A Game of Thrones Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 21 2012 03:02 Oberyn wrote: If possible, I think it would probably be best if spoilers beyond the first book were put in spoiler tags. I would think it is possible to discuss the flavor of the characters in this game, without going into the events of the fifth book and spoiling it for everyone else. No, if people absolutely can't handle spoilers they should just out now. I don't want to feel forced to play this game while petting around with spoilers. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Greymist come out and play! ##vote: GreYMisT | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 22 2012 09:20 risk.nuke wrote: I want to kill greymist and gumshoe about equally much. just to clarify, my original vote for greymist was pressure and I want to lynch him now for other reasons. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 22 2012 09:38 sandroba wrote: What's in it for you? Use the right account, and what's in it for him doesn't matter. We're playing for what's in it for US. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Untitled Reporter: Before we get to that, the day started of with a bunch of stupid stuff. Can you tell us a bit of what that was nuke? nuke: Yes naturally, so yes the day started of with wherebugsgo instantly deciding to do some initial trolling. My cameraman Mr.Wiggles caught some of the first responses. On March 21 2012 16:48 wherebugsgo wrote: + Show Spoiler [Xatalos] +hi I'm vanilla town But isn't he third party? DAFUQ ![]() + Show Spoiler [evantrees] + ![]() The city was in chaos for a brief moment untill Acrofales rolled in and said. + Show Spoiler + Acrofales wrote: I'mma specculate on littlefingers wincondition. ![]() The quality play continues with GreYMisT wanting to lynch modconfirmed unlynchable third party. Which brings us to one of our main-candidates for the evening. Ladies and Gentlemen I present to you. ReDMisT. On March 22 2012 01:20 GreYMisT wrote: Guys I say we lynch Wherebugsgo, just to be certain. Sand/Syllo can you guys sign you posts? It makes it a lot easier for the rest of us to keep track of who thinks what. Xatalos, I'm interested on what you think about Wherebugsgo/littlefinger. How do you think we should go about interacting with him now that we know he is 3rd party? Also i would like to assure everyone that even though I am hosting Aperture Mafia, the science will not keep me from being active here. After reciving a pressurevote at the start of the game GreYMist emerges. He doesn't say anything about the vote made against him which I don't actually hold against him too much, altough a "Go bugger yourself nuke" in response to my vote would had been nice. However he doesn't say anything else either to generate lynch-discussion. Instead he tries to lead the conversation onto third-party discussion. If you look through his filter here. GreYMist Filter. His continued posts are pretty worthless. He makes a few points like informing how a Mayor system works, shoots down a role-claim. Denying freepasses and punching Mattchews poor logic in the face. Whilst these are alright posts and by that I mean not straight out useless or fluff they aren't doing much to help town either. They are just the kind of replies someone was going to post and GreYMisT posted first. So in terms of "helpfull discussion" aka "lynch discussion" GreY still sits on a pretty solid nothing. On March 22 2012 03:44 GreYMisT wrote: If it wasnt already apparent that the "Guys we should lynch wherebugsgo, just to be sure" was a joke, me saying later that it was should have made it quite clear. But enough of that, At the moment I would much prefer lynching Gumshoe over anyone else at this point. Notice how he jumps on the easiest lynch he can find, and then later he turns into more of a "sympathetic townie" where he give Acro a way out of the lynch (ie. claiming). in this way a Scum Gumshoe would win both ways. He either gets a townie lynched, or gets his role. First. No, I did not see any sarcasm in your lets lynch littlefinger post. This is what you wrote. On March 22 2012 01:20 GreYMisT wrote: Guys I say we lynch Wherebugsgo, just to be certain. Tell me where is the sarcasm or how this clearly is a joke because I don't see it. Especially since the majority about that post is concerning what to do with littlefinger. GreYMisT dismiss it as sarcasm and a joke after the post BUT it wasn't sarcasm nor a joke. And that makes GreYMisT a L-I-A-R. Which is Scum in latin. I absolutely love the second part of this post If gumshoe is scum for jumping on the easiest lynch he can find, does the same go for you jumping on gumshoe? On March 22 2012 03:44 GreYMisT wrote: But enough of that, At the moment I would much prefer lynching Gumshoe over anyone else at this point. Notice how he jumps on the easiest lynch he can find, and then later he turns into more of a "sympathetic townie" where he give Acro a way out of the lynch (ie. claiming). in this way a Scum Gumshoe would win both ways. He either gets a townie lynched, or gets his role. My other candidate right now was gumshoe but the case on him has already been stated and I don't feel like beeing overly repetetive. Winner: ReDMisT! Close but keeps his head: gumshoe! That's all for now, stay tuned! | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 23 2012 13:09 chaoser wrote: Risk.nuke's "big post" is scummy as fuck (happy SLJ?): Firstly, it's taking greymist's post about wanting to lynch WBG out of context and misrepresenting it. It also has this paragraph which makes no sense: Denying freepasses and arguing with mattchew's logic would fall under "helpful and lynch discussions". And greymist advocated lynching gumshoe so he's got a strong stance already and not just "sitting on a pretty solid nothing". And while you're leveling all this criticism at greymist, you yourself have not been doing much either. How is this worthless multiple paragraph post a case? It's just trash. Where was the pressure?! You literally vote for him and then post one liners about wanting to kill gumshoe. What pressure was there?!?!?! ##vote: risk.nuke Nicholas' big post: I don't understand this post. First you say that risk.nuke has posted the most scummy post (which I agree) but then you say both him and gumshoe are scum buddies? When risk.nuke has been saying gumshoe is scum since the start of the game? You're totally misrepresenting their relationship especially given the fact that in that post, risk.nuke even uses red lettering for gumshoe...Are you saying he's halfheartedly bussing or something? Can you explain how you arrived at that conclusion? And then instead of voting for him, you keep your vote on gumshoe...if you think risk.nuke has the most scummy post, why not vote for HIM? and then you ask for a replacement in thread with a shitty reason...I remember Curu modkilled DrH when he did this in lotr and DrH had a much better reason than you...I doubt you're going to get replaced so I suggest you keep playing and respond to my questions. That or you're getting modkilled. Oberyn, I asked you some questions in my previous post, Can you please answer them? And to answer yours, obviously something that I thought was pushing scum agenda. Usually this means misrepresentation. (cough cough, risk.nuke, Nicholas) Right now he's still a null read to me, especially since he's started to contribute/post more. gumshoe, I'm confused. Can you explain why you're voting for layabout and not someone else? Wtf is, "he might be aggressive scum or reckless town but he's dangerous as scum so let's lynch". Why not just go find someone else that you think is more likely to be scum?! Finally, Risen destroyed page 19...please don't do post-by-post analysis anymore, especially if you're going to marathon post like that...condense your ideas into one or two big posts...else it's hard to read Chaoser,First I love how you take a direct and full quote and call it out of context. then chaoser wrote: Denying freepasses and arguing with mattchew's logic would fall under "helpful and lynch discussions". And greymist advocated lynching gumshoe so he's got a strong stance already and not just "sitting on a pretty solid nothing". And while you're leveling all this criticism at greymist, you yourself have not been doing much either. How is this worthless multiple paragraph post a case? It's just trash. These kind of posts are helpfull sure, but they are the kind of posts that if greymist hadn't posted them there are probably atleast 4 other people in this thread that would had if grey hadn't been faster. I'm just trying to emphasize that these are the kind of posts that look helpfull and are a very easy way to make yourself look alot more helpfull and contributing then you actually are. And I wanted to make that clear so the town don't look at those posts and thinks they are more helpfull then they are. Posting these types of posts pose almost zero danger to the scumteam in the way that discussing lynches do. About pressuring grey. I voted for him, that IS pressure you... "insert disparaging intellectual comment here" I tried to make him come out and post, but it was completely ignored which was another thing that beeped on my scumradar. Gumshoe: He's close the top of my lynch list and people are calling me chainsaw defending him by attacking greymist. You need to get your heads examined. You can't say I haven't posted a case on him. He posted like a scum in the thread. My respons to that was saying I want to lynch him for those posts and I asked town who else wanted to lynch him with me (which if everyone would had been so kind as to answer could had been a great source of information). I could had made a case on him when I made one on Grey but all that would had led to would be getting comments from other players about how that had already been posted and how I only stole other peoples cases" This is day 1. The most important informationgain today is who wants to lynch who, not who could make the best damn lynchpost based on ONLY day 1 posts. Good lynchposts are just another currency for how hard you're trying to get someone lynched which translates into information. And go relook GreYMisT talking about wbg, he wasn't joking. And his post led to a bunch of useless wbg discussion just like he must have known that type of post would cause. And discussiong wbg instead of lynches are anti-townplay. After a few people raises their eyebrows at the post he tries to dismiss it as 'beeing sarcastic.' Note that he doesn't do that immediately. In his first reply to SLJ he doesn't say a thing about beeing sarcastic but rather asking him what else to discuss. Which one obvious answer to is lynchcandidates. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 24 2012 07:09 wherebugsgo wrote: Hey guys, look: all the scum are switching to evantrees now! Lololololol I don't feel to well about the evantress, too much late bandwagon on the lurker and it's going fast. Compared to how slow everyone has been to unite up untill now. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 24 2012 08:11 DoYouHas wrote: Am I correct in saying Layabout is currently set to be lynched? Yes and no. Layabout is on 5, greymist is on 4. But layabout is such a incredibly dumb lynch I can't see the town not changing from him shortly (just need some more activity). Altough to be fair layabout was still a better lynch then most previous candidates because it will atleast provide some information on the people voting. However it's still terrible and dumb as hell since the case on layabout was he was slightly lurking and mostly meta. aka not playing as well as he should. Which isn't even no longer the case because he's come back and posted some sensible stuff. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 24 2012 07:20 chaoser wrote: posting from hospital, on shift. addressing risk, just because there is a chance others might have posted it doesn't mean greymist posting it is noncontributing. I think I understand your "they are helpful but not TOO helpful" idea in that you think they're relatively "safe" helpful posts to make. Is that correct? But then what is the difference between greymist and any number of players in here making "safe helpful" posts. None, I'm just saying that when evaluating a person you must take this into consideration. Since I was attempting to get GreYMisT lynched I forsaw that those posts would make people less reluctant to lynching him if they misinterpreted the posts as more helpfull then they are. Even if Greymist wrote the first part sarcasticly it didn't sound sarcastic and either way. Looking at it now neutraly he comes in and uses his first post in the game to talk about wbg and his next thing in the post is to ask another player of their thoughts on wbg. Which is very undenisbly leading the discussion onto wbg. I could have understood if a townie wanted to do this if he just wanted to see what people would post about wbg and try to draw some information from that. But GreYMisT doesn't claim that that. From what I can read, his only goal and concern after that was to establish his own innocence by claiming it was a joke. Meaning it was not his intention to move the discussion to wbg which I also can't buy. In Greys early post he didn't want to discuss lynch-candidates. He choose to straight out ignore my vote on him, talked about other stuff and asked other people for their opinions. This supports the fact that greymist didn't want to talk lynch discussion. He names gumshoe but it's in truth just jumping on the easiest target, mafia or townie a person who messed up in the thread and that was the extent of the effort. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 24 2012 08:58 wherebugsgo wrote: ok guys, I have an idea. Let's all switch to someone else completely, other than layabout and GreYMisT. How does that sound? I'm sorry, while I want to save layabout I can't hear you over the sound of the two remaining minutes. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 24 2012 09:03 Risen wrote: I posted precisely why I feel like I do. You were playing human centipede with greymist. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 24 2012 09:06 VisceraEyes wrote: layabout, the Stark Bannerman has been lynched. ![]() | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
"If I had a quill and some maesters ink I could write me member was as long as me arm, wouldn't make it so." | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 25 2012 07:34 Risen wrote: Bullshit he did. He voted with no support, and then backtracked and was like OH WELL I VOTED B/C THIS. Let this be a lesson, don't fucking vote without support and then look scummy by having to support yourself later when people call you out. On March 24 2012 07:15 layabout wrote: In light of his recent posts I think oberyn cares about finding scum or at least he is bothering to produce the signs of looking for scum and i do not think we should lynch him. I don't think greymist cares about finding scum. He has made many posts but the only lynch candidate he has pushed has been oberyn. I looked at grey earlier but i thought it would be easier to vote for alerdan (who's vote on me is poorly justified) rather than to try to come up with some sub-par analysis, i was curious about why he was still telling us to lynch oberyn even though oberyn is showing more signs of a town agenda than half of the people in the thread. By continuing to push oberyn it looks to me like Greymist is trying to keep the votes spread. A greymist lynch sounds like the best option we still have. also i would like to point out that leading the votes are for : evantrees (3) - Mattchew, Sinensis, OriginalName a lurker layabout (3) - SamuelLJackson, gumshoe, Alderan a lurker Mattchew (3) - Acrofales, Xatalos, MrZentor, evantrees an annoying dude Did anybody else see my posting like this? Go sit in the corner. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Evantress had a wagon going on him, knowing his flip will give us information from that wagon. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
I know you are mafia. It's just a matter of time before I can convince the others of it, and I'm not in a rush. I play mafia with my focus on the endgame and you will not survive it so as far as I care, I consider you a lynched man walking. And I got several ideas of whom your scumbuddies might be. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 27 2012 01:54 chaoser wrote: If you had to lynch three people right now, who would they be? Out of acro and risen, who would you lynch? Greymist, Lyter and maybe Gumshoe. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Mods can we have a 24 hour day today if town agrees on it? There won't be or well you don't know with the ratio of morons in this city but there shouldn't be much confusion about who we're lynching. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 27 2012 18:40 risk.nuke wrote: We don't need a case, we got a redcheck. Acro. Sit down shut up. Mods can we have a 24 hour day today if town agrees on it? There won't be or well you don't know with the ratio of morons in this city but there shouldn't be much confusion about who we're lynching. *Tomorrow* | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 27 2012 18:59 Zealos wrote: This is never good for town, even if we know who we are lynching, we should still make progress towards the next days lynch ect. Yeah that works on paper. Nobody ever does that, in reallity all that happens is this thread goes yellow for a day. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
GreYMisT (5) - risk.nuke, Oberyn, wherebugsgo, layabout, MrZentor | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 29 2012 03:27 risk.nuke wrote: Final Day 1 Vote Count GreYMisT (5) - risk.nuke, Oberyn, wherebugsgo, layabout, MrZentor GreYMisT (5) - risk.nuke, Oberyn, wherebugsgo, layabout, MrZentor Edit. I got layabout confused with someone else, thought he'd died. so nvm. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 29 2012 03:29 risk.nuke wrote: GreYMisT (5) - risk.nuke, Oberyn, wherebugsgo, layabout, MrZentor Edit. I got layabout confused with someone else, thought he'd died. so nvm. Double nvm I got tricked my the op. This is what you get when you only look at the game causally for a few days. GreYMisT (5) - risk.nuke, Oberyn, wherebugsgo, layabout, MrZentor | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 29 2012 13:48 Sinensis wrote: I'm voting evantrees if this bothers you read my filter. He had his chance. It sounds as if you think YOUR filter is better this his. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
What do you think of Alderan and Greymist. Who are your scumreads? | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
So basicly the Zealous lynch is bad, 1. Zealous is one of the few more active people. 2. He's done some few bad stuff but he's also done some good stuff which is completely ignored which I just find curious. The rest of the people. + Show Spoiler + gumshoe Jitsu Alderan chaoser Lyter Xatalos GreYMisT sinensis evantrees Looking at them right now there are two people I don't want to lynch. Meet Jitsu and Zealous. People I want to lynch more. You know how I feel about GreYMisT and he's looking bad from the layabout lynch vote-count. He was pushing risen but slow to vote him and it continues like that. I believe in odds and not badluck. But mostly I have gotten the feeling during the entire game that he's playing the game like he scum would play it. From when I know he's watching but doesn't post to how he chooses to post. I get scumchills and I'm probably right because I'm fairly smart. Alderan: I can't remember perfectly and i'm to lazy to go look though his filter. But there were scummy stuff in there, got a bunch of (-) from when I looked over it yesterday so it's there. Also, alot of flipped townies showed suspicion against him and what dead townies think counts alot. I think these two have the highest percentage to flip red. People I want to lynch. Chaoser: This guy isn't this bad. So either he's scum or he gives 0 shit about the game. And last time he did this he was scum. (Hammer mafia if you want to check) gumshoe: This guy is not forgotten. People I want to lynch less. Lyter Xatalos sinensis evantrees You might be wondering why I have labeled you as People I want to lynch "less". I'll tell you why. It's because you don't post. You have posted scummy things, or you've been unlucky and been on the wrong side with your opinions. It's all lead you to the same place. The place where you're suspicious. In a normal game when a person gets under suspicion they have to post to try and clear themselves. It is the pro-town way if you're a townie under suspicion. But it's also to be understood that in most mafia games everyone look town, so there isn't more then one or two people at a time. The threat of they beeing lynched is very real. This is the first game I play where instead of primarily trying to find the scum I'm trying to determine who's the safest bet for scum because logicly you can't all be scum. A problem for me here is none of you feel the threat or pressure of beeing lynched so you don't give a shit about trying to clear yourselves. If you don't say anything and if you don't have any opinions you push for I can't read you. In any other game you would had been dead by now. Any other game Day 4 and you looked like you do here you would be regarded as confirmed-scum. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On April 01 2012 03:06 GreYMisT wrote: You haven't made a real case against me, that's why you become scum Hey GreyMisT, I didn't know you were here lurking, lol jk. I know you're here lurking. I also know you're mafia because this is an important day to lynch scum but you don't do anything or push anything. Because you're scum and already under alot of heat. So pushing hard for another townie lynch would spell the end for you. Which you probably realised which is why you aren't pushing very hard for my death. At the same time you don't want to bus. So you lurk and do nothing. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Seeing greymist die is all the reward you really want! | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
![]() ![]() kill greymist! | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
I'm breaking of and forming a new one-man coalition. My capital is The Tower of Joy. Don't come here or I'll throw shoes at you. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Also thats not what makes me not scum. Beeing me makes me not scum. Always townie, never not townie! 10 games and counting! | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
End Game ![]() risk.nuke was sitting in his tower cursing everyone else. Suddenly Xatalos snuck up on him. risk.nuke cleverly threw a shoe in his face. Insane as he had become he though that would stop him. Xatalos proceeded to push risk.nuke out of the tower. risk.nuke the stark bannerman fell to his death The Mafia Wins Acrofales the queen achieved victory Xatalos the kingslayerhave achieved victory Chaoser the princehave achieved victory Lyter the imp have achieved victory everyone else was also scum. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
gg scumteam. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On April 06 2012 03:03 Alderan wrote: I played the worst I possibly could have. I'll blame it on not being able to put a lot of time into it. Going to do a better job at selecting games that fit into a couple week time window that I have free. My apologies to the town. It got bad because everyone was posting little, leading into everyone posting less because it's harder to motivate yourself to play. It's not really any one persons fault but all of towns combined. | ||
| ||