There's nothing at all in my conversation with Arctocod that says anything about my alignment. It does say about his, however. He refused to talk openly and rather decided to hide behind his gimmick and fake identity. Haven't seen him on irc since then.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

October 14 2011 14:07 GMT

#549

No, though you may make specific inquiries over skype

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

October 14 2011 19:53 GMT

#579

This "if you are town, you must be running for mayor since you can only know your own alignment" is such an hilariously flawed logic. The only way to elect someone is to get more than 1 vote and that supposedly requires townies voting for townies or we are guaranteed to end up with a scum mayor.

Absurdly bad

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

October 14 2011 19:59 GMT

#581

I never said I didn't talk to him about the game, you are imagining things. Mig said we talked a lot non-game related things, but that's about it.

It's you who is dodging. Explain how a townie gets elected without other townies voting for him and thus at least to a degree trusting him.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

October 14 2011 20:16 GMT

#585

You are back to saying that every single townie should run for mayor

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

October 14 2011 21:27 GMT

#597

On October 15 2011 06:17 wherebugsgo wrote:
It's clear that syllogism is not a candidate. He has no votes.

Feel free to vote for me, but it doesn't appear likely we've enough votes to elect us both. Obviously if mig can't be elected, I would rather have me as one of the two elected roles.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

October 15 2011 08:18 GMT

#678

This greymist wagon is absolutely scum influenced. I can not believe people like Foolishness would push to elect a new player, especially in this setup. Greymist may still be town, but the intend is clearly to prevent the threat of townie mig being elected.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

October 15 2011 08:38 GMT

#680

You do realize the whole point of the elected office is to have a good player protected by bodyguards? While #1 priority should be to deny the position from scum, the notion that we should elect a new player to achieve that when there is a very good player who is even more likely to be town is ludicrous. Greymist's draft position is even #22

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

October 15 2011 17:01 GMT

#714

Haha not that this has any relevance to the game, but he absolutely is not my "mafia hero". I thought he was scum in DRH's experimental game, and indeed he was

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

October 16 2011 07:47 GMT

#870

If there are any guns out there that require targets, contact me or mig please

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

October 17 2011 15:49 GMT

#995

Rad raises some good points, but I'd like to hear more from Meapak, specifically who does he consider a solid lynch today. Arctocod apparently, but how about building an actual case

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

October 18 2011 15:06 GMT

#1092

It's a shame two yorkists were already dead, if that's indeed his family

##vote Meapak_Ziphh

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

October 19 2011 04:53 GMT

#1246

Jackal thanks for that

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

October 19 2011 10:56 GMT

#1256

This is more a post game topic, but it's a shame the game is currently so dull for observers and even for the majority of town. Little to no actual analysis is being done in public and even in private it's largely a matter of the process of elimination. I could go into detail as to why I think we ended up in this situation, but I'll save that for post game, though perhaps the reasons are already apparent to most.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

October 21 2011 12:04 GMT

#1387

Deliberately misleading players like that would be disgusting, given that this is an open setup and the OP states that there are only four factions. If an invention changed alignments, the only number shown should be the total number of players remaining

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

October 23 2011 07:21 GMT

#1514

So did Kenpachi really pick NKVD agent at #2 as scum because he misunderstood the role description

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

October 23 2011 18:37 GMT

#1529

PM games make me so incredibly lazy; I'm pretty much content talking to a few selected people and being otherwise completely invisible. Anyway, I concur with Rad's thoughts on skype/irc. They put too much pressure on most scum players, especially skype. When talking to people who you know well, you've to answer pretty fast and doing something like erasing/rewriting your replies constantly can make you look scummy. I suppose you can get used to it, but it still gets pretty demoralizing having to constantly be ready to lie in real time.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

October 24 2011 17:48 GMT

#1576

That's a bad approach; there aren't that many defensive roles and scum aren't likely to end up with most of them. You've flexibility with KP roles, so you can aim at scum or town depending on the situation. Defensive roles only postpone the inevitable, especially if townies are doing the shooting. One of the teams going for vote rigger could have easily solved the DT as pardoner problem immediately as well.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

October 24 2011 17:57 GMT

#1578

Going for GF at #6 is fine, I was mostly referring to the other picks, which were all around way too safe

Besides, not like anyone followed a plan and if you get checked, you are generally dead anyway

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

October 24 2011 18:28 GMT

#1580

It's not a townie point of view, we probably spent more time theorycrafting scum setups before the game than townie ones. Obviously the plans have to be adjusted according to draft order, but expecting other teams to do everything for you is a mistake.

Prev 1 2 3 Next All

Please or register to reply.

Live Events Refresh