|
On July 07 2011 06:07 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2011 06:03 syllogism wrote:
Also Drazerk isn't making any sense whatsoever. That Caller praising has been just a gimmick you made up? Then you "fake claim" and retract. Why would you do that as town? Take all my posts into consideration and not just the claim. Claim to prove a point which I did, I reclaimed it once it had been proven. Why would I do it as Scum / Conspirator as I am basically martyring with the claim something they don't do.
Am I getting this straight: before the game begun you decided to pretend your role forced you to praise Caller in every post.
Can you explain why you did this. Please don't say it was to prove a point later on
|
I don't think I'm willing to swallow a new town player pretending to have a posting restriction and then later fake claiming to "prove a point". He only retracted it once we came up with a plan involving nuking him. No one had role claimed at the time of the fake claim, except Palmar I suppose but that doesn't count. Sowing seeds of doubt is decidedly anti-town. It seems more like something intended to use as a mafia fake claim.
|
On July 07 2011 06:56 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2011 06:48 syllogism wrote:
I don't think I'm willing to swallow a new town player pretending to have a posting restriction and then later fake claiming to "prove a point". He only retracted it once we came up with a plan involving nuking him. No one had role claimed at the time of the fake claim, except Palmar I suppose but that doesn't count. Sowing seeds of doubt is decidedly anti-town. It seems more like something intended to use as a mafia fake claim. It wasn't a posting restriction it was a laugh, although when I claimed I was just getting slightly sick of it.
If you are truly town, never do it again, especially the fake claim part when it serves no pro-town purpose.
|
You also claimed to have no nukes, when there was no pro-town motivation to do that (note: the other player who did that was Palmar, the conspirator/scum). This and the fake posting restriction both point towards an intention to later use them for a fake role claim.
|
On July 07 2011 08:45 GMarshal wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2011 08:43 JeeJee wrote:On July 07 2011 08:42 GMarshal wrote:On July 07 2011 08:41 JeeJee wrote:On July 07 2011 08:39 GMarshal wrote:
I'm dead in a few hours JeeJee, I'm not scum.
And I fail to see how you drew the conclusion that I'm in communication with chaos. I think chaos13 just completely misinterpreted my theoretical power which may or may not be real or fictitious with the EMP. The EMP has no effect on radiation levels or anti-nukes. What it actually does depends on a couple things though :/ You'd have to be pretty retarded to misinterpret it in such a way You'd also have to be pretty retarded to shoot nukes at me/day 1 at all, yet here we are. Anyway, what would you do with my theoretical ability JeeJee? Who would your fictitious experts in infiltration target and why? your mom That was rather unkind and nonconstructive. If I had such a theoretical ability perhaps you would not be a poor target.
Pretty sure another team of agents is already on their way to his place
|
On July 07 2011 08:58 Mr. Wiggles wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2011 08:57 sinani206 wrote:On July 07 2011 08:51 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
The ability also destroys nukes, so use it on a suspicious player, but also one who has fired, or seems like he would fire, nukes in the future, as it would get rid of part of his arsenal.
For example:
Sandroba (Who I personally feel is town, but it would be nice to know for sure, I also don't trust him to not random-shoot)
TAA (Wanted to use nukes earlier, this would remove part of his arsenal and reveal his alignment)
Sinani206 (Who I feel is still suspicious, and who claims his last nuke was "stolen")
I got a PM from caller after I launched my second nuke at JeeJee that my third nuke had been stolen and I now had zero nukes. I'd still like to see a public check on you, and also, this would confirm that your nuke is gone, as it would be destroyed if you're lying, or else it wouldn't effect you at all. Nothing to worry about if you're telling the truth. :p
There's a public check flying his way, eta a few hours
|
So wait, can we still vote?
|
Still better than policy lynching people who you think are townies
|
I would be up for lynching TAA, but since I think Mataza is town, I can't unvote until we know we can get him ahead of Mataza in votes
|
They aren't like vigis because even if you happen to hit scum, he can nuke 2 townies in retaliation, there's a radiation cap and nukes can be shot down by both town and mafia and it's not immediately clear whether the one who shot the nuke is town or not
|
|
|
|
|
Also are we getting the roles?
|
Jeejee was it you who deactivated the nuke aimed at you or someone else
|
"Some factions may rely on the Allies or Axis victory with certain prerequisites.", so it's entirely possible CCCP is a third party faction that wins with allies as long as they fulfil certain secondary objective.
|
The OP claims roles are revealed upon death
|
I notice the OP has been updated with
"Leon Trot-Ze: A cultist that can win with town"
|
I'm pretty sure that's just flavor so the conspirator can still win after "dying"
|
As for "zombies", lynching people who claimed nuke immunity is a terrible plan, scummy even. For one, we don't know if zombies exist at all. Second, we don't know if they are third party or axis aligned; our victory condition is to eliminated axis players. Finally, there's no reason to believe players with at least some degree of nuke immunity have to be zombies.
|
Not that I'm against lynching Coag, but I would do it because he seems scummy, not because he might be a "zombie"
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
