|
On November 17 2011 09:48 chaoser wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 09:45 Cyber_Cheese wrote:On November 17 2011 09:42 chaoser wrote:On November 17 2011 09:41 DCLXVI wrote:On November 17 2011 09:32 chaoser wrote:On November 17 2011 09:28 DCLXVI wrote:really kenpachi? I don't know you but I didn't expect you to whine so much and give up. Even if the town is bad, you can at least try pointing out their errors instead of just bitching. @Zona can he be put on the banlist for this? I certainly don't want to play with him again: Play to win. Make your posts, and choose targets for your actions in order to help your team achieve its win condition. How can you say he didn't play to win? His case prompted a lot of discussion and activity. Get off your high horse; you're sure as hell not good enough to be bitching about Kenpachi "whining and giving up". since when is it a prerequisite to be good at this game to say that this means someone gave up? + Show Spoiler +On November 17 2011 06:41 Kenpachi wrote:
lol town sucks On November 17 2011 06:44 Kenpachi wrote:
alright, tell me. Where is this day going? its going to shit. you know why? you guys are lynching me.
Fact: When town lynches a town Kenpachi, they lose. you know why? because town sucks.
Killing off inactives with lynches is just so bad. lrn2play On November 17 2011 06:48 Kenpachi wrote:
im going to fucking shoot myself. Walrus and risk.nuke need more experience because this is ridiculous On November 17 2011 06:55 Kenpachi wrote:
i can do better than that. you guys are just so demoralizing On November 17 2011 07:06 Kenpachi wrote:
very well.
gg i surrender
you win mafia On November 17 2011 07:07 Kenpachi wrote:
"gg i surrender" On November 17 2011 08:51 Kenpachi wrote:
No i want to piss you all off On November 17 2011 08:57 Kenpachi wrote:
##Vote: Kenpachi
Im the Doctor that can only protect greens. oh and i also function as a watcher.
On November 17 2011 08:58 Kenpachi wrote:now that i proved that you guys are indeed retards, i have no regrets. implies i have a role On November 17 2011 09:06 Kenpachi wrote:
This is the first in a long time since i went defeatist. the first time, i was really bad. this time, you deserved the punishment. srs and it goes on.... Kenpachi is way better than you are. I don't think he's missed a single vigi shot at mafia and I'd sure as hell rather have him at end game than you. When he flips scum who was relying on his reputation, you'll be eating those words. Or you'll be eating your words when lanaia, me and kenpachi all flip town. WTF is the point of that post? I thought we already discussed the difference between a winning decision and a smart decision in Team Melee Mafia. I'd rather lynch hiroruby, a smart choice than kenpachi, a bad choice. Seriously go fuck yourself, I'm done playing TL mafia; after this game I'll be co-hosting/hosting only.
umadbro?
|
On November 17 2011 09:59 chaoser wrote:Show nested quote +##Vote: Palmar
He has been pushing a moronic case against chaoser since the beginning and most of you are eating it up. When the Lanaia/kenpachi thing came up, he threw his vote their way haphazardly, my guess because they are both town (although I still have some hope that KP was scum) and he just wants to make more town lynches day 1. All the while he has been pushing this chaoser lynch as a sure thing. If we lynch chaoser and he flips green or blue, I want palmar dead the next day for sure. He wants chaoser dead because as he said himself chaoser is a good player for town. He has built a case against him on LAL so he can hide behind policy when he is proven wrong about chaoser when chaoser flips. His entire case on me is literally built on the fact that I somehow "Lied" when I clearly did not. That's the one fact he keeps bringing up over and over again. What a joke.
Your not getting voted because of LaL, it's because you're scummy.
|
On November 17 2011 09:13 Lanaia wrote:As I write this, I am currently reading page 32 but I felt explanation has priority over my reading at this moment in time. I was most definitely aware it would show my anti-vote when I submitted it.Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 06:56 Drazerk wrote:On November 17 2011 06:54 Lanaia wrote:
Greymist: Yes, I do. From what I've seen of his town play in the past, I felt he was town. If I'm wrong, I'm sorry. I have to go right now, but as soon as I'm back from class (around 4 pm PST, it's nearly two now) I will try to explain more. I got the null void that I always get from kenpachi what exactly led you to believing he was town? He just felt more town to me than some of the other people in game.I felt trying to save someone I'd thought was town was a good idea, at least at that point in time. Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 06:58 Drazerk wrote:
Lanaia one last question - Was you aware your anti vote would appear in the vote list? I knew it would appear in the votelist with my name attached, yes. Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 07:06 Zephirdd wrote:
Kenpachi is saying a lot and defending himself a lot, but isn't giving anything conclusive. I already voted him to "pressure" him to give a good reasoning/analysis on the game(similar to Palmar's), but it's no use. The vote stands, and won't go back.
That said, I'd like to know Lanaia's reasoning for the anti-vote, and WHY to take it back right now. I believe you had a good reasoning for Kenpachi to be town this game, and I want to know it. I also believe you were not aware that the Anti-Vote would show your name. However, why take it back? Why not just explain yourself later on(when you have the time), and convince people that Kenpachi is actually town? Why just let him die like that, are you trying to remove any "connections" people made between you and him? Or did you actually change your mind and are trying to actually lynch him? (Or are you Mafia trying to save your ass by team-killing?)
It just feels scummy imo.
##Vote: Lanaia I took it back because people got all pissy at me. And people getting pissy at me frustrates me. I've already said I'm terrible at convincing people. And if I were trying to lynch him, I'd have a vote on him, no? And no, I am not mafia trying to save my ass because that would not be the best way to go about it. I was most definitely aware it would show my anti-vote when I submitted it.I don't care if you don't believe me. Now I am going to finish reading the game. On November 17 2011 09:21 Lanaia wrote:
OH, And for the record, I didn't remove it until it was evident everyone had seen it and I'd clearly done something effing stupid. I'm sorry.
Oh, and I didn't consult with town because that would essentially mean a full role claim d1- not something I wanted to do.
CLEARLY I SCREWED SOMETHING UP.
LaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaL
|
saying that kenpachi always lurks isnt a defense though. its to help teh nubz who dont know about him.
|
neither defended each other
|
On November 18 2011 07:17 HarbingerOfDoom wrote:Show nested quote +On November 18 2011 07:09 sinani206 wrote:On November 17 2011 09:13 Lanaia wrote:As I write this, I am currently reading page 32 but I felt explanation has priority over my reading at this moment in time. I was most definitely aware it would show my anti-vote when I submitted it.On November 17 2011 06:56 Drazerk wrote:On November 17 2011 06:54 Lanaia wrote:
Greymist: Yes, I do. From what I've seen of his town play in the past, I felt he was town. If I'm wrong, I'm sorry. I have to go right now, but as soon as I'm back from class (around 4 pm PST, it's nearly two now) I will try to explain more. I got the null void that I always get from kenpachi what exactly led you to believing he was town? He just felt more town to me than some of the other people in game.I felt trying to save someone I'd thought was town was a good idea, at least at that point in time. On November 17 2011 06:58 Drazerk wrote:
Lanaia one last question - Was you aware your anti vote would appear in the vote list? I knew it would appear in the votelist with my name attached, yes. On November 17 2011 07:06 Zephirdd wrote:
Kenpachi is saying a lot and defending himself a lot, but isn't giving anything conclusive. I already voted him to "pressure" him to give a good reasoning/analysis on the game(similar to Palmar's), but it's no use. The vote stands, and won't go back.
That said, I'd like to know Lanaia's reasoning for the anti-vote, and WHY to take it back right now. I believe you had a good reasoning for Kenpachi to be town this game, and I want to know it. I also believe you were not aware that the Anti-Vote would show your name. However, why take it back? Why not just explain yourself later on(when you have the time), and convince people that Kenpachi is actually town? Why just let him die like that, are you trying to remove any "connections" people made between you and him? Or did you actually change your mind and are trying to actually lynch him? (Or are you Mafia trying to save your ass by team-killing?)
It just feels scummy imo.
##Vote: Lanaia I took it back because people got all pissy at me. And people getting pissy at me frustrates me. I've already said I'm terrible at convincing people. And if I were trying to lynch him, I'd have a vote on him, no? And no, I am not mafia trying to save my ass because that would not be the best way to go about it. I was most definitely aware it would show my anti-vote when I submitted it.I don't care if you don't believe me. Now I am going to finish reading the game. On November 17 2011 09:21 Lanaia wrote:
OH, And for the record, I didn't remove it until it was evident everyone had seen it and I'd clearly done something effing stupid. I'm sorry.
Oh, and I didn't consult with town because that would essentially mean a full role claim d1- not something I wanted to do.
CLEARLY I SCREWED SOMETHING UP.
LaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaL Do you know the full extent/limitations of Lanaia's role? How did she full role claim by anti-voting Kenpachi? We still don't know if she can double vote, how many times it can be used, etc etc.
i doubt thats not her full role. if it isnt then she is scum because anything else would be too powerful for town.
|
On November 18 2011 07:20 Tyrran wrote:
So within four hours, we must focus on getting another lynch. We already have 2 people a 8 votes, i suggest we focus on them. Both look scummy, both are in my likely scum list, yet Drazerk voted for Sinani206 so its unlikely that both are scum.
First of all, Sinani was a big partisan of dividing our attention . Quite amusingly he used the divide and conquer analogy, where as pointed by WBG, you are suppose to divide you enemy. Meaning we town are the enemy?
He Bandwagoned against Lanaia, which as i explained before, is something that is very pro-mafia. Just look at his post just before, when we already established that Lanaia should not be lynched. Both his votes are given without any explanation other than "its obvious". He is either scum or an extremely bad town. Even Drazerk looks good in comparison. I dont think town needs him.
##Vote Sinani206
lololol hypocrite
|
On November 18 2011 07:21 HarbingerOfDoom wrote:Show nested quote +
Yawn, if you guys really think kenpachi is a better lynch than sinani in regards to people trolling/lurking in the game then that's just sad.
Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 07:54 chaoser wrote:On November 17 2011 07:52 Palmar wrote:
I don't think Kenpachi will be missed anyway, he's completely useless as either side. He has never missed a vigi shot So please explain how that isn't Chaoser defending Kenpachi. If it is him defending Kenpachi, should you be lynched under LaL?
oh didnt see that post lol
|
also except for the last one, which is the one i was talking about in that last post, those posts are just telling teh nubz his meta
|
On November 18 2011 07:27 Tyrran wrote:Show nested quote +On November 18 2011 07:22 sinani206 wrote:On November 18 2011 07:20 Tyrran wrote:
So within four hours, we must focus on getting another lynch. We already have 2 people a 8 votes, i suggest we focus on them. Both look scummy, both are in my likely scum list, yet Drazerk voted for Sinani206 so its unlikely that both are scum.
First of all, Sinani was a big partisan of dividing our attention . Quite amusingly he used the divide and conquer analogy, where as pointed by WBG, you are suppose to divide you enemy. Meaning we town are the enemy?
He Bandwagoned against Lanaia, which as i explained before, is something that is very pro-mafia. Just look at his post just before, when we already established that Lanaia should not be lynched. Both his votes are given without any explanation other than "its obvious". He is either scum or an extremely bad town. Even Drazerk looks good in comparison. I dont think town needs him.
##Vote Sinani206
lololol hypocrite Great defense. I will remind you that I voted kenpachi only becaused i agreed with risk.nuke that this was the rigth way to proceed. And i will redirect you to This post where i explain why mafia would press charges on Lanaia, and thus why those who blindly voted for her are suspects.
your bandwagoning on me when you vote me for bandwagoning
|
*looks at votelist*
##Unvote: chaoser
##Unvote: Lanaia
##Vote: Drazerk
##Vote: Nisani201
|
Oh I get it, DCLXVI is 666. hahahahahaha
|
On November 18 2011 10:00 Kibibit wrote:
Ditto, I'll be at MLG, so there will be some relative inactivity, though I can post from my phone.
barely missed that 24 hour thing
|
also its a 72 hour day so 1:20 is pretty short relatively
|
On November 18 2011 10:06 Kibibit wrote:Show nested quote +On November 18 2011 10:03 sinani206 wrote:On November 18 2011 10:00 Kibibit wrote:
Ditto, I'll be at MLG, so there will be some relative inactivity, though I can post from my phone. barely missed that 24 hour thing ?
- You most post in the thread at least once every 24 hours. Your role may also include other activity requirements which you must follow.
|
oh lol i didnt see your earlier one
|
SCUMTEAM
no lol
but also chaoser is always stupid so its ok
|
stop posting while im typing
|
On November 18 2011 10:27 chaoser wrote:
I seriously suggest people give two more votes to vote sinani off. He's not going to be helpful for town at all in the coming days. I don't see how people can say kenpachi was a good vote and then NOT vote sinani due to "A lurker was already lynched". WBG, Palmer, Cyber, etc. talk about me making a mess in thread (which I didn't) but decide to ignore sinani? what bullshit
look how the kenpachi vote turned out. do you want that to happen again?
|
theres no such thing as a counter bandwagon in this game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
