TL Mafia XLIV
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
| ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On August 19 2011 22:07 chaos13 wrote: Palmar is just trolling/tunneling atm. I don't think he's going to provide anything more than what he has, so we can pretty much just ignore him until he does. No posts of Jackal's stand out to me right now. To be honest I didn't even realize he was playing this game until you made that post. Ask me later when he's posted more and I've had some more time to catch up on my reading the thread. I think he wanted to spark some discussion. Don't know what ringed his scum bell on dropbear aside from posting some policy's. Oh, and i just want to say that that filter button will make life sooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much easyer. i just discovered it | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On August 20 2011 00:34 Palmar wrote: It's not sheeping when my argument is the best in the thread yet. Also, sheeping my votes is generally a good idea. What, yeah when we know your not mafia. And what about dropbears play in real time mafia. His play was vastly different then now. | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On August 20 2011 19:26 Pyo wrote: woah, woah, woah... BrownBear? I thought you wanted DropBear dead? I think he just doesn't like bears:\ | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
| ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On August 23 2011 01:08 Palmar wrote: Hence "I don't know when and how". The medic should absolutely claim if Foolishness was up for a lynch. Also, if the medic suspected he might be getting shot for some reason, leaving the information with us is good. If I get RB'd tomorrow does that confirm Foolishness? Hell no... I don't even know what you're saying here. But yes, he's not about to be lynched today, thus it's stupid to claim until at first near daybreak tomorrow, maybe even wait another cycle or two. People keep talking about Vain: I think shooting him tonight would be an excellent idea. He hasn't contributed squat to this game and doesn't deserve to live. If you wanna direct vigi's at least come up with more targets. I wouldn't be surprised if there actually was a scum medic. On August 23 2011 02:44 supersoft wrote: why don't we lynch RayzorFlash? He's probably gotten coached and his death would give us a lot of information to work with... Can you write out what information we get then? In my opinion that only creates more wifom | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On August 21 2011 09:02 Lucidity wrote: Ok from the voting thread it looks like Sevryn is the closest to being lynhced. We can't no lynch. ##Vote Sevryn. Hurray for deadlines at 4am. I'll catch up tomorrow and shit. Sorry. | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On August 23 2011 03:52 supersoft wrote: funny how xtfftc, vain and rayzorflash defend each other ;-) @vain: you want an answer to your question? filter me. That is correct | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On August 23 2011 04:13 supersoft wrote: i'd prefer vain but let's do it. ##Vote: xtfftc wtf, you prefer me but lets just go for xtffc. Sounds logic. Now when its not xtffc you can always say"oh jeah i liked vain better" very convenient | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On August 23 2011 04:22 hiro protagonist wrote: I have no idea what your trying to say Vain... He asked me if i meant what xtffc said. To me it was pretty clear but i guess not to everyone. So to be clear: Yes, if we agree on a single target and direct vigilante's to them you have a big chance mafia just protects them. but i think we wasted too much posts on that subject already. | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On August 23 2011 04:54 wherebugsgo wrote: Who are the 3 scummiest people to you, then? 1: nard 2: xtfftc 3: dunno yet | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On August 23 2011 06:14 Jackal58 wrote: Dammit. Why did you slam a vote onto Sevryn when it was obvious there was a very good possibility the vote may have been shifted off of a person that appeared to be a townie getting mislynched? because i'm stupid and didn't want to no-lynch. Also it was like 3am in the morning:@ | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On August 23 2011 06:00 wherebugsgo wrote: Sorry for all the posting, but I just noticed this, gotta follow up: 1.) Okay, why? Why is nard suspicious to you? 2.) Why is xtfftc suspicious to you? 3.) Why is nard MORE suspicious to you than xtfftc? 4.) If you don't have a third person, what have you thought about Mig? Rayzor? 5.) Why are you lurking so hard? You sure love lists. Ok here it goes. 1: don't you see his posts are revolving around nothing at all? He's posting and saying nothing at the same time. Also withholding his vote so he doesn't have to elaborate that much in case of a switch. 2: Same as with nards with the vote witholding. and posts like this set me off a bit On August 21 2011 04:42 xtfftc wrote: In this case, ##Vote: Sevryn Now, let's proceed with a discussion of what actually matters. My gut says supersoft and QuickSilver but my gut is biased and wants those who go after me dead ^^ Although Supersoft being so cautious when defending Sevryn and yet so aggressive against me and his earlier bandwagonning is something worth remembering. I want to hear more from DropBear and BlackBear. I do not find DropBear particularly suspicious but he still has to answer the questions raised. BlackBear is suspicious (going too agressively against inactive players, some random accusations) and, unlike DropBear, is a target we might get a majority for. Hiro, judging by the OP I think we have about 6 hours left. He is basically saying he suspects 2 people and then just after that he wants us to don't mind him:\ He is pointing out that he wants to hear more but asks no questions. 3: nard is contradictive. He wanted to get sure we got a lynch but still voted brownbear, wtf? 4: didn't check all the posting history's yet 5: i'm not lurkin now, am i? also i didnt' really thought i had something to add so i refrained from posting what i guess i shouldn't have done | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On August 23 2011 21:24 Mig wrote: The whole thing is weird I don't know why db would fake claim DT then say he checked supersoft instead of saying he checked me. Well if he was mafia it would be very convenient if they lynched you so he could say "i checked supersoft not mig, Sorry" and could live another day. I say we lynch supersoft an look if it checks out. There is a chance supersoft was framed or is a miller but i think ill take that chance over lynching xtfftc or mig. | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On August 23 2011 21:43 supersoft wrote: pff. are you kidding me? Liquidite - Welcome to TL Mafia XLIV you are JimboSilvers, the retired serial killer, you now live at the old folks home, Paradise Lost, while the place is disgusting, you have adopted a philosophy of pacifism, so taking up the knife against the mafia is not an option, you can however still vote to kill mafia, be quick about getting them lynched so you can go back to sleeping and playing cards. Jeah, that tells us almost as much as dropbears claim Also, each role has custom fluff, to deter any silly ideas like name claiming, the mafia may at any point request a safe-claim from me and I will provide it, safe claims can be for any role, from Liquidian to Inquisitor | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
| ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
| ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On August 24 2011 00:31 DropBear wrote: Yeah well you know from RTM that my judgement isn't always best T_T Sorry for being a retard but we need to get back to business. RayzorFlash and xtfftc? Yeah, but why was the mindset of this? get supersoft lynched? get mig lynched? get yourself lynched? I'm just confused why you thought it was a good idea to claim, please elaborate because you could have just made a case against supersoft without being night target Number one | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On August 24 2011 05:05 Kurumi wrote: Someone looked at Lucidity's posts? Besides claiming VT in first post, 1/2 of posts being "sorry for being afk" he has done nothing. He said he would get a replacement if he wasn't able to play, are we lacking people or what? I filtered him a while ago. He just wen't afk most of this day and put a shitty vote on severyn. Anywhays i don't think we should discuss him or any lurkers because we won't come any further. He's in my opinion a better vigi target than discuss all his, 6? posts that he has. By the way, i can't get over the feeling that hiro was pushing an agenda. It wasn't just the idea that was bad. The arguments were sloppy either. 50/50 chance its a mafia? good way to cover your ass when it turns out he was a detective. This is in my opinion way more convincing than lynching xtfftc, nard or mig. | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
Also. Palmar isn't chaos playing the same as in Real time mafia. It could be just me but wasn't revolving around EVERYTHING like his last play then or am i missing something:\ | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
i hope i'm right now:\ Vote: Mig | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
Btw, there were two post today that set me off. On August 29 2011 16:43 Barundar wrote: Wherebugsgo, you are putting way too much into the vote of a suspect. We have a red check from a sane DT, that alone is reason enough to lynch Vain, regardless of where others put their vote. Smart scum knows that newbies pay a lot of attention to other suspects actions, and as scum I've successfully scared off people from voting on my scumbuddy, simply by being suspicious and voting with shady enough reasons. If the quotes you have listed would have hinted at DT checking Vain the night before chaoser's claim, there might have been something to your framer theory, but now it's just null. You haven't even considered that Nard could simply have a more powerful scum role than Vain, such as roleblocker, making it preferable for mafia to lose Vain first. As town you don't know scums intentions, so don't bother WIFOM'ing yourself into an endless line of conspiracy theories. If you want to be productive you can start discussing what target to go after once Nard and Vain are dead. Personally I'm the most certain of Bumatlarge being scum, simply because BB post an analysis of xttffc, without commenting on mig at all, and afterwards completely ignored Mig posting his DB analysis, despite popping into the thread to drop a comment to Foolishness. Mig didn't bother yelling at him either to consider his case. Bum saying that BB's actions makes perfect sense without even reading the thread doesn't do much to change this opinion. After bum I'm the most suspicious of Pyo for hardcore lurking. For the last scum I'm a bit uncertain: Kurumi did the capitalized Y in his claim, making me suspicious about him. I had him as town before though, simply because I think Palmar dieing was detrimental to Mig's push for chaos13 the day he got lynched, and because a scum vigi wouldn't feel the need to claim that he shot a townie. RayzorFlash, because of Mig's chaoser push day 1 when he became a lynch target, and a couple of really bad posts. Other mild suspects includes: Errandorr because I simply can't read him. He seem to not have been afraid to give his opinions though, making me lean town on him. Navillus for lurking hard after starting out well day 1. Could have been simply scared away by the spam though. That's nice. Tell the town they should shut up for two days and don't even bother to discuss silly conspiracy theories because its all just stupid WIFOM. Just for a minute consider that i'm townie and it doesn't sound that far fetched at all. Your just living in a world where me and nard are already flipped and you only have 3 scum to worry about. Well i'll tell you that you won't be happily surprised. When that happens scum will then probably try to lynch chaoser and we lose the game because everyone thought he was telling the truth and is not so sure anymore. On August 28 2011 12:56 bumatlarge wrote: Pretty silly chaser, i think we would have been fine with just going with foolishness on nard, but I highly doubt you are lying about your check. We should check Vains history to match up with chaosers claim, and by we I mean me. For now my votes going on him. I trust chaoser is telling the truth, and he's a strong town read. ##vote vain In other words: We lynch vain and if he turns out to be town we lynch chaoser because he lied to us and he's scum and i win. On August 28 2011 15:56 Varpulis wrote: Hmm, the margins of error that I can see are: Chaoser's is mafia, and he's not sane. I don't think he's mafia and he's confirmed himself as sane. If you want to argue the possibility that vain's a miller, the same argument can be made replacing vain with nard and miller with nosy neighbor. For the purposes of my decision, I'm ignoring both possibilities. I would like to stress that I'm not against lynching nard. In fact I would hope that he dies too, and soon. I simply think that it's better to lynch vain first. I really do need sleep, so I'll revisit this tomorrow when I'm not dead tired; maybe I'm missing something. Hopefully both will have claimed by then, and we can move forwards from there. Oh, And i'm voting Nard without a doubt. We already had 2 noisy neighbour and i don't believe they have two framers. Also he had suspicion on him from day 1 one and it looks like he just dug his own grave with his last post. I'm also inclined to lynch bumatlarge also becouse he is scum and to prove that i was framed, Scrap the miller thing we already had 2 noisy neighbours. | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On August 29 2011 23:41 Barundar wrote: Mind giving us the rest of your reads vain, as well as your role text? There, But i could have gotten this from anyone so it doesn't really say anything. Or be creative like kurumi:p + Show Spoiler + Liquidite - Welcome to TL Mafia XLIV you are Lance, the local professional starcraft 2 player, your user name is Legion, and you are a member of the well reputed team IM, as IMLegion, you have no special powers, however you will use your tactical genius and gosu micro to vote for scum and bring down the mafia. i would but i won't because i gotta eat & run. Be back in 3 hours though | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On August 29 2011 23:41 Barundar wrote: Mind giving us the rest of your reads vain, as well as your role text? By the way. Supersoft looks town to me. he was talking waaaaaaaaaaaay to much about nard even in the beginning in the game. Also he was very active from the beginning of the game. Started about mig at day 2.Also If xtfftc turns out to be scum we can be almost sure he's town. If not i still would put him as town | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On August 30 2011 03:18 Barundar wrote: I asked for scum reads. Way to easy for mafia to give town reads. Sucks i can't just magically make scum appear. If i'm scum you want all reads you can get. If i turn out town you don't get any information from my town or scum reads. It's the reasoning behind the reads that seperates the scum from town. Now the next time when you feel to call someone out just close teamliquid and take a break. There was nothing in your post that asked for scumreads | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On August 30 2011 03:51 chaoser wrote: So you basically said you don't want to give reads cause if you were scum, it's bad for you, and it you're town we don't get any info from it? Yeah ok lol. The fact that you even mentioned that if you WERE scum it'd be bad for you is telling enough for me. I'm pretty sure my check was correct. Lynch him tomorrow. No, i'm just doing one person at a time and when i find a scum read i'll let you know:\ I don't think i'll be around for long because of my not very pro-town behaviour so i figured i catch up and look for anything you might have missed. On August 30 2011 03:38 Varpulis wrote: reads mean scumreads. townreads are beyond useless, unless you're discussing a lynch candidate who you believe to be town. this post literally SCREAMS scum. Especially the bolded part. yes we do, we get the opinions of somebody we know the alignment of, which is impossible while you're alive. You've claimed that you're town, so why don't you go about proving it? Scumhunt, weigh in on suspects, DO SOMETHING. Also, telling people not to call people out is bad. Really bad. WBG, read this post, and tell me if he's town that got framed. I seriously can't believe how you think that, especially after reading posts like this. I am just filtering people one by one and trying to reason why someone is town/scum. If you see something faulty in my reasoning or see a hidden agenda give me a call. How the fuck are you otherwise gonna know if i'm scum or not. Your just like chaos and lucid in your nice little world where i'm undoubtedly scum, while the mafia is just laughing their asses off because their plan worked out perfectly. Also i don't proofread my posts for scummy behaviour because i'm not scum | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On August 30 2011 03:55 Varpulis wrote: I'd be quite disappointed in our vigis if he's still alive tomorrow (assuming kurumi isn't the only one) A double lynch would be nice right about now. Ye, shooting me would be better. Please don't waste a lynch on me:\ Btw, i vote nard | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
| ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On August 31 2011 07:44 wherebugsgo wrote: Are you going to post scumreads or not? This post is like...not enough. To me it has the air of a townie who's just given up, but we need more from you, otherwise you're gonna get lynched. In fact I'm pretty sure most people want to lynch you first, so you need to give us some great reasons not to. Yeah, i know that and its not gonna change with mafia hammering on me and i know i can't defend myself because i just stupidly followed the rest:\ Maybe i'll put some time into this tomorrow but i don't really think i'll live up to that cause its my bday tomorrow. | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On September 01 2011 22:45 Barundar wrote: Vain moved during night? Please, do explain. No i didnt. Wheresbugsgoto tracked bumatlarge/BB to me the same night chaoser checked me and came back with scum. so pyo still could be a non-naive dt I think this is pretty straightforward Vote: bumatlarge | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
| ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On September 05 2011 07:01 Erandorr wrote: way to waste my 500th :D Not if you post something tonight ![]() Well, i checked pyo's history and there's not much to go on. He didn't push or vote for scum untill it was sure and was fast to accuse me when chaosers check came back. That and the wierd claim sets me off a bit. He got back a green claim he said but didnt gave the result or even thought i the people he checked were green. I think he's the best shot we got:\ | ||
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
| ||
| ||