Wheel of Fortune Mini Mafia - Page 2
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I was hoping Sandro would come in and balance out some of this Toad. Not that I disliked Toad's posting (in spite of the majority of it being about me :S), but there was just so much TOAD and so little Sandro. Unless Rad and Ace are both scum (imba?) I have to believe that Rad is telling the truth about his claim. However, unlike Radfield I'm not so willing to dismiss the idea that Ace is GF based on "Radfield's luck". However, facts is facts, and I don't see Radfield fake-claiming DT just to clear someone. Therefor, I'm willing to believe Radfield's claim and I'm also willing to reserve judgement on Ace until I see more of his play. I didn't mind it so much yesterday, but today MrZentor's self-vote seems...very strange. Like, he claims the point yesterday was to gauge reactions and stuff, but he never unvoted and he never really did anything with that information. And today, it feels more like trying to stay consistent - I mean, what reactions are there to gauge that he couldn't have observed yesterday? I don't like it. MrZentor, can you explain in detail why you felt the need to vote for yourself again today? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On April 25 2012 08:26 Snarfs wrote: There you are! What happened to the VE from C9++? ![]() No one loves "dominating VE", but I'll certainly try and keep more active than most of D1. /salute How do you feel about MrZentor? I feel like a lot of people were throwing around "town" a lot in conjunction with MrZentor, so the fact that he didn't die overnight is kinda surprising to me. Taken with his mystifying self-vote immediately into D2, what do you think about him now? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On April 25 2012 09:30 MrZentor wrote: I hope you guys know I'm getting some really good information. Anyways, masons need to claim before I'm gonna point out the scum. Yeah, I'd be totally stoked to see something worthwhile from you. That stunt at the end of the day yesterday with the "to-do list" almost got me to vote for you then. Can we expect it to be of similar quality to your prplhz case (read: real bad), or should we expect more? And why should masons claim before you point out the scum? It seems to me like we can get the most information out of your posts if the masons (presuming masons) claim AFTER you "point out the scum". | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I think he's referencing the Majority Lynch system MafiaScum uses where L-1 is the vote before the "hammer-vote". | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Sup Sbrubbles? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Forumite: If you had asked me yesterday, I'd have said that between the two, Forumite/Zentor, Forumite looked worse. However, since Zentor has started looking worse, Forumite has proportionally started looking better based on how early he was on Zentor's shit yesterday. I'm going to have to go back through and reread their interactions once I hear what Zentor has been up to and make a judgement based on that. Right now, I'd say he's looking okay. Marv: Marv hasn't given me much to go on today - I'm waiting to see what kind of stuff he puts out today. As I said earlier, meta-wise (Ltd.) it's not unusual for marv to be in hot water D1, so I'm eager to see what he's got. If he fails to produce, I'd like to destroy him. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Snarfs, what do you think about the players you asked me about? Specifically marvelosity. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On April 21 2012 06:53 Radfield wrote: /in this is a C9++? I have never been modkilled and don't intend on starting here. The only thing I ever read from the OPs are whether there are PMs or not ![]() On April 21 2012 06:53 wherebugsgo wrote: I did but you still can't read edit: yes Radfield, basically, but balanced for TL standards. again, I stress: anyone who has not read the OP and has /inned demonstrating that they have not read it all will not be counted Radfield, you should probably tell me why you think I'm scum bro. I'm a terrible lynch. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
![]() I'm afraid you're mistaken, but I'll respect you as a player and respond to your post properly. Just give me a few minutes in front of a computer WITHOUT job-packs closing in on me and we'll chat. (in ~ 5-6 hours) <3 | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On April 26 2012 09:47 Radfield wrote: Don't cut down my case by calling it a gut read. I'll admit that the voting section is slightly weaker than I like, but it is only part of a body of evidence. I think there are numerous tells in your posting that show a mafia mindset. I'm just playin Rad, it's a great case - its weakness is that it's based on my inactivity and your perception of my mindset while posting. I fully intend to actually respond to it in full sir, I was just joking. ![]() | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On April 26 2012 09:24 Radfield wrote: I think VE is very likely scum. His posts consistently show a non-town mindset, both in his reasoning, and the things he chooses to point out. I won't say he's been explicitly pushing mafia objectives, because I don't think that's what he's been doing. I think he's trying to blend in, and stay on the periphery. As such, I'm going to be detailing how certain posts show a mafia oriented mindset. I'd also like to illustrate that I don't think VE really ever gave a crap about who we voted(or who he voted) for Day 1, despite the fact that he spent a lot of time talking about the lynch. This is a very apt and accurate summation of Radfield's case against me. The only problem with it lies in the fact that the bolded statements seem to contradict each other. Why would my posts show a "mafia oriented mindset" if I'm not explicitly pushing mafia objectives? I mean, if you disagree with my reasoning for my votes that's one thing, but I've given reasoning for all of my votes which shows very clearly that I "give a crap" about the lynch D1. On April 26 2012 09:24 Radfield wrote: This really is a bizarre first post. We're a few hours into the game, and VE is declaring that he thinks 5 players(everyone who has posted) are town. Why as a townie would you EVER say that? Why would you ever THINK that? It takes me the better part of Day 1 to begin to pick up town reads, and certainly more than a few posts. Fact is, I agree with VE, that I think all five of those players(prplhz, forumite, zentor, Radfield, SamuelL) ARE town. I think VE came into the thread and saw that, and fired it out. I'm going to be brutally honest here when I say....that I was drunk when I posted this. That being said, this was actually my joking way of disagreeing with Forumite's post regarding Zentor, specifically. I realize that dishing out town reads is useless and gives mafia information, but I thought that the early hour would make the content ironic and the meaning would be clear. The joke was poorly constructed, and I blame my inebriation. On April 26 2012 09:24 Radfield wrote: This is a completely twisted way to look at meta. The fact that he was found suspicious on day 1 in another game is completely irrelevant to this game. The key is why he looked suspicious, how he was playing, and how it compares to this game. If no one found him suspicious in Newbie VI, that wouldn't matter, because the key is how his play in that game(and alignment) compare to this game. I don't think a town player(at least not one who has played as much as VE) would look at a past game and say, " oh, people found him suspicious in that game, and I find him suspicious in this game, therefore I will reconsider my suspicions". It makes no sense. He actually mentions this again later on, and again uses the same reasoning:+ Show Spoiler + Marv: Marv hasn't given me much to go on today - I'm waiting to see what kind of stuff he puts out today. As I said earlier, meta-wise (Ltd.) it's not unusual for marv to be in hot water D1, so I'm eager to see what he's got. If he fails to produce, I'd like to destroy him. Again, the key is WHY he got in hot water, and how it compares to his play this game. Yet VE is not looking for that. I actually was looking for that Radfield. I didn't realize I had to outline my thought-process so clearly, but what I found when reading your game was a tendency to lurk and pop in with short, directionless posts. That led me to posit that he might have just learned something from that experience and is choosing to instead just let others post and observe. I never would have reached this conclusion unless I had been convinced to go reread the early part of your game, which is why attributed my reasoning to you...not because I'm sheeping you or buddying you or whatever. On April 26 2012 09:24 Radfield wrote: Again, we have a failure here from VE. "Unless Rad and Ace are both scum (imba?) I have to believe that Rad is telling the truth about his claim". He is completely ignoring the other scenarios where I could be scum, other than just me and Ace being teammates. Yet VE states that unless they're both scum, Radfield must be town. Lets go through the other options, both of which have been pointed out by other players: I am scum and trying to buy townie cred. I KNOW ace is town aligned, therefore I can get him off my back at a time when he is pressuring me. It was also pointed out that depending on mafia roles, they can surmise the likelihood of a counter-claim. I am SK and trying to buy townie cred. I KNOW ace will go along with me. Either he is scum and now knows I am SK, or he is town and will likely believe my claim. It's a pure gamble though, and a less likely scenario. Me and Ace both being teammates is actually quite unlikely. We would make a very formidable scum-team, and exposing ourselves with such a ballsy claim would be irrational and irresponsible. VE immediately accepts my alignment as town, and in fact only questions whether I would fake claim as a townie. Town players should be questioning whether I am scum or not, NOT questioning whether I am actually vanilla town faking a cop check. Only mafia would question that, because they already KNOW I am town. The fact is, only your claim gives me reason to doubt my read on Ace. That being said, by my estimation, that means that you're either town telling the truth and have a green check on Ace or you're scum and are Ace's partner. We presumably only had 1 KP hit us last night, so I don't know why I would consider that you might be an SK, but know this: I didn't just accept that you're town, I decided that you're more likely town based on your claim than Ace's partner. I would never consider that you'd lie as VT, I would be insulted if you think that I'd do that and I expect you're a little insulted if you believe that's what I meant. When I said "fake-claiming a DT check to clear someone", I meant as scum. Not as town. Minor, but important I think. I have to take a break, but I'll respond to the rest of your post in the morning after I sleep. In the meantime, I'd be very interested in the actual reasoning you have behind thinking Zentor is town, as he's in queue for lynch, I'm not the only one who thinks he's scum, and you're trying to derail his wagon. I think independent of your read on me, you need to be clear with town about that. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Also, thanks for showing up from out of nowhere only to comment on this brah. I couldn't help but notice that you didn't mention MrZentor during your short return to the thread. You know, the leading lynch candidate? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
My bad. ##Vote: MrZentor | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
VisceraEyes wrote in response to Radfield: I actually was looking for that Radfield. I didn't realize I had to outline my thought-process so clearly, but what I found when reading your game was a tendency to lurk and pop in with short, directionless posts. That led me to posit that he might have just learned something from that experience and is choosing to instead just let others post and observe. I never would have reached this conclusion unless I had been convinced to go reread the early part of your game, which is why attributed my reasoning to you...not because I'm sheeping you or buddying you or whatever. This was in my response to Radfield Sbrubbles. This is dumb, people don't even want to read when attacking me. What's the point in defending myself? When MrZentor flips red, can we please lynch the piss out of Sbrubbles? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On April 26 2012 09:24 Radfield wrote: Straight up bizarre. No town player should have been remotely suspecting Zentor to get night-killed. There was no way mafia would ever kill him, he was way too massive of a distraction. If you are a townie, ask yourself this: Did you remotely expect Zentor to get killed night 1? This shows a massive disconnect in VE's thought process from what a typical town view should have been. This was actually my way of pressuring Zentor - at this point I was convinced of Zentor's guilt based on the late-day shennanigans, and pointing out that he was still alive was my way of trying to pressure him into slipping up. Obviously he was in no danger of being night-killed if he's town, but I thought that saying as much might cause him to panic. On April 26 2012 09:24 Radfield wrote: One more small contradiction. These two sentences do not make sense together. He claims first that he has no scumreads, yet then immediately claims that scum are putting less effort, which in theory would give you some really easy scumreads. If all the scum are just doggin it, then they should stick out like sore thumbs compared to "most everyone who's posting." The problem with lurkers is that they look like everyone else who's not posting. I'm not sure exactly how many scum to expect, but it seems to me that if a couple of them aren't posting, then how do I separate those who are just lurking from those who are scummily lurking? I don't know, and that's why I was insecure about lynching anyone yesterday. On April 26 2012 09:24 Radfield wrote: AND NOW A WORD FROM OUR SPONSORS! I'd like to take this commercial break to have you look at this quote, really look at it. So first Forumite looked worse. However somehow Zentor and Forumite are on a see-saw, and forumite looks better the worse Zentor looks. This is ridiculous, and completely at odds with proper scum hunting, which VE knows full well. Additionally, here is VE's read from Day 1 on Forumite: Forumite is town, and in no way does VE insinuate that he finds Forumite scummy. Yet somehow on Day 2 Forumite has crawled his way up to only "looking okay", when VE clearly stated he saw Forumite as Town on Day 1. Conundrum and Contradiction. Here's my problem with this conclusion - D1, I thought both Forumite and Zentor were town - but as I said in the post you quoted, if you'd asked me yesterday, between the two, I would have said that Forumite looks worse, based on his case on Zentor. You're right in that I never insinuated that I thought Forumite was scum, because I never did. But I thought he looked slightly worse than Zentor before dusk yesterday, and now I don't think that's the case. I don't see how this is a contradiction, and I don't see how this is evidence that I'm scum. I'm just trying to be transparent and open. On April 26 2012 09:24 Radfield wrote: AND WE"RE BACK! I want to detail how I don't think VE really cared about our Day 1 lynch, but I'm having trouble setting it down in text, as I think it's kind of subtle. I'm not going to use quotes, so I highly recommend you go back and read the relevant section in VE's filter(or better yet, the full game text). Short form is this: VE never actually does any scum-hunting on Day 1, nor does he ever actually try to push a lynch. He bounces around, pushes a candidate here, throws some names out there, but never really commits. He begins by pushing an ace lynch, yet immediately after(as in next sentence) starts discussing lynching lurkers, particularly sbrubbles. His vote on Ace is so supremely weak that it doesn't merit a vote by a long shot. He then switches onto sbrubbles for no reason than the fact that he has few posts. Yet sbrubbles few posts were jam packed with content, and showed obvious thought and care for the game. VE keeps bouncing though, and it seems obvious to me that he was searching for an appropriate bandwagon. He makes plenty of weak suggestions - ace, myself, sbrubbles, marv - but refuses to run with any of them, and is constantly seeking approval of the other players. I will also add that both VE's conciliatory tone, and lower than normal activity level raise my suspicions, but those are not by themselves scummy things. I think there is a body of evidence though that shows VE is not playing his usual town game, and is consistently displaying mafia thought patterns. ##Vote: Visceraeyes I think your entire case is based on how you think I would act as town/scum. I'll admit to not being as glaringly town as I've been in the past, but I die N1 on games I do that shit and I'm tired of it. Instead, I thought I'd sit back and rape scum with observation instead of pressure and thread presence. Clearly it's gotten me into some trouble, but I am trying to win with town. I think you should vote for either MrZentor (today's lynch) or Sbrubbles (my preferred alternative). | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On April 27 2012 03:14 Sbrubbles wrote: Hmm, thanks, I didn't think he'd be refering to a previous post. That's partly answered, then, but I still find the change of heart odd. My point is answered, but I'd still like Toad's to be. All Toad is saying is that he can't tell if he thinks that Rad is being manipulative or if I am. I don't know what you want me to answer for in Toad's post at all, it's just an observation about our exchanges. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
That's...okay with you? As someone who's saying I'm "trying to divert the Zentor wagon"? DOES NOT COMPUTE! DOES NOT COMPUTE!! | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
This game is...very odd. I'll post my final thoughts before dawn. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
| ||