|
On February 28 2012 08:35 wherebugsgo wrote:Hey VE, according to your logic based on me talking to syllo, this post makes you scum: Show nested quote +On February 25 2012 10:58 VisceraEyes wrote:
BC - is this DocH's normal play? It looks to me like he's pouring on the "Hey guys, watch me pressure these noobs!" a little thick... asking BC for his reads subtly hinting Dr. H is scum. today, talks to Dr. H as if he's knowingly talking to a townie, trying to convince him I'm scum. sup scum logic
What I did: subtly poke an inactive-ish player (BloodyC0bbler) a specific question with clear motivation (is this scummy? are you going to contribute?) regarding a controversial player (DocH) who's absolutely NOT a lynch candidate.
What you did: ask an active player (syllogism) a vague question (what are your thoughts) with unclear motivations (you've already said redFF was bad, you hadn't noted any change of opinion as of this post) of a player who's given his opinion on the player you're asking about (RedFF) who was already a lynch candidate.
They're not the same things. Try again scum.
|
On February 28 2012 08:47 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 08:43 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 28 2012 08:35 wherebugsgo wrote:Hey VE, according to your logic based on me talking to syllo, this post makes you scum: On February 25 2012 10:58 VisceraEyes wrote:
BC - is this DocH's normal play? It looks to me like he's pouring on the "Hey guys, watch me pressure these noobs!" a little thick... asking BC for his reads subtly hinting Dr. H is scum. today, talks to Dr. H as if he's knowingly talking to a townie, trying to convince him I'm scum. sup scum logic What I did: subtly poke an inactive-ish player (BloodyC0bbler) a specific question with clear motivation (is this scummy? are you going to contribute?) regarding a controversial player (DocH) who's absolutely NOT a lynch candidate. What you did: ask an active player (syllogism) a vague question (what are your thoughts) with unclear motivations (you've already said redFF was bad, you hadn't noted any change of opinion as of this post) of a player who's given his opinion on the player you're asking about (RedFF) who was already a lynch candidate. They're not the same things. Try again scum. trololol scum can't handle being owned on his own logic now you're just making up shit
Awwww, at least TRY and refute it scum - you don't have to go all redFF on us.
|
On February 28 2012 08:57 wherebugsgo wrote:alright, so here's my post, let's compare it to what VE has said: Show nested quote +On February 22 2012 06:37 wherebugsgo wrote:
syllo can you give me your opinion on redFF?
I think I was completely wrong about him.  Compare that to this shit: Show nested quote +On February 21 2012 11:59 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 21 2012 11:49 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On February 21 2012 11:42 Jackal58 wrote:
Dear redFF and WBG
You both suck.
Sincerely,
Jackal58 I endorse this statement fully and from the bottom of my heart I thank you for letting me know I am not insane. Why are we debating Policy lynches this early into the day? Seriously? This isn't a game with a player like 2010 bill murray who spams while being a dick, this isn't a game with a mod hating spammer named showtime. Instead we have for the most part a fairly solid crew devoid of spammy trolls. If you want to lynch someone for being bad, wait till they start being bad / scumlike, dont lynch them for shits and giggles. Policy lynching people on retarded reasoning is worse than RNG votes for early discussion. Cut the nonsense out. Anyone who keeps talking about it from this post on be warned. as a side note, VE since you are making moderate sense for the first time ever I have to give you props for impressing me two games in a row. /salute What are your thoughts on redFF BC? I'm almost convinced that he's just bad and not scum, but I'd like your thoughts before I act on it. Show nested quote +On February 21 2012 12:20 VisceraEyes wrote:
Re: Jackal
DAAAAYYYUUUUMMMM....
Nosrslytho, who's scum guy? I want drunk Jackal's opinion to compare it with sober Jackal's opinion later XD Show nested quote +On February 21 2012 17:15 VisceraEyes wrote:Syllo what do you think about the back and forth between chaoser and WBG? It seems genuine, so I doubt it's scum v scum - I can't decide if I think one of them is scum or if they're both town  Show nested quote +On February 22 2012 04:09 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 22 2012 04:04 redFF wrote:
I don't really care about chaoser at this stage, haven't paid much attention to him tbh.
Layabout is bad because he berated dirkzor for not finding 3+scum and hasn't stated a read all game. The fact that you haven't paid much attention to chaoser is....interesting. Wouldn't you say that's interesting syllo? lastly, something slightly different but it gives you an idea of the angle VE is coming from: Show nested quote +On February 23 2012 10:11 VisceraEyes wrote:
I'm not sheeping you Doc or I would've voted redFF. I trusted you to do the right thing. This comes from the person who voted redFF 3 different times on day 1. This comes from the person who is claiming I am following town sentiment when he called at least (by my count) 8 people scum on day 1, trying to find what would stick. This comes from the person who is trying to lynch me based on being manipulative yet is, without a doubt, trying to manipulate the lynch right now. Proof is above.
Look! I found a bunch of posts where VE asks people specific questions with context surrounding them, and think I can compare them with a vague buddying attempt I made late D1! What fun - and in this way, I don't have to answer for any of the points raised against me! Callooh Callay!! - WBG's Inner-Voice
|
On February 28 2012 09:06 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 09:02 prplhz wrote:
Can you quickly reiterate your problems with VisceraEyes? 1-contradicted himself on logic; calls me scum for one thing when he's done it himself at least 6 times 2-pushes responsibility for day 2 lynch onto me despite supposedly agreeing with the sentiment 3-2 day hole in activity from yesterday, says he'll post before lynch but doesn't 4-makes shit case on me based on my first post and the fact that I can be manipulative as scum 5th and most importantly: talks to people as if he already knows their alignment
1) I've already explained why the first instance of this you brought up is a completely different thing, which you've not only failed to comment on or refute, but have maliciously tried to discredit simply by saying "he's making shit up"
2) I didn't push responsibility on you for shit - you pushed for Blazinghand, and I said I was with you - this in NO way indicates that I thought you were leading the lynch, only that you pushed it yourself and that at the time I agreed with you. You're scummily trying to twist my words into something you can call scummy, and it's not going to work.
3) Not indicative of alignment. You know this shit bro.
4) My case was good, the whole thing was NOT based on your first post. It's was based on your manipulative behavior as a whole on D1. I could make a similar case for D2 and D3, but I feel like this is enough to get you lynched.
5) I'm not speaking to anyone as if I know their alignment. Do you know something about DocH that I don't? I'm talking to him assuming he's town because regardless of his alignment, that's the alignment he'd have me believe he is. I'm talking to you like scum because I have a case on you and you're ignoring it - but I similarly don't know your alignment.
|
On February 28 2012 08:43 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 08:35 wherebugsgo wrote:Hey VE, according to your logic based on me talking to syllo, this post makes you scum: On February 25 2012 10:58 VisceraEyes wrote:
BC - is this DocH's normal play? It looks to me like he's pouring on the "Hey guys, watch me pressure these noobs!" a little thick... asking BC for his reads subtly hinting Dr. H is scum. today, talks to Dr. H as if he's knowingly talking to a townie, trying to convince him I'm scum. sup scum logic What I did: subtly poke an inactive-ish player (BloodyC0bbler) a specific question with clear motivation (is this scummy? are you going to contribute?) regarding a controversial player (DocH) who's absolutely NOT a lynch candidate. What you did: ask an active player (syllogism) a vague question (what are your thoughts) with unclear motivations (you've already said redFF was bad, you hadn't noted any change of opinion as of this post) of a player who's given his opinion on the player you're asking about (RedFF) who was already a lynch candidate. They're not the same things. Try again scum.
THEY ARE NOT THE SAME THINGS! REFUTE THIS OR SHUT THE HELL UP WBG!
|
On February 28 2012 09:26 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 09:23 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 09:17 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 09:13 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 28 2012 09:07 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 09:00 wherebugsgo wrote:
I can't justify leaving my vote on Toad when prplhz and VE essentially just outted themselves.
##unvote Toadesstern
##vote Visceraeyes why not prplhz instead? Why not RoL instead? We basicly tried to lynch RoL from d2 (or even d1?), he said nothing, basicly claimed mafia recently and we're still not able to lynch him. why not prpl-I only have one vote why not RoL-I only have one vote, and VE is more likely to be scum because the case extends beyond simple meta. In fact as of now we may actually be wrong about RoL and he might just be bored inactive town. Why kill someone who's done almost nothing alignment indicative as opposed to someone who is contradicting himself in logic and flailing around in thread? If VE flips scum we should certainly look at both prpl and RoL. If I'm wrong about you (which certainly seems possible now that prpl's shown his ugly face) then there's also some 4th scum out there. I've been asking myself, why did risk.nuke get replaced, in a game with no replacements? We haven't been able to lynch him either, and that's made me wonder for a while. How does prpl showing up have anything to do with my alignment? uhuh, wait don't answer that one! I found the answer myself: On February 28 2012 07:33 kitaman27 wrote:Here are my scum power rankings!(anything past 5 may be completely arbitrary) + Show Spoiler [unimportant right now] +1.) prplhz:On February 23 2012 03:38 prplhz wrote:
What the fuck are you talking about. I complained about the redFF lynch and pushed the BloodyC0bbler lynch. On February 24 2012 13:02 prplhz wrote:
I pushed BloodyC0bbler around the time I said that so it's not true when you say that I didn't provide an alternative. On day one, prpl hard defends redff from the lynch, without providing an alternate candidate. He claims to have pushed the BC lynch. Lets take a closer look: On February 23 2012 03:17 prplhz wrote:
I think BloodyC0bbler is more scummy, but I think there might be better targets today that I'm more comfortable with. This is like Responsibility Mafia! where BloodyC0bbler was just gone, but he has been scummy so far. On February 23 2012 03:49 prplhz wrote:
Since we have dropped the BloodyC0bbler lynch I think that Blazinghand is a good lynch for town, especially if I'm the alternative. On February 23 2012 03:54 prplhz wrote:
If BloodyC0bbler is a possiblity then I'm more up for that than anything else. I'm a little unsure of him but he's a ton better than lynching me. On February 23 2012 03:56 prplhz wrote:
Like, I think BloodyC0bbler is scummy but I'm always kinda unsure about my reads (because, allegedly, I'm bad). On February 23 2012 05:24 prplhz wrote:
I really doubt that BloodyC0bbler is going to attract enough votes don't you think there are other alternatives that are more likely to flip scum than redFF and more likely to pick up enough votes than BloodyC0bbler? Is this honestly what prpl considers pushing? A bunch of wishy-washy statements without providing any actual reasoning? He constantly brings up how bad he is as if he is trying to downplay his abilities. Now lets move on to day two: He starts off by voting RoL. Towards the end of the day he changes to blazing. His reasoning: On February 25 2012 18:20 prplhz wrote:
Going to vote Blazinghand. I don't see any reason to believe his claim.
##Vote: Blazinghand The entire game, the strongest reason prpl has believed someone to be scum is because of a Floridian claim. Not once does he even reference his actual posts or behavior. Looking back to day one, prpl was willing to defend red because the claim made sense to him. The next day, a similar claim is provided and he has no reason to believe it. The entire game prpl has responded poorly to pressure and would be a fine lynch candidate. 2.) RebirthOfLeGenD: You can't get frustrated at peoples concerns if they are legitimate points. You've spent more time defending yourself than contributing. You say you're busy. I can understand that, but the game started a week ago and we're still waiting. The only legitimate case you've given us was on DrH. Is there a reason you chose to ignore my concerns with the case? 3.) chaoser: Tough to make a case on someone who hasn't posted since part way through day one. 4.) BloodyC0bbler: As far as I can tell, the only reason people think you are town is because the day one lynch was close. Is this the same day one lynch whose results were covered? Your voting patterns so far have been extremely opportunistic. Rather than commit to a certain scum suspect, you've waited for the bandwagon to become strong and then jump on quoting a random post that suddenly changes your mind. Maybe you could point me towards what makes you town? 5.) wherebugsgo: lol you seriously didn't roll mafia yet again did you? First BH claims scum and now this? On February 28 2012 04:41 wherebugsgo wrote:
@RoL: you're fucking lucky Toad scumslipped so hard, or I'd be pushing you like there's no tomorrow. All you do is lurk lurk lurk and then make excuses for your inactivity. That's exactly what you did when we were teammates in Couples Therapy and it's what you did (IIRC) in Purgatory as well. "gosh darnnit, I'd really love to vote for you RoL, but all these townies are just so easy to push"+ Show Spoiler [unimportant right now] +6.) risk.nuke: Moderately less scummy because his name isn't chaoser. His replacement has a lot of work to do to salvage the game. 7.) dirkzor: On February 23 2012 07:05 Dirkzor wrote:
Hahahahahahahhahahaha... Fuck that was a hilarious "flip" :D Haha: "lol that's annoying" Hahaha: "lol that's really annoying" Hahahahahahahhahahaha: "I didn't have anything to do with that. I swear." 8.) DrH: He has been reasonable in the main thread and questionable in the voting thread. I was really surprised to read that he actually voted for Blazinghand. Looking through his filter, I'm really having trouble find the reasoning for his switch. Could you please point me in the direction? What happened to RoL? You're dropping him for today as well? Why are you ignoring your reads and pushing whoever happens to be the flavor of the day? I'd put you higher if the slots weren't already taken. 9.) VisceraEyes: I'm not reading through his filter. You can't make me. Lets go with 9th. 10.) Toadesstern: Appears to be putting more effort in than any other player. I'll take him to lylo any day. 11.) Tyrran: I'm having trouble finding a scum player out of the newer players. I liked how his opinion on blazing changed from day one to day two. Needs to be more helpful if we wants town to win however. 12.) layabout: I read through his filter last and 12 was the only spot remaining. Congrats. 13.) Jitsu: Seems to be looking for things with a town mindframe. Not really pushing his reads very hard though. 14.) kitaman27: lol the scum team isn't even bothering to try to make this guy look bad. Did they fail a hit on him or something? nope kita's just wrong. anyway I'm not going to get lynched today, and if scum tries it's going to be hilarious. I have secrets  so go ahead VE, try to lynch me. Really, I feel sorry for you since you have 0 idea what's coming.
Come on WBG - COME ON. You really think I have ZERO idea what's coming? You're ass is going to fake-claim something retarded, claiming scum in the process and you're going to get lynched.
Give me a hard one.
|
On February 28 2012 09:28 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 09:26 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 28 2012 09:23 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 09:17 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 09:13 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 28 2012 09:07 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 09:00 wherebugsgo wrote:
I can't justify leaving my vote on Toad when prplhz and VE essentially just outted themselves.
##unvote Toadesstern
##vote Visceraeyes why not prplhz instead? Why not RoL instead? We basicly tried to lynch RoL from d2 (or even d1?), he said nothing, basicly claimed mafia recently and we're still not able to lynch him. why not prpl-I only have one vote why not RoL-I only have one vote, and VE is more likely to be scum because the case extends beyond simple meta. In fact as of now we may actually be wrong about RoL and he might just be bored inactive town. Why kill someone who's done almost nothing alignment indicative as opposed to someone who is contradicting himself in logic and flailing around in thread? If VE flips scum we should certainly look at both prpl and RoL. If I'm wrong about you (which certainly seems possible now that prpl's shown his ugly face) then there's also some 4th scum out there. I've been asking myself, why did risk.nuke get replaced, in a game with no replacements? We haven't been able to lynch him either, and that's made me wonder for a while. How does prpl showing up have anything to do with my alignment? uhuh, wait don't answer that one! I found the answer myself: On February 28 2012 07:33 kitaman27 wrote:Here are my scum power rankings!(anything past 5 may be completely arbitrary) + Show Spoiler [unimportant right now] +1.) prplhz:On February 23 2012 03:38 prplhz wrote:
What the fuck are you talking about. I complained about the redFF lynch and pushed the BloodyC0bbler lynch. On February 24 2012 13:02 prplhz wrote:
I pushed BloodyC0bbler around the time I said that so it's not true when you say that I didn't provide an alternative. On day one, prpl hard defends redff from the lynch, without providing an alternate candidate. He claims to have pushed the BC lynch. Lets take a closer look: On February 23 2012 03:17 prplhz wrote:
I think BloodyC0bbler is more scummy, but I think there might be better targets today that I'm more comfortable with. This is like Responsibility Mafia! where BloodyC0bbler was just gone, but he has been scummy so far. On February 23 2012 03:49 prplhz wrote:
Since we have dropped the BloodyC0bbler lynch I think that Blazinghand is a good lynch for town, especially if I'm the alternative. On February 23 2012 03:54 prplhz wrote:
If BloodyC0bbler is a possiblity then I'm more up for that than anything else. I'm a little unsure of him but he's a ton better than lynching me. On February 23 2012 03:56 prplhz wrote:
Like, I think BloodyC0bbler is scummy but I'm always kinda unsure about my reads (because, allegedly, I'm bad). On February 23 2012 05:24 prplhz wrote:
I really doubt that BloodyC0bbler is going to attract enough votes don't you think there are other alternatives that are more likely to flip scum than redFF and more likely to pick up enough votes than BloodyC0bbler? Is this honestly what prpl considers pushing? A bunch of wishy-washy statements without providing any actual reasoning? He constantly brings up how bad he is as if he is trying to downplay his abilities. Now lets move on to day two: He starts off by voting RoL. Towards the end of the day he changes to blazing. His reasoning: On February 25 2012 18:20 prplhz wrote:
Going to vote Blazinghand. I don't see any reason to believe his claim.
##Vote: Blazinghand The entire game, the strongest reason prpl has believed someone to be scum is because of a Floridian claim. Not once does he even reference his actual posts or behavior. Looking back to day one, prpl was willing to defend red because the claim made sense to him. The next day, a similar claim is provided and he has no reason to believe it. The entire game prpl has responded poorly to pressure and would be a fine lynch candidate. 2.) RebirthOfLeGenD: You can't get frustrated at peoples concerns if they are legitimate points. You've spent more time defending yourself than contributing. You say you're busy. I can understand that, but the game started a week ago and we're still waiting. The only legitimate case you've given us was on DrH. Is there a reason you chose to ignore my concerns with the case? 3.) chaoser: Tough to make a case on someone who hasn't posted since part way through day one. 4.) BloodyC0bbler: As far as I can tell, the only reason people think you are town is because the day one lynch was close. Is this the same day one lynch whose results were covered? Your voting patterns so far have been extremely opportunistic. Rather than commit to a certain scum suspect, you've waited for the bandwagon to become strong and then jump on quoting a random post that suddenly changes your mind. Maybe you could point me towards what makes you town? 5.) wherebugsgo: lol you seriously didn't roll mafia yet again did you? First BH claims scum and now this? On February 28 2012 04:41 wherebugsgo wrote:
@RoL: you're fucking lucky Toad scumslipped so hard, or I'd be pushing you like there's no tomorrow. All you do is lurk lurk lurk and then make excuses for your inactivity. That's exactly what you did when we were teammates in Couples Therapy and it's what you did (IIRC) in Purgatory as well. "gosh darnnit, I'd really love to vote for you RoL, but all these townies are just so easy to push"+ Show Spoiler [unimportant right now] +6.) risk.nuke: Moderately less scummy because his name isn't chaoser. His replacement has a lot of work to do to salvage the game. 7.) dirkzor: On February 23 2012 07:05 Dirkzor wrote:
Hahahahahahahhahahaha... Fuck that was a hilarious "flip" :D Haha: "lol that's annoying" Hahaha: "lol that's really annoying" Hahahahahahahhahahaha: "I didn't have anything to do with that. I swear." 8.) DrH: He has been reasonable in the main thread and questionable in the voting thread. I was really surprised to read that he actually voted for Blazinghand. Looking through his filter, I'm really having trouble find the reasoning for his switch. Could you please point me in the direction? What happened to RoL? You're dropping him for today as well? Why are you ignoring your reads and pushing whoever happens to be the flavor of the day? I'd put you higher if the slots weren't already taken. 9.) VisceraEyes: I'm not reading through his filter. You can't make me. Lets go with 9th. 10.) Toadesstern: Appears to be putting more effort in than any other player. I'll take him to lylo any day. 11.) Tyrran: I'm having trouble finding a scum player out of the newer players. I liked how his opinion on blazing changed from day one to day two. Needs to be more helpful if we wants town to win however. 12.) layabout: I read through his filter last and 12 was the only spot remaining. Congrats. 13.) Jitsu: Seems to be looking for things with a town mindframe. Not really pushing his reads very hard though. 14.) kitaman27: lol the scum team isn't even bothering to try to make this guy look bad. Did they fail a hit on him or something? nope kita's just wrong. anyway I'm not going to get lynched today, and if scum tries it's going to be hilarious. I have secrets so go ahead VE, try to lynch me. Really, I feel sorry for you since you have 0 idea what's coming. Come on WBG - COME ON. You really think I have ZERO idea what's coming? You're ass is going to fake-claim something retarded, claiming scum in the process and you're going to get lynched. Give me a hard one.
The bolded sounds really bad. I'm aware.
|
Toades - I actually like a BC lynch more than a RoL lynch if we're talking about scummy lurkers. If we're talking about dangerous scum, my preference is a WBG lynch. BC will become dangerous when he starts "contributing" to town if he's scum - while he's lurking, I feel like WBG is doing far more harm to town.
|
On February 28 2012 09:45 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 09:44 VisceraEyes wrote:
Toades - I actually like a BC lynch more than a RoL lynch if we're talking about scummy lurkers. If we're talking about dangerous scum, my preference is a WBG lynch. BC will become dangerous when he starts "contributing" to town if he's scum - while he's lurking, I feel like WBG is doing far more harm to town. You're calling people scum based on how potentially dangerous they are if they were scum. This is fucking fearmongering and it isn't even scumhunting. It operates on the basis of the assumption that myself and BC are mafia. Basically you're saying "these two players are dangerous as scum, so that means they're scum" good fucking god
Nah, I have reasoning for thinking BC is scum. I'm just getting you lynched today.
One at a time bro.
|
On February 28 2012 09:47 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 09:46 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 28 2012 09:45 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 28 2012 09:44 VisceraEyes wrote:
Toades - I actually like a BC lynch more than a RoL lynch if we're talking about scummy lurkers. If we're talking about dangerous scum, my preference is a WBG lynch. BC will become dangerous when he starts "contributing" to town if he's scum - while he's lurking, I feel like WBG is doing far more harm to town. You're calling people scum based on how potentially dangerous they are if they were scum. This is fucking fearmongering and it isn't even scumhunting. It operates on the basis of the assumption that myself and BC are mafia. Basically you're saying "these two players are dangerous as scum, so that means they're scum" good fucking god Nah, I have reasoning for thinking BC is scum. I'm just getting you lynched today. One at a time bro. no you don't, you haven't had a proper reason for calling anyone scum all game.
No, YOU'RE black! - WBG the Pot, referring to VE the Kettle.
|
On February 28 2012 09:48 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 09:26 wherebugsgo wrote:I have secrets so go ahead VE, try to lynch me. Really, I feel sorry for you since you have 0 idea what's coming. I love surprises!
If you wanna coax a fake-claim outta this one you're gonna need to vote him Kita.
|
I didn't say I'd lynch you for claiming - I'll lynch you regardless. I said TOWN would lynch you for claiming - which as you've pointed out, has a pretty decent track-record.
|
On February 28 2012 10:14 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 10:10 VisceraEyes wrote:
I didn't say I'd lynch you for claiming - I'll lynch you regardless. I said TOWN would lynch you for claiming - which as you've pointed out, has a pretty decent track-record. you need more than one scumbuddy to lynch me.
Don't got none. *shrug*
|
Easier conclusion to swallow: VE is town.
Your mileage may vary.
|
On February 28 2012 10:22 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 10:20 VisceraEyes wrote:
Easier conclusion to swallow: VE is town.
Your mileage may vary. so town VE goes and disappears for 2 days? What happened to the town VE from Responsibility that spammed while no one was talking to get the thread active, and complained that he was the only one talking? Why would town VE sit around and let the thread die? I'll tell you the answer: town VE wouldn't do those things. So, you're not town VE! Woot Occam's Razor.
Oh man, look at how amazingly large my filter is! It's because I've been doing that self-same thing ALL GAME THIS GAME!
Except, aw shucks - for the first time in like 5 years I actually decided to get schwasted for a whole weekend this weekend. Guess that means I'm scum right? Right Bugs? RIGHT?!
|
On February 28 2012 10:25 Toadesstern wrote:
he's got more pages in his filter than I have in mine. I'd consider that spamming.
No, I'm personally responsible for the thread dying Toad - not spamming. Get it right.
|
On February 28 2012 10:28 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 10:05 kitaman27 wrote:On February 28 2012 10:03 prplhz wrote:
I'm not really worried about how you're claiming alchemist, probably just means that BloodyC0bbler is going to vote you. haha best prpl post of the game Is that good or bad? Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 10:06 wherebugsgo wrote:[...] On February 28 2012 10:03 prplhz wrote:
@wherebugsgo
I'm not really sheeping. This thread is in a bad state and I'm blaming you. You're pushing left and right for bad reasons and your contributions all seem to be pretty irrelevant. I think there's something off about your behavior.
I'm not really worried about how you're claiming alchemist, probably just means that BloodyC0bbler is going to vote you. Why did you send a potion to kitaman27? I doubt he drank any unless he's your scum buddy. You're blaming me for no one posting? Good one. It's totally my fault that you've done jack shit all game. It's totally my fault that VE disappeared for two days and then decided to shit up the thread by forging a case on me. Yeah, totally my fault. I'm not claiming alchemist you moron. Partially, you're responsible for the inactivity because people post less when there's an asshole around. The bad state I was talking about was how there is virtually no scum hunting going on and none of your activity seems to be focusing on this. You have pushed left and right but never used it for anything, now you want to lynch VisceraEyes on a bad case. You're usually unflappable but this seems kind of like an OMGUS on a player I don't think looks scum at all. I think all of those problems you have with VisceraEyes are off. Do you actually think he's scum?
What struck me as off about the reasons he gave were that they were all only really pertinent to today - no mention of scummy behavior before today except for his whole "u were gone 2 days lolol"
I mean, I expect him to go build a whole OMGUS case on me eventually to try and dodge the lynch, but his reasoning provided so far has been weak as fuck.
prplhz, where HAVE you been?
|
On February 28 2012 10:37 prplhz wrote:
I've been busy and that's going to be my answer regardless of alignment and regardless of whether a meteor struck my apartment or I'd been golfing with Barack Obama.
I just didn't know if you were going to actually try and excuse your absence like I did. *shrug*
What do you think of the BC/RoL Inactive-Vet-A-Thon? The fact that they're both alive is troubling to me - I think BC is the better chance for hitting scum between the two. What do you think?
|
On February 28 2012 10:39 DoctorHelvetica wrote:VisceraEyes has looked scummy for a long time. His case on WBG is grasping at straws, especially the fact that you're pushing a player Day 3 based on loud posts Day 1? You didn't catch onto his question to syllo then? Here's how scum play often works: Scum 1: I need to push a bandwagon today so X doesn't get lynched Scum 2: WBG has been pretty spammy, changed his mind a lot, etc. he might be an easy candidate Scum 1: Hm, ok I'll make a post about it I'm still reading all the posts here but it seems like VE is criticizing WBG for buddying? Show nested quote +On February 22 2012 14:56 VisceraEyes wrote:
DocH I'm intrigued by your ideas and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter. Also this: Show nested quote +On February 22 2012 16:42 VisceraEyes wrote:
That was dangerously close to role-fishing syllo - the existance of one town-tracker doesn't preclude a second town-tracker. Am I missing something? "Role fishing" imo is one of those things that scum accuses other townies of doing it's supposed to be "Scummy" but in 5 or 6 games as scum I have never really done it or known any teammates to do it either, except in PM games where it's pretty easy and often town roles have a lot of incentive to rolefish Show nested quote +On February 22 2012 15:55 VisceraEyes wrote:
And BC is your strongest read right now Syllo? Like, without question?
Did you ever get around to looking at the whole WBG/chaoser thing sir? I feel like that exchange means something. chaoser's defense was solid, but I didn't mind WBG's attack either.
However, chaoser still seems to be interested in finding scum, while WBG has only recently been calling red scum...he's been tunneled in on chaoser ever since that argument.
I'm starting to get a red read on WBG. Is this really that different than what WBG did?
It's cool Doc - join the VE wagon of failure then. If you can't see a marked difference in the vaguery that WBG asked Syllo and my questions to others in the game then I can't help you. He's scummily trying to skate by doing jack shit, and he deserves the rope today. If you think I fit that bill better, then you should vote for me.
In fact, fuck it. Everyone should just vote for me and get it over with. I'm willing to admit that I could be wrong about WBG, but I'm certainly not wrong about myself - I'm town. If me dying clears up any confusion regarding WBG, then lynch the fuck out of me and then lynch the fuck out of WBG. I'm not defending myself when I'm doing everything I can to get scum lynched right now. No time.
|
On February 28 2012 10:47 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
I'm not voting for you VE, I just said that. I just want you to respond to my post and if you are being reasonable about it I should see that. You don't need to get emotional about this.
I'm working on it - sorry, WBG comes on strong and you've been pushy this game. Give me a minute.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
