TL Mafia XLVIII
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 04 2011 23:53 Refallen wrote: Not a smurf; I lurk TL while watching SC2, discovered this forum, and enjoyed reading through TL Mafia XLVII! this is a lie... noone enjoyed reading through mafia XLVII | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
It is retarded to even discuss the option of a no-lynch until a few hours before the voting deadline. Any amount of time knowing there will be no lynch is time wasted for town not gathering information through discussions and accusations. Random Lynching: No. I can see the merit (reds not being able to throw weak cases at others and defend themselves) but this also is not pro town at all. Some thoughts on people Palmar - Is acting a lot different then last game where he was town. This is causing suspicion for me and the RNG vote is stupid especially after last game he claimed to be a really good day 1 lyncher (and that was with 80 people probably the best RNG case available). Scummy Vaderseven - Honestly I have no idea. He seems to be playing very similar to last game where he was scum and the cases brought against him are not exactly stong. If I had a gun to my head I'd say town though. Syllogism - This game "Zodiac" lists are fine as a guideline for medics, especially in a game with newer players or players who are otherwise unsure as to who is a likely n1 target. Even if they decide against following it, it will discourage mafia from shooting into it. Given the recent success rate of TL medics, I think the main early game function of medics is to discourage mafia from being overly bold with their shots rather than to actually save someone. Last Game (Town) I think we shouldn't be lynching into presumably active veteran players on on day1, given the number of lurking new players that will likely be present. Also is a ton more activity and aggressiveness out of Syllogism this game. Scummy Other People on my Scum watchlist Jackal TruthBringer Viscera Corrupt Soap | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 06 2011 00:22 redFF wrote: I don't see a contradiction in these posts, what point are you trying to make here? Its not a direct contradiction.. just "feels" different. Also, Prplhz, Draz, and redFF were all mafia in the last game and are playing completely different this time around. So far they all come off as town to me. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=285690&user=122881¤tpage=3 Red's last game where he is mafia. A ton of 1 liners that basically say nothing. This game he has been hoping all over people aggressively and been contributing a lot more. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 06 2011 00:41 redFF wrote: how does it "feel" different, that's incredibly vague. in this game he is supporting a veteran naming "zodiac list" where as last game he was against acting on veterans and it seems like his stance on pointing out veterans to new players has changed. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 06 2011 00:35 Mattchew wrote: Also, can someone explain to me the options Mafia has for night KP. I know there can be a range but I am wondering if it will be like 3 KP (like the half living mafia of last game) or is there other set ups for killing can someone please explain this? If there are specific "killers" in the mafia, will role blocking stop them? | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 06 2011 02:16 Palmar wrote: I had already claimed I was lying. On November 24 2011 18:23 Palmar wrote: I will be running a strict Lynch-All-Liars policy (LAL) and will push hard to enforce it. With a game this big we cannot afford townies running amok with some ridiculous plans of how lying will somehow benefit town. Do not lie, you will be held accountable. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 06 2011 02:44 supersoft wrote: wanna explain that any further? You're scum and you know soup and v7 are both town?! How is Palmars action bad, since we don't know the result?! scumslip?! He's trolling, lying, and RNG lynch voting. These are all counterproductive for town. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 06 2011 04:09 Zephirdd wrote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=291212¤tpage=33#641 Radfield: My only issue with that post is that you didn't say anything about... erm... the one topic that is burning here. I mean the Palmar/V7 bullshit. Why do you think neither are lynch material? Because we haven't seen the flip on V7's killshot and Palmar has done nothing but troll and look like a jester. There just isnt enough info yet to make a read on them. I believe that Rad is trying to hit scum but trim the fat (aka shitty town) if we miss on our first lynching | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 06 2011 04:24 VisceraEyes wrote: For the record Rad, it is NOT viable to act scummy to survive N1 when half the thread and now a vet claim IN thread that they believe that's what he's doing. It makes his "efforts" useless because scum then assume that's what he's doing and shoot him anyway (if he's town). I doubt Palmar would be doing something so transparent. But then again, I haven't seen him play in a while. I still think he's scum. And I still want him to hang. My 2 cents. Is this WIFOM | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 06 2011 05:03 Zephirdd wrote: This and This makes me feel it's a bad idea to vote Palmar now. His earlier posts were okay, and I basically get that he was laughing hard at the whole situation that happened today. I'm still unsure about voting V7 over anyone else. Putting myself on his place, it sounds like something I would have done(albeit not on Soap). Doesn't help that Soap hasnt flipped yet. Gah, back to mark zero again. If anything Corrupt is my strongest(1%) scumread at this point, just because of my retarded head and its tendency to see that last response of his as a post made with help of scumbuddies, but that's a nonlogic thought as its huge WIFOM -_- In a sense, Mattchew isn't helping either, but he doesn't look like the red cardboard that came out of a Mountain-only MTG meeting that happened on the middle of China under red lights that he was on XLVII, so I'd say he is a second here, but it isn't any big deal at all. Gah. ##unvote Palmar How have you contributed more than I have in any way shape or form. You have echo'd others thoughts, wrote long-winded IDK anymore posts, explained rules and terminology, and posted one-liners | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 06 2011 05:17 Zephirdd wrote: I didn't echo someone's thoughts on Corrupt. Sure I posted after redFF, but that's what I truly believed at the time. Either way, it's not like you are at any danger of anything at all, why are you worrying so much? I'm just throwing away my thoughts(something that you haven't done), just for the sake of transparency. I didn't like your analysis so I critize it. You're post was On December 05 2011 04:54 Zephirdd wrote: Context. Simplifying it, redFF convinced me it's not a big deal to throw a vote on someone you find scummy. And I'm not regretting it at this point... But you never said why you thought he was scummy until you had other's present their cases and you could echo their thoughts. Now you try to calm me down off of you, why? | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
Post in class on iPhone | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 06 2011 09:50 Drazerk wrote: Other than meta. Explain how Palmar is town explain to me how he is scum. Yeah vaderseven went apeshit and shot off a townsperson but that wasn't exactly Palmars fault, just a consequence of his actions. He has been a troll and posted a lot of bullshit but is slowly coming around and not just defending himself as others have claimed. My feeling is that redFF is mafia and I would like people to look more closely at that. If not I cannot sit here and vote for someone we know so little about... I will re-read the cases on heir and laniana and if I find something substantial I will vote those ways. Im sick of the palmar v7 argument, its just like the ace palmar of last game that leads to town looking like retards. people forget that scum can post here too and let some direct arguments and conversation the ways they want it to go. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 06 2011 10:14 Drazerk wrote: How does it HAVE to be palmar? It can be one of his scum buddies helping him. draz when did you become ace's smurf | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 06 2011 10:15 Drazerk wrote: Palmar isn't town and even if he is it gives us a lot more information than a no lynch ever will and we won't have to deal with him trolling for another day and repeating this whole mess once more what information will it give us? can come up with 1 solid pro-town consequence of palmar lynching and flipping town? | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
Don't worry red only I am making a case for you... Corrupt is just jumping on because you wanted to vote for him | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 07 2011 01:39 prplhz wrote: @redFF Hey, what do you think about Mattchew? This would require more than one line so dont expect a response from red this game | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
And I am getting the strange feelings about radfield as well. He just seems likes he is going through the normal town motions to throw suspicion | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 07 2011 20:44 prplhz wrote: Hey, I've decided to try my hand at some case writing even though I haven't done this successfully for god knows how long. I still want to lynch vaderseven and TruthBringer but I don't think that's going to happen today so here's another guy I'm suspicious of. On Mattchew The guy starts this game by joking around for three posts, to look active rather than to help. He is then called out for it by Radfield and I, after which he doesn't joke around anymore at all. I think this looks like mafia who got attention he didn't like and then he changes his behavior abruptly. In his next post he comments on current event in thread, but what strikes me is that he calls Palmar "suspicious" and also attempts to discredit syllogism for what he believes is a logical inconsistency (but it isn't). This will be a trademark of Mattchew's posts. He does the same thing to Palmar here when he quotes how Palmar support LALiars in last game but lies here, indirectly saying that Palmar should be lynched but without saying it himself. Next thing he does is argue a bit with Zephirdd when Zephirdd calls him out on his relative uselessness. His defense is not trying to be townie, it is not trying to prove that Zephirdd is wrong in any way, his defense is actually an attack on Zephirdd. I think mafia mostly feel guilty in the charges against them, but they still have to do something about it, so pointing out the flaws of others hoping that attention will be directed at them instead is something a lot of mafia do. He is not saying that Zephirdd is wrong, he is saying that Zephirdd is being a hypocrite, but this does not make his attack less valid. Next thing he does is go for redFF in this post. I find this weird because his reasoning is that redFF has gone for Palmar and is now going for Corrupt, but he said that redFF looked townie in this post, and that was after redFF tried to get Palmar lynched in the beginning of the game. Also, Mattchew has a pattern of going after "scum tells", his attack on Zephirdd consisted only of this too. In his next post he refuses to vote for Palmar and vaderseven. but the manner in which this is done is more interested. Like with the "prplhz, Drazerk and redFF look townie", I think scum like to band up names and then comment on them collectively instead of forming an opinion on each one of them. This way they don't have to argue for their opinion and they will hopefully get the support of the townies who are on that list because he is actually called them scum. I believe that there is a scum on both of those lists of names, but Mattchew thinks he will get away with calling them townie without actually having to argue for it because he grouped them with other townies. In this post he actually says no-lynch > lyching Palmar at a very critical point in the game, Palmar was getting pushed very hard and was looking to be lynched if it wasn't the the collective intervention of just about every veteran in this game except Drazerk. The thing I think is weird about this is how hard he's apparently changed his stance on Palmar, from trolling lying RNGing to "townie". The post is also very egocentric, what he does here is say "Palmar is town, I'm not voting for him." but he doesn't care what everybody else does. Why isn't he trying to get people off Palmar and onto something else instead of just washing his hands and then watching the blood bath that seemed almost inevitable at the point? Overall his style is being aggressive on other people's integrity while very defensive on his own. All his aggression seems to be to discredit other people instead of actually finding scum and he seems more concerned with his own innocence than with other's guilt. ##Vote Mattchew @Radfield You need to do something today, that night2-deal you made yesterday wasn't accepted by anybody with a brain. Palmar has started contributing and so will you have to. @VisceraEyes I appreciate the effort but Palmar isn't getting lynched today and there are 5 other scum out there for you to catch right? Focus on somebody else. Im sorry that as peoples post count in the thread doubles, triples, and their style becomes the exact opposite of their opening that my opinions on who's who changes. I still stand by the fact that I voted for someone who I thought was scum and still do believe is scum in redFF. I still think Palmar is town and I still believe lynching hier was a bad decision. I am trying my very best to be as active and as useful as possible in my second game ever where not much has been said aside from trolling and tunnelling. I drew some bad evidence to support cases to try and create something when in reality nothing was there. Luckily for me and town these were pointed out and disregarded. I still believe draz and yourself (prplhz)" have given off nothing but town vibes and posted well. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 08 2011 00:20 Palmar wrote: Hey Mattchew, vote annul. your making it extremely hard even though I agree votes should be on annul until someone steps up and claims they protected him | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 08 2011 00:27 Drazerk wrote: NO ONE SHOULD STEP UP. We already have 1 medic in the open we don't need both of us Ok here's my question to everyone. How is it that Draz is still alive and if any of you were mafia would syllo (who never looked 100% town or that "good" of a player this game) and supersoft (who also didn't help town too much) be the ones you went after? Re-reading a lot of what has gone down has lead me to start thinking that Palmar and V7 could both be mafia and outside the game set up the entire dayvig shot to somehow make them both look like town. V7 can say that he was posting like town beforehand and then was rushed into his decision and blame Palmar, while Palmar starts with trolling but then knows he has enough prestige(or w.e) to start posting with quality leading people back off of his bandwagon. The Jack of all trades role seems like it was a nice out for V7 to prove he was town and now Palmar and V7 are considered town and pushing people to be lynched. Erandor is STILL not active and this just leads me to believe that he is scum. The best advice scum team last game gave was to just lurk especially with all the drama and 60 retards shouting at each other all game. Also claims he was roleblocked... what role was blocked? redFF I still think is scum for the same reasons I gave before. He claims he was roleblocked.. what role was blocked red? Annul It is really easy to claim medic saved you after n1 killings. This was attempted by redFF last game (a little differently) when he was scum. I guess draz has a point saying that noone should step up to claim your saving but this is extremely susipicous | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
Red and Eran still waiting on the roles you claim to be blocked from doing... One of them could be mafia and had their KP blocked | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 08 2011 01:36 annul wrote: holy shit i wake up and i have 6 votes on me lol why the fuck is palmar of all people leading a wagon on ME of all people? did you all forget the shit he pulled yesterday? letting palmar run shit = outed jack and a dead green for what its worth reds may not actually get 3 KP -- i logically deduced this because A. who the fuck would shoot me night 1, and B. night vigs usually dont get to shoot night 1. yes i now see syllo's flip and i know they can but they usually cant. yeah syllo was on my ass all of night 1 so he probably did, but i didnt even think it was possible to do until i checked the OP i find it funny that palmar keeps with the omgus trend and thinks "oh my god, annul told town to cool off in 47 and he isnt doing it now, he must be red, GET HIM" yeah in 47 you were MAYOR, thats why i pulled everyone off you. 6 votes in an instawagon because.... i claimed the truth, that i got shot, immediately upon seeing the PM? which not a single red player would ever do? against all the shit palmar did day 1 and his logical failures day 2? LOLOLOL the medic who saved me needs to shut the fuck up and not claim. whoever said "ill keep on annul until you claim" needs to be looked at really hard I said this.. I am taking it back... I am still learning whats good for town and whats not. I do not want to vote you tonight yet. I want more discussion on Palmar, V7, redFF, Eran and yourself. You all seem very scummy to me. + Show Spoiler [sandroba style] + PALMAR, V7, REDFF ERAN AND ANNUL You all seem very scummy to me. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 08 2011 01:51 Radfield wrote: That's because there is already a ongoing discussion topic which you only touched on a little bit. I agree that Erandorr looks like scum right now. I disagree with redff, he spams and posts 1 liners every game regardless of alignment. In his case, it is not a scum tell. Both Erandorr and RedFF claimed roleblocked, but that does not mean they necessarily have a role. Oftentimes in games you are informed you were roleblocked even if you are vanilla town. The chances of v7 and Palmar being both scum is astronomically low in my eyes. Not only do BOTH of them seem like townies, and BOTH have claimed likely town roles, but there is very little chance that the conversation between them was manufactured. I think that it would have been more productive to let them answer the question of what role they are. You have now given both of them an easy out and although it was probably going to be their answers, you have now essentially limited information we could be recieving. Also, Palmar and V7 were both in the last game and Palmar was involved firsthand in the Palmar vs. Ace vs. BC in which they were all town. It would be ingenius but not out of the question for them to stage a similar occurence this game. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 08 2011 01:54 annul wrote: yeah because this is obviously the most likely scenario, that if we were all red, we would all be collectively circle bussing each other zzz thank you for quoting my sarcastic version. Only palmar and you are being bussed right now | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 08 2011 02:06 prplhz wrote: @Radfield I'm not a big fan of you calling me "prp" it kinda reminds me of "perpetrator", can't you call me "prpl" or "prplhz" instead? I call you Radfield all the time. Can you outline for me what is bothering you about me? I can see how you might have a problem with the two other people on that list, though I don't think either of them is a better lynch than annul at all. I'd like to stop you from writing a huge accusation on me because I doubt I'm getting lynched today and I wouldn't want you to waste time on a big post on me. more reason to write an even bigger post please and thank you | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 08 2011 02:09 Erandorr wrote: Interesting. Would you mind explaining why us telling you our roles is pro-town? You may be right. But in that case How is saying that you were role blocked helpful? (this might be obvious to experienced players sorry) | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 08 2011 05:27 Palmar wrote: yes. barring a medic claim from a person I'm willing to believe, I am that certain. If annul flips green I'll take all the blame, if part of that is to be lynched I'll accept that. just like you were willing to be lynched when ace flipped town? the lynch me if he flips town argument is so dumb. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 08 2011 05:42 Erandorr wrote: If you are so convinced, why don't you make that case? On December 08 2011 05:44 Lanaia wrote: Personally, I wouldn't've protected either annul or syllo if I'd been a medic. I'd've protected supersoft. A newer player could have protected annul over syllo for lack of knowing. Erandorr, one more thing... Why are you so blatantly following Palmar? In your answers, I saw very little thought that was your own. @Mattchew If you're looking for a case, why don't you make one on Eran? Ok. Erandorr Last game in Scum QT Syllo is one of the best players period he would be an extremely important kill. Plus palmar respects him a ton and if those two got things rolling together that would get very scary why would you waste anything on annul??? especially a double hit. Nah shit happens to overconfident scum. if they were smart they would look at all the players who were content sitting back and not contributing shit (like me). One or two players have to set themselves up to lead town if we get palmar out of the way. so grey and red , get on it! If you read his last game (scum) in between the mayoral campaign and mass vote switch it reads extremely similar to this game game This is what I am using to point my finger at Erandorr. I'll answer any questions should anything need further explanation. I am still voting redFF but this is why I can be persuaded to Erandorr | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 08 2011 06:09 vaderseven wrote: Stop asking for a mysterious medic to come forward. The person that can best say why a medic would have protected annul is that medic himself. Why give the scum a possible way to detect you through motive posting. Assuming the alignment of an unclaimed role and/or determining the algnment of someone by assuming the alignment of an unclaimed role is rediculous. Annul claims he was shot and protected. Annul is not confirmed scum by this and a doc protecting him confirms nothing. As a town we need to stop basing huge conckusions off of ALMOST 100% unconfirmed data. You want to know what an easy case for scum to jump on looks like? One that is based in assumed facts that are just not confirmable. I have no idea what annuls alignment is but I can certwinly say there is nothing about his claim of being protected in no way suggests any one single conclusion let alone confirming one. Ok we understand you don't like the annul case. Can you please present something about someone other than palmar? | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 08 2011 06:32 Lanaia wrote: Mattchew, you ignored my question... I would appreciate an answer to this. If I've missed it, I'm sorry. I just don't get the logic behind it. I really fail to see where you were going with it. Also I'm pretty sure you're not supposed to quote the QT from last game as I'm pretty sure we never gave it out. Read this spoiler please. + Show Spoiler + Also, I feel the need to quote this again... On December 06 2011 10:44 Incognito wrote: Enough with the SPAM. Stop posting one liners or there will be --- Posts like these: as well as the other one liners are unacceptable. Please consolidate your posting and keep this thread readable. Thanks! And this... On December 07 2011 12:17 wherebugsgo wrote: Hey all, please cut down on the one liner spam. Incog has asked at least twice already and I have received a PM from a player about the spam situation. This will be the last warning before more serious consequences begin to appear. as you guys are ignoring it, it seems. not ignored.. missed... my apologies I think that Palmar and V7 set up the entire situation so that V7 could shoot a townie early with an excuse. Palmar can just play the wtf happened and I didn't mean to get a townie shot card and then they are both cleared. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
once again.. people assuming scum based off accusations on themselves. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
Why? (this isn't meant to be rude I would actually like to know why previous game QT's should not be used) | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
Can you explain to a noob like myself what all this post means On December 08 2011 06:48 prplhz wrote: Use them all you want, people were just talking about whether it was posted and whether it should be posted and stuff like that. There is it, it was posted and that's all there is to say about that, move on to stuff that is actually related to the game we're playing right now. oh ok... thought you meant not to use it... apologies... | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 08 2011 06:52 Lanaia wrote: Another question, then... If they were doing that, why wouldn't they have shot a more experienced and contributing player than Soap? Why would they do it d1? What exactly makes you think they did this? I'm not sure, but it's technically private still, and where I'm from, you're typically not allowed to use info outside of the game that not everyone has access to. It very well could be different here. My apologies. I was incorrect. Missed this a while ago. I really don't see why we'd lynch both and I also don't see why we need yet another roleclaim. I do agree with Toad's case on Eran. Mattchew, red is correct in that your post saying why you're going to vote red is scummy. You say you haven't seen a case that you truly believe in, which implies the case on red is one you don't believe in. If that's so, why are you on red? I said (or meant to say) I havent seen another case that I believe in. I made my case against red and still believe in that over anything else thats been presented | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 08 2011 08:33 Radfield wrote: I also felt prplhz was looking townie halfway through yesterday, but his actions are against him. Truthbringer was over-the-top scummy with his first posts, which is very very rarely a scum trait. Since that I feel he has been decent. vaderseven is almost surely town. He might be my strongest town read. The fact that prplhz is still pushing for lynching him seems like he's not even paying attention. If he's a jack he is town, if he's a jack he can prove his role. Add to that his posting is very green, and you have someone not worth looking at for a long time. If he is miraculously still around on day 4/5 after having done nothing for town, then yeah, but not until then. The case on Mattchew was pretty thin in my eyes, though to be honest I skim-read it. I had mattchew down as prob town. However, I just re-read his filter and it looks worse than I recall. In particular his posts after getting called out. There are definitely mafia motives with posts like these: I have completely changed my views on the medic revealing himself... I didn't realize how stupid that would be until it was told to me. He also made the worlds shortest 'case' against erandorr. That being said I'm not real sure he is scum, but he certainly reads less green than I thought. So where does that leave me on prplhz you ask? I'm not really sure. His defense was decent: truthbringer IS less of a raw newb than I realized, PYPI was multi scum teams so is moot, my points about tone are pretty weak. But his reaction to the v7 vig shot, his justification of finding v7 scummy, and his semi flip-flop on annul rub me very much the wrong way. I'm not really sure which way to take it from here. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
I have completely changed my views on the medic revealing himself... I didn't realize how stupid that would be until it was told to me. Was supposed to be my statement after the quote.. not in it lol | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 08 2011 12:27 redFF wrote: scumteam atm is palmar, prplhz, zephirdd mattchew and then someone else i dunno maybe rad? I'd be surprised if anyone on this list was mafia sorry I'm not sorry for being honest (or it might turn out I'm just stupid) | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 08 2011 18:58 Lanaia wrote: I'm sorry. I know I said I would post, but I literally just spent 14 hours on my project and am almost done. It's now bedtime. I didn't realize it would take so long. I will post first thing in the morning. Can you at the very least explain why you'd be surprised? I would be surprised because zeph and rad I read into as definitive town. Rad for contributing and building a good town atmosphere and zeph has literally nothing suspicous about his posts. prplhz has been pushing at guys which can be read as scummy but I think that his pushing for answers has been pretty pro-town thus far. Palmar is by far the sketchiest on this list imo. His tunneling on annul screams "misleading town away from voting a mafia member to get lynched" but it could just be his ego on his read convincing him he is right. Plus I am town, so 4 out of 5 would really surprise me and Palmar I am questionable on. On December 08 2011 22:50 Palmar wrote: The people on Annul's wagon have nothing to do with whether or not you should be supporting it. You should simply look at the strength of the case and determine for yourself if it's valid enough to earn him your vote. If you always consider who else shares your opinion you'll never get anywhere because nothing stops mafia from bussing teammates. I have looked at Errandor. There is nothing about his play that conclusively puts him down as scum. Sure, there are questionable things in there, but that's not a reason to lynch him today. I'm offering you a good opportunity to gauge his alignment by lynching annul. Lynching Errandor will not solve anything that's going on in town now. It's basically an excuse for lynching a scummy lurker. That was for day 1, today we're going after mafia. And I just gave you mafia. This was an awful post. For starters, toad pointed out your blatant contradictions. Secondly, your case against annul is not as strong or as 100% as your "self appointed thought leader" self thinks it is. Finally, if you keep trying to muscle people into voting the way you see things with hardly anyone ever fully agreeing, unless they are blindly following you because of past successes. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 08 2011 23:12 Palmar wrote: Woah, are you intentionally being thick? There is no way to tell anything about the alignment of a person being bandwagoned or followed by looking at the people following them. This is because you cannot scumhunt against player a based on the actions of player b. Thus you cannot deduce annul's alignment by looking at who's voting for him. However, you can deduce a player's alignment by looking at whom he's voting for. Because in that scenario you're evaluating player a's alignment based on the actions of player a. To make it simple: Annul is not responsible for the people voting him, and I'm not responsible for the people sheeping my case (which everyone should be doing). Thus: The people on Annul's wagon have nothing to do with whether or not you should be supporting it. Errandor is however responsible for his own vote, and his own decision for following me, thus: I'm offering you a good opportunity to gauge his [Errandor's] alignment by lynching annul. If you fail to see the difference of people being responsible for their own actions, and people being responsible for other's actions, I'm not sure I can help you. Woah, are you intentionally being thick? He's saying that you cant say "don't look at who votes annul" followed by "watch how erandorr votes" | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 08 2011 23:28 Palmar wrote: Why not? If toad thinks Erandorr is mafia, and Erandorr votes for annul, that should have no impact on whether or not the case against annul is valid, because Erandorr isn't annul, they're seperate people. Toad could be wrong about Erandorr, I could be wrong about annul, and Erandorr could be bussing annul. You cannot read anything about whether or not the annul wagon is valid based on who is on it. However, while the fact Erandorr votes for annul says nothing about annul, it does say a lot about Erandorr, because... Erandorr is Erandorr. I don't get what's complicated about this. I believe he's talking about more people that look scummy then just eran jumping on the annul bandwagon, and I think he is claiming that its a nice scum hideout vote. I dont know whos right (I personally agree more with Toad based on my own reads) but I think you can read into the people (not just eran) voting for annul and question that bandwagon | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
You should probably drop the I liked soap, he flipped green, therefore I'm green routine. Atleast with me it's not making you look less scummy, infact quite the opposite | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
you realize last time you did this... ace flipped town and you backed out | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 09 2011 00:01 Toadesstern wrote: please stop these things I know palmar is confident in his own and might be willing to do such a thing but it's NOT going to help town, it's just a tool to make a case look stronger "see I even would agree to that deal, np ezpz". NOONE should agree to that kind of deal unless he's 100% certain his target is scum. There is no 100% chance to know someones alignment in this game unless you're mafia and know it. Therefore it's at max something like 99%. Even if you somehow got a 99% clear case which I doubt we have here (neither annul nore erandorr) there is 99 cases in which town won't get an advantage because palmar was right and 1 case in which we're just fucked because palmar's the next guy who's getting lynched because he was wrong although he believes in his case. So unless you think yourself that palmar is 100% scum there's no reason to suggest such a thing because that "bad" case isn't a bad case if we lynch a mafia. Therefore, stop it. In no way, shape or form, did I intend that to be an honest plan. I realize its stupid I just like hearing and reading peoples responses to it. (I wanted to wait for annul to respond to this but I have a feeling he would hop on what you just said) | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 09 2011 00:03 hyshes wrote: He can't back out if we force it on him. If we are with 16 who support this 100% (so me +15, palmar not included) i'm willing to do this. lol what? Please explain to me why you are actually willing to do this. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
so can you explain why you think annul is scum and why you think palmar is scum. and why they cant be 2 townies bumping heads. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 09 2011 00:16 Palmar wrote: Mattchew is actually arguing that this would be a terrible idea, so i think he simply wanted to gauge my reactions. I actually wanted annul's reaction. I knew you would say yes lol | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 09 2011 03:37 Zephirdd wrote: I just had this random thought, as we seem to be in this fight between Erandorr or annul's lynch. Ask yourself which flip gives you the most. - If Erandorr flips scum, congrats we got scum. - If Erandorr flips town, fuck our lives. - If annul flips scum, we can disregard his protection claim or assume it exists; either way, we got a scum and that also should increase Palmars credibility(which seems to be worrying a lot of people) - If annul flips town, Palmar's credibility goes downhill BUT we confirm that there is at least one town-aligned medic other than the supposed Drazerk claim. either way, annul's flip should provide us much more information than Erandorr's flip. Yeah this point is too good for me too ignore and be stubborn about. The information gained from lynching annul is greater than anyone else. ##unvote ##vote annul | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 09 2011 03:51 Toadesstern wrote: The problem I have with that is that I'm not exactly willing to lynch for information. I am reading the case on annul again right after this post. A couple hours I thought it's weaker than my cae but who knows what sticking my nose into that case might make me see what I did not see earlier. As an almost neutral party (I favor the lynching of eran straight up) the cases presented are close enough where the information becomes a tipping point for me. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
Saying what I said is bad because you only have to look at the case when it hurts palmars case but when it's supporting his case it's okay? You gotta rephrase this i've read it 6 times and I just dont understand what you are trying to say | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 09 2011 07:49 VisceraEyes wrote: I disagree. Erandorr was playing the game just fine. He was calling for a lynch of a Vet d1, okay? He built a monster case on Radfield d1. He didn't provide ANY content though. If he were unable to post, yeah, sure, okay...not enough information, poor sampling of posts, yadda yadda...but he was playing, man! I have no doubt that he was playing sick, but that does NOT make him town, I'm sorry. It just doesn't. Do you believe that he was role blocked? | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
Toad is most likely town though out of everyone else | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
mason toad | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
##vote redFF | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 09 2011 12:45 kingjames01 wrote: Just because one is pitted against the other doesn't prove that 1 is Town and the other is mafia. Stop using false dichotomies. Just come out and admit that you are, in fact, mafia Why are you so desperate to lynch annul? So that you can kill Palmar when annul fllips Blue? Why would you switch your vote from a player who you are convinced is mafia? King.. I think you have great points about refallen but you need to vote redFF tonight and then we can go after refallen more tomorrow | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
ITS redFF OR NO LYNCH... YOU DECIDE | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 09 2011 12:48 annul wrote: explain to me why redff is better than refallen? i like KJ's points a lot We don't have the man power to switch to refallen.. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 10 2011 00:48 redFF wrote: really? you're telling him to stop tunneling? Red, I have accused you of being scummy. You are not my ONLY scum read that I speak of in this thread. You can quote me saying vote for red 40 times because they are all within a couple hours of the lynching deadline when I was trying to push for your lynching. I am not calling people names for not voting you I am simply trying to show people what I believe and hoping they come to the same conclusions. You have another 72 hours to convince me that you are not scum. What do you, redFF, think of these players - this is not my scumlist or townlist its just a list of people being less discussed Hyshes Jackal Sandroba Truthbringer Corrupt - now xsksc Lanaia Risen Visceraeyes | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 10 2011 01:54 redFF wrote: you want me to give mafia a comprehensive threat assessment list at the start of the nigh? I'll wait until day if I even decide to answer you. I accept your reasoning for not answering right now. I will ask again come daytime. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 10 2011 06:08 sandroba wrote: Why are you assuming annul is town in your most likely scenario? There is no town motivation at all in anything he has done so far. This is not meant to be rhetorical or condesending, have you ever seen a scum JOAT with public dayvigs? | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 10 2011 06:12 Toadesstern wrote: because I felt we did not have a majority for Drazerk and Erandorr who were my primary targets at that point in time. At least I did not want to act selfish and just shoot who I thought was scummy without looking for recent accusations. Therefore I looked up rads suspicious list and picked someone we both think is suspicious I was saying that rhetorically to vent frustration | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 10 2011 09:29 Incognito wrote: Ok I'm back. Everyone calm down. Please play nice and stop the name calling and cursing immediately or there will be modkills. so many warnings | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 10 2011 14:25 annul wrote: okay so now that the breadcrumbed parity cop has a guarantee in palmar, he is essentially a regular DT now. so we have an outed DT and a two claimed medics in refallen and drazerk, we have v7 and myself who have certain night powers, and palmar with the double vote yeah how are you alive.. draz? | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 10 2011 15:03 Lanaia wrote: Draz and I have already gone over this. I think it was the beginning of night. Where? i cant see in your filter | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 10 2011 15:19 Lanaia wrote: Mattchew, this quote chain is mostly it. I mean, it's obviously not every single possibility (he could technically be scum but I don't really think so right now). Scum doesn't always kill PRs, you know.... Um.. im talking about annul.. he claimed he was shot and protected.... i was saying that the only other medic was draz that could save him unless theres a 3rd medic | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 10 2011 21:50 Drazerk wrote: for argument's sake and confirming both palmar / refallen. I protected sandroba last night so refallen has to be a medic. did you protect annul night 1? | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
I think we are very far behind as town, and we need to take a risk. My risk is believing that all of ya'll, Palmar, V7, drazerk and even Buma are town. My thoughts Town: Mattchew - My damn self Palmar - Has tunnel vision but otherwise has been extremely pro-town after a few shitty day 1 posts. I think the day 1 posting style was based off his recent death before day 3 streak he has going which is understandable Buma - I believe Eran was mafia role-blocked and now with the switch I realize why Eran did such a shitty job this game Zephridd - Has played an extremely town friendly game Drazerk - I am hoping that his claim was real Toadesstern - Has played an extremely town friendly game Kingjames01 - Has started to tunnel Refallen, which is ok becuase he makes a good case, but has done nothing scummy. Vaderseven - The townie posting style JOAT The I have no fucking clue Hyshes Jackal Sandroba Truthbringer Corrupt - now xsksc Lanaia Risen Visceraeyes The probably Scum Refallen - Kingjames made a fantastic case against you. You have been extremely scummy this game. RedFF - Call this my personal tunnel vision arrogance, but I believe you have done nothing beneficial for town this game. Your claim to first analysis was fluff and easy. Since you have provided nothing, defended yourself, specifically OMGUS me and now have let it somehow get personal. And finally... [red]Annul[red], looking back we should have just lynched him yesterday. Sorry but there was just not ENOUGH to make another town lynch and I was not fully convinced. I feel stupid now but hope that lynching him and some more good medic play will bring us back into this game Now if we can use this list (or an altered version) to start filtering who we scum hunt, we could be extremely effective and efficient. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
Need to update. Ps. annul that means there are 2 medics saying they didn't heal you.. REALLY YOU EXPECT US TO BELIEVE THERES A THIRD? | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 11 2011 03:26 redFF wrote: my play is so different from my scum play it's unreal. I'm gonna pull a palmar and say the good players know im town. also if nobody claims a second roleblock then either eran was lying or rad was rb'd or we have a town rb. so when your town, you post 1 liners, play extremely defensive and do nothing productive for town? | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 11 2011 04:48 Lanaia wrote: No no no no no. I will not lynch Palmar as I believe Zeph's claim. Why do you think that Drazerk's claim is bullshit? Why are you assuming that there are only two medics in the setup? It's technically possible there's a third out there. But we don't even know for sure that we have a godfather or that it's chosen, do we? (or is it an unwritten required rule on TL?) I'm voting annul. scumslip? | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 12 2011 11:38 Lanaia wrote: If they don't think he's scum, why should they vote him? I'd say it's a pretty damn good reason to NOT vote him. Mattchew, do you think annul is scum? It feels like the only reason you think he's scum is because he claimed to be hit n1, which has been confirmed. That's literally the only reason I see in your filter for you yelling about annul being scum. How do you feel about the medic who claimed protecting annul? I haven't seen you mention that so I'm curious. Does it change your opinion You only voted annul because you didn't think red would be lynched. As soon as it looked like it, you switched. Why? Why not just be on the person you think is most scum the whole time? I'd really like to know that. I think I'm starting to agree with annul in regards to drazerk, though. I know LaL isn't always the best, but it's kind of always been something I agree with. Now that I look back on it, draz's claim was kind of insane. I think that annul is scummy and a leach on town. He takes a ton away from scum hunting and causes repetitive and circular conversation that leads to nowhere. He's literally 70% of the last 2 days of discussion. Lynching him and redFF would just lead us to work towards new scum. I have said for a while that redFF is scum to me. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 12 2011 11:35 kingjames01 wrote: Mattchew: What is your stance on redFF? lol | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 12 2011 11:48 Lanaia wrote: What if they were to both flip town? How would you feel, having advocated a double-lynch? WHY do you think annul is scummy? How do you FEEL about the medic claiming to have saved him? Is something wrong with someone being a huge part of the discussion? Would you prefer he lurks? You don't have that many fewer pages than he does. (I can't make that last statement grammatically sound :/) .... Why do you bother quoting someone only to say lol. How is THAT productive? If they both flip town we lose. I have advocated redFF being scum all game and annul has done nothing beneficial for town. I would feel bad because I will have been part of the reason we lost. I think annul is scummy because he didn't shoot his scum read he gave it off to someone else. He also has no analysis or commentary that helps town, ever. He was protected and vig shot n1. There is something wrong when theres 6 fucking mafia and we are only talking about 1 fucking person. I would prefer he provided analysis, shot his own scum read, and stopped debating with palmar. I have been extremely active because I want to be as helpful as I possibly can. As you can see I have not focused purely on Annul and have been posting my own feelings on other players and topics throughout the game. I have said redFF is scum like 300 times, thats why I said lol, I hate being redundant | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 12 2011 11:58 kingjames01 wrote: Well, he has been pretty vocal against redFF so I can understand his intent. My real question didn't come across correctly but it tied in with the discussion of double lynching. I'll ask again: Mattchew: You have stated that you think that annul should be lynched as well as redFF. So is it your belief that they are both mafia? Please explain your reasoning as to how mafia would allow the possibility for the only viable lynch candidates to be both on their side. They are both bad for town. That usually means they are scum correct? They both have provided nothing and annul has been distracting. I believe they are both scum | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 12 2011 12:04 kingjames01 wrote: Mattchew: think about this for a minute. There are 6 mafia members and 13 Town remaining. Propose a reasonable mafia-oriented plan in which both annul and redFF are lynch candidates and there's relatively little talk about ANYONE else. Wait, what? Don't we have another hour??? It makes me believe that 1 of them is not mafia and that they are hiding their votes somewhere meaning 1 is def mafia, which we need to get atleast 1 kill today to stay in this game i think | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
fuck. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
God the wrath of Palmar is probably coming in like 3 hours | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
Still Kickin: Refallen Palmar Erandorr replaced by bumatlarge hyshes Zephirdd Drazerk Jackal58 sandroba TruthBringer Toadesstern annul kingjames01 Corrupt replaced by xsksc Lanaia Risen VisceraEyes vaderseven Mattchew | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 13 2011 01:04 hyshes wrote: I'm up for a Mattchew lynch tommorow. I'll be honest I have no defense. My reads have been horrible. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
if you had a vig shot and knew annul would be lynched tomorrow 100% who would you shoot, if you were a jailor who would you jail, and if you were a cop who would you check? I would ask medic but I don't want scum to know that answer, the others I don't believe will help scum that much unless they have a framer and medic right? | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 13 2011 03:55 hyshes wrote: With these kind of questions, i want to lynch mattchew 100% whats wrong with them... If each question yields 2 or 3 answers it could help confuse scum and help town. We need a solid night and the most important roles are the medics which is why I left them out | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 13 2011 05:50 Drazerk wrote: I vote we kill Mattchew tomorrow so were you actually role blocked night 2 or was that part of the lie too? | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
The way I see it is either Annul is scum and wanted Palmar shut up, or Annul is town and Mafia wanted Palmar to look like he needed to be shut up. I don't think Draz lied about being roleblocked, and I think that he is town. I am starting to believe that both Draz and Annul are town. fuck. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
outta respect to the recently deceased, and he's the best candidate. Draz is town. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 14 2011 05:35 annul wrote: so who wants to actually explain to me why they think drazerk is town? Because mafia role blocked him night 2 | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 14 2011 07:31 annul wrote: though read mattchew's filter lol he pushes palmar for a while and then instaflips onto me... then instaflips off of me and onto redff... then instantly ges back onto me... his main argument all the while is "annul claimed to be shot and no medic came out to claim he got saved" -- now we know 1. i did get shot and 2. medics did save me so what is HIS reason now for being on me? oh yeah "well annul is detracting from scumhunting and is 70% of the town debate" <--- not something i control! when asked about me or redff he says "They are both bad for town. That usually means they are scum correct? They both have provided nothing and annul has been distracting. I believe they are both scum" proven wrong once... will be proven wrong again if i flip. so really you have provided even less of a nothing than i have, because i have to act to save myself; you do not and you chose poorly. so i mean this is what you contribute: the drazerk defense: and lastly, something that encapsulates your play style this game in some perfect and pristine format... TWENTY EIGHT MINUTES LATER res ipsa loquitor. I responded with my I suck and I am bad's to seperate events that made me realize how bad I was playing | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 14 2011 08:18 TruthBringer wrote: Regarding drazerk, I don't think he executed it that well, but his plan was apparent. He was trying to get shot because he was a veteran. It wouldn't have been a safe play for a mafia to claim to be a really powerful role (which he did) because then the mafia would gun him down really quickly and it would look suspicious if they didn't. He was hoping the trap would already be sprung, the mafia would attack him the veteran and he could explain it all. He was trying to be a hero, but it didn't work out. Now, annul, v7 has all the same abilities as annul. That doesn't prove that annul is town, but I think other things are compelling. 1. The balance argument. 6 mafia vs 19 town. I doubt mafia would be given a role with a day vig power. 2. Not killing Palmar. annul could have killed Palmar earlier because Palmar did seem suspicious early in the game. He could have easily rationalized it, but he didn't. Palmar was already tunnelling annul early on day 2. At that point, Palmar wasn't very highly regarded as town. 3. Giving his shot to Toadesstern. He didn't know who Toad was going to have him shoot. I'm sure he didn't expect Toad to shoot prplhz. He couldn't have just backed out if Toad told him to kill someone who really was mafia. If he really were mafia, he could have easily shot redFF or someone else who had been very suspicious all game. Hyshes: Hyshes has made no effort towards being pro-town. He has the MO of the average mafia player this game (seemingly.) The mafia have been staying below the radar and the townies have been the ones drawing attention to themselves. Honestly, as a town, we've made it really easy for the mafia. redFF did several shady things that brought attention to himself. So have Palmar, v7, annul, and drazerk. I'll admit that I don't know that annul, drazerk, and v7 are town, but it seems that the mafia have been able to just lay low this game and watch the town be self-destructive by some players drawing all the attention to themselves and others just focusing on them. The mafia haven't had any need to do anything bold like claim RB immune medic or offer a shot to the most townie considered person. They've been able to lie low and I think that's how we'll find them, the quiet, unhelpful, uninvolved players, like hyshes. ##vote hyshes We have 2 medics, a JOAT with a medic ability, an extra vote, a syllo with 2 shots, and a cop. You really think they couldn't/wouldn't give scum 1, ONE, extra shot? | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 14 2011 08:31 Lanaia wrote: A vanilla townie, you know, like how everyone we lynched has been. Mattchew, you seem to be assuming all our PRs have claimed. Do you think that is the case? Nope. Those are only what have been claimed. And I only included 1 JOAT because my point is there could VERY WELL be a scum JOAT making him not part of the town team | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 14 2011 08:45 Lanaia wrote: Personally, if you're going to assume one isn't, you'll have to possibly assume other roles aren't right. We're also confirmed to have an RB but we don't know what side it's on. There are 2 rb's | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 14 2011 10:54 VisceraEyes wrote: I'm not sure about a mass-claim - I mean, with as little cohesion as this town has, I doubt that would do anything but introduce a lot of WIFOM and confusion, right? Wouldn't that make it harder to find scum, not easier? Let me know if I'm wrong, I haven't been in many games with mass-claims. I've looked into Drazerk and I still like him as a scum-pick, but I'm also looking into Sandroba, hyshes and Annul as alternatives as we speak. Before rereading, I want to state for the record that I have to exert special effort to look at Annul and Sandroba objectively, because I have a town and scum read on them already respectively. Just FYI. Draz is town. I don't know about the rest of your list. If you do vote anyone else please make a case for them if you are really sure about lynching them. Otherwise Annul seems to be the best bet for town | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 14 2011 19:44 Toadesstern wrote: what the fuck is going on. Yesterday I was about to vote annul because V7 said he's scum, than he changed to "do not vote annul because he's not scum" and now he's back to annul is scum? Is there going to be more changes comming or do we now have a final statement? And yes I haven't voted yet because of what I said above. V7 first said he's scum, than he said he's not and I went to bed 2am. Now I woke up an see a shitload of text I have to read. I just read it.. it is, as you said, a bunch of shit. Basically it comes down to there being 2 JOATs. 1 is mafia and 1 is town. keeping my vote on annul | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 04 2011 20:05 ZBot wrote: Current votes: annul (11): bumatlarge, Drazerk, Lanaia, sandroba, Mattchew, vaderseven, xsksc, hyshes, Refallen, TruthBringer, Toadesstern vaderseven (2): annul, VisceraEyes hyshes (2): kingjames01, sandroba (1): Jackal58 Drazerk (0): Voting ends at December 15 2011 13:00. (That's approximately 4:37:19 from now.) anyone got a guess who we should lynch next if annul flips red lol | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 15 2011 08:38 Lanaia wrote: Mattchew, why don't you answer your own question? VisceraEyes. He is annul's voting shadow | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
Take away draz and I agree. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
is this realistic? | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
HE SCUM CLAIMED XSKSC | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 15 2011 10:56 sandroba wrote: LOL GG /dance On December 15 2011 10:59 sandroba wrote: Timezones differences suck =) | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 15 2011 11:22 Lanaia wrote: They appear to think he claimed scum. I'm a bit confused myself. I don't understand... How do we know this is a scumclaim? HE LAUGHED IN THE FACE OF TOWN.. JUST LIKE KENPACHI | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 15 2011 11:28 VisceraEyes wrote: Don't listen to his lies! GG indicates that he thinks the game is over..i.e., he secured the mislynch and it's over now. Sandroba is SCUM! I'VE THOUGHT THIS GUY WAS SCUM ALL GAME AND NOW HE POSTS THE TRUTH LISTEN TO HIM IF BUT ONLY FOR TODAY | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
Annul Sandroba Toadesstern Visceraeyes Risen AND WHO | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
Sandroba Toadesstern Visceraeyes Risen AND WHO | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
Drazerk Truthbringer Kingjames01 Vaderseven Mattchew Refallen Known Mafia Annul Sandroba Toadesstern Visceraeyes Risen THE MAYBES [b] Jackal58 bumatlarge hyshes xsksc Please Discuss | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 17 2011 08:35 Qatol wrote: Stop mocking other players, please. Also, please no more pictures unless they're actually needed. so it wasnt mafia mocking town with obvious vote switching into 50 gg's and a bunch of pics and videos? interesting | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
I actually had a solid amount of scum on my list from day 1 (jackal, viscera, and sand) I got distracted by last games palmar vs ace battle in which both were town and just causing distraction. Redff I thought was town on day1 and then started suspicions day 2 into thinking he was scum day 3. It was basically my own tunnel vision that did me in on red. Need to learn how to scumhunt better and come up with better cases. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
| ||