On April 13 2012 02:32 FourFace wrote:
EBWOP:
Also FOS: Blazinghand
EBWOP:
Also FOS: Blazinghand
How can you FoS him after you voted him....
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Mementoss
Canada2595 Posts
April 12 2012 17:36 GMT
#1981
On April 13 2012 02:32 FourFace wrote: EBWOP: Also FOS: Blazinghand How can you FoS him after you voted him.... | ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
April 12 2012 17:39 GMT
#1982
On April 13 2012 00:39 Toadesstern wrote: I am going to such great lengths to try and defend MY ASS from you calling me mafia based on town treats or something that is CAUSED by other people. I am posting walls of text, I won't deny that. However I am doing that because I have to because every minute gonzaw and VE are fingering me with equally big wall of texts. More gonzaw than VE. What would happen if I would ignore those things? People would call to lynch me because (and I'm quoting here): Show nested quote + Oh and actually pointing fingers all over the place isn't a mafiatreat either. You think a mafia is happy being on 5 different lists of people who fos'ed townies all game long? Hell no, a mafia is trying to be diplomatic, not talking about his reads at all always trying to dodge having to give reads. That's were gonzaw is absolutely right, just that I am not doing that If I would just ignore those things people would rightfully lynch me instantly for refusing to take stances and for refusing to give reads or explanations. Because that IS a mafiatread. I am really sorry that I have to answer all those walls of text. If you lynch VE today and gonzaw gives me something life half a day (ingame day, that's 24 hours) as an experient to see what would happen I am more than happy to prove that I am not disruptive at all. So why is everyone calling me disruptive, when in reallity gonzaw (and VE) is the cause of that because he forces me to answer every single bullshit there is. What? Here, I'll tell you why you are disruptive: EVERY.SINGLE.POST.OF.YOURS this D2 has been about you "defending yourself". You accuse VE of making a bad case on you, but you do so defending yourself. You accuse me of making another "bad" case on you, and again you OMGUS me by defending yourself. All your posts have been defensive, with you trying to "explain" yourself, in a somewhat obnoxious manner and a very unclear and drawn out one. People accused you, but you just created more shitstorm by just defending yourself in that way. And now that we are in the eye of the storm and the discussion has calmed a little bit, you are still defending yourself. I don't see you trying to find other scum, I don't see you adding more to the discussions going on here about what possible scenarios there are between the two of you. I don't see you pressuring other players, not even when nobody is talking anything at all. Also, you accuse me, you FoS me, you say I'm "disruptive"; but you don't say why. I've asked you like 4 times to reread the thread, reread my filter and make a case against me, yet you ignore it and keep FoSing me without any sensible reasons. You say I'm always "fingering" at you and being disruptive about it, when it's obviously fucking false. You are telling me that's not disruptive? However, VE is doing the exact same fucking thing. Instead of brutally defending himself, he just looks at us with puppy eyes and says "Come on guys! I'm trying here " or "I'm just trying not to die, come on is there a friend out there that will help me lynch Toad?". And again, the discussion has died down a little bit, and he doesn't do shit, he still plays the victim here even though some people are even considering lynching Toad or lynching someone else entirely. Of course, he makes an unfounded FoS on johnny wanting him lynched out of the blue and saying that the Toad wagon "doesn't have support" so he wants to change. He doesn't make a case against johnny, doesn't make any analysis whatsoever about this "lack of support" of the Toad wagon, which actually was bullshit. He doesn't pressure anybody else, nothing. Both of you are disruptive, and useless when the discussion dies down. And I don't know what to think of that. About Artanis: I do get that he only posts to respond to accusations, and doesn't try to contribute on his own nor be part of the discussion. But like I said, I think a wagon on him will get resistance, just because of the fact that he's not "confirmed scum" (in a way) and people will doubt the legitimacy of that wagon and doubt why it should be Artanis and not someone else. That wagon won't happen, just like the ST/ghost/etc wagons wouldn't have happened on D1. So no, I wouldn't want to risk NL and another shitstorm, only by getting a wagon on Artanis, which I'm also not that confident that he will flip scum right now. Remember we lose with 2 misslynches. BH is the only player I would even consider "confirmed scum" this game, and a mass-switch on him is possible, considering I haven't seen a single person that has defended his behaviour. But again, that will leave the VE vs Toad matter unsolved, and by the way both of these are acting right now (when the shitstorm has somewhat stopped) they won't bring anything new to the table and will make it harder for us to determine their alignment later on, bringing us into a situation like this all over again (even if trackers/watchers/DTs claim with checks on them, etc). To be honest, I'm inclined to vote VE, mostly because his "defeated" attitude doesn't make sense, nor does his push for johnny's lynch, and he isn't acting like he would as town at all. His case against Toad is good, but I feel most of his points are rehashes of my case against Toad. Anyways, in 1 hour or so I'm going to uni and be back around the deadline, so I'll have to make my vote count, but I'm still trying to figure these things out, and I'm kind of uncertain about whether a BH massswitch would be good or not (since I'm very confident he will flip scum), in the case the one of Toad/VE we lynch today ends up being town. | ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
April 12 2012 17:43 GMT
#1983
On April 13 2012 02:19 Jitsu wrote: Show nested quote + On April 13 2012 02:15 Mattchew wrote: Jitsu wins the game for a Mike Ditka reference Didn't you guys know that Coach Ditka is god? DUH + Show Spoiler + /sarcasm for someone who inevitably doesn't get that this is a joke and I am a HUGE Bears fan Brian Urlacher Eff Tere Dubs. Show nested quote + On April 13 2012 02:09 Hassybaby wrote: wbg's right...at any point there's even a remote attempt to shift the direction of the thread out oft he shitstorm, someone comes back in to push it straight back. Mem, you know my stance. I think Toad and VE are two hothead townies bashing their heads against each other, and both showing pretty desperate moves along the way. But the way the day has gone, its almost impossible to distinguish whether its the lurkers or the 2nd/3rd instigators who are scummy. Yes, I would vote Artanis. I don't know if there's time though. Why would we shift the direction to something out of the shitstorm? If we divert our attention away, I guarantee this day will culminate in a no lynch. Toad or VE. Our path has been chosen. Pick the side. You know which is the right one. No, I really don't. That's why I took my vote off. If it's 100% clear to you, congratz, because I'm confused as fuck after all that's happened. | ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
April 12 2012 17:47 GMT
#1984
On April 13 2012 00:55 Toadesstern wrote: I never said to not use "wifom". By all means, try to think about what makes sense and what does not and try and find the most reasonable explantion. Instavoting me after the nightkills makes no sense because assuming "Toad told people to protect Jackal and is a mafia who used a single bullet on Jackal to kill him" is not the most reasonable explantion. Since both VE and gonzaw instavoted me and I had a mafia read on both of them I am assuming they are not even trying to figure out what's happening because clearly they didn't even look at the nightkills. I said telling someone "that's just wifom" is a bad treat. False On April 13 2012 01:18 Toadesstern wrote: For why I call gonzaw mafia: Pretty much for what you accused him just now. Being disruptive on purpose with his fingerpointing asking EVERYONE in the thread about his case, being all over the place to hear someone about his own cases from every single player in the game. And yeah, pretty much everyone said the case he did is a null, yet he proceeds to push me for that like a maniac. False. Reread the thread, apparently a lot of people think my case against you is good. I am pretty sure a townie would reconsider for a bried second if he would get that much "no" about his case and observe me while watching what happens when I am not forced to bomb the thread because of him. No because I'm not that influence-able. Just because people ignore me throughout some part of the game, it won't discourage my reads. Just because people don't agree with my case at some point, I won't drop it if I think it's good. The fact that you are almost getting lynched because some people reread my case is proof of that. And I fail to see how me asking people to review my cases is disruptive; even more I fail to see how it's "fingerpointing" (fingerpointing generally means FoSing a lot of people); even more I fail to see how it makes me scum; even more I fail to see how that could convince you of me being scum, yet you ignore everything else I've done and said. | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
April 12 2012 17:49 GMT
#1985
On April 13 2012 02:39 gonzaw wrote: Show nested quote + On April 13 2012 00:39 Toadesstern wrote: I am going to such great lengths to try and defend MY ASS from you calling me mafia based on town treats or something that is CAUSED by other people. I am posting walls of text, I won't deny that. However I am doing that because I have to because every minute gonzaw and VE are fingering me with equally big wall of texts. More gonzaw than VE. What would happen if I would ignore those things? People would call to lynch me because (and I'm quoting here): Oh and actually pointing fingers all over the place isn't a mafiatreat either. You think a mafia is happy being on 5 different lists of people who fos'ed townies all game long? Hell no, a mafia is trying to be diplomatic, not talking about his reads at all always trying to dodge having to give reads. That's were gonzaw is absolutely right, just that I am not doing that If I would just ignore those things people would rightfully lynch me instantly for refusing to take stances and for refusing to give reads or explanations. Because that IS a mafiatread. I am really sorry that I have to answer all those walls of text. If you lynch VE today and gonzaw gives me something life half a day (ingame day, that's 24 hours) as an experient to see what would happen I am more than happy to prove that I am not disruptive at all. So why is everyone calling me disruptive, when in reallity gonzaw (and VE) is the cause of that because he forces me to answer every single bullshit there is. What? Here, I'll tell you why you are disruptive: EVERY.SINGLE.POST.OF.YOURS this D2 has been about you "defending yourself". You accuse VE of making a bad case on you, but you do so defending yourself. You accuse me of making another "bad" case on you, and again you OMGUS me by defending yourself. All your posts have been defensive, with you trying to "explain" yourself, in a somewhat obnoxious manner and a very unclear and drawn out one. People accused you, but you just created more shitstorm by just defending yourself in that way. And now that we are in the eye of the storm and the discussion has calmed a little bit, you are still defending yourself. I don't see you trying to find other scum, I don't see you adding more to the discussions going on here about what possible scenarios there are between the two of you. I don't see you pressuring other players, not even when nobody is talking anything at all. Also, you accuse me, you FoS me, you say I'm "disruptive"; but you don't say why. I've asked you like 4 times to reread the thread, reread my filter and make a case against me, yet you ignore it and keep FoSing me without any sensible reasons. You say I'm always "fingering" at you and being disruptive about it, when it's obviously fucking false. You are telling me that's not disruptive? However, VE is doing the exact same fucking thing. Instead of brutally defending himself, he just looks at us with puppy eyes and says "Come on guys! I'm trying here " or "I'm just trying not to die, come on is there a friend out there that will help me lynch Toad?". And again, the discussion has died down a little bit, and he doesn't do shit, he still plays the victim here even though some people are even considering lynching Toad or lynching someone else entirely. Of course, he makes an unfounded FoS on johnny wanting him lynched out of the blue and saying that the Toad wagon "doesn't have support" so he wants to change. He doesn't make a case against johnny, doesn't make any analysis whatsoever about this "lack of support" of the Toad wagon, which actually was bullshit. He doesn't pressure anybody else, nothing. Both of you are disruptive, and useless when the discussion dies down. And I don't know what to think of that. About Artanis: I do get that he only posts to respond to accusations, and doesn't try to contribute on his own nor be part of the discussion. But like I said, I think a wagon on him will get resistance, just because of the fact that he's not "confirmed scum" (in a way) and people will doubt the legitimacy of that wagon and doubt why it should be Artanis and not someone else. That wagon won't happen, just like the ST/ghost/etc wagons wouldn't have happened on D1. So no, I wouldn't want to risk NL and another shitstorm, only by getting a wagon on Artanis, which I'm also not that confident that he will flip scum right now. Remember we lose with 2 misslynches. BH is the only player I would even consider "confirmed scum" this game, and a mass-switch on him is possible, considering I haven't seen a single person that has defended his behaviour. But again, that will leave the VE vs Toad matter unsolved, and by the way both of these are acting right now (when the shitstorm has somewhat stopped) they won't bring anything new to the table and will make it harder for us to determine their alignment later on, bringing us into a situation like this all over again (even if trackers/watchers/DTs claim with checks on them, etc). To be honest, I'm inclined to vote VE, mostly because his "defeated" attitude doesn't make sense, nor does his push for johnny's lynch, and he isn't acting like he would as town at all. His case against Toad is good, but I feel most of his points are rehashes of my case against Toad. Anyways, in 1 hour or so I'm going to uni and be back around the deadline, so I'll have to make my vote count, but I'm still trying to figure these things out, and I'm kind of uncertain about whether a BH massswitch would be good or not (since I'm very confident he will flip scum), in the case the one of Toad/VE we lynch today ends up being town. To make it short: I already said I am no longer considering you for a lynch at all and given how this day turns out I'd much rather not turn up the disrupto-meter by making cases about someone else when it's obvious it's either VE or me today. I will try to be less disruptive, stop defending myself and instead make cases myself tomorrow, however we can't let a no-lynch happen today and making other cases that are not going to matter are exactly achieving that. | ||
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
April 12 2012 17:58 GMT
#1986
On April 13 2012 01:58 Mementoss wrote: That picture made me laugh. Just for reference 6 people do not have an active vote atm. It would be nice to here there current stance and get a vote. List of people who do not have an active vote: Kepachi Grackaroni HassyBaby gonzaw JohnnyWup FourFace I actually don't know. Everything has been a mess and it's hard to tell who's town and who's scum. I've been extremely on the fence about VE (Look at how many unvotes/revotes...). I think the claims from both "parties" were stupid. I think they could both possibly be scum, or both possibly be town, or actually different. I'm starting to lean back towards voting VE because of his FoS on me for no reason, just to get an "easy target". This is a hard situation though. I don't think anyone besides VE or toad should be lynched, I don't want this moving into day 3. | ||
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
April 12 2012 17:59 GMT
#1987
| ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
April 12 2012 17:59 GMT
#1988
You haven't done so since N1. And I don't want you making other cases and presenting other lynch candidates, I want you to at least comment on other players and do something else. You haven't commented on BH, you haven't commented on Artanis until a little while ago (and didn't contribute yourself or post your actual thoughts on him). You haven't commented on the lurkers, and what you did comment you haven't really made any original content. You saying "I will try to be less disruptive, ..." doesn't mean shit. | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
April 12 2012 18:15 GMT
#1989
On April 13 2012 02:59 johnnywup wrote: also spoiler that shit toad. sry On April 13 2012 02:59 gonzaw wrote: No, I don't care if you want me lynched or not. You said you thought I was scum, so prove it. You haven't done so since N1. And I don't want you making other cases and presenting other lynch candidates, I want you to at least comment on other players and do something else. You haven't commented on BH, you haven't commented on Artanis until a little while ago (and didn't contribute yourself or post your actual thoughts on him). You haven't commented on the lurkers, and what you did comment you haven't really made any original content. You saying "I will try to be less disruptive, ..." doesn't mean shit. As mentioned. I won't today. Doing so would be disruptive. I already mentioned like 4 or 5 people I want do be lynched other than VE. Remember there's only 6 mafias in this game? However I've got like 9 to 10 people I'd consider to be mafia. I also explained why I voted you. If you think that's not a good reason to vote you fine, I already dropped it although I still think it's somewhat true, but apparently people from both parties think you'de be playing like this as town as well so I will ignore you for now until I made a case that everyone agrees upon or someone else does. And as mentioned, that won't happen today. If you want me to give you a brief 10 words for for every player in this game without an explanation (as much as you can do in 10 words, or 1-2 lines or whatever) say so. I'd do that but I think that's not helping at all except for your read on myself, which actually while typing makes me consider this because every vote counts :p I haven't commented on Artanis until recently because I did not think he'd become an issue and thought it's set on VE vs me, which it apparently still is. So I didn't want people to talk about that while we need to figure out what to do when I thought he's not an issue for today. | ||
Jitsu
United States929 Posts
April 12 2012 18:15 GMT
#1990
| ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
April 12 2012 18:20 GMT
#1991
What do you think of BH? Really, how many times do I have to ask this? And no, doing so won't be disruptive, it's called "contribution". | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
April 12 2012 18:25 GMT
#1992
On April 13 2012 02:25 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Alright, so let me get this straight. People want me lynched for lurking, and the one post I made about gonzaw which I cleared up later and everyone's more than happy to jump on the Artanis bandwagon. There is no case, the only case you have is that I lurk and don't post unless I get called out1. I'd like to refer all of you to my game in TL Mafia XXX, with my filter here. In big games, I tend to lurk, and I was townie in this game. It fits with said meta, and I did post some of my own analysis, though I struggle in large threads.2 What worries me is the instant bandwagon on me3; seems like Mafia has found a way to relieve pressure from one of their scumbuddies and found an easy train to ride, since there's no one that's going to hate a lynch of me4. If neither Toad nor VE dies today, we're just going to have the same mess again tomorrow5. I'm also massively confused why people have stopped voting for VE. Let me suggest to you a quiz that either determines what you should do with VE or how your play has been this game. Q1: Was VisceraEyes' claim beneficial for town? O) Yes L) No Q2: Did VisceraEyes' claim timing make sense? M) Yes Y) No Q3: Is chaos good for town? G) Yes N) No Q4: Did Viscera cause a ton of chaos? C) Yes U) No Q5: Given the answers to these questions, does it make sense to lynch Viscera? H) Yes S) No Diverting from this issue just means we're going to have this shitstorm all over again on D3. I find the redirection extremely scummy. 1: Hilarious how you say that there is no case and then you summarize the case in the same sentence. 2: I think you're trying way harder in that game than you are in this game but year old meta is unimportant, and meta generally is of lesser importance than how you're actually acting. 3: Instant bandwagon? A lot of people have said they found you scummy but I'm the only one voting for you, and then ghost_401 who I had to personally ask to vote for you before he did it. How the hell is this instant bandwagon? If anything, people are staunchly resisting this lynch. 4: You are saying that the attack on you was orchestrated by scum, are you calling me scum or what? Why am I scum? What do you mean that people aren't going to hate lynching you? There are god damn 2 votes on you and one of them came from a guy who was semi-bullied into doing it. I think you're feeling pretty guilty right now and you're just trying to get some sympathy from people. 5: No and stop saying that, it's just fearmongering. The watcher/tracker plan I have mentioned could possibly give us a lot more information about VisceraEyes, and if VisceraEyes gets another check off that could tell us a ton about Toadesstern and there is no way in hell that they're both scum. The only "resolution" or "epiphany" in this game is when you lynch scum, there is no lynching for bad or lynching for information. Overall, your case on VisceraEyes is that he's not playing well but after SNMMIX, you of all people should know that that is in no way an indication of him being scum, probably even to the contrary. From those questions it seems like you're operating on a weird "guilty until proven innocent" principle and most of this town is just derping along. With what I've read so far I find it very dubious that we're going to find scum in VisceraEyes/Toadesstern and Artanis[Xp] is the best I have found outside of them and I think the case on him is pretty solid. There is no "we have to lynch into them today", we only have to lynch into scum and Artanis[Xp] is scum. | ||
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
April 12 2012 18:28 GMT
#1993
| ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
April 12 2012 18:30 GMT
#1994
On April 13 2012 03:20 gonzaw wrote: For fucks sake Toad. What do you think of BH? Really, how many times do I have to ask this? And no, doing so won't be disruptive, it's called "contribution". He is the one guy besides Kenpachi who is still white in my spreadsheet, aka I haven't made up my mind about him. I remember him mostly as a bad player who usually gets mislynched as townie very easily because of his weird style. So far I haven't found a thing that makes me think strongly in either of the two directions. I am not even sure if I ever saw him play as mafia. That's why I am not talking about BH, what point is there if I think he's a null? Other than him playing bad I don't have something. Someone else you want to ask about to prove I am not lying about him being one of the only 2 guys being white?^^ | ||
FourFace
701 Posts
April 12 2012 18:33 GMT
#1995
It's how everyone should play as town. Respect | ||
FourFace
701 Posts
April 12 2012 18:34 GMT
#1996
| ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
April 12 2012 18:39 GMT
#1997
On April 13 2012 03:30 Toadesstern wrote: Show nested quote + On April 13 2012 03:20 gonzaw wrote: For fucks sake Toad. What do you think of BH? Really, how many times do I have to ask this? And no, doing so won't be disruptive, it's called "contribution". He is the one guy besides Kenpachi who is still white in my spreadsheet, aka I haven't made up my mind about him. I remember him mostly as a bad player who usually gets mislynched as townie very easily because of his weird style. So far I haven't found a thing that makes me think strongly in either of the two directions. I am not even sure if I ever saw him play as mafia. That's why I am not talking about BH, what point is there if I think he's a null? Other than him playing bad I don't have something. Someone else you want to ask about to prove I am not lying about him being one of the only 2 guys being white?^^ There's a point because he's a major point of discussion now; and all player should participate in the discussion by commenting on the important issues that take part of it. Really? Do I have to babysit you on how to play as town? *sigh* Anyways, I'm going away to uni now so I'll have to vote: ##Vote: VisceraEyes For the reasons I stated previously, although I'll leave the lynch to town and see what you guys can figure out out of this shitstorm. | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
April 12 2012 18:43 GMT
#1998
The trolling is way more than I am used to from him so that surely is different. Not sure what to make of it though. I mean sure you could say it's to either a mafia trying to look bold, like he's not afraid to die at all or a towny who actually is trying to be bold playing like one of the big guys (aka vets). I'd say the mafia explanation is a little bit more reasonable but that guy is crazy. I don't think he's very diplomatic. He is clearly taking stances and the trolling makes it really hard to actually read into his explanations of why he is doing something. So that's taken with a graint of salt. As mentioned. I don't think he's strongly mafia or strongly town at all, pretty much a null for me. | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
April 12 2012 18:44 GMT
#1999
On April 13 2012 03:28 johnnywup wrote: prplhz, do you really want the toad vs VE case going on in day 3? :\ one way or another it's going to end bloodily. cases for artanis isn't going to change that. I already commented on it but I'll flesh it out. VisceraEyes claimed detective. Tonight all our watchers and trackers will be on him. If VisceraEyes is scum then he will have to either visit someone or claim roleblocked. If he claims that he visited someone then the tracker can see if he is telling the truth. If he didn't visit someone then he dies. If he claimed roleblocked the the watcher will see how many people visited him. If 2 people visited him then that sounds reasonable, if only 1 then the watcher uses his brain. If nobody visited him then he dies. Because of this, we might have a confirmed scum tomorrow depending on what he claims, but I seriously doubt that he's scum. We might also have a semi-confirmed town tomorrow depending on what happens during the night. "How do you know we have a tracker or a watcher?" Well I don't, I'm just guessing it since they're cool roles and GMarshal probably put some in but this is all speculation. No matter what, we have more information about VisceraEyes tomorrow which is a perfectly good reason for letting him go today, especially considering that we have a perfectly good case going on Artanis[Xp]. On top of all this, I don't think that VisceraEyes is scum and there's no "because they're been up for lynch and some people at some point thought they might be scum, then we have to lynch them to settle it." that's just a myth perpetuated by scum who like to laugh their asses off at town. Why do you say that this is going to end bloodily? What makes you think this? You are just saying stuff for no reason, there is no reason why this has to end in us lynching all of them just because some people don't know what to think. You don't sound at all like you think they're town and you just want to lynch into them because "we have to lynch into them at some point, might as well be sooner than later", what the hell kind of logic is that? | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
April 12 2012 18:46 GMT
#2000
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games Organizations Counter-Strike Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH276 StarCraft: Brood War• practicex 80 • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv • Kozan • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamezSOOP • Laughngamez YouTube • Migwel • sooper7s |
Sparkling Tuna Cup
SC Evo Complete
Dark vs Classic
kiwian vs Spirit
WardiTV Invitational
ByuN vs Clem
MaxPax vs herO
Cure vs SHIN
BSL: ProLeague
Bonyth vs Dienmax
DragOn vs Sterling
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
StarCraft2.fi
OlimoLeague
StarCraft2.fi
StarCraft2.fi
[ Show More ] The PondCast
CranKy Ducklings
|
|