EPT
Real Time Mafia - Page 28
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
TheAwesomeAll
Netherlands1609 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
On June 29 2011 01:04 sandroba wrote: Okay, go read syllogism big post about medics optmization and ask yourself if it makes sense for mafia to be posting that. Now go DT check drazek, because he's scum. Before this TAA never mentions Drazerk. After he goes on a tunneling spree like a maniac. Guess Drazerk is scum after all. | ||
|
hiro protagonist
1294 Posts
On June 29 2011 03:18 TheAwesomeAll wrote: solid point man, hiro GM so hard to choose between drazerk and hiro, but since drazerk was town last time we played he must be town now. (i take metagame arguments with a grain of salt :>) (nevermind read his recent post) Drazerk GM Lets give Drazerk some credit. Because after all, who started the bandwagon against 201? who succesfully shifted the discussion away from GM? Hell yeah, Drazerk . Wow they are talking with each other and not really contributing. You know why that isnt scummy? Because they arent trying to blend in. They seems oblivious of the town, there is no way they are getting lynched, because they are town (or so they think) They have no fear and are two untamed lovers using every communication they got to express that. Scum doesnt do that And he didnt say anything ... His other posts are about the Scum Walhalla that is lurkers and technical issues. The important thing is how he succefully diverted attention from GM. Discuss. (dt check this guy, shoot GM imo) well, thats that then. ##Vote Drazerk | ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
##vote Drazerk | ||
|
PaqMan
United States1475 Posts
On June 28 2011 23:46 TheAwesomeAll wrote: shit just got real I couldn't have said it better. I am still headstrong in my belief that Drazerk is scum and I'm sticking to my guns. But if he flips green I will be full of giggles. Also, I agree with Sandroba's idea of a vigi shooting Drazerk. Since syllo made such an obvious blue hint (one that someone even pointed out), I am really surprised that TAA was shot instead of him? I know TAA most likely didn't get any DT results back, but this should be no-shit thinking. We should take a look at what people TAA was after. Chances are someone in his 4-person list is scum. I would do it now, but it's 4 AM and I'm only human...  goodnight Town! | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
Are we ignoring the possibility of him being the mafia that TAA found? For a relatively new player like TAA (btw, don't be sad, you played well), checking the most outspoken person in the game sounds like a clever thing to do. I'm going to go back and have a look at the timings. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On June 29 2011 00:21 TheAwesomeAll wrote: if GM is scum, he is GF. Please dont check him. I had a better look at what TAA might have breadcrumbed. This one stuck out, and the timing fits too. Does this mean that he checked GM and got an innocent report? I'm definitely not trying to clear GM, as TAA continued to push for him as mafia later, but this looks more like a clue than anything else in TAA's post history. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On June 28 2011 15:23 VisceraEyes wrote: What do we do with it? We've pretty much unanimously decided that blues will be acting on their own with VERY limited guidance from the rest of town. Should we just go down the list and start asking people their opinions on each one? Or is that just something to look at once people start dying? This isn't VisceraEyes, he's much more like me in that he likes to shoot first and talk later. On June 28 2011 15:42 VisceraEyes wrote: I go to do research to answer GM's question and I come back to this?!?! Real Time is going to be INSANITY. Nice, where is your research? On June 28 2011 16:20 VisceraEyes wrote: @Sandroba GM fully admits to subscribing to a controversial stance that he'll catch flack for. Don't you think he'd be toning it down a bit on the lurker-hunt if he were scum? I don't know, uncalled soft defense of GM, not much of a scumtell. On June 29 2011 01:15 VisceraEyes wrote: Only 4 pages in 8 hours...not bad guys, but it seems we're caught up in a lot of mudslinging and tunneling, something I thought we as a town vowed not to do d1. Yes, we have to find a lynch target for today...but come on guys. Bring a case with SUBSTANCE. I know, I haven't done much in the way of scumhunting yet. You don't have to remind me. I'm working on a case as we speak. Just letting you know I'm awake and reading. point a, if there is anything VisEyes does well it's tunneling. This guy can put out ridiculous amount of pressure on people if he feels like it, but somehow the king of tunneling is now against that? It almost feels like a different person playing. Also, where is your case? You've posted enough in other games you're playing. Stop pretending to be reading and working when you're not about to deliver. On June 29 2011 08:38 VisceraEyes wrote: It appears the main topic of discussion here is Dazek vs. Syllogism. In the name of keeping discussion down to a few candidates, I'm going to go ahead and read back through these two individuals' posts. Stay tuned! I'm tuned. There is nothing on the radio. On June 29 2011 09:03 VisceraEyes wrote: I fail to see how you flipping green will prove ANYTHING about GM. You could just as easily be wrong about GM. However, if you flip RED, it's unlikely that GM is town...but I wouldn't lynch him based on that alone. Dealing in absolutes is very scummy to me. Just sayin. Back to reading. -.- More soft defending GM, again, I just don't like the smell of this. I think VisceraEyes is scum So, here is my suggestion on what we do in the situation. VisceraEyes has basically contributed nothing to the discussion, but he has soft defended GM a couple of times. This is one of the times I'd say we have an excellent vigi target. If we shoot VisEyes and thus flip him, we have information on what could be the motivation behind his defense of GM, and we're rid of someone who repeatedly doesn't contribute and fails to deliver, and is scummy as hell. Seriously, I've played enough with this guy to know this is not his town play. If he was town he'd probably be trying to get me hanged or something, he'd at least be on a crusade. That's how he rolls. | ||
|
DropBear
Australia4380 Posts
On June 29 2011 19:05 Palmar wrote: Btw GM started the game out really strong. Are we ignoring the possibility of him being the mafia that TAA found? For a relatively new player like TAA (btw, don't be sad, you played well), checking the most outspoken person in the game sounds like a clever thing to do. I'm going to go back and have a look at the timings. Palmar, TAA can't have found a mafia. On June 25 2011 09:05 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: Detective: You are a detective. You have two powers. Starting Day 1 you may choose to check a players role. Once the action is submitted, it takes you 12 hours to perform the investigation and you will receive your result 12 hours after the action is submitted. Is it really likely that he would have got a result back yet? I don't think so. The Drazerk bandwagon has formed with a speed I've never seen before. It scares me that he now has 12 votes and the next highest is 2. There has been absolutely zero opposition to it. Does this ring alarm bells for anybody else? | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On June 29 2011 20:07 DropBear wrote: Palmar, TAA can't have found a mafia. Is it really likely that he would have got a result back yet? I don't think so. The Drazerk bandwagon has formed with a speed I've never seen before. It scares me that he now has 12 votes and the next highest is 2. There has been absolutely zero opposition to it. Does this ring alarm bells for anybody else? Well why the hell are we bandwagoning him then. here are some important timings to think about. TAA died 27 hours after the game started, that's definitely enough time to decide and investigate. In fact, investigating early is good because that allows the cop to build a case and steer the town in the right direction with ample time before the lynch. TAA's report that GM could only be godfather and DT's should not waste their checks on him came 12 hours and 15 minutes into the game. It's almost as if TAA saw GMs big opening post and decided to simply start out investigating this person who was taking a clear leadership role in town. So yes. I disagree that he couldn't have investigated. I agree that the Drazerk train is dumb at the moment. My alternative is hanging VisceraEyes. ##Unvote Drazerk ##Vote VisceraEyes I will not be able to sway town on my own. Please, help me in this town, let's turn this bandwagon around and get VisEyes hanged instead. I have an analysis on him earlier. DropBear, I challenge you to be the first one to join me. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
##Vote VisceraEyes | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
Hyaach
Singapore1737 Posts
Him hugging GM was bad, but it just seems like gullible townie taking a huge leap of faith on the first ray of light. TAA tunnelling him was a disadvantage to drazerk as we all know TAA's alignment now. But TAA started off drilling at GM. I think he just associated everyone that defended GM with him together. FoS GM Hiro and VisceraEyes GM soft defended hiro and quickly back off like TAA mentioned earlier. i find it wierd for someone as outspoken as him, maintains a neutral ground like his. He asked TAA to for opinions on hiro but never gave his own. In fact he has ask people for opinions and then post out his own after people gave theirs. Why be so passive if you want to take a leadership position? If you think drazerks is posting fluff. take a look at hiro's post. Its worst. All they say are "hi i'm here, too scared to take a stance" He has never post an analysis on anyone that is worth something but always comes onto the bandwagon after a few players voted. On June 29 2011 09:03 VisceraEyes wrote: I fail to see how you flipping green will prove ANYTHING about GM. You could just as easily be wrong about GM. However, if you flip RED, it's unlikely that GM is town...but I wouldn't lynch him based on that alone. Dealing in absolutes is very scummy to me. Just sayin. Back to reading. -.- blanket statements everywhere. Covering both side of the spectrum so he can always fall back if shit blows up. still waiting for the analysis too VisceraEyes so i'm gonna ##Vote hiro protagonist | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On June 29 2011 21:56 Hyaach wrote: I don't know about Drazerk. As people point out, the bandwagon against him is forming at quite an amazing speed. Him hugging GM was bad, but it just seems like gullible townie taking a huge leap of faith on the first ray of light. TAA tunnelling him was a disadvantage to drazerk as we all know TAA's alignment now. But TAA started off drilling at GM. I think he just associated everyone that defended GM with him together. FoS GM Hiro and VisceraEyes GM soft defended hiro and quickly back off like TAA mentioned earlier. i find it wierd for someone as outspoken as him, maintains a neutral ground like his. He asked TAA to for opinions on hiro but never gave his own. In fact he has ask people for opinions and then post out his own after people gave theirs. Why be so passive if you want to take a leadership position? If you think drazerks is posting fluff. take a look at hiro's post. Its worst. All they say are "hi i'm here, too scared to take a stance" He has never post an analysis on anyone that is worth something but always comes onto the bandwagon after a few players voted. blanket statements everywhere. Covering both side of the spectrum so he can always fall back if shit blows up. still waiting for the analysis too VisceraEyes so i'm gonna ##Vote hiro protagonist Just so you know. until you present a better case against hiro, you are not helping town stop the drazerk bandwagon by presenting yet another option. a) build a stronger case against hiro than the one that currently exists against VisEyes b) join us in lynching VisEyes. | ||
| ||
