EPTWhat is the max player count?
Steamship Liquidia (TL Mafia 46)
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
What is the max player count? | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE! MAKE IT WORK NOW, YOU HAVE 1 HOUR. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 15 2011 20:44 Forumite wrote: /confirm I´m going to step in here. DCLXVI allready caught this and posted before me, but I don´t think my reason for noticing has been discussed. Okay, to me it looks like this; LSB wants us to Lynch All Liars. Kenpachi claimed Townie, but LSB doesn´t want us to take the Kenpachi claim seriously. My problem here is that either Kenpachi lied, or he just told Scum not to nightkill him, because it would be no use. If we are going to go by the LAL policy, then either Kenpachi lied or acted Pro-Scum, so why should we back off? Kenpachi does this every game, then we can ignore his claim, but what I don´t agree with is LSB promoting LAL wanting to ignore the claim, even if it is meta. It took him about 5 posts to go back on his own policy of Lynch All Liars. If Kenpachi lied (or play Pro-Scum), why does LSB then defend him after his first policy post? FoS LSB As for lynching 1-2 lurkers and 1-2 scum, sounds reasonable, I think we should stay at about that number for now. We need to be carefull about lynching, not just because of the consequences in the setup, but if we find 5 players who seem connected, then it´s better to lynch 1-2 and see if they are scum, than lynching all 5 at once and kill 5 innocent townies at once. Ummm... what? I'm sure you know this. Kenpachi's townie claim means nothing. It never means anything. He does it every single game. LSB ignoring it does not imply contradiction; it implies common sense. And your FoS on him is incredibly scummy. FURTHERMORE, claiming town is not pro-scum, because it is in everyone's best interest to appear as a vanilla towie. Townies want to look green because they are green. Blues want to look green so that they are not a Mafia target. And Mafia wants to look green (most of the time) because they don't want to get lynched. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 16 2011 01:19 Zephirdd wrote: "most of the time"? Care to explain to a newbie when would a mafia NOT want to appear green?  Sometimes Mafia has to fakeclaim a blue role as a last resort to escape a lynch. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 16 2011 02:10 GreYMisT wrote: Nisani, in both your relevant posts of the game, you have given very neutral coments, and they both serve to give the mafia an "out." bolded are the examples. and To me this seems really odd. Care to elaborate on your reasons for posting these? I was simply responding to what some people were saying. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 16 2011 02:32 bumatlarge wrote: Next person that mentions LAL is getting a vote placed on them. Seriously enough with the useless shit. We will be lynching however many scummy people we can find on the particular day. We are restricting ourselves when we don't have a clue as to what our boundaries are. Nisani has posted complete fluff and none of it shows any effort in actually heling town. I don't think the new people are brain-dead, so unless the specifically ask about something, don't use them as an excuse to post asinine shit. Oh, hi kibbibit  ##Vote Nisani201 I cannot tell if you are scum or just plain stupid. I make about a few posts and you accuse me of "useless fluff"? FoS on you for creating an anti-town atmosphere. None of what I said was useless fluff. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 16 2011 12:05 wherebugsgo wrote: Nah, remember I said we need to all focus on one person until 24-36 hours before lynch. Then we start consolidating to get multiple targets. Basically, if one person is working on a case on one person and one person only, it's more effective than if that one person tries splitting their attention to watch four or five at once. It's just not effective. If we all focus on one target each and then evaluate toward the end of the day, we can sift through the best cases and work on lynching those. However we need activity in the last 24 hours to make this viable, and we'll rack up a lot of posts. But it'll hopefully be the best way to find scum. What I don't want people doing is what chaoser is doing; just going out there and throwing votes left and right without actually thinking about them. Sure, you can do it if you want, but it's not going to be pretty. The thread will be a mess and you'll have multiple people OMGUSing because they're taking votes. Oh god... Why? Why do you always say things in every game that makes me mad? There are so many ways this could go wrong. For instance, say we're focusing on Target A, and then Target B does something that is moderately scummy. Do we FoS him? Vote him? "No," says the master, WBG. "First, we must finish discussing target A, THEN, we can go ahead with Target B." This can only protect mafia. Please, no one do this. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
Enough with the FoS. Forumite is scum. ##Vote: Forumite | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
Both of them are bullshit. First we have this case against LSB, which I already mentioned: On November 15 2011 20:44 Forumite wrote: /confirm I´m going to step in here. DCLXVI allready caught this and posted before me, but I don´t think my reason for noticing has been discussed. Okay, to me it looks like this; LSB wants us to Lynch All Liars. Kenpachi claimed Townie, but LSB doesn´t want us to take the Kenpachi claim seriously. My problem here is that either Kenpachi lied, or he just told Scum not to nightkill him, because it would be no use. If we are going to go by the LAL policy, then either Kenpachi lied or acted Pro-Scum, so why should we back off? Kenpachi does this every game, then we can ignore his claim, but what I don´t agree with is LSB promoting LAL wanting to ignore the claim, even if it is meta. It took him about 5 posts to go back on his own policy of Lynch All Liars. If Kenpachi lied (or play Pro-Scum), why does LSB then defend him after his first policy post? FoS LSB As for lynching 1-2 lurkers and 1-2 scum, sounds reasonable, I think we should stay at about that number for now. We need to be carefull about lynching, not just because of the consequences in the setup, but if we find 5 players who seem connected, then it´s better to lynch 1-2 and see if they are scum, than lynching all 5 at once and kill 5 innocent townies at once. And then we have this: On November 16 2011 22:48 Forumite wrote: No, the game had allready started. You confirmed getting your role first of all players, then when people got going with discussing policy, you dropped the above post. During 2 hours people had been talking about policy, and even dropped a few weird posts that have since been called out, so the game had definetly started. And about which part is scummy about it? Everything! You excuse yourself as a new player, thereby lowering our expectations on your contribution in the game, making way for future lurking. It´s an empty icebreaker, full of forced enthusiasm. The message of the post is "I´m trying to help but will probably fail". Is that the kind of player we are going to rely on in this game, or someone who will be left until the end because noone will bother to shoot him? He is pressuring them based on bullshit cases. ------------ In regards to chaoser, I don't think that Palmar's analysis has enough evidence to prove him guilty. Just because it's Palmar doesn't mean that we can't look at his analysees objectively. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
But most of it is irrelevant. Kenpachi is not irrelevant. He should die. ##Vote: Kenpachi | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
Is Kenpachi dead, or can I unvote him? | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
##Vote: Palmar | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
Seriously, why aren't more people voting for him? ##Vote: Drazerk | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
I'm not voting Sinani or prplhz because I think we have pretty good non-lurker suspects that can die. I prefer lynching scum over lurkers. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 18 2011 04:58 wherebugsgo wrote: I think Nisani should probably die at some point. Preferably tomorrow. why | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
--- In other news, here is my defense + Show Spoiler + On November 18 2011 05:28 Nisani201 wrote: WBG you are so wrong... I provided a reason for every single one my votes. Okay, I think I understand now. On November 17 2011 08:55 Nisani201 wrote: Just read through the thread. A lot of shit is going down. But most of it is irrelevant. Kenpachi is not irrelevant. He should die. ##Vote: Kenpachi That's not a reason. "Kenpachi is irrelevant therefore he should die" is not a reason for him being scum. At that point, Kenpachi was pretty self explanatory. I could have explained more but I didn't think it would be necessary. His insane martyring triggered the vote for me. On November 17 2011 10:02 Nisani201 wrote: Palmar needs to get lynched. His case against chaoser is stupid, and he has barely been doing anything throughout this game. His vote on Lanaia is also scummy. ##Vote: Palmar That sounds like a reason, but actually it's just bull. Completely unsubstantiated. Nope, it makes complete sense. On November 17 2011 02:16 Nisani201 wrote: Both of them are bullshit. First we have this case against LSB, which I already mentioned: And then we have this: He is pressuring them based on bullshit cases. ------------ In regards to chaoser, I don't think that Palmar's analysis has enough evidence to prove him guilty. Just because it's Palmar doesn't mean that we can't look at his analysees objectively. When Palmar asked you "what case is bullshit" you just picked the two and said they're bullshit. You didn't say why. You didn't point out anything that seemed fabricated. You just said they're bullshit. Real convincing, dude. That's because I explained it earlier in the thread here. On November 18 2011 01:58 Nisani201 wrote: I just read through Drazerk's filter. He has been jumping on bandwagons and supporting bad lynches this whole game. Seriously, why aren't more people voting for him? ##Vote: Drazerk This one makes you a hypocrite, since you also voted Kenpachi. But I'm not supporting bad lynches. The problem is that both you and Drazerk look terrible, and neither of you has amazing town play. Drazerk is straight up bad as town (no offense, Drazerk you defended yourself by saying that lol). I'd rather vote you over Drazerk right now since you seem to be soft-defending chaoser at every turn, and I don't like chaoser right now. So, you need to die. ##unvote Drazerk ##vote Nisani201 | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 18 2011 08:29 wherebugsgo wrote: Drazerk will make a better lynch tomorrow, once we see these flips. Today, chaoser, nisani, and bum need to die. If any of those flip town then we need to heavily reconsider Drazerk+Coag. Why is Coagulation suspicious again? | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
##Unvote: Nisani201 | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 18 2011 08:32 wherebugsgo wrote: I'm not going to bother answering you anymore, since it's clear you're not reading the thread. Consider yourself ignored. You do this a lot. Especially when you're scum ##Vote: wherebugsgo | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 18 2011 08:42 Drazerk wrote: Stop being an idiot and read the thread ##Vote: Nisani201 What makes you think I'm not reading the thread? | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 18 2011 09:12 GreYMisT wrote: You really arn't ever going to provide significant reasoning for voting are you? even when that is the major case against you, you decide just to do it anyway. ##Vote: Nisani201 Denying information like that is anti-town. He's done it to me before as scum. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 18 2011 10:47 bumatlarge wrote: I'll look into sinani, he seems to post unsurprisingly similar to nisani This is untrue. I'd vote you, but I guess some people are right in that I am voting too many people. Maybe tomorrow I will push for your lynch. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 18 2011 10:58 chaoser wrote: Are you willing to vote sinani nisani? Given how your "too many votes" right now means nothing since it's 2 more minutes till the end of day Well I guess it doesn't matter anymore, since hyshes voted him. But I don't think he'll flip scum. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
Drazerk Zephirdd GreYMisT risk.nuke Tyrran Lemonwalrus Cyber_Cheese These people voted for both Kenpachi and sinani206. There is 1-2 scum on this list. Drazerk is one of them | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
Did you read what Kenpachi flipped? | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
The vote on Sinani206 had no reasoning at all. scumlol | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
wherebugsgo Palmar Drazerk | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 19 2011 03:42 sinani206 wrote: wtf stupid caps lock  You were already warned; you're not supposed to post in the thread. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 19 2011 06:00 wherebugsgo wrote: I read this post and laughed. I'll respond to it, I guess. No one cares if you get lynched. You're also mountains of useless as town, so honestly if we try pushing your lynch and you don't contribute to finding scum then we still don't know your alignment. Chaoser is the opposite. People will care if we start pushing his lynch, and as town he is useful. Thus, if he actually is town he will hopefully contribute to us finding scum. If chaoser is scum we'll get good reactions out of other scum too. If you're scum, you're easy as hell to bus. If I were scum, for example, I'd bus the fuck out of you as soon as you had suspicion. You're more of a liability to your team than a benefit. That makes you a better vig target than a lynch target, since the discussion created in your wake will be completely useless. So you're saying I should be vigged instead of a lurker? loooool | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 19 2011 07:09 wherebugsgo wrote: A player like Nisani or Drazerk is best left to a vig shot because they will not contribute much if they are town and we try to lynch them. Why do you keep saying this? Stop dictatin what contributions I will make in the thread. You keep saying that I will be useless D2, but I know exactly what I am going to do. I'm going to push for your lynch, as well as Drazerk's. You know this is coming, whci his why, right now, you're trying to nullify everything I say by putting it under the label of "useless." That way, when Drazerk is lynched, you can take the credit. You don't want a vig to shoot me because I'll be useless. You want a vig to shoot me so you can bus Drazerk all by yourself. You're scared because you see me as a threat. If there are any vigs here, think before you shoot. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
But don't worry WBG/Palmar, you're pretty funny too. ##Vote: Palmar ##Vote: wherebugsgo ##Vote: Drazerk | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
##Vote: prplhz | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
##Unvote: Drazerk At least now I can focus on more important people, like WBG and Palmar. However I think I focus on Palmar today. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On November 16 2011 21:49 Palmar wrote: Actually, I just read Chaoser's filter ##Unvote: Coagulation ##Vote: chaoser So here's my reasoning chaoser needs to be lynched. First off, we should establish that chaoser is both analytical and critical as town. His play this game starkly contrasts that idea. He is throwing accusations and votes both left and right without actually doing much to back them up. Now, this leads us to think what would make chaoser throw his votes around like this. The only sensible reason to do that as town is to apply pressure, but when you are the one being pressured it's actually not beneficial to do this, because no one is going to listen to you anyway. The optimal town play in this situation is to try as hard as you can to build reputation for people to listen to you for. However, chaoser seems not even slightly interested in raising his status in the game, feeling pretty comfortable being not listened to at all. Something only scum is interested in. This one is particularly interesting. First off, we have to understand how sinani206 works to see if this is legit. Remember, sinani206 hasn't got the greatest track record as town or scum, but he does have his tells like everyone else. This little vote he placed on chaoser seems to be pretty genuine. Like he's not pro enough as scum to realize that doing something like that with his meta as scum is excellent play, and thus the simplest explanation is that sinani206 is town. chaoser should have understood this, yet he directly OMGUS votes sinani206, even gloating about the fact he's voting multiple people. So yes, I think chaoser would be an excellent lynch today. Also, just for future reference: This is chaoser soft-claiming a power-role. No reason to do it unless you're scum. If you can't understand how he's soft-claiming a power role, well... you deserve to be punched. So yeah, let's kill that guy. This is his initial analysis on Chaoser. There are 3 points in this analysis: 1. chaoser is voting a lot of people. 2. chaoser is OMGUSing sinani206 3. chaoser is "softclaiming a power role." The first point is incorrect because this game has a mechanic that is special for voting multiple people. The second point is wrong because chaoser's vote on Sinani206 is not OMGUS The third point doesn't even make sense. This bullshit analysis is the origin of our trust for Palmar. And it has branched into a case against chaoser that makes absolutely no sense. wherebugsgo's analysis on Chaoser is identical to Palmar's, but that is for another time. Later in the day he votes for both Kenpachi and Lanaia, both for stupid reasons. Even though he said that chaoser should condense his targets, we have Palmar targeting a total of 3 people. Going for multiple targets isn't scummy. But what is scummy is self-contradiction. Speaking of which... On November 17 2011 08:19 Palmar wrote: How is that relevant chaoser, I don't want to lynch you because you're outspoken, I want to lynch you because you're playing anti-town, you lied about your role-claim and you're making bad calls. I think I am being fairly outspoken, I'm just playing pro-town, and thus no one wants to lynch me. Palmar is now accusing chaoser of playing "anti-town," and for lying. First of all, we have no evidence that chaoser is lying (other than "you are not vanilla town, that is not a possibility"). and second of all, Palmar provided no evidence of "anti-town." BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE! On November 17 2011 10:09 Palmar wrote: I'm gonna sleep. Chaoser: why did you throw those votes around so liberally early on? Please explain your thought process and what you wanted to achieve. If I believe your answer I'll consider laying off you. Palmar is now implying that chaoser's multi-vote was actually a pretty important factor in the case, and that he'll dismiss it if chaoser can justify it. Another contradiction: On November 17 2011 10:23 Palmar wrote: (when you voted for sinani206 you said something like "I'm so happy I get to vote for many people), makes me believe that there is an ulterior motive to it. On November 16 2011 23:54 Palmar wrote: oh wait... I can vote for multiple people? That's awesome ##Vote Coagulation ##Vote Drazerk While these contradictions are scummy, we have to go back to the point of Palmar manipulating us and stealing our trust. Now you might say, "is he really stealing our trust? Surely you're taking this too far." But this fact is evident in this post, where he directs blues: + Show Spoiler + As for townies, any medics should be protecting into this group of players: Forumite Tyrren risk.nuke Palmar Wherebugsgo If we have investigative roles, we should be checking into this group of players chaoser Lemonwalrus Greymist Bumatlarge Zephirdd If we have vigilantes they should be focusing on people who are hellbent on being useless and scummy to boot. Nisani201 Drazerk xskxc etc etc Yes, i'm directing blues, what about it bitches? There is no reason for town to direct blues. Blues should direct themselves, because they are confirmed town to themselves and can make their own opinions. If we give someone else this kind of control, it transfers it to unknown alignment. In this case, that alignment is scum. ...and then there's this. I stated this before, he wants to nullify my thoughts against him because he knows it's coming: On November 18 2011 23:56 Palmar wrote: yah, do you have a problem with that? Like, I'm almost just as certain that nisani201 is scum, and I don't care if some hero of the town shoots him and leaves him dead in a ditch, he's not going to be useful anyway. Even if he's town nothing of value was lost. I will conclude my analysis with a scumlist that Palmar provides. Currently it provides no reasoning; however I wouldn't be surprised if he follows it up later today. On November 21 2011 06:05 Palmar wrote: I had an initial town read on prplhz, I'm sorry but I don't have time to expand upon that, so I'm just gonna go ahead and not support a lynch on him. I'm really sorry for my performance today, real life is just taking time away from me. here are my scumreads: ##Vote: DCLXVI ##Vote: chaoser ##Vote: Lemonwalrus ##Vote: RebirthOfLeGenD Stop being manipulated. Get out of your box. Realize that Palmar is scum, and vote for him. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 21 2011 09:22 wherebugsgo wrote: Greymist the simple fact that you have to ask that of Nisani should probably tell you that he needs to die. He's not interested in being transparent or following through on what he says. He contradicts himself constantly. He's scum. LOL YA HE'S TOTALLY USELESS BECUZ HE'S ATTACKING MY SCUMBUDDY! OLOLOLOLOLOLOL LET'S IGNORE HIM. Anyways, yes I admit that I shouldn't have said I would go for WBG, since I'm going for Palmar today. tbh it doesn't really matter because they're both scumbuddies, and share the exact same opinions. The entire purpose of the scumteam is to brainwash you into thinking that I'm useless. There's no other reason for them to keep reminding you of that in the thread, other than following a scum agenda. Read the analysis I made on Palmar, one more time. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 21 2011 19:07 Cyber_Cheese wrote: I was on the fence about this one. I still don't feel sure about voting him, and I feel like there are better options for today. ##Unvote: Prplhz I feel like Nisani is much in the same boat as him, with the difference that Prplhz seems to be able to express some form of transparency for things he does. Nisani has shown he is capable of making good posts + Show Spoiler + http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=282366¤tpage=75#1495 And yet most of his posts are one liners, and votes with minimal explaination, he seems to be deliberately holding information back from the town ##Vote: Nisani What the fuck? Did you read my analysis on Palmar? You're just eating the bullshit that WBG and Palmar put out that you don't even read my posts because you just think I'm useless. I'm not going to pressure WBG today because I'm considering the possibility that he's been misguided by Palmar, much like how jcarl and I misguided him in XLV. However he is not off the hook. Everyone else should be focusing on killing him. He is evil scum and deserves to die. ##Unvote: wherebugsgo | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 22 2011 03:59 Palmar wrote: Does anyone notice how absurd these choices of votes are. Now unless you buy into some ridiculous theory we're a scum team and Nisani201 is attempting to bus me, your votes make absolutely no sense. You KNOW that in these two votes you're getting at least 1 townie lynched, and if I'm correct about Nisani201 being innocent you're going after 2 townies. I guess it's hard to see those things when you're not reading the thread. I find this post incredibly scummy. Hey look, we can agree on something. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
Palmar has not even attempted to defend himself, and you are still trusting him. Why are you trusting a case made by obvious scum? Palmar is the enemy here. All of you should be lynching him. If you don't think he's scummy, read my analysis again. WBG is just being his usual tunneling self, and I am starting to lean more towards him being scum than him being stupid town. I don't think I'm going to get lynched today, but we have to realize that the true enemy is Palmar. He is the king of misguiding the town this game. From now on, I want you to read everything he says objectively. Don't mindlessly trust him like you have been so far. WBG is sort of the same thing (except he's merely a parrot). | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 22 2011 10:32 bumatlarge wrote: Also WBG, do you really still think palmar is town? DCL is claiming to be a 2nd medic (which is lol, either he or palmar has to be scum just off that, people should AT LEAST be voting one or the other), so unless palmar has some claim up his sleeve, DCL being town is very damning. I am inclined to believe this. His vote on both me and Palmar shows that he has an indifferent perspective on our conflicts. And as we all know, and indifferent perspective is a scum perspective. ##Vote: DCLXVI | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
His baseless vote on Palmar is a way of separating the scummy lurker from the outspoken townie. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
##Vote: Palmar ##Vote: RebirthOfLeGenD ##Vote: DCLXVI | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 23 2011 13:05 wherebugsgo wrote: RoL is very likely to be town because I thought Hiroruby was town. You're not. Please die. There exists a case on you, I've reiterated it at least 3 times. Dumb townies are dumb. They don't listen. You die now. ooohhh thahnk yuuuu come agin No you haven't. This is the case against me (there is also this post, but that is just a quote of my previous link, and a bunch of false statements with no evidence). The rest of your posts are just random statements that mean nothing. "Nisani is scum," "Nisani deserves to die," and so on. People are believing you because you're repeating it so much; I have done nothing scummy this entire game. As such, when you say something like this: On November 23 2011 12:42 wherebugsgo wrote: What's setting me off about DCL is that nisani is voting him... it really proves that you are avoiding all avenues of logic to simply think that I'm scum. That is scummy in and of itself. Thus my vote. ##Vote: wherebugsgo | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
DCLXVI I just looked through his filter and I think that I voted him for a stupid reason. This post is incredibly scummy, but that's pretty much it. I don't think there's enough evidence on him. ##Unvote: DCLXVI RebirthOfLeGenD Both RoL and Hiroruby have been lurking, and haven't contributed much, which makes me think that this is a scum strategy. I think that his old vote on Palmar was a way of separating him from Palmar because they are both scummy. His recent posts are interesting but I feel like he did it because he was called out on lurking, rather than to actually help town. Palmar Palmar is trying to control the town. There is no reason for a townie to do this. He has contradicted himself multiple times, and took his bullshit case on Chaoser way too far. He has been attacking me with empty statements throughout this entire game, despite the fact that he actually has no reason to believe I'm scum. wherebugsgo Besides parroting Palmar, is he refusing to believe the slightest possibility that I could be town. He keeps bringing up his bullshit case on me that makes no sense. Recently he made this and this posts, in which he colorized the name of players that were not confirmed. It isn't super-scummy, but it's not something that a town-aligned player would do. It means that he is going to illegitimate lengths to allude to the fact that I'm scum. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 24 2011 05:48 wherebugsgo wrote: STOP VOTING ROL. You all saw how your retarded lynches based on inactivity and "lack of contribution" turned out. Drazerk, sinani, prpl all flipped town. I give RoL greater than a 90% chance to flip town. Don't push his lynch. He is not pushing a scum agenda. If he was, he wouldn't want the amount of attention he'd receive with 7 simultaneous votes. RoL is a much more experienced player. We should all have high expectations for him. In XLII he was incredibly outspoken as town (even though all of his reads ended up being wrong), and this is the exact opposite. Sinani and Kenpachi are known for not posting as much. RoL is not. That is why he should die. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 04 2011 11:44 Zona wrote: It is possible that some role abilities are tied to the votes that are cast, so be mindful as to how you exercise your vote I would not recommend voting Coagulation. I am almost certain he is trying to draw votes to himself for whatever reason. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 25 2011 03:47 Palmar wrote: It's possible nisani201 isn't scum. I actually don't care, I want him dead either way, for terrible. I will read sabin010 later, I'm off to enjoy an evening of turkey and football. bahahahaha kill this guy | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 24 2011 01:22 Palmar wrote: If you are town I will seriously consider not playing with you again. You're not allowed to be an asshole until you stop being wrong. On November 25 2011 03:47 Palmar wrote: It's possible nisani201 isn't scum. I actually don't care, I want him dead either way, for terrible. I will read sabin010 later, I'm off to enjoy an evening of turkey and football. If this guy is not dead by tomorrow night then you guys are fucked | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 25 2011 06:12 Palmar wrote: Seriously, fuck off you moron. Go die, I hate you. If you're town you don't even fucking try. What a useless sack of shit. ...wow | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 25 2011 06:40 Palmar wrote: I wouldn't even be surprised if you managed to vote ONLY for townies this game. Forumite Kenpachi Palmar Drazerk Wherebugsgo prplhz RebirthOfLeGenD DCLXVI Maybe 1, 2 at most scum in there, but potentially none. How do you feel about that? You're scum. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
It just didn't seem like we were talking about much. If you guys want to talk about stuff, go ahead. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 26 2011 03:39 Zephirdd wrote: LSB, HarbingerOfDoom, risk.nuke, GreYMisT, Forumite, Tyrran, wherebugsgo These all claimed/confirmed green. Just because you asked <3 I claimed green when I got lynched. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
Is there a complete role list? | ||
| ||
