EPTOn April 13 2012 04:32 johnnywup wrote:
##vote VisceraEyes
have it your way VE
##vote VisceraEyes
have it your way VE
Ok wtf is this OMGUS
TL Mafia LI - Page 102
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
Ok wtf is this OMGUS | ||
|
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Toad is no Vet. Toad is scum. I prefer a Toadesstern lynch above all else | ||
|
Jitsu
United States929 Posts
| ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
God you guys make me want to cry. I'll respond in earnest when I get my hands on my laptop. Currently on my phone :p On April 13 2012 04:09 VisceraEyes wrote: According to sanities it's still eithier right or wrong Toad - it's not "more likely to be wrong", it's still just either right or wrong. Toad Red - 50% Sane: Red Insane Green Paranoid Red Naive Green Toad Green - 50% Sane: Green Insane: Red Paranoid: Red Naive: Green Wanna push lies to town moar Toad? Actually it's simpler than that. let's ignore ALL other variables; actual likelihood of someone being scum, being framed, being a miller, etc. If you are town and you get a red check n1, and we assume there's an equal chance to get any of the sanities, that means 1/3 of the time you are correct (sane), 1/3 of the time the check is worthless (paranoid) and 1/3 of the time the check is opposite (insane). Not 50:50. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
And that doesn't even account for framer/miller mechanics. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
| ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Just because a check is worthless doesn't make it wrong if he's scum and I'm paranoid. Christ, are you retarded? | ||
|
Jitsu
United States929 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
I will also support wherebugsgo as an alternative lynch. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
I don't even want to respond to that, this is ridiculous. As an apparent DT you really don't know how your role works. That's what makes your claim so utterly unbelievable. Anyway, as I said earlier, I'm okay with ignoring VE/Toad completely and killing someone like Artanis or ghost_403, or katina, or Jitsu. BH wouldn't be a terrible choice either though tbh I haven't read his posts very thoroughly. The problem we have though, is that we will have a verydifficult time getting a consensus and getting people to stop talking about VE/Toad. That's just how it's going to be until one of them dies. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
alright I'm done, Risen you were right lol. my vote stays on VE, if he flips town, idgaf anymore | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
You don't care though. All you care about is flipping me. You and Risen both are playing with pants on your head. You're not thinking or reading the thread. Leave your vote on me Bugs, I'm not going to flip today. All that does is make you look suspicious for playing like a noob when everyone knows you're not. STOP playing like a noob Bugs. | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On April 13 2012 04:49 Jitsu wrote: It's not like VE blew a random check on a random player either. He was suspicious of Toad Day 1. I would feel that the DT check would serve to strengthen the case, especially since (in at least the last few games) i've seen VE play exceptionally well with player reads. that's got to be a strong case if "I have no idea about his alignment at all" strengthens it. | ||
|
FourFace
701 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
GOD YOU ALL CAN'T BE SCUM X( | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
On April 13 2012 04:55 wherebugsgo wrote: LOL alright I'm done, Risen you were right lol. my vote stays on VE, if he flips town, idgaf anymore I'm gonna jump right on here. | ||
|
FourFace
701 Posts
| ||
| ||
