BC's Arkham City - Page 25
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Palmar
Iceland22632 Posts
| ||
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
On February 07 2012 22:41 Toadesstern wrote: yeah but I'd much rather not lynch Radfield d1. And no if I apply the same logic to other people and barly come to the same conclusion. I'm not done reading everyone's filter so I can't say that for people after #17 inr our list because I haven't reread their filters yet and everything I got on them is a gut feeling. Why not? If they're scum hang them, I don't care who it is. I just don't understand why you're tunneling layabout when you refused to even explain your suspicions earlier. Do you want to make a case or not? You're not committing to anything. | ||
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
Unless you're committed to never explaining anything. Have to wait for your scumbuddies to tell you what to say or do you just not like playing this game at all? | ||
Radfield
![]()
Canada2720 Posts
Palmar you're reading the thread! That must mean your town ![]() I'm down with a Sheth lynch. He's putting in effort, but it's a similar kind of effort as Election Mafia(when he was scum). All his topics are peripheral, he's making long rhetorical posts, and spending too much time talking about irrelevant stuff than he should. That being said, he doesn't feel terrible, but it's that same niggle I got in Election mafia. Sheth, can you point me to a game where you were town? I'm also up for lynching CC. He's been pushing scum agenda this game, which is very much what he has done in the past. In LOTR he pushed scum agenda fearlessly the entire game, and he's doing the same thing here. Joker claiming ASAP is extremely sub-optimal, and does nothing but give mafia something to talk about. You've spent 15 posts talking about 3rd party issues and 2-3 talking about lynching or scummy players. And those have all been about Schworz, who is an easy candidate. Please step it up. | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
| ||
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
On February 07 2012 22:56 Toadesstern wrote: Well here we go. I take everything back I said about radfield. Pretty much the same as Palmar for me now :p take back everything? such bold statements as: "i'd rather not lynch radfield d1" and "I'm so much more foresighted than radfield." - pre-game Now you're backpedaling on statements you never made that's a first for me | ||
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
you also mentioned you didn't like his picks on his list but never actually called him out beyond that. still, it's nothing. | ||
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On February 07 2012 22:41 Toadesstern wrote: yeah but I'd much rather not lynch Radfield d1. And no if I apply the same logic to other people and barly come to the same conclusion. I'm not done reading everyone's filter so I can't say that for people after #17 inr our list because I haven't reread their filters yet and everything I got on them is a gut feeling. Why not? If you feel Radfield is scummy why wouldn't you want to lynch him? I see this sentiment posted in almost every game on here now. I don't want to lynch player X on day one. Fair amount of the time that sentiment has been put forth by people that flipped scum. If somebody looks scummy I'm going to push for their lynch. I don't care who it is. Remember No guts. No gory. | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On February 07 2012 22:59 DoctorHelvetica wrote: take back everything? such bold statements as: "i'd rather not lynch radfield d1" and "I'm so much more foresighted than radfield." - pre-game Now you're backpedaling on statements you never made that's a first for me keep cool man. Just lynch me if I end up lynching wrong people and I'm fine with that. Or read my last game and you might understand why I don't really feal like explaining a lot right now unless someone really wants to talk with me and discuss my own and his reads. The pregame thing you quoted got a trollface underneath and it's pregame. It's common knwoledge that 99% of everything said pregame is trolling isn't it? But I'm getting the same feeling I got from p4n last game about you this game. So that's a good thing I guess. | ||
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
Also, because it's still Day 1 I want to bring up two things: Roles can have variations (something like paranoid doc or cop, etc) and we have traitors here On January 24 2012 14:08 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Insane inmates You are a insane beyond belief. As such you killed a tyger security guard and decided to wear his clothes. Basically, any Detective checks on you will mark you as a Tyger Security Guard . As you are now donned in the security guards uniform, you subject other inmates to the same punishments the guards gave to you. You win with the inmates even though you hate them. You also don't realize just how insane you are and as such think you are a regular inmate. Note: Some names appear under 2 categories. These players will have to decide to be one or the other for their role. They are not both. Some roles might also have slight alterations to the "standard" although nothing game breaking. Not all names listed are guarenteed to be in this game, however only names listed will be in this game. Each role, much like Asylum, will have unique flavour text to make the gf style roles have more fun with the game. See Arkham Asylum for flavour text examples that I used for when you submit your role choice. So during free time when You feel like actively lurking at least search for breadcrumbs from Traitors, if they exist. As role variations I guess sanity cops, suiciding vigs and maybe paranoid docs (protect+rb) Okay, enough of my setup rabble. I thought it's relevant to bring that to people so we know where are we standing. Yes, I know that discussing setup is the thing I've done the most. Oh well. I think Palmar is getting less bored and more productive.. at least hope he does. Also, HUGE FoS on WBG on getting the Schworz case back (First Toad then quick switch to him). This lynch is going to reach the level of absurd amazingxckd lynch got in one of the games I played. He claimed DT and was against guy who wrote nothing to defend himself and got lynched. At least gtrsrs got iGrok hung. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=305850¤tpage=22#432 The biggest part is pushing arguement saying "Claiming day 1 is ok and it's by no means anti-town" Also: Two shady people support wbg: BillMurray (although: he voted for Kenpachi first, no reaction till now) DoctorHelvetica Look: There's NO POINT in defending Kenpachi Everyone who defends him tries to prove that claiming day 1, be it false or not is not bad and does not give any info about his alignment THIS IS FALSE. This is also trying to drive attention off Kenpachi. Schworz looks like new, irratiated town to me. Why? Because I was IN THE SAME FUCKING SPOT. Also, his actions make sense. Schworz is Town. People I think are mafia: Cyber_Cheese DoctorHelvetica -_-Qualis wherebugsgo Kenpachi Probably Mafia: Layabout I haven't looked into Sheth case. Give me some time. | ||
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On February 07 2012 14:56 ~OpZ~ wrote: I think RTG is town....only because I liked his first few posts this game even though a few people jumped on him. Just sayin. I was mafia last game with him. But I really need to catch up. That fuckin bastard penguin blew the bridge and left me over here with these ass hole joker inmates....I'ma fucking kill that fat fuck when I get back to the museum. You're bloody traitor. | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On February 07 2012 23:01 DoctorHelvetica wrote: Missed one because I CTRL+F 'radfield" and not 'rad' you also mentioned you didn't like his picks on his list but never actually called him out beyond that. still, it's nothing. that's because I'm not sure if he did that on purpose and I do not know what to make of it. He might be pulling a wbg on me and everyone else. On February 07 2012 23:02 Jackal58 wrote: Why not? If you feel Radfield is scummy why wouldn't you want to lynch him? I see this sentiment posted in almost every game on here now. I don't want to lynch player X on day one. Fair amount of the time that sentiment has been put forth by people that flipped scum. If somebody looks scummy I'm going to push for their lynch. I don't care who it is. Remember No guts. No gory. I don't like lynching vets d1. Said the same in L. Remember I was the guy telling everyone to not lynch Palmar? I ended up being a townie (a vet) as well. So it really is my opionion. And with rads most recent post I'd even say he's leaning town for me right now. He just posted so little that it's hard to judge. | ||
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
Furthermore BC's disclaimer was not talking about traitors it was talking about characters who have more than one category as in Harley Quinn falling under both Medic and Vigilante if I'm not mistaken | ||
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
On February 07 2012 23:07 Toadesstern wrote: that's because I'm not sure if he did that on purpose and I do not know what to make of it. He might be pulling a wbg on me and everyone else. I don't like lynching vets d1. Said the same in L. Remember I was the guy telling everyone to not lynch Palmar? I ended up being a townie (a vet) as well. So it really is my opionion. And with rads most recent post I'd even say he's leaning town for me right now. He just posted so little that it's hard to judge. I'm reading that game. It's a shame no one listened to you when you were right, but this isn't a 60 person game, you're gonna get heard. Don't use excuses to stay quiet any longer. And what's the point of even saying anything? You never really accused Radfield of anything so why suck up and praise his towniness unless you're just trying to get town cred yourself | ||
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
| ||
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
On February 07 2012 23:10 DoctorHelvetica wrote: Of course it's not good. Explain how it gives any info at all about his alignment when the guy does it in every single game regardless? He even does it in games that don't have vanilla townies. Furthermore BC's disclaimer was not talking about traitors it was talking about characters who have more than one category as in Harley Quinn falling under both Medic and Vigilante if I'm not mistaken EBWOP, bolded part is edited (in reference to kenpachi claiming green) | ||
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On February 07 2012 23:13 Jackal58 wrote: Kurumi - Insane inmates are the same as millers. They have no idea they'll check red. Ah fuck This still doesn't make sense from Town perspective, right? | ||
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
| ||
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On February 07 2012 23:14 Kurumi wrote: Ah fuck This still doesn't make sense from Town perspective, right? I'm not following. Millers are a pain if you're a DT but they should still be playing as a townie since they don't know they're millers. | ||
Tunkeg
Norway1235 Posts
Reason 1: He have only been dicking around. Not posting anything of value (well, this is the case for many players you might say. Reason 2: He is creating "tools" for scumhunting that is totally useless (funny, yeah, maybe, depends). Exactly like he did with his Bullshit formula in Purgatory, where he was scum: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=298603¤tpage=74#1464 Layabout is the first to point out anything he sees as bad, crappy, stupid etc etc. And from my limited knowledge of his play I think his scumhunting is pretty good. So for him to post such distracting crap like this I see as scummy. Reason 3 He is scared. I have called him out twice (three times counting this post) allready and he haven't talked back. What's up with that mister superaggressive? Is it because you know I am the king of tunneling, and as scum don't want this kind of attention? I think a layabout town would go straight for my throat after these posts. He is just sitting back and taking it. Come out, bring your a-game, be your obnoxious scumhunting SOB layabout townie, or face the hangman tonight as the fooling around scum layabout. #Vote: layabout | ||
| ||