|
On August 29 2011 03:50 Lucidity wrote:
1. You defended BB with no reasoning behind it. "He's 100% innocent".
2. You even tried to use Foolishness' death now to prove BB's innocence. That's just desperate.
1. I wanted to make sure nothing stupid happens
2. yeah i didn't do that. I wanted to know whether foolishness had checked him or not, because he posted this huge bearhuntpost.
And yes, I still believe Kurumi is innocent.
And just for the record: I accused Nard, Rayzor, xtfftc, vain and you.
Reason, you didn't vote for Rayzor day1 and you didn't vote on mig or xtfftc day2
Some of you even didn't vote mig at day3.
Thats my reason, short and convincing. At least in my eyes.
|
On August 29 2011 04:37 Lucidity wrote:
What do you make of the "You's" in Kurumi's role claim?
don't care, maybe he wrote it, maybe not. If he was mafia, GM would have written him a fakeroletext etc.
as for your who and how etc. So far I was right with my guesses. mig was red, nard and vain probably are, too
All three of them are on my list. if they are scum, i have a really nice quote since I only consider rayzorflash scummier than vain. i told you, that you are not the #1 on my list. but you are on that list and BB isn't.
if rayzor or xtfftc flip green my list would change drmatically, but right now i don't see how they're town. Both of them contribute nothing but distraction.
|
yeah but obviously i sacrifice 3 of my fellow scumteammembers to gain towncredit, after trying to save 2 townies from dying day1 and 2.
|
On August 29 2011 04:50 supersoft wrote:
yeah but obviously i sacrifice 3 of my fellow scumteammembers to gain towncredit, after trying to save 2 townies from dying day1 and 2.
ah wait and if rayzor is red, I tryed to get one of my scumteammembers lynched instead of a townie! i did an excellent job there for my team.
|
On August 29 2011 13:02 VisceraEyes wrote:
Why am I suddenly Mafia? I haven't been paying this game enough attention admittedly, but I wouldn't say to a scummy degree. I've voted honestly and I wouldn't say unjustly.
What's the case against me exactly?
I am not sure, but I think they're trying to confuse us. I think vain should die. And Rayzorflash right after him.
|
|
|
this looks like a DB-DT-claim to me. Fake and extremely distracting.
|
just tell us the results of your checks. jackal returned green? vain red? errandorr?
|
lol i can't believe that someone screws up like this :D
|
i'd say vain first. He's been extremely scummy and is one of my suspect i had right from the beginning because of the rayzorthing.
|
On August 31 2011 18:21 Pyo wrote:Show nested quote +On August 31 2011 15:09 Barundar wrote:The only thing that bothers me about Pyo is he claim DT at night, which could be a shitty attempt of trying to draw a hit, which I didn't consider before I called BS on it. But that would mean he had to write his flavor text himself, since GM only give fake flavor to mafia, and the flavor text looks very convincing. I'm leaning mafia on him unless he make a bloody good case for his innocence. I've been ignoring VE for a long time, but I like WBG's points against him upon re-reading. I'll have to look more into him, but we might end up at a point where he is simply the only one left I don't have a town read on  . Btw why the hell is mafia not RB'ing you? DING DING DING, we have a winrar. I know I had been lurking a bunch as I tried to figure out my sanity, but once chaoser came out and claimed, I knew I was a naive DT (every check, including Vain, has returned green) xtfftc returned green. I figured the best I could do was try to draw the hit away from chaoser or at least put off the death of a confirmed sane DT for another day. I am not quite sure what to make of both of us still being alive and neither of us being role blocked - my guess is that they were hunting for a medic.
I believe you there, however your plan was complete shit. Why didn't you just post your flavortext, your checks and (edited) results. Ofc mafia wouldn't kill you, if you act scummy as hell and refuse to give your results.
|
well, i am not sure about BB. I think we should stick to vain who is in my eves definetely scummier.
my mafialist is:
xtfftc, rayzorflash, vain, BB
|
i won't change my vote. Vain is the one who has to get lynched today.
|
ah wait i changed my mind. voting bumatlarge. I overlooked this thing that he visited vain. sorry, i got very few time right now. I have to write my bachelorthesis and it's a storm of work right now
|
haha i owned you pretty badly in SNMMIV right?
|
On September 02 2011 05:50 Pyo wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 00:51 Barundar wrote:
Pyo you still haven't given your last check (the one from last night). Yes I did!!! xtffftc came back green...
okay you're naive.
|
1. Lucidity
2. chaos13
3. ghrur replaced by Barundar
4. xtfftc
5. Erandorr
6. RayzorFlash
7. darkponcho replaced by VisceraEyes
8. Vain
9. chaoser
10. supersoft
11. Navillus
12. Curu
13. Pyo
14. Kurumi
|
hmm, i was thinking about you, xtfftc:
since the end of like day3 or something i don't think that your posts indicate that you're scum.
But I still have no real explanation for the votings that happened on day2.
Maybe I read too much in there, and BB flipping red also weakens my case against you.
I believed that mig and you are both scum, because on mig was no scum and mig/nard didn't vote you either. I am not 100% sure anymore...
Also vain, yes i think he's green. And he was a suspect of mine because he refusd to switch on rayzor. But that doesn't change my attitude towards rayzor. I still think that he's scum.
I will post something about the players that i think are town for sure. since I don't want them to get shot, I'll post that tomorrow.
|
On September 04 2011 09:31 RayzorFlash wrote:
I was suspicious of chaoser's claim ever since he actually claimed it, check my earlier posts. The longer he stays alive without providing more "useful" information, the more suspicious I get.Especially because of the initial timing of his claim, added to the new information about bum being framer, and in his two nights since then he hasn't provided anything useful except for being roleblocked, and Kurumi coming up green which could be misdirection itself
I'm also inclined to think Pyo and Navillus are scum, Pyo because of the horribly bad claim, and Navillus because of how hard he's been lurking despite being the one to propose the lurker list in the first place
Would be up to vote for either Pyo, Nav, or Chaoser today, based on who's closer to majority. For now that would be
##Vote: Pyo
aha cool. you agree with pyo that chaoser might ne scum, however you don't vote chaoser and you vote pyo.
##vote rayzorflash
|
pyo isn't a good target. His claim was pretty stange, but i don't think scum would claim like that.
He wasn't under pressure at that time. However it's correct, that his voting behaviour and his checks don't make any sense...
hmm
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
