Saying things like this is only hurting you. If you are really town you will change your attitude, start being more constructive and scum hunt.
Hammer Mini Mafia - Page 4
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Paperscraps
United States639 Posts
Saying things like this is only hurting you. If you are really town you will change your attitude, start being more constructive and scum hunt. | ||
Paperscraps
United States639 Posts
On January 31 2012 18:42 Palmar wrote: actually, if anyone has a bullet, killing layabout or LSB isn't a bad idea. Killing layabout is a bad idea, because he is only likely to give away 1 vote. Thus, town loses 4 votes. Killing LSB is ok, because we will only lose 1 vote. | ||
Paperscraps
United States639 Posts
On January 31 2012 19:41 prplhz wrote: Killing people isn't about who has this or that many votes, it's about hitting scum. Doesn't matter how many votes they have then. Point taken. On January 31 2012 21:09 Palmar wrote: yeah, what's better? living scum with 4 votes or dead scum with 4 votes? This is rhetorical. | ||
Paperscraps
United States639 Posts
On February 01 2012 04:30 chaoser wrote: You yourself stated only that you didn't want to hammer the vote even though your vote wouldn't have hammered. This added reason of "I did not want to vote because I didn't want SOMEONE ELSE to hammer" was not mentioned then and so I can not willingly believe this point since it has only just now been introduced. You are reaching. I did the same thing. I pulled my vote on VE because the votes on VE were nearing majority. I didn't want someone to accidentally hammer, like layabout did. Side note: When quoting it is nice to have the name at the top of the quote to see who is saying what. On February 01 2012 05:15 chaoser wrote: But palmar's only real argument against LSB is that he gave his vote to layabout. When compared to what layabout has done and posted, I don't think it's the same condemning thing at all. Possibilites for VE's actions: 1. VE sacrificed himself for LSB. 2. VE is telling the truth and was hit by a vig. Note: vig has not come forward. 3. VE is telling the truth and was hit by mafia, thus Palmar is fake-claiming a hit in some elaborate mafia scheme to become virtually confirmed town. 4. VE just decided to start trolling out of nowhere. I differ to occam's razor here. | ||
Paperscraps
United States639 Posts
Mind expanding on that question? | ||
Paperscraps
United States639 Posts
layabout seems to have given up to an extent. If I was really town I would fight to the bitter end. LSB isn't pushing for his balancing mechanism which we has adamant about earlier. The whole game he has been pushing his plans, but now that he is under the gun he hasn't said anything very coherent. | ||
Paperscraps
United States639 Posts
If you are under suspicion, then the town thing to do is give all your votes away to your most pro-town read. layabout made it pretty clear he is only going to trade 1 VP. LSB can only trade 1 VP so this point is null for him. If we lynch LSB tomorrow we will only lose 1 vote. If we lynch layabout we lose 4 votes, but if we wait to lynch layabout on D4 we only lost 3 votes and get further analysis on layabouts VP trades to find the final scum. Anyone trading VP to either layabout or LSB is suicide. | ||
Paperscraps
United States639 Posts
Obviously if you are town you will have the same vested interest as these town players. Stop posting filler and find someone that is scummier than you! Convince us! I understand I am repeating things said above, but pride is a dangerous thing in mafia. Sometimes repetition and emphasis is the best medicine. | ||
Paperscraps
United States639 Posts
Popcorn time! ![]() | ||
Paperscraps
United States639 Posts
| ||
Paperscraps
United States639 Posts
So vig kill reveals alignment? I gave 2 votes to risk.nuke. For being pro-town. | ||
Paperscraps
United States639 Posts
| ||
Paperscraps
United States639 Posts
##Vote layabout if it isnt already apparent... | ||
Paperscraps
United States639 Posts
hmm...I need to think about this for a second...something seems way to easy. | ||
Paperscraps
United States639 Posts
Now I see why layabout was so adamant that we wasn't going to give votes away, to justify having soo many today. Anyways layabout needs to die. ##Vote layabout | ||
Paperscraps
United States639 Posts
On February 01 2012 10:44 Paperscraps wrote: Yeah, it looks like the votes given to Palmar were siphoned to layabout. Now I see why layabout was so adamant that we wasn't going to give votes away, to justify having soo many today. Anyways layabout needs to die. ##Vote layabout My only reservation is that the mafia knows we will see right through this power play. WIFOM Is mafia setting up layabout or is layabout in on it? | ||
Paperscraps
United States639 Posts
On February 01 2012 10:44 jaybrundage wrote: Our Hero has fallen D: Wait shouldnt Prplhz still have his votes because palmar died during the night? Im confused about this. Also I gave one vote to Jackal58 because i have a town read on him. Paperscraps why would you give risk.nuke votes when palmars reads were on risk.nuke being possible scum?\ Palmar thought risk.nuke was scum, because he suggested a no lynch and layabout traded 1 vote to him. I don't agree. | ||
Paperscraps
United States639 Posts
On February 01 2012 10:50 chaoser wrote: I think that they were expecting this to be THE game ending power play though. I mean...given layabout's play through the game, I'm 90% certain he's mafia. Yes I agree. I just like to think of all possibilities. It is just how my brain works. | ||
Paperscraps
United States639 Posts
No offense to the cowboy of course. ![]() | ||
Paperscraps
United States639 Posts
He is anti-town. Palmar was killed last night proving his innocence. Mafia new people would be trading a lot of votes to him. There is no discussion. If you are town you will neutralize the threat layabout presents. | ||
| ||