Resistance I - London Calling - Page 22
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Beyond that, I have to reread and I promise to do so today. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
Also things are super confusing now that Jackal and I have the same portrait. In any case, I don't trust Palmar any more. I kinda trust Radfield a little more but I still don't know what his deal was with the D1 team. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
I'd like to say that a team that includes me is a team with a higher success rate... include me in teams please. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On January 04 2012 06:08 Blazinghand wrote: Ah yes good move claiming Town. I was under the impression, however, that we are all implicitly claiming Town. I in fact can and will say the same thing: I'd like to say that a team that includes me is a team with a higher success rate... include me in teams please. Mocking me isn't giving you any points bro. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On January 04 2012 06:06 VisceraEyes wrote: Also I'd like to say that a team that includes me is a team with a higher success rate...continue including me in teams please. ...not "Hey guys, I'm totally town" Now don't get all incredulous with me when you're putting words in my mouth. If you think I'm "hulking out" on you, you clearly haven't played enough games with me. If you're really interested in my thoughts after I read, quit trying to distract me from reading by mocking me and arguing with me. I'll post my thoughts shortly. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
Blazinghand and Radfield same question. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
Literally the only way a team that includes you would have a higher success rate would be that you're town, right? But we're all claiming town. That's how this setup works. Like, obviously NOW that you've made the second post it's like "oh, ok VE is just thanking me, Blazinghand, for including him in a team selection" but could you possibly understand how someone might interpret your post as a redundant and largely unuseful Town claim? | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On January 04 2012 06:32 GreYMisT wrote: VE i would like to know who you think is the spy team. Blazinghand and Radfield same question. On January 04 2012 06:12 Blazinghand wrote: All my mocking aside, I do actually think VE is probably town... My current scumlist is Radfield, Palmar, Zona. ._. So i'm thinking Greymist just literally doesn't read my posts. Like, at first I was kind of joking but now i'm substantially more serious. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On January 04 2012 06:34 Blazinghand wrote: So i'm thinking Greymist just literally doesn't read my posts. Like, at first I was kind of joking but now i'm substantially more serious. was writing that before you posted that line, then i got distracted preparing for newbie mafia. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Radfield, what are your thoughts on Palmar? Do you think he can be trusted? BH, your flailing around and not making sense. But you sound town. So I'm at an impasse. Jackal, this game needs more Jackal. We gotta take the Jackal back. Zona, what are your thoughts on Jackal? Like, in general? Right now my scumlist includes Blazinghand, Toadeastern and Jackal but I barring some meteorically Town post from Palmar, I can't include him on a mission list I'd yay. I'm similarly biased against Radfield solely because he chose the first team that ended in failure. Statistically, it seems like D1 would be town favored, so the fact that our N1 ended in failure makes me mistrust Radfield, albeit a little irrational. If we can make it through tonight, we'll probably be okay N4 due to scum needing to include 2 of their number to sabotage the mission...therefor I'm weighing very carefully before yay'ing any teams for tonight. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On January 04 2012 07:08 VisceraEyes wrote: BH, your flailing around and not making sense. But you sound town. So I'm at an impasse. :/ On January 04 2012 07:08 VisceraEyes wrote: Right now my scumlist includes Blazinghand, Toadeastern and Jackal but I barring some meteorically Town post from Palmar, I can't include him on a mission list I'd yay. I'm similarly biased against Radfield solely because he chose the first team that ended in failure. Statistically, it seems like D1 would be town favored, so the fact that our N1 ended in failure makes me mistrust Radfield, albeit a little irrational. OK I'M TOTALLY NOT DEFENDING RADFIELD but i feel the need to call out bad math. There's about a 50% chance of exactly one spy on a randomly-selected N1 team of 3 players. There's a 21% chance of exactly two spies on a randomly-selected N1 team of 3 players. Given that the first leader was chosen at random, there was a 33% chance of this leader being a spy, and a 67% chance of the leader being town. Assuming the leader is town, there's a (3/8) chance that the first guy he picks is a spy, and following that a 5/7th chance that the second guy he picks is town, leading to a 26% chance of one spy in permutation one. There's a 5/8th chance that the first guy he picks is a town, and a 3/7th chance that the second guy he picks is scum, leading to a 26% chance of one spy in the second permutation. If he makes two picks, there's a 3/8th chance the first pick is spy, and following that a 2/7th chance the second guy is spy, making it 12.5% chance he picked two spies to go with him. This means that, assuming Radfield is town, there was a 56% chance of him picking exactly one spy, and a 12.5% chance he picked two spies if he picked completely at random. My math from previously in the thread. + Show Spoiler + On January 02 2012 19:53 Blazinghand wrote: In the event of 1 spy on the d1 team: 33% chance of Blazinghand 33% chance of Palmar 33% chance of Radfield What are (randomly) the odds of 1 spy on d1 team? there's a 1/3rd chance for the first guy to be a spy, right? so assuming that, for the other two not to be spy, there is a 3/4ths chance to not pick the 2/8 ppl who are spies, then a 5/7ths chance not to pick the 2/7 people who are spies, meaning there is a 1/3*3/4*5/7 = 0.1786 of the first guy being a spy "but wait blazinghand" you say "what if the first guy is town, then the second guy is spy? well don't worry man, i can help you with that. Check this: the odds of the first guy being town is 2/3rds, right? well ok if the second guy is a spy there's a 3/8ths chance of getting him as spy, then if the third guy is a town, there's a 5/7ths chance of him being town... which comes out to 2/3 * 3/8 * 5/7 = 0.1786 of the second guy being a spy "oh shoot blazinghand" you say "how does that work?" well, we're just multiplying probabilities, so the order doesn't matter, right? The one thing we can determine for sure is that it should be the same probability of a single person on that team being a spy. That makes sense, yes? Adding these three probabilities together, the probabilities come out to 53% chance of exactly 1 spy on N1 team! That still leaves a lot of room for the possibility of 2 spies N1. What are the odds of 2 spies on the d1 team? The odds of there being 2 spies means that after there has been picked a spy (1/3rd chance) there is another spy pick, either immediately (1/4 chance), and then the third spy ISN'T picked (6/7) chance or there is a town pick then a spy pick (the other 3/4 of the time, there is a 2/7 chance of a second spy). (1/3) * (2/8) * (6/7) = 0.0714, and with three combinatorial routes, this leaves us with a 21% chance of 2 spies on D1. Well, what about the remaining 26% chance? There is a small but non-zero chance that there were no spies D1 (which wasn't the case, but for completeness sake) and the odds of that would be 2/3rd * 5/8 * 4/7 (order irrelevant) which gives us a 23% chance. There's also a very small chance that the mission actually contained 3 spies, which would be a 1/3rd * 2/7 * 1/6 = 1.5% chance. Very small. Now you're probably thinking "Wait why would there be 3 spies N1, Blazinghand? that sounds horribly unlikely and sub-optimal for the spies, doesn't it?" Why yes, reader, that DOES? See, the thing a raw probability calculation like this leaves out is that in every situation, there's a chance that the spy is Radfield, rather than Blazinghand or Palmar. See, if Blazinghand or Palmar is the spy, that has no impact on whether the other dude (Blazinghand or Palmar) is the spy. However, if Radfield is the spy, he's the dude who put together the team. He could easily chose to include 1, 2, 3, or 0 spies regardless of probability. This makes things much more interesting. Now imagine you're Radfield. This means you are a spy and are totally devious and smart etc etc. So you lucked into a d1 captainship, and you get the feeling people are gonna sheep all over you. You posted a question and some people have made some vaguely scummy d1 posts (Zona, Blazinghand both made posts prior to Greymist's warning about posting anything that could be used as spy meta). What's an optimal strategy? Well, as Radfield, you'd pick your scumbuddy Palmar, who has been judiciously silent, and Blazinghand. Blazinghand, being the mad nerd baller that he is, will nayvote the team, looking even scummier, but luckily the (now probably not) scum Jackal comes in and hammers the vote. Now, you get into a big long argument with Blazinghand and Palmar sort of chills. Townies, operating under the assumption that there was 1 spy N1 (when really there were two-- you sabotaged and palmar did nothing, so it looked like there was only 1 spy), are not going to select an "only new dudes" 4-man team. They don't want to select Blazinghand, because you've made a case against him. And, despite (or because of) your best efforts, Blazinghand has made a case of sorts against you. Naturally, the pick Palmar. You wait until a team of 3 townies plus Palmar gets suggested, and of course it passes-- nobody wants a team with Blazinghand on it, and you are vaguely suspicious to some. Palmar sabotages, and now things are looking scary. People immediately assume it's not Palmar, even though he's the common article between the two missions. Some people are like "Well radfield isn't confirmed town any more" and some people are suspicious of Palmar, but Blazinghand is still on everyone's scum list... and then your Third man swoops in, Zona, who busts out this big "Blazinghand and Rad are working together" theory and it doesn't really make sense but people buy it because people will buy things when they're desperate. Zona took a hit earlier during the "is this a scum strat being said" deal, but things start to make sense. Radfield/Blazinghand/Zona? could be. Radfield/Blazinghand/someone else? maybe. But these people aren't paying attention to the facts and the facts are that Radfield is scummy and the ONLY REASON HE WOULD BRING ME D1 when I looked scummy would be to entrap me as he has! it's an elaborate plot | ||
| ||