Buddying up/defending jay like GiygaS did is scummy regardless of jay's alignment. Even disregarding that, don't you think his switch in mentality toward seph is very scummy? I think it is.

Shraft

Sweden701 Posts

December 28 2011 01:10 GMT

#309

On December 28 2011 09:48 Cyber_Cheese wrote:

Show nested quote +

I'm not really sure... The Seph vote was nearly unanimous. I feel like Jay is scum, and I don't see why Giygas would openly buddy with scum.

Even if they're both scum, openly buddying up only ends up in endless WIFOM. Did he buddy up to defend his scum buddy or did he buddy up in order to make the other player look scummy? It says little about alignment of the player who is being buddied up to (maybe there's some specific cases where you can use it to deduct something, idk). Buddying up is anti-town in itself.

Either way, if you believe jay is scum, switch your vote to him. He has shown that he is back and that he won't be modkilled.

Shraft

Sweden701 Posts

December 28 2011 01:37 GMT

#311

Yes. I will be up until Wiggles posts the night post.

Shraft

Sweden701 Posts

December 28 2011 01:38 GMT

#312

EBWOP: I will be around until Wiggles posts the night post.

Shraft

Sweden701 Posts

December 28 2011 01:50 GMT

#315

I want GiygaS lynched. I didn't find jay scummy reading his filter, and the cases on him aren't satisfactory either in my opinion.

Shraft

Sweden701 Posts

December 28 2011 02:11 GMT

#318

On December 28 2011 11:03 GiygaS wrote:
Are you fucking kidding me, well it looks like the votes won't change in the next hour, so pay attention to my words guys, as it's more unbaiased opinions.Last question, why does switching opinions on somebody make me scummy?

It's about how contradictory those two posts are. (The first one about not lynching based off of one post and about you looking forward to his defense, and the second one voting for him aggressively even though he barely said anything at all.)

Shraft

Sweden701 Posts

December 28 2011 02:16 GMT

#320

I suppose that ET is going to get modkilled. If he's town, we're going to lose (barring vig hitting scum and successful medic protection). If he comes in and votes last minute, I'd like our vigilante (if we have one) to blow his brains out during the coming night.

Shraft

Sweden701 Posts

December 28 2011 02:30 GMT

#324

On December 28 2011 11:22 Dirkzor wrote:
What happened to "We should let blues think for themselves!" ?

It's just that I'm so fucking tired of all inactivity...

Shraft

Sweden701 Posts

December 28 2011 02:34 GMT

#326

If we assume that ET is going to get modkilled and that he is town, a no lynch would be preferable today.

Shraft

Sweden701 Posts

December 28 2011 02:36 GMT

#327

If he comes back, I can agree to switch my vote to jay in order to get a lynch today (Dirkzor should be as well) and then have the vig (assuming we have one) hold his shot. A lynch > a vig shot imo.

Shraft

Sweden701 Posts

December 28 2011 02:41 GMT

#333

On December 28 2011 11:38 GiygaS wrote:

Show nested quote +

Why would losing 2 townies for nothing be preferable?

Because it's like choosing between a lynch with 8 lynch targets available (3 being scum) and one with 6 lynch targets available (3 being scum).

Shraft

Sweden701 Posts

December 28 2011 02:42 GMT

#334

And yeah Dirkzor, I don't like ET. Let's lynch jay.

##Unvote
##Vote jaybrunage

Shraft

Sweden701 Posts

December 28 2011 02:45 GMT

#336

##Vote Jaybrundage

Shraft

Sweden701 Posts

December 28 2011 02:52 GMT

#339

Current vote tally:

GiygaS - 1

jaybrundage
Dirkzor
Shraft

Shraft - 1

Hyshes

Hyshes - 2

Adam4167
Cyber_Cheese

Dirkzor - 0

~~Cyber_Cheese~~

Jaybrundage - 6

Misder
GiygaS
Cyber_Cheese
Dirkzor
Shraft
Adam4167

Shraft

Sweden701 Posts

December 28 2011 02:54 GMT

#340

I'm not sure on jay, but I'd rather have a lynch than a no lynch for sure. If we have a vig, he shouldn't shoot tonight. (It's basically trading your shot for another lynch the next day unless we get a successful medic protection. DO NOT SHOOT.)

Shraft

Sweden701 Posts

December 28 2011 02:55 GMT

#341

EBWOP: I didn't update the number of votes on hyshes, it should say zero.

Shraft

Sweden701 Posts

December 28 2011 03:00 GMT

#343

Night post incoming any minute now!

Shraft

Sweden701 Posts

December 28 2011 03:16 GMT

#348

VIGILANTE, HOLD YOUR SHOT!

And with that, I'm off to bed.

Shraft

Sweden701 Posts

December 28 2011 03:51 GMT

#350

In fact, it might be better to just have our vigilante shoot. If we can't get an unanimous lynch going (and, looking at today's lynch, that is highly unlikely) it will be very easy for them to force a no lynch by switching their votes at the very last second. Our vigilante should shoot.

Shraft

Sweden701 Posts

December 28 2011 03:55 GMT

#351

On December 28 2011 12:44 jaybrundage wrote:
That last minute vote switch OP. GG town

Knowing that ET wouldn't get modkilled, it was better to ensure a lynch tham to risk a no lynch.

Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All

Please or register to reply.

Live Events Refresh