|
On February 21 2012 11:22 VisceraEyes wrote:
Red, you misrepped me when you said I was voting you "for pushing a Policy Lynch" when that's not the reason I was voting you at all. Forget about that?
You are voting me for "using the pushing of a policy lynch as a way of Hollowly Contributing to Thread Attempting to Appear Pro-Town"
Since the whole "Hollowly Contributing to Thread Attempting to Appear Pro-Town" is just your interpretation of me pushing a policy lynch, I'm fairly sure that me saying you are voting me for pushing a policy lynch is accurate.
|
On February 21 2012 11:21 DoctorHelvetica wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2012 11:17 redFF wrote:On February 21 2012 11:05 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 21 2012 08:49 redFF wrote:On February 21 2012 08:46 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 21 2012 08:40 redFF wrote:
Nothing I've done is scummy and this is not going to get off the ground so enjoy your lonely wagon ve and drh. Defensively misrepresenting other players arguments seems scummy to me. You're just contributing another negative oneliner devoid of content. If you're not scum, you're really careless. I'm fairly sure carelessness is a towntell if anything, so thanks for saying im acting like town? Yeah that's why I said if you're not scum you're acting really careless. Regardless making terrible arguments, explain how any arguments i've made have been terrible. You can't just say this without any backing up. misrepresenting other players, you said i was misrepping and i explained how i wasn't and you didnt respond. and being antagonistic as a defensive action are not helping you here. is being antagonistic a scumtell? If so then wbg is scum every game! One good example of misrepresenting is by insinuating I'm calling you town/contradicting myself based on something I didn't say at all.
surely if i'm caught scum and its only a few hours into day 1 i'm still pretty careless?
|
Same thing happened in resurrection : two townies got lynched because they were unable to defend themselves from the town derpwagon spearheaded by redFF, who at the time 100% believed they were scum. bolded why it was their fault
he views himself so highly hilarious coming from you, not that I disagree.
I don't know what those last quotes have to do with mafia other than calling me a hypocritical asshole, which is probably true.
|
Show nested quote +On February 21 2012 11:01 redFF wrote:
ITT: wbg is still butthurt over couples
I'm so tempted to make a quote montage from that game. I remember reading your filter on day 3 and seeing that you had, at one point or another, called literally every other team in the game scum.
I don't see how that matters. Pressuring people and gauging reactions is a fun part of mafia!
Just because people don't play however you view the correct way to play is doesn't make them wrong.
You also haven't played mafia very long, and only here afaik, so probably haven't seen the extent of terribleness that exists in the mafia playing world.
|
On February 21 2012 11:42 Jackal58 wrote:
Dear redFF and WBG
You both suck.
Sincerely,
Jackal58
PUT HIM IN A HOME ALREADY COAG
|
On February 21 2012 11:45 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2012 11:27 redFF wrote:On February 21 2012 11:22 VisceraEyes wrote:
Red, you misrepped me when you said I was voting you "for pushing a Policy Lynch" when that's not the reason I was voting you at all. Forget about that? You are voting me for "using the pushing of a policy lynch as a way of Hollowly Contributing to Thread Attempting to Appear Pro-Town" Since the whole "Hollowly Contributing to Thread Attempting to Appear Pro-Town" is just your interpretation of me pushing a policy lynch, I'm fairly sure that me saying you are voting me for pushing a policy lynch is accurate. No, your contributions have been hollow and useless. Your only actual "attempt" to scumhunt was casting doubt on me for "being a hypocrite". Only the "attempting to appear pro-town" part is interpretation. The "hollowly contributing" part is accurate. So no, you saying that I'm voting you "for pushing a policy lynch" absolutely is NOT accurate. Nice try though.
again, all your opinion.
So yes its still accurate.
|
Ace is a cunt and not in this game, stop riding his dick and play.
User was temp banned for this post.
|
IF I WAS ILLITERATE HOW COULD I BE WRITING THIS POST.
HAH GOT YOU THERE HAVEN'T I.
|
On February 21 2012 11:53 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2012 11:50 redFF wrote:
Ace is a cunt and not in this game, stop riding his dick and play. and yet hes better than you in near every way. What does that say about you?
him being a cunt has nothing to do with his skill at mafia.
|
heh, I like being called a douche canoe, read my filter and tell me where i stopped being civil, i'm fairly sure its just after wbg came in and called me bad and stupid, in fact I think that's when the whole thread turned to shit!
What a coincidence.
Back to scumhunting, what do people think of my thoughts on kita, or are we all ignoring it because I'm bad.
Ve is probable town, the people that hopped on my wagon after him and drh likely have at least 1 scum in there, so chaoser/kita/bh.
|
Actually bc I'm kind of pissed you're calling me the troll when any personal flaming/animosity started with wbg's first posts of the game, everything I've said has been a response to that. Before that I was being perfectly civil, maybe bad and stupid, but not a dick.
|
If i made you think i was town doesn't that make me good town?
/food for thought
2 players have been on the 2 major wagons of early day 1, chaoser and kita. Betting there's one scum in there.
|
|
|
On February 21 2012 12:14 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2012 12:12 redFF wrote:
If i made you think i was town doesn't that make me good town?
/food for thought
2 players have been on the 2 major wagons of early day 1, chaoser and kita. Betting there's one scum in there. Are you talking to me? Bad news for you: Nothing you've done has made me think you're town. Good news for you; Nothing you've done has made me think you're scum. Bad news for you: Everything you've done so far has made me think you're bad.
♫ You're so vain, I bet you think this post is about you ♫
|
On February 21 2012 12:19 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2012 12:18 redFF wrote:On February 21 2012 12:14 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 21 2012 12:12 redFF wrote:
If i made you think i was town doesn't that make me good town?
/food for thought
2 players have been on the 2 major wagons of early day 1, chaoser and kita. Betting there's one scum in there. Are you talking to me? Bad news for you: Nothing you've done has made me think you're town. Good news for you; Nothing you've done has made me think you're scum. Bad news for you: Everything you've done so far has made me think you're bad. ♫ You're so vain, I bet you think this post is about you ♫ maybe I should post that nice collection of couples therapy quotes it'd probably give the thread a laugh. Whatcha think?
If it has anything to do with the game at all, then do it. If not, make a new thread for everyone to laugh at me in!
|
After reading toad's filter I am inclined to agree with jackal and wouldn't mind a dead amphibian at the end of the day.
|
put down a vote if hes scum don
|
Syllo the reason for the policy lynch being on Tyyran was because of your comment pregame yeah. I haven't even read arkham city so I have no idea what happened beyond what you said at the beginning of the game.
Tyrran's post suggested he would be active and playing, hence the unvote.
|
verbosity, managing to write two long posts without any scumhunting.
Now since then he's got worse, one thing he said especially leaps out at me
Oh and btw I agree with wbg on the matter that I can't read redFF properly. There's also a bunch of other players I don't think I'm capable to read that good. I read this as "here's my excuse for why I won't be giving many reads this game"
It's one of the scummies things said so far and something I'm fine with wagoning.
|
On February 22 2012 00:25 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2012 11:14 redFF wrote:
kita:
votes tyrran in his first post of the game.
Attacks me for pushing a policy lynch(which he is on) when i called them bad 4 months ago.
thinks he's caught me in a mafia meta contradiction when really my policy regarding policy lynches has just changed.
He was also grilling me for a few posts before stopping and going back to pointless fluff, while placing a vote on me without announcing it in thread.
so erm ##vote kita Without announcing it in the thread? lol you act as if I'm voting you without ever mentioning you. Who cares if I post it in the thread. For transparency's sake, please do so in the future.
Yes, I voted tyrran in the first post of the game. I do that in most games. Do you believe that's scummy? No, I never said it did.
Yes, I attacked you for your discrepancy in opinion, does that make me scummy? It would be a discrepancy in opinion If I had said it 2 days ago, but I said it 4 months ago, it's a misrep. WHAT CHANGED IN 4 MONTHS? A lot, actually...
Have any of the reasons in your omgus vote pointed to me being scummy? Calling it an omgus is purposely framing it in a scummy light to make me look bad, noted.
You pushed a policy lynch and immediately backed off an hour into the game after getting in trouble. You didn't even mention that you still wanted to lynch tyrran. my vote was still on him. Instead it took my questioning for you to even bring it up. My vote was still on him. If tyrran was your preferred lynch, why did you switch to me hours later? You said you dropped tyrran because you didn't think you could get him lynched. Just answered your own question, also his post gave me hope that he would be active. Does that mean you're more confident that you can push my lynch? Or is it that you are simply attacking your attacker? Lol if I was going to attack my attacker wouldn't I have voted VE or drh? Not some "me too!" shitty wagoner.
You discredited the ability to scum hunt on day one, I didn't discredit it its the truth, day 1 is the hardest day to get a scum lynch.push a policy lynch because of a mafia epiphany, drop the policy lynch because you were simply generating discussion, go back to supporting the policy lynch after being questioned, false, my vote didn't leave until after your questioning of me. and then swap to the guy who is questioning the policy lynch. Is this you framing yourself as the great attacker of the policy lynch? No that would be VE and drh, you just tagged along.
Nap time. As much as I enjoy talking about red, I'll try to look at everyone else when I wake up.
ENJOY
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
