup wrote:
im sorry i failed you town



On May 05 2012 09:35 johnnywup wrote:
bleh i feel so guilty for this game. if i conveyed my reads a little better or something i dont know but bleh


On May 05 2012 09:41 johnnywup wrote:
i thought you were scum mattchew and thats primarily because you allowed an ottox lynch with 2 confirmed scum. but no one listened to me so ugh


On May 05 2012 09:49 johnnywup wrote:
matt, the timing didn't make sense as town which was my second biggest issue. but no one listened to me. urghh


The key things to note are that Johnny:
  • Posts a lot, this does not necessarily mean that we should expect him to have a massive filter but he does put a lot of time, thought and energy into the game as town.
  • He is concerned about communicating his ideas to others and convincing them
  • He is working to improve his town game
  • He feels like he owes town something

I see no signs of his town game so far.

johnnywub is sitting back and watching the thread. When i called him out he instantly de-lurked, said nothing, and left.

+ Show Spoiler [Today's post's] +
On May 07 2012 04:45 johnnywup wrote:
I'll be completely honest, I've been addicted to that 999 game so I haven't been posting much.

Also I don't want any gold stars. i looked at a filter, saw something odd, pointed it out. that's what all town should be doing. Speaking of which I'm gonna look over some filters now. I'll report back when I have something substantial


On May 07 2012 04:52 johnnywup wrote:
lol i love how NT says "it would be correct to be shooting into the lurker crowd" while lurking himself


On May 07 2012 04:54 johnnywup wrote:
i just noticed that from your post and thought it was interesting. i guess it is rehashing. I'm just agreeing that it's strange and scummy


On May 07 2012 05:02 johnnywup wrote:
Paqman Marv BH and Mementoss are all saying the same thing at approximately the same time? weird, maybe you just agree with one another and want to quote it as if you found it yourself? O_o




But even then, he makes no stance. He doesn't pressure jdub, doesn't make some sort fos, does nothing except call him out for lurking.
I would say that that is his only other contributing post. Read through his filter and it becomes apparent that he puts more effort into defending himself than hunting scum.


#4
The next thing I want to bring up is how quickly he comes to defend Kenpachi.
+ Show Spoiler +
On May 07 2012 21:48 layabout wrote:
If blubbdavid Nova_Terra and Paqman are the remaining scum then kenpachi has got all of them.


On May 07 2012 21:51 layabout wrote:
frogg we are not lynching kenpachi.

don't be silly.



On May 07 2012 22:12 layabout wrote:
I would love to know how you felt that this:
+ Show Spoiler +
On May 07 2012 04:37 Nova_Terra wrote:
Next, Kenpachi
Absolutely worthless, if you consider his connection case useful i dunno what to say
Vote: Kenpachi


On May 07 2012 13:19 PaqMan wrote:
Just found out that I'm probably going to miss the lynch.
I guess it doesn't bother anyone how fast a wagon formed on NT?
I don't feel comfortable putting my vote back onto him.

Hence this quote:
Show nested quote +
On May 06 2012 07:11 Kenpachi wrote:
On May 06 2012 06:48 Blazinghand wrote:
Yeah, I shot Palmar. He looked like scum to me. I gave him the benefit of the doubt D1 but he didn't contribute and was silent, as scum Palmar tends to be.

Here's my crumb:

On May 06 2012 03:27 Blazinghand wrote:
Man this situation just makes me want to eat my own heart


Type "eat heart of" into google search (but don't hit enter) and it'll suggest "eat heart of palm"

Palm -> Palmar, my target.

rofl are you kidding me


His only post since D2 started.
He ninja-voted D1, isn't contributing and the few posts he has are very lackluster. From what I understand Kenpachi is a veteran, yet he's been the least helpful out of everyone (excluding Froggynoddy, who is inactive).

Also this gem: + Show Spoiler +
On May 05 2012 06:31 Kenpachi wrote:
ARE YOU GUYS KIDDING ME? DO YOU NOT NOTICE THE TREND HERE?

NT i thought at first was not mafia but then layabout cames along and throws in POLICY LYNCH TIME
NO
NO
NO
WTF? NO

i believe layabout and NT are mafia together because NT NT had aroused suspicions in thread andended in hotshit. He was completely saved by something so stupid. layabout, as his buttbuddy saves him with such a weak push that only the newbs are following.
by experience, policy lynch almost always never works. its a scare tactic, not an actual method used to lynch people, especially day 1
i also believe marvellosity is mafia with them because he said NT is scummy and changes his mind like nothing happened

Show nested quote +
On May 05 2012 02:43 marvellosity wrote:
At the moment Nova looks the scummiest for reasons already expanded upon by others. The fact that so little of anything has occurred today makes Nova's stance that he doesn't want to air his tentative reads all the worse.


Show nested quote +
On May 05 2012 05:53 marvellosity wrote:
Sold, I don't have a solid scumread on anyone and BM is just useless and anti-town no matter his alignment.

such a contradiction, they were made about 3 hours apart.

BM is a potent player and everyone knows that. I feel day 1 lynching a veteran is the worst thing you can do. If i were mafia, id put BM near the top of my priority list just because of his sheer experience.



He made his scum reads and calls out who he believes to be the remaining scum team. But he doesn't push for their lynch or pressure them or anything at all. As of now I think Kenpachi is a better option than NT.

##Vote Kenpachi

I'm hoping I'll make it back before the deadline but I'm not too sure.

was the best lynch to support?

Why dont you have a look through here and tell me what you learn about kenpachi's play?

Then address the cases on the people that should get lynched: Blubbdavid or Nova_Terra or might get mislynched: layabout.


On May 07 2012 22:26 layabout wrote:
EBWOP*So you are saying that it doesn't matter if your logic for voting on day1 is weak/contradictory/scummy because we have limited information?

Show nested quote +
On May 07 2012 22:19 froggynoddy wrote:
On May 07 2012 22:15 layabout wrote:
On May 07 2012 22:07 froggynoddy wrote:
EBWOP: was reading through blubb's and then NT's filter's, (NT's attack of him seems odd: did he explain wtf he meant by that?!?) as former being your vote and the latter having the most votes. I'd rather blub defended himself as it will give us more to work with but a lot of what you've said, Laya, seem to be a criticism of blubb's Day 1 vote logic, which as we all know is bound to be weak. Most of our votes were bound to be wrong, and all of our logic to be hugely flawed due to limited evidence.

So you are saying that it doesn't matter if your logic for voting on day1 is weak/contracitory/scummy because we have limited information?


No, I'm saying that its less likely of being alignment indicative then actual thread activity at this point.

But Kenpachi has been more "active" than froggnoddy, Eiii, l10f, ghost_403 johnnywub, grush, mementoss, sinensis and papaganda.

He might not even have PC acess at the momnet


That post^ is complete BS that I don't even understand how he could have possibly came to that conclusion. The only person he's been more active than is froggynoddy, and even then Froggy's posts have way more quality than KP's does.

On May 07 2012 22:35 layabout wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2012 22:26 froggynoddy wrote:
On May 07 2012 22:12 layabout wrote:
I would love to know how you felt that this:
+ Show Spoiler +
On May 07 2012 04:37 Nova_Terra wrote:
Next, Kenpachi
Absolutely worthless, if you consider his connection case useful i dunno what to say
Vote: Kenpachi


On May 07 2012 13:19 PaqMan wrote:
Just found out that I'm probably going to miss the lynch.
I guess it doesn't bother anyone how fast a wagon formed on NT?
I don't feel comfortable putting my vote back onto him.

Hence this quote:
Show nested quote +
On May 06 2012 07:11 Kenpachi wrote:
On May 06 2012 06:48 Blazinghand wrote:
Yeah, I shot Palmar. He looked like scum to me. I gave him the benefit of the doubt D1 but he didn't contribute and was silent, as scum Palmar tends to be.

Here's my crumb:

On May 06 2012 03:27 Blazinghand wrote:
Man this situation just makes me want to eat my own heart


Type "eat heart of" into google search (but don't hit enter) and it'll suggest "eat heart of palm"

Palm -> Palmar, my target.

rofl are you kidding me


His only post since D2 started.
He ninja-voted D1, isn't contributing and the few posts he has are very lackluster. From what I understand Kenpachi is a veteran, yet he's been the least helpful out of everyone (excluding Froggynoddy, who is inactive).

Also this gem: + Show Spoiler +
On May 05 2012 06:31 Kenpachi wrote:
ARE YOU GUYS KIDDING ME? DO YOU NOT NOTICE THE TREND HERE?

NT i thought at first was not mafia but then layabout cames along and throws in POLICY LYNCH TIME
NO
NO
NO
WTF? NO

i believe layabout and NT are mafia together because NT NT had aroused suspicions in thread andended in hotshit. He was completely saved by something so stupid. layabout, as his buttbuddy saves him with such a weak push that only the newbs are following.
by experience, policy lynch almost always never works. its a scare tactic, not an actual method used to lynch people, especially day 1
i also believe marvellosity is mafia with them because he said NT is scummy and changes his mind like nothing happened

Show nested quote +
On May 05 2012 02:43 marvellosity wrote:
At the moment Nova looks the scummiest for reasons already expanded upon by others. The fact that so little of anything has occurred today makes Nova's stance that he doesn't want to air his tentative reads all the worse.


Show nested quote +
On May 05 2012 05:53 marvellosity wrote:
Sold, I don't have a solid scumread on anyone and BM is just useless and anti-town no matter his alignment.

such a contradiction, they were made about 3 hours apart.

BM is a potent player and everyone knows that. I feel day 1 lynching a veteran is the worst thing you can do. If i were mafia, id put BM near the top of my priority list just because of his sheer experience.



He made his scum reads and calls out who he believes to be the remaining scum team. But he doesn't push for their lynch or pressure them or anything at all. As of now I think Kenpachi is a better option than NT.

##Vote Kenpachi

I'm hoping I'll make it back before the deadline but I'm not too sure.

was the best lynch to support?

Why dont you have a look through here and tell me what you learn about kenpachi's play?

Then address the cases on the people that should get lynched: Blubbdavid or Nova_Terra or might get mislynched: layabout.


Ok, so... are you trying to show me that because he plays like this both as town and scum we should excuse untowny behaviour? I don't like that as an argument as untowny behaviour should always be punished. That being said I understand that perhaps this would be a better job for any vigs we have left. It just seems unlikely unless we do unless we have a pyro. I will keep reading through threads and see if anything convinces me. As I said, other than what I think about lynching into inactives, NT's weird post (see above post) and your hard defence on Katina seem like the strongest indications of scumminess imo.

It was more of an "inactivity from a player that's always inactive is meaningless". There is also some merit to the notion that scum will try to lynch Kenpachi.

Show nested quote +
It just seems unlikely unless we do unless we have a pyro

I am not sure what you are trying to say but blue pyro's are trackers not not vigis.


Again, you cannot be freaking serious. You pushed for BM's lynch, am I correct? SO HOW ARE YOU DEFENDING KP WHEN KP'S PLAY MATCHES EXACTLY LIKE BM!
lurk, lurk, lurk, inactive, spam one-liners, purposely not contribute, purposely play anti-town. KP said that he's so busy he cannot possibly play, but he could have EASILY come up with a small read/fos/case on someone. Instead, he wastes what little time he has to shit up the thread.
KP is the most anti-town player in the game right now, and you're defending him hard.
Remind me why you wanted BM lynched.



#5
+ Show Spoiler +
On May 05 2012 07:04 Bill Murray wrote:
well, layabout hopping on the lynch makes me really suspect him
he would normally leave me around if he's town
of my wagon, i would like you all to lynch layabout

On May 08 2012 04:22 blubbdavid wrote:
layabout is scum, SA is town
I will not move my vote from layabout
-snipped-


Hmm. The victims of our mislynches both suggest to lynch layabout. And so far we're ignoring them.


Why I believe layabout to be scum boils down to;

1) Has nothing on blubb, but as soon as DYH pushes a case and lynch on him, layabout makes a weak case and pushes it forward as if he had been suspecting him for a while.

2) layabout does not create his own scumreads, does not establish his own opinions, and does not make his own stance. He has other people do the work for him, and then he starts pushing reads. Basically, he's not scum hunting.

3) All of layabout's "good, quality posts" are the only ones where he is defending himself, not doing any actual scumhunting.

4) People previously thought his analysis on Kat was an attempt at soft-defending. But after individually separating his posts, we can all clearly see how hard he is defending Kenpachi. KP's play is awfully similar to BM's.

5) I'm restating this one because I feel it's one of the stronger points against layabout:
He does not actively hunt scum. All he does is push other people's reads.



I retract my FoS on him. I'm confident that layabout is scum and I want him lynched tomorrow.


His push of a policy lynch on BM followed by his defence of Kenpachi is, as you rightly point out, totally contradictory. This looks scummy. This is a pretty large part of your case, but given the number of posts layabout dedicates to it, it seems fair enough. It also seems correct that his case on blubb came out of the blue a little, and the post you quote in your point about blubb is surprisingly vague - it's as if he's narrating a story rather than giving an opinion.

I don't hold that much weight with the two dead mislynches thinking layabout was suspicious. It could be damning, it could not - this is more like confirmation evidence to me. The point on the jdub post is neutral - it was a good post, because it was calling jdub out for not playing to his town meta in any way. Where it falls down is that it doesn't actually make a definitive statement about jdub at the end - although the implication is clear.

The strongest evidence against layabout is in summary points 3) and 5) in conjunction. layabout has spent practically the whole game defending himself, with the significant read on blubb being brought about by DoYouHas's case. If the accusations on layabout were so weak, why does he continually feel the need to defend himself? Answer them once (maybe even twice), but if they keep getting regurgitated he should move on and do scumhunting himself, as that is the best townie defence of all. It's well documented that it's a classic mafia mind-set to feel the need to defend yourself constantly, even after having already done so.

I think layabout has a decent chance of flipping scum.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nova_Terra

The case against Nova_Terra is in many ways simpler. He actually has 4 pages of filter but precious little to say in any of it. Typical scum trait is lots of posts, little content. His one and only case so far was on Mementoss, and is remarkably incoherent and lacking in actual evidence. There are a lot of 'reasons' why Mementoss is scum, but no evidence to back it up.

+ Show Spoiler +
On May 05 2012 06:00 Nova_Terra wrote:
In accordance with popular demand, i will share my top scumread which is currently Mementoss (not based on OMGUS)

mementoss starts off suggesting to policy lynch two people, etc. Makes a few totally unneccessary 1 liners, and then when he is called out on it he goes NO WAIT i has reason, then decided to teach us, which just came off freaking weird.
Then he goes aggressive on layabout, throwing suspicion while not doing much of anything, then joins the Grush did something scummy this looks really bad group. not original. then after blazing notes something on me he joins in that too, and makes remarks in an unsure way, seeming to want to be able to backtrack if necessary. then, when called out on it, he goes into defensive aggression mode and suddenly gains massive confidence which hadnt been in his play before.
Overall
1liners
Enlightens us on 1 liners
throws suspicion while not doing much at all
joins scummy bandwagon
seems unsure
agrees with an Oh i noticed the same thing!
makes arguments based on my meta, which is questionable entirely based on the fact that i never play this lurky, town or scum
randomly gets massively confident, as opposed to his earlier play, its as if someone told him to be more sure

and so ##Vote: Mementoss



Moving swiftly on from Mementoss, this time we get a Kenpachi accusation:

On May 07 2012 04:37 Nova_Terra wrote:
Next, Kenpachi
Absolutely worthless, if you consider his connection case useful i dunno what to say
Vote: Kenpachi


His case against him being, what? That he's worthless? That's not a case. When I prod him on why he dropped his case on Mementoss, we get this:

On May 07 2012 05:16 Nova_Terra wrote:

I never abandoned my case on mementoss. However i feel that a lynch on him has a lot of resistance and therefore i am expanding my horizons.
.


Well, actually he did abandon his case. He was throwing up a badly made case on Mementoss, and then he did not push it in any single way, and wildly stabs at Kenpachi. Yes, this is abandoning the case. While we're around Kenpachi:

On May 09 2012 08:02 PaqMan wrote:
The argument that NT "bussed" Kenpachi is so invalid. He made it known that he wanted KP dead more than 4 days ago. If anyone should look suspicious for bussing it should be me. Which I'm really really surprised no one has even mentioned that.



It's so invalid? Need I remind you of LIII, where, I dunno, scum Mattchew repeatedly pushed for a scum BM lynch on days 1 and 2 (and possibly beyond?). He did this safely in the knowledge that BM wasn't going to be lynched at that time.

You find layabout's case on blubb suspicious, but at least it isn't as outrageously wishy-washy as this:

On May 07 2012 05:37 Nova_Terra wrote:
I find blubb leaning slightly scum actually, as his filter is a mass of 1 liners which barely say anything of note and defense of himself. I do find it strange that he isnt pushing me if he is scum, because im an obvious target and it would be a super ez town lynch.


On May 07 2012 05:46 Nova_Terra wrote:
Marv seems good at posting early 1 liners and then aggressively onto easy and profitable bandwagons. he is one of my top scumreads that i had earlier


and as you see he throws fingers at me for good measure.

The following 2 posts are obvious:

On May 07 2012 23:35 Nova_Terra wrote:
Finished my exam, will sleep for a while then try to be useful :D


On May 09 2012 06:32 Nova_Terra wrote:
I'll post some analysis after classes tomorrow, but i do want to note how i had an accurate read on kenpachi and left my vote on him. there was no reason at that point in time to bus kenpachi, had i been scum.


Always with the delay. What scum-hunting have we had from Nova_Terra so far? We haven't. A quickly abandoned case on Mementoss, a go at Kenpachi, a go at me, and calling blubb vaguely scummy. In 4 pages of filter. Wow.

Lastly, there is the totally unsatisfactory answer to the contradiction that BH points out:

On May 09 2012 07:10 Nova_Terra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 09 2012 07:05 Blazinghand wrote:
On May 09 2012 07:03 Nova_Terra wrote:
1. Layabout goes hard on townie Bill Murray, who then is lynched
2. Layabout goes on Townie Blubbdavid who is then lynched
3. Layabout defends Mafia kenpachi, who dies to kurumis fist of modkillery
this shows outcomes that makes layabout seem more scummy


Ah, that's interesting, May 9th Nova_Terra! However, I have another player here who disagrees with you.

His name is May 7th Nova_Terra! You should argue with him:

On May 07 2012 05:29 Nova_Terra wrote:
I dont think that layabout is scum, as 1. i really doubt that scum would push for a town lynch so hard and defend a scum mate who wasnt even active, which scum would know


When this behavior is continued on and on, it obviously makes someone more scummy


"When this behaviour is continued on and on". What has actually changed between the two dates? Kenpachi gets mod-killed and flips scum, and layabout defended him a couple of times in the interim. This is apparently enough to make Nova go from "I don't think he's scum for these reasons" to "actually for the same reasons I DO think he's scum". Pretty scummy.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Overall, Nova has done nothing to suggest to me that he isn't scum. He has a long filter with no scumhunting, but plenty of throwaway accusations. He contradicts himself.

layabout has points against him and a decent chance of flipping scum, but I am more convinced with my read on Nova, because I see the possibility that layabout is just a frustrated townie who has been goaded into defending himself too much.
[15:15] <Palmar> and yes marv, you're a total hottie
PaqMan
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States1475 Posts
May 09 2012 00:55 GMT
#1086
The whole situation on NT looks very much like ottox in LIII.

I'm aware that it's not much of a justifiable reason but I feel that NT is just horrible/bad. Look at it from a scum point of view and tell me what is NT accomplishing? Nothing at all except setting his own ass on fire.

Look at layabout with a scum point of view and his entire filter is incriminating.
He's contradicting himself everywhere. He's pushing other peoples reads instead of making his own, even when asked. He doesn't make & push his own reads. He isn't actively hunting scum. He's so preoccupied with defending himself. He puts way more effort into writing quarter-page posts instead of hunting scum. He isn't contributing to town. If you look at the bigger picture, everything he's done has been pro-scum.

Overall, Nova has done nothing to suggest to me that he isn't scum. He has a long filter with no scumhunting, but plenty of throwaway accusations. He contradicts himself.

Your accusations can also very easily be applied to layabout.

So tell me, if NT has done nothing to show you that he isn't scum, what has layabout done?
t(ツ)t
PaqMan
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States1475 Posts
May 09 2012 01:03 GMT
#1087
look at layabout from a scum point of view and tell me what he has accomplished/is accomplishing for his scum team?
1- pushed a mislynch on BM.
2- pushed a mislynch on blubb.
3- no contribution to town
4-no individual/personal reads, allowing him to sit back and chill
5- pushes forth other people's reads
6- doesn't have to actively hunt for his own teammates because he's too busy writing intricate defenses.

compare that to the actions NT has made.
t(ツ)t
marvellosity
Profile Joined January 2011
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 09 2012 01:06 GMT
#1088
I can turn it round back at you with the same argument.

On May 09 2012 09:55 PaqMan wrote:
Look at layabout with a scum point of view and his entire filter is incriminating.
He's contradicting himself everywhere. He's pushing other peoples reads instead of making his own, even when asked. He doesn't make & push his own reads. He isn't actively hunting scum. He's so preoccupied with defending himself. He puts way more effort into writing quarter-page posts instead of hunting scum. He isn't contributing to town. If you look at the bigger picture, everything he's done has been pro-scum.



Nova contradicts himself, when he pushes blubb he doesn't even push him, he didn't push his read on mem, he isn't actively hunting scum. He doesn't even put effort into writing any sort of meaningful post instead of hunting scum. He isn't contributing to town.

I told you why Nova is my strongest read over layabout:

On May 09 2012 08:55 marvellosity wrote:
I see the possibility that layabout is just a frustrated townie who has been goaded into defending himself too much.
[15:15] <Palmar> and yes marv, you're a total hottie
PaqMan
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States1475 Posts
May 09 2012 01:08 GMT
#1089
On May 09 2012 08:55 marvellosity wrote:
I see the possibility that layabout is just a frustrated townie who has been goaded into defending himself too much.


Frustrated how? because people kept bringing up the same argument against him?
t(ツ)t
PaqMan
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States1475 Posts
May 09 2012 01:09 GMT
#1090
How does that "frustration" play into any of the reasons he is scum.
t(ツ)t
marvellosity
Profile Joined January 2011
United Kingdom36160 Posts
May 09 2012 01:11 GMT
#1091
Yes, for example the much rehashed katina argument, and frustrated at the state of the game.

At the risk of repeating myself, Nova is my strongest read, layabout also has a good chance of flipping scum - but much like your Ottoxlol argument on Nova, my gut tells me layabout has a higher chance of being townie than nova.
[15:15] <Palmar> and yes marv, you're a total hottie
PaqMan
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States1475 Posts
May 09 2012 01:13 GMT
#1092
On May 09 2012 10:11 marvellosity wrote:
Yes, for example the much rehashed katina argument, and frustrated at the state of the game.

At the risk of repeating myself, Nova is my strongest read, layabout also has a good chance of flipping scum - but much like your Ottoxlol argument on Nova, my gut tells me layabout has a higher chance of being townie than nova.


Okay, that is understandable.

Eiii, l10f, grush, papapanda, Froggynoddy, you guys need to start posting.
t(ツ)t
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
May 09 2012 01:13 GMT
#1093
Great more modkills... <_<

On the idea of people defending Kenpachi and Kenpachi flipping scum, I'm not sure how much this means, his playstyle is really erratic, so as town it's really hard to tell his alignment. (Hell, I even soft defended him to get people to vote onto people I thought had better chances of flipping scum) However, I would like to look at the people that pushed him aggressively and confidently. There is NO way to be confident about a Kenpachi lynch unless you are scum with him. He is the perfect bus as he is a likely vig shot, and doesn't actively help the scum team in ways other than lurking. This being said, this makes me think scum Nova is even more scummy, trying to get town cred by doing nothing. Marv points this out well in the above post. Actually I agree with just about everything Marv posted in that last post.

Marv playing to his town meta, useless for a couple days and picking it up late game, I no longer find him that suspicious.

##Vote: Nova_Terra

DoYouHas and SomethingAwesome the BLU Depressed Soldiers were found dead. Not so sure about this. Probably some blue sniping going on, or getting rid of the veterans. Gotta re-look into their filter. WIFOM, they could be keeping me alive (as well as BH, why would they keep him alive with chance of engineer and close to confirmed town?) as hard pushers on Nova, hoping for a Nova mislynch. This is pure WIFOM, but something to think about.

More WIFOM, DYH had his doubts about Paqman and even had a case started against him before dropping it, but you could tell there was some doubts, BH also called paqman an "asset" to this town. DYH is dead, BH is alive after his claim. Coincidence? Maybe. Maybe not. Think about it. Look back into paqmans filter. Make an opinion on him.

Also Im seeing A LOT of players names, that I can't remember anything they posted off the back of my head, or any recent stances they made. Grush ever since the modkills and made himself look town has not been around, papapanda what has he done recently? Sinesis as well. Pressure these players. We need more out of them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
PaqMan
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States1475 Posts
May 09 2012 01:17 GMT
#1094
ebwop: I meant your gut feeling, not the "frustration" part.
t(ツ)t
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
May 09 2012 01:18 GMT
#1095
Also playing with and looking into Nova_Terra saying "I think he is just a bad townie" does not suffice to me. As I said before his reads may not always be right as town but he actively tries to promote discussion and makes a good effort to make cases. There is only one situation I can think of that would make Nova not scum but I'm not going to go into it because its not solid and more of a gut feeling.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
PaqMan
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States1475 Posts
May 09 2012 01:19 GMT
#1096
Mementoss: What do you think of layabout and my case against him. You didn't make any mention of it.
t(ツ)t
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
May 09 2012 01:22 GMT
#1097
On May 09 2012 10:19 PaqMan wrote:
Mementoss: What do you think of layabout and my case against him. You didn't make any mention of it.


Reading and will respond soon. But everything you said about NT I disagree with pretty strongly so far. I don't think its anything like the ottoxlol case. Ottoxlol defense was I don't understand the case, and claiming scum multiple times in the thread.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
May 09 2012 01:31 GMT
#1098
Paqman I think your case is very good against Layabout, but a lot of it has been mentioned before. Points 1 2 and 5 look unique and I really like the way they are presented. Point #4 I don't think is the best, I defended Kenpachi do you think I am scum? I am pretty confident that laya or nt are scum but not both. I'm having trouble deciding which is the better lynch.

Also this quote in your case caught my eye mainly because of LIII trickery:

On May 07 2012 21:48 layabout wrote:
If blubbdavid Nova_Terra and Paqman are the remaining scum then kenpachi has got all of them.


I remember mattchew mentioned his WHOLE scum team in a similar type post. There is a chance that certain people voting quickly on kenpachi could be scum, the remaining left are Nova, Paqman and Froggy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
PaqMan
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States1475 Posts
May 09 2012 01:46 GMT
#1099
On May 09 2012 10:31 Mementoss wrote:
Paqman I think your case is very good against Layabout, but a lot of it has been mentioned before. Points 1 2 and 5 look unique and I really like the way they are presented. Point #4 I don't think is the best, I defended Kenpachi do you think I am scum? I am pretty confident that laya or nt are scum but not both. I'm having trouble deciding which is the better lynch.

Also this quote in your case caught my eye mainly because of LIII trickery:

Show nested quote +
On May 07 2012 21:48 layabout wrote:
If blubbdavid Nova_Terra and Paqman are the remaining scum then kenpachi has got all of them.


I remember mattchew mentioned his WHOLE scum team in a similar type post. There is a chance that certain people voting quickly on kenpachi could be scum, the remaining left are Nova, Paqman and Froggy.


I called him out on KP because of how hard laya was defending him. Just by this quote:+ Show Spoiler +
On May 07 2012 21:51 layabout wrote:
frogg we are not lynching kenpachi.

don't be silly.

You can see how insistent he is on not wanting to lynch KP. He doesn't follow up with why not, he just blatantly states it.
The only legitimate stances that layabout has made are people who he doesn't want to lynch.

blubb wasn't scum, I'm not scum, and Kenpachi was. KP didn't mention his whole team.
t(ツ)t
PaqMan
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States1475 Posts
May 09 2012 01:48 GMT
#1100
ebwop: I'm not calling you scum for defending KP because I didn't even think that you were "defending" him until you mentioned it. I thought you were just trying to get the votes consolidated. You made your reasons clear, while layabout was just saying no no no.
t(ツ)t
Prev 1 53 54 55 56 57 79 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL 2v2 ProLeague S3
19:00
Day 5
ZZZero.O114
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
IndyStarCraft 163
UpATreeSC 148
NoRegreT_ 92
EnDerr 68
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 23459
Calm 3494
Mini 545
firebathero 242
Hyuk 167
Dewaltoss 126
ZZZero.O 114
sSak 58
scan(afreeca) 30
Counter-Strike
fl0m5614
Foxcn112
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu566
Other Games
tarik_tv58061
gofns19584
summit1g3978
Grubby3326
FrodaN1322
C9.Mang0607
Beastyqt485
B2W.Neo311
ArmadaUGS91
Trikslyr67
FunKaTv 36
KnowMe30
PPMD28
ZombieGrub28
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV28
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 40
• HeavenSC 31
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• intothetv
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 27
• ZZZeroYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV327
League of Legends
• Doublelift1371
• Jankos1086
• TFBlade1012
Other Games
• imaqtpie1048
• Scarra496
• Shiphtur293
Upcoming Events
Korean StarCraft League
7h 13m
SOOP
13h 13m
sOs vs Percival
CranKy Ducklings
14h 13m
WardiTV Invitational
15h 13m
ByuN vs MaNa
MaxPax vs Solar
Reynor vs Creator
Gerald vs Spirit
Cheesadelphia
19h 13m
CSO Cup
21h 13m
BSL: ProLeague
22h 13m
Hawk vs UltrA
Sziky vs spx
TerrOr vs JDConan
GSL Code S
1d 12h
Rogue vs herO
Classic vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 14h
BSL: ProLeague
1d 22h
Bonyth vs Dewalt
Cross vs Doodle
MadiNho vs Dragon
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
4 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Serral vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Reynor vs Scarlett
ShoWTimE vs Classic
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.