/in
Sleeper Cell Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Ace
United States16096 Posts
/in | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 25 2011 09:54 darmousseh wrote: /confirm. Got my pm ![]() | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Scum still know they are Scum and that almost everyone else is Town. That shouldn't drastically altar their behavior. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 25 2011 11:55 Impervious wrote: Also, I'd be looking for any unusual word choices/phrases that a player could use to help identify themselves to/complete a clue they left the sleeper agents. Unfortunately, we probably won't know what the clues will really mean, but it could lead us to the cell leader, or a red faking as the cell leader to take pressure off the leader. Great idea. With only 1 player knowing all of the identities it would take them a long time to individually reveal all the information to each Agent. So there may be codewords or themes to try and hint to Agents what alignment they are. So if we ever see out of ordinary phrases and words between multiple players then we have a link. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 25 2011 12:29 Mr. Wiggles wrote: Of course scum-hunting is going to be the best way to find scum, but breadcrumbs are also a good way of finding out the cell leader. It looks like he can only send one PM to one of his people per morning/evening, which means that he's going to have to find a way to get information out to them otherwise, or else he'll have no way to contact more than a couple of them. We can't really rely on the connections between players in this game, so if someone starts acting weird after PM time, maybe they're scum. Also, when we kill the GF, we can go back and look at who he was trying to direct, and who he was paying special attention to, and how. eh how? The point of bread crumbs is to prove something before it happens via hidden clues. So how in the world is that going to help us find the Cell Leader? | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 25 2011 21:57 Vain wrote: Well for instance the cell leader could hint them who is who. It is stated in the first post that the cell leader is allowed to breadcrumb. He can also send that pm at dusk and down so in theory he could give some direction to who to vote for to lynch at dawn and also who to hit at dusk. Which would still take a lot of time. As far as I see there is no way for the CL to mass communicate to all the Scum in the game without us picking up on it. Either way I've got a different question for everyone: Look at the player list. Let's pretend you were the Cell Leader for a second. What 3 players on the list would you send a message to and what would it be? (assume everyone is Scum for a second so you can just pick anyone) | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 25 2011 22:38 Impervious wrote: Guys, this talk about breadcrumbing is nice and all, but I don't see it going much further at the moment. We should probably wait a while before bringing this up, so we can catch a slip up. Especially if they are trying to hide their posting in the thread. I think we should talk about the pros and cons of of double-checking anyone who gets the result of "insufficient analysis", to make it easier on the DT. The pros of double checking are that you are more sure of the result. The cons are that you could be checking someone else instead, therefore checking more people. I really think the cons outweigh the pros in this case. Thoughts? Even if you double checked someone and got "Incomplete Analysis" it's a waste of time. If you get it once and you checked the person because you assumed they were scum it's better to come out with it and play the odds that they are CL and not that you hit the 25% chance you rolled the wrong result. Also there may be other roles not listed in the OP that have this same effect. Whether they are good or bad you won't know so you could end up wasting another day of your check to get you no further than your first check. Just roll with the odds on this one. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 25 2011 22:46 sandroba wrote: Ace, I trust your analysis and think you are a smart player, but I don't like the idea of feeding ideas to the cell leader. I don't see how this can be helpful for town as I can think of other methods of comunicating with the sleeper agents that do not involve using the posts in this thread. Well you can keep those methods to yourself since you don't seem intent on sharing. What I'm doing here is something else. Guess you'll just have to read into it a bit more. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
1.) Eiii If I recall I played in a Mafia game with him a long time ago. I think he's the only one here that was around more than 2 years ago? If so I could send him a message and it would be clearly obvious it was from me. 2.) Jackal58 I think I've also played a game with him before and he didn't suck. 3.) GMarshal/darmousseh/GGQ I've modded games with all 3 of them participating. All 3 of them played decently in the last game I ran so they'd be prime choices. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 26 2011 00:10 tnkted wrote: it wouldn't matter who I sent my 3 to, I'd just have to write: "Twinkle Twinkle Little Scum 3rd" and they'd know who I am. Technically, theres no reason that scum needs to know who their buddies are if they know who the CL is. The CL can use them like a conductor, posting a scumlist or an analysis that triggers the agents to pick a certain person, perhaps the person third in the list or something (ie the 3rd from above). So I'll be watching scumlists to see if anybody dies from that. IMO, the cell leader is going to be posting with the best of us this game. He's got to blend in more than anyone, and since he's godfather he's immune to checks. I'm guessing that the first time the DTs 'insufficently' checks a vig and the vig is lynched, we're going to be a lot less likely to lynch on results from DTs. I have no idea what "Twinkle Twinkle Little Scum 3rd" even refers to. Either way can you just answer the question? It does matter. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Post your lists or at least give some damn good reasons why this is useless. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Rean, why, Kenpachi, Zorkmid, Vain, darmousseh, and GGQ still have to post their lists. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
But ok sir critic, what should we do instead? | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
![]() Discussion has centered on the setup but a few of us are trying to push some agendas here. There is much more going on here than you think. Once everyone finishes posting their lists I'll explain why I asked for them. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 26 2011 05:27 why wrote: At this point sandroba has already laid out why he wouldn't want to say anything. You FoS him for it. This is anti-town, since you are FoSing someone for hiding something that only a scum would want/need to know about. You are the one prolonging discussion about something that shouldn't require further discussion. That's not anti-town. Whether or not sandroba is correct in sharing his information and whether anyone believes what he is hiding is beneficial to the town, Jackal laying a FoS on him for that isn't anti-town. anti-town is doing something that hampers the goal of killing scum. This isn't such an incident and it is a relevant discussion. Add it up to your suspicion points and keep letting him dig a hole for himself if you think he's so anti-town. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Impervious can you list your 3 players? | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Since no one has any solid analysis and are pretty much much reading posts trying to make them look scummy instead of reading people there isn't a good lynch yet. I'd say we should unvote or get rid of inactive but that seems silly. This notion that Scum may be trying to play low activity so they are contacted by the cell leader is absolute nonsense. The Cell Leader already knows the Agent's identities so activity level doesn't matter. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 27 2011 02:32 Jackal58 wrote: + Show Spoiler + On April 25 2011 07:36 tnkted wrote: Yep, got mine too. This is going to be an interesting game, I got a strange role. On April 25 2011 07:41 tnkted wrote: Lol GM, the cell leader's messages can't possibly have gone out yet, the game hasn't even started yet. I'm not crumbing, I'm just honestly stating that my role is strange. Here: WEIRD ROLE, DUDES On April 25 2011 07:47 tnkted wrote:It makes perfect sense once you see the role. I might actually claim pretty early this game. Debating the merits of it. ???? I'd also like to know the point of your exercise. and where's the role claim or the hint of his role? Thanks for playing. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 27 2011 02:37 Impervious wrote: Ok, between this "secret plan", this recent slipup, and defending someone who is currently suspicious, is anyone else getting a weird vibe from Ace? what is he suspicious of? Saying he might role claim? That isn't a suspicious action at all. You guys are looking for things that aren't there. If someone says hey I have a pretty good role/strange role/interesting role and I might claim then show me how that is scummy behavior. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 27 2011 02:55 Impervious wrote: Well, unless we get some kind of confirmation that there are indeed roles not listed in the OP that are in play, his actions are definitely suspicious. Nobody in either of the two blue roles would even dream of bringing that much attention to themselves at this point in the game. Also, I await the revealing of your plan. On April 08 2011 14:51 iGrok wrote: [center]ROLES This is a semi-closed setup. Some Roles and their abilities will be disclosed, however role counts will not be. There is at least one of every Roles below. There may be other Roles not listed. The OP makes it quite clear that the possibility exists. Still waiting on more people to post. Really need more activity before I reveal my plan. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 27 2011 03:28 Jackal58 wrote: And just to be clear I am not asking tnkted to role claim. I want to know why he felt compelled to bring it up pre game just to say "Let's just forget this" Wtf do people do that for? Well on that I somewhat agree. My only issue with him was the fact that he claimed it as a bread crumb when there is no such thing as a public bread crumb. If you guys have an issue with that it makes more sense imo than getting upset over a supposed role claim that didn't happen. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 26 2011 23:37 Jackal58 wrote: We have about 12 hours remaining until day is up. So it's time we begin to decide who is going to be our first lynch. I really hate day 1 in these games. I pretty much suck at the beginning of these. That said though I do think tnkted has made a few posts that need to be clarified by him. Let's start with this one. So if it's in towns best interest to drop it why did you bring it up? The subject did not arise due to a slip in conversation or an argument. You flat out stated you had a strange role: And then continued again: And he also tries to assure GM that the cell leader can't possibly have gone out yet. But for all we know he may have laid out the first part of his breadcrumbing to his team mates in pregame posts. He doesn't want to discuss it yet it was an intentional slip/slide/red herring/breadcrumb or whatever you want to call it. Now this post: Everybody disregard my bread crumb? Don't look for breadcrumbs? Don't look for scumtells? I didn't sign up for basket weaving tnkted. Wtf should we do? And lastly Seems to know how the CL is going to operate. Then tells us to ignore any DT checks we may get. I am not the greatest analyzer in this game. Far from it. It is also day one so the body of work we all have to go on is minimal. However these posts from tnkted all seem to carry the same anti-town feel to them. If I'm way off the mark please show me. Until then my vote is going on tnkted. Sorry twinkles. First lets us realize that as of the first line of his post Jackal's insistence is that we should find our Day 1 lynch. My issue here is that tnkted's announcement of a strange role is being put out there as if it's scummy when it isn't. It's not anti-town, it's not scummy - it's just bad play. Now when I posted my list earlier about the 3 people who I'd contact I listed Jackal and my reasoning was that he doesn't suck. Which means I think more often than not he can recognize bad town play over scum play and imo this is an obvious case of it. + Show Spoiler [2nd posts] + On April 27 2011 02:32 Jackal58 wrote: + Show Spoiler + On April 25 2011 07:36 tnkted wrote: Yep, got mine too. This is going to be an interesting game, I got a strange role. On April 25 2011 07:41 tnkted wrote: Lol GM, the cell leader's messages can't possibly have gone out yet, the game hasn't even started yet. I'm not crumbing, I'm just honestly stating that my role is strange. Here: WEIRD ROLE, DUDES On April 25 2011 07:47 tnkted wrote:It makes perfect sense once you see the role. I might actually claim pretty early this game. Debating the merits of it. ???? I'd also like to know the point of your exercise. This was from the previous page when I asserted that tnkted never role claimed and Jackal quoted some of his posts that didn't show that he did. Pretty much this is either Scum behavior or Jackal mixing up tnkted's bad play with Scum play. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 27 2011 05:03 GMarshal wrote: Sorry Ace, but I think your analysis is faulty, I don't see Jackal as being scum atm. It could be my relative inexperience, or it might just be that we disagree on that, but I think that at the moment jackal is a terrible lynch, at the very least he is being vocal, which is much, much more than what we can say for many of the players in this thread. I know I've said this many times before, but I think our best call today is to lynch a lurker, with a non-unifed mafia it also means they have no way of knowing if they are lynching a buddy, which makes it much less likely to be misdirected than the usual attempts at day 1 inactive lynches. Ok then well for now we'll just agree to disagree. I'm not sold on lynching lurkers yet. I feel as if we've got more than enough information in 15 pages to do some suitable scum hunting. In a few hours I'll post my information. By then the people that haven't answered my questions probably won't. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 27 2011 06:56 Zorkmid wrote: Well, convince me.....otherwise, this looks scummy as fuck. convince you of what? Over half the players in this game have posted at least one post of substance. Good - now you can scum hunt. Trying to lynch lurkers on Day 1 isn't always a good idea and depending on the setup is quite foolish. This is one of those setups. If you're an Agent lurking doesn't benefit you nor does it hinder you. It's not a scum tell and even in normal setups it isn't a scum tell. On April 27 2011 06:54 sandroba wrote: I would like to suggest you post your info right now, so it can be relevant to the current lynch. If you post it in a few hours, it's gonna make no difference, at least for today. There was enough time already for anyone willing to answer your questions to have done so. It's not relevant to the current lynch. It's relevant for Night 1 actions though. Don't worry it'll all make sense soon. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Let me clarify about scum tells since I know the inevitable is going to happen where someone ends up arguing a moot point. Day 1 scum tells are usually very weak. It takes either a monster slip, a role or information that can act during the day, or generating some discussion that ultimately splits the players into groups where there is a strong possibility that Scum is stuck in one of them. Lynching lurkers on Day 1 does none of this especially when the case against them is "you haven't posted enough". This would be fine if it happened in a newbie game since they tend to do ridiculous things like this because they don't know any better. Is this a game full of newbies? No. So pretty much everyone here knows that blatantly lurking as Scum on Day 1 would result in a suspicious looks. Secondly, and this is really important: There is no pressure on any of the lurkers to post Day 1. Remember what I said about information? Has any role information been created since the OP was posted that involves these lurkers? No. So it's not like they are running away from an accusation. So trying to lynch lurkers because you think they are Scum is a waste right now. If you want to lynch lurkers on the premise that they won't help us later on in the game then hey - go for it. But trying to point to them and say they aren't contributing so they are most likely scum is old meta. Everyone knows it so it's no longer relevant. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 27 2011 09:15 GMarshal wrote: @Jackal, Ace is a scary player on either side, mafia or town, his town play is not up to his mafia play, but thats because his scum play is miles ahead of what almost anyone can pull off. His ability to mislead and misdirect the town is something to be terrified of and if he is mafia we can expect him to be ready to start crushing the town soon, as a policy, every dt in the universe should be checking him. I'm not familiar with his town play other than "from this point forward I'll talk with my guns" and knowing Qatol was mafia in the one were Qatol was the scum mayor, that was the game where he did the whole "posters who are invisible to me" thing too. Overall Ace is a vet, no-one should underestimate his play, town or mafia. I find it mildly amusing that I posted the names of three people as inactive and all three of them popped up sooner rather than later. Almost as if they were watching the thread... Ace, you say that lurking is "old meta" but I have found that in my experience even experienced players tend to lurk as mafia, since its simply much more comfortable/you are less likely to slip up, especially without a team giving direction/help I think many of these players might decide to lurk, or at least be mildly inactive. You seem to think jackal is scum, is there any other player you think is likely to be mafia as well? If every game you go after lurkers then Mafia just won't lurk. We're speaking of Day 1 here and not further along in the game when at times as Scum it is a good idea to lurk. Either way I'm removing my vote on Jackal so no one does anything crazy since I think this isn't majority lynch and you can die with 2 votes on you. Beside jackal no one else is a major suspect to me. And yes my post is still coming in later. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
GMarshal Ace - pardoner, XXXVIII, veteran, information Mr. Wiggles - serial killer why sandroba Ace GM Mr. Wiggles Ace Eiii - recall, 2 years ago Jackal58 - suck Gmarshal/darmousseh/GGQ - modded, prime, choices Jackal58 tnkted - My beloved Tackster - You're easiest (dead) GMarshall - Clues and Puzzles tnkted Twinkle Twinkle Little Scum 3rd Rean (dead) Jackal58 - breadcrumb this, my beloved GMarshal - "wheels on bus go round" my bus driving skills in insane 2 Vain Ace tnkted GMarshal why "do something specific" Ace Wiggles GGQ Zorkmid Ace - Make friends of Violence, Joy Jackal58 - Make friends of Violence, Avarice Vain - Make friends of Avarice, Joy Mr. Wiggles PI Bear, Detective, grisly Ace - analyzer/arguer GMarshal - all around player Jackal58 - tunnel, aggressive, friendly fire Impervious Ace Mr.Wiggles GMarshal Eiii Ace Jackal - insane 2 Tackster (dead) [u]Final Tally[u] Ace (8) Mr.Wiggles (4) why GMarshal(7) Eiii Jackal58 (5) darmousseh GGQ(2) tnkted(2) Tackster(2) Rean Vain So the top players that the Detective should check tonight: myself, GM, Jackal and Mr.Wiggles. We are the players that were mentioned the most as players that would be picked to contact. Secondly those keywords are there so that from now on (or even before this post) if anyone posts with those unique words we have something to go off of. With the Cell Leader not being able to mass communicate I think keywords in the thread are their only option. With everyone on the lookout for keywords or hints to things only the players would share we can slow them down. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 27 2011 22:49 GMarshal wrote: Ace - its Ace, as policy he should be checked. Also I find his retraction of the vote on jackal to be unexpected, from seeing previous games with Ace I would have expected him to stick to his guns with the lynch. I don't know how many games of me you've read but I don't always stick to my vote, especially not Day 1. Also with no majority lynch someone can end up dying with a couple of votes. Like Kenpachi who only died with 3 votes. How come no one went back to look at it? Zorkmid actually ended up deciding Kenpachi's fate. Mr.Wiggles would have gotten lynched but the vote switch ended up taking out Kenpachi instead. He's also a good target to DT check and may actually be the best one. @Impervious: Acting weird how? | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Or maybe that was one of the worst towns I was a part of. So many games like that though so it's hard to pick one. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 28 2011 04:23 Eiii wrote: I still have no clue what the point of this was. You know the gf doesn't get to pick his scumbuddies, right? Is this some kind of metagaming thing where you're trying to figure out who would be most likely to be picked, or are you gf and do you know something about how the scum side works that we don't? Ooooor was the point to just assign a unique keyword to a set of players to make communication easier? Yes we know that. The point is that if you see players in the thread change their behaviors toward one another or start typing those unique keywords then there's a chance for secret communication. Did you read my entire post? @bum: Explain. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 28 2011 07:28 Eiii wrote: That's a given, everyone should have known from the start that when a player mysteriously does a 180 (or less even!) overnight it's something to be looked at. You didn't answer why DT checks should be directed at those who were basically voted to be a scum dream team. I still don't understand why this tally has any influence whatsoever as to who looks scummy or not. Those players should be DT checked because most of the players picked them for a Scum dream team like you said ![]() | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 28 2011 23:34 why wrote: Sorry for not posting more, I've unexpectedly had to work multiple 14 hour days and haven't had time to do anything but sleep and work. I've asked for a replacement, but until that comes through I'm going to do my best to help out. I think Ace should be the number one lynch candidate today. Here are my reasons: Ace's plan resulted in very little information for town. It supposedly generated a DT check list by seeing who would be the most likely to be messaged if they were a sleeper. However, this obviously has very little relation to who is actually a sleeper. I think it was a lot of hoopla for not a lot of payoff, which makes me think that Ace had an alternative plan. My guess is that he is either a sleeper agent that is trying to help the CL by providing an excuse to post lists of players (which is a strategy multiple people have said they would employ were they a CL) or he is the CL himself who wants to use his list to inform people. Ace is a good player and is not above publicly pushing a plan that benefits mafia. Also, Ace's play day 1 reminded me a lot of his play in Orgah Mafia, just sitting back and shooting down plans while not sticking his neck out too much. In that game I believe he was a survivor. When you think about it, being a survivor is almost identical to being a sleeper agent early in this game; you have no allies and your goal is primarily to survive (this obviously changes once you get a PM from the CL). To be honest, I haven't read any of Ace's games except for that one, so he may just always play this way, but it still makes me suspicious. I'm also a little suspicious of Jackal58 still (especially given his paranoid reaction to my and Ace's pressure), but I think that may just be standard Jackal. Zorkmid I'm not that suspicious of, even though he caused Kenpachi (who turned out town) to die over Mr. Wiggles. To say that he did this with an agenda is to say that either Zorkmid is CL or Zorkmid was the person that the CL PM'ed first. I doubt that Zorkmid was PM'ed first, as he appeared on very few of Ace's lists. If he was CL, then it seems way too brazen an attempt at influencing the vote to do without posting in the thread. Plus it was about an hour until the vote ended, so it wasn't like it was a ninja attempt. First of all in Orgah Mafia I barely posted because I really had no idea what the hell was going on half the time. Secondly I shoot down ridiculous suggestions a lot. Maybe you should read more of my games to know this. My role PM from Orgah wasn't actually a survivor role: it was a Neutral role that could kidnap players. Even if that was true your analysis is still wrong. You said I sat back and shot down plans in Orgah Mafia - I've been one of the most active players so far this game and I've proposed a plan. So you're evidence here is already faulty. As for the bolded if you read my explanation twice already I've addressed this. I'm not going to quote those posts again because I honestly believe you aren't reading the game. The day started with GM's death and instead of even trying to figure something out based on that you jump immediately to me - interesting. Let's continue with the Zorkmid issue. In fact lets keep it short. This same post has you defending Zorkmid's vote (who is replaced by bumatlarge) while accusing me with made up proof. And you and bumatlarge both voted for me in no time. Your reasoning is a problem with my plan and some made up issues from another game. Bum's reasoning? On April 29 2011 01:53 bumatlarge wrote: Why is right here. I still have no idea the usefulness to town with the lists. Though, when do messages get sent? Rean was modkilled at the first lynch, which I thought hapens before any messages. Either Ace or Jackal is standing out for me, hopefully I can churn out something nasty on them. So because you don't understand it, I'm scum? :/ And what in the world does Rean being modkilled have to do with me? On April 29 2011 01:34 why wrote: + Show Spoiler + On April 27 2011 08:47 Jackal58 wrote: Long drive home. Traffic sucked. Actually traffic lights sucked. The first 20 miles they were all out. Fuck me. Anyways I was pondering what I may have said or done to appear scummy to Why and Ace. I honestly can't think of a reason. I have been honest and straight up with my posts. I asked questions about sandroba and why he would make a post that alluded to information he wouldn't share. Why thought that was scummy. sandroba answered it and others beat me about the head and shoulders about it. I'm not always the most astute person in the world. I moved on. I did what I felt was an honest analysis of tnkted. I was hoping tnk would respond so we could move on. Tnkted is playing in a game I am cohosting on another forum He has not been there all day so I am going to assume he just has life going on today. Ace just says I'm scummy with no real reasons. He says tnkted is just playing poorly. and I'm scum because I analyzed him. I say bull shit to both their votes. So my traffic addled brain came up with two reasons. The first one is scum cannot build a bus today because they don't know each other. Except for one. This scenario would put why in the scum camp with Ace as the CL. It's the only bus scum can do. Why has disappeared. Ace has voted me because I'm scummy. The second scenario is this. I was talking to Coagulation before the game started about the people playing. Asking him for his opinion of those that I hadn't played with or played very little with. Most are names I don't know. Coag didn't know them either. But his assessment of Ace was much praise on his ability to play scum. He said he's one of the best. But that was followed by "But his town play absolutely sucks". So now I am torn between two options. I honestly don't know which scenario makes more sense to me. I really do hate day 1. I put some light pressure on you. Ace tells me my reason for pressure was completely stupid here: + Show Spoiler + On April 26 2011 05:42 Ace wrote: That's not anti-town. Whether or not sandroba is correct in sharing his information and whether anyone believes what he is hiding is beneficial to the town, Jackal laying a FoS on him for that isn't anti-town. anti-town is doing something that hampers the goal of killing scum. This isn't such an incident and it is a relevant discussion. Add it up to your suspicion points and keep letting him dig a hole for himself if you think he's so anti-town. then like 12 hours later accuses you for completely different reasons. You come to the conclusion that either Ace sucks at town play or Ace and I are in a scum bandwagon together. Sounds paranoid to me. I'd still rather put pressure on Ace though. Speaking of which: ##Vote: Ace Another false post here. You didn't put any pressure on anyone. You posted some nonsense on why he was anti-town and I said that it wasn't. You accused him of being anti-town for placing a FoS on another player. I said it isn't. Now you're just being silly. On April 29 2011 00:23 tnkted wrote: I agree with the pressure on Ace. Why? Virtually all of our only dead player's posts were anti-breadcrumbing posts, and all refered to ace. They were pretty vehemenant too. I think CL sent rean a message saying that "if you're scum, argue against breadcrumbs" or something similar. Perhaps rean was confirming himself to Ace? Explain. Those 2 posts by Rean refer to me because I was the one calling him out. Other than that I don't see how the bolded statement is true. As of now I'm voting for bumatlarge because of the Zorkmid vote yesterday and his fast hop on to my wagon with bad reasoning. why is using shoddy evidence but bum should be smarter than that. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 29 2011 03:07 bumatlarge wrote: Please quote an explanation of the list thing because my read-through provided me with nothing. With a valid reason to it, I have no reason to vote you. um...you voted for me. lol. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
I still think bumatlarge is our lynch for today. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
When the day started and why claimed I was scum you sided with him and voted for me as a lynch candidate. Not once did you mention anything about Jackal. When I refuted his post against me all of a sudden you come out with a claim that Jackal is scum - even though your investigation turns up insufficient. Like I said before this would be well and good because you have to take a chance but the fact that you voted for me when the day started kind of kills this proof. If you knew Jackal was scum why would you vote for me? | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 29 2011 11:35 bumatlarge wrote: Oh wait hahaha, Ace I already caught you man. Ace sees bum claim blue, already suspicious of both bum and jackal, he makes the logical assumption that it would be best to lynch jackal first, since lylo is not here, nor will it be until a day after both jackal and bum are dead. If jackal is CL, yay go town. If bum is lying, lynch him the day after. Ace sees bum claim blue, knows jackal is CL, oh fuck bum needs to die before jackal so we can leave town while buying mafia a free hit from lynching bum and giving our CL another day. Now it would be one thing if you considered both options as green, and leaned towards lynching me, as jackal as CL would give you a bad image, but it would be a decent trade. You instantly -let me repeat that- INSTANTLY assume I am lying. There is no consideration there. I know you as town would entertain the notion that I am blue for a bit, even if you made sure that your opinion of me lying was made known in your first post. But you know jackal is CL, so that is not your thought process. Have some other scum post now, I'm on a roll. stop it. I already know you're lying. Like I said look at how the day started: On April 29 2011 01:53 bumatlarge wrote: Why is right here. I still have no idea the usefulness to town with the lists. Though, when do messages get sent? Rean was modkilled at the first lynch, which I thought hapens before any messages. Either Ace or Jackal is standing out for me, hopefully I can churn out something nasty on them. This was within 3 hours of the day starting. Even with why's silly logic on how I could be scum that I posted you immediately agreed to it. From the voting thread: On April 29 2011 01:54 bumatlarge wrote: ##Vote: Ace On April 29 2011 03:07 bumatlarge wrote: Please quote an explanation of the list thing because my read-through provided me with nothing. With a valid reason to it, I have no reason to vote you. You said you have no reason to vote for me although you already did. It is now 7 hours into the day. At this point 'why' hasn't followed up on his accusation (subbed out) and neither has his replacement. The wagon's momentum to get me lynched stopped here. At this point you allegedly know your information from last night but still have not revealed it. 7 hours later you drop a dung bomb. In your post you make up some stuff about me bread crumbing to Jackal because I posted after him - come on. You even mention that you did not get a result but that Jackal must be the Cell Leader and I'm breadcrumbing to him and your made up situation that we have a relationship. What relationship? You're grasping. You made up a situation that doesn't exist and we should lynch you for it. GGq, Impervious don't you think it's a little weird that bumatlarge accused TWO people today, switched his vote, and is allegedly an Intelligence Agent that didn't get a guilty result but is sure both are scum? Think logically about all of this. This guy is lying for sure. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Realize he's not trading himself. Remember his analysis wasn't that Jackal is scum - it's that he got no information from the check. This way if Jackal flips town he can always say well it was a mistake. bum isn't trading himself 1 for 1 here - he's setting up a position that has an out in case Jackal flips town or he gets lynched. He's made up a bunch of hypothetical links here. If he didn't start the day off attacking me I'd believe him. If you believe his claim is legit then answer this for me: Why would he accuse me, then Jackal? If he is really the detective wouldn't he just out Jackal instead of waiting half the day to start? | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
That should read be more inclined to believe him. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 29 2011 16:38 bumatlarge wrote: thanks wiggles really putting yourself out there to shove some words out of my mouth. Jackal Ace Wiggles That's what Im feelin' Wiggles, he blatantly commentated twice on how he spends time in his card rides thinking about mafia. He came back insufficient. HE SPENT THE WHOLE GAME OBSESSED WITH CL. That is not mere coincidence. He is the cell leader. Saying Car instead of "steelers profile" leaves enough space for jackal to add 17 other characters in. If jackal only revealed that he was scum, he would then HAVE to publicly coordinate the rest of the scum with happy birthdays until his next message. Clue them all in (I would have done it I think) and then it doesn't matter if you live or die, once scum know who each other are, cell leaders only have to send messages hinting at targets and such. The entire first day I read 20 pages of posts talking about how to catch breadcrumbs, and now mine are useless, when they are completely feasible. Then my behavior analysis, which any nin-kum-poop can see jackal's behavior, is pretty much undeniable that jackal talk non-stop about breadcrumbs and cell leaders. Just flat out say that what jackal did does not make him Cell leader so town can mark that down on you. And yeah, I think he was attempting to communicate with Ace somehow, or Ace was trying to communicate with him. And i meant "if scum doesnt hit me" blahblahblah free confirmed something. And isn't 25% x 25% around 7%? I may be talking out of my ass with that. And I become an obvious target. I want jackal lynched now so scum don't get a breather knowing the current CL (yes i made that up now when ggq pointed out it goes to another sleeper) and I kinda want to die. Sorry if that screws over your behavior analysis on me, but I have a busy internet-less weekend. I had ways of remaining active if I had a different role, but I got IA so this makes sense to me. Have no idea why you're making a huge deal over me claiming, unless your scum then your just grasping. That makes a lot more sense. And please connect me to batman. That makes this beautiful. Because if I get lynched and pop blue, varp is a nice solid lead to townie town. AND CHERRY PICKING BREADCRUMBS?! LOL WHAT AM I SUPPOSED TO DO? OH ILL SKIP THAT OBVIOUS CRANNY DONT WANT TO CHERRY PICK. No where do I say my analysis is weak. Blatant word twisting. I said my information+crumbs are stronger and I'll say it again. My analysis is obvious. I'm sorry if it's obvious but jackal made it that way. I can rip to shreds all of his posts relating to his role, but I really dont have time, and Im spending too much time churning out responses to scum. cherrypicked breadcrumbs food oh its all making sense now! I didnt think you were scum when i analyzed jackal. I entertained the humorous notion about the birthday. You exploding all over it, and gunning against this analysis that has nothing to do with you like it's your last defense DEFINITELY make you scum in my eyes. I don't think I remember you ever attacking something like this. I like it wiggles, but next time do it as town to throw us for a little loop. Jackal sent a "car message" wiggles and ace know it, so they know jackal is CL and they need to attack me because they think they can drag town into lylo. If anyone else has questions, I'll try to answer tomorrow. Cell Leader You may send a message consisting of 5 words or 20 characters to any agent at dawn and dusk of each day. Submit it like a normal action. The message can't contain the name of any player. The message is PM'd to both myself and chaoser. We will send it to the player you specify. So your bread crumbing argument is off. This is why we keep saying you're making no sense. You didn't even read the OP. Ah well, at least we know you're regular Scum and not the Cell Leader. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 29 2011 23:37 tnkted wrote: Yeah, I was. I'm going to hold off until this bum/ace situation is solved. You'll see why. I've been busy with schoolwork lately, sorry yall. I've already pulled out of a couple other games, hopefully I'll have time to keep playing this one! My thoughts: As far as I can read my gut is actually telling me to trust bum, which is a suprise because I usually make it a point to distrust bum as long as possible because I find his style of writing so persuasive. In this case, however, I think that he's wrong about jackal, but right about Ace. Jackal, while his style of play this game is totally different from his previous games (its an improvement Jackal! you're getting targeted partly because your meta is off!) probably isn't stupid enough to post traffic breadcrumbs in the middle of the thread. That's wifom of course, but I feel good about it. I've gotten a feeling of earnest effort from him all game that I'm willing to indulge in. Regarding Ace: Ace has absolutely refused to hop on a few things that other people have found scummy. There was my belated roleclaim, the fact that I blatantly told mafia to kill ace (which was an honest mistake, I had no intention of doing that.) Whats interesting is that he didn't die. GM died instead. I'm going to speculate for a minute on how this could have gone down: Lets say we have 5 mafia and one CL, roughly 1/3 of the total players. 1 scum is dead, which makes it 5 scum overall, 4 of them agents. What way would they vote? Since they can't communicate in the thread, and only one of them knows who the CL is (assuming that one person is told every day/flip), if we assume that that player wasn't Rean (for the sake of arguement, I still think it was), wouldn't they have a somewhat even split around who to kill? Perhaps the split went like this: 2 - GM 2 - Ace Since its a tie, the CL gets to choose. Both were extremely high profile targets. Why wouldn't Ace get killed? Theres the possibility that whoever CL is could read GM well, which is a possibility. I think that Ace cast the final vote that killed GM. This isn't conclusive, of course, its all speculation, but I think it makes sense, and since I don't want to vote for bum at this point, I'm voting Ace. #vote ace what the hell is this? What role claim? Where? Also where do you guys go off with all these hypothetical situations and made up scenarios to try and paint people scum. So bum claims DT, says Jackal is Scum with insufficient evidence and you're voting for ME? that doesn't even make sense. You're trying to off me with no evidence here. Town look very carefully at the voting thread and read this post. Out of no where tnkted pops up and votes for me with terrible reasoning and completely ignores the bum/jackal situation. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 30 2011 02:27 Jackal58 wrote: I am not in favor of lynching our DT. No matter how obsolete he just managed to make himself. why do you believe he's a DT so easily? There is no way you can 100% believe him so fast. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
I still think he misread the OP if he's really a Detective. The bread crumb stuff just makes no sense. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 30 2011 04:39 chaoser wrote: yoyoyo day ends in 8 and a half hours, get your votes in can you update the thread so we see the count before the lynch? ![]() | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
I don't think bum is a dead man walking because if he's a Scum lying about being DT we are back to the same scenario tomorrow. His reasoning just doesn't add up period. What othe thing did you think I thought the breadcrumbs were for Ace? I read the OP very clearly and I still believe I am on the right track. Just what I said. I have no idea how your entire link between Me and Jackal = we both said happy birthday to Mr. Wiggles. Thats just ridiculous. We can all pick out arbitrary posts and say HEY LOOK A BREADCRUMB! | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
1.) you investigated Jackal 2.) got an inconclusive result In no way can you say Jackal is Scum for sure now. You got an IC result, figured Jackal must be the CL then went from there. That isn't actual Scum hunting is it? You're trying to fit Jackal into what you think happens to be Scummy instead of finding Jackal to be scum. Big difference here. GGQ that part you bolded actually isn't a strong part of his analysis at all. Other players have talked about the CL, tnkted pulled some move earlier that was a "bread crumb", even GM made a list of DT checks and talked about the Intelligence Agent taking a shot Night 1: So in what way does bum decide that jackal stands out more than any of them? You and everyone else need to change your votes. Especially with this little gem right here: That you immediately assumed I was lying was what made me really think you were scum, instead of looking at both sides in the thread, like every other townie did, like varp, GGQ and impervious. Now you went back on that, so yeah I think you slipped there. But you shouldn't be lynched until after jackal. It's Day 2. How do you know they are all town? Only way you would know that if is you know who is all Scum. Hello Mr. Cell Leader. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 30 2011 11:32 GGQ wrote: Read over Zorkmid's posts on day1, they seem consistent with a dt to me. which posts? point them out | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
![]() @bum: *yawn* | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 30 2011 12:46 bumatlarge wrote: Ugh you guys get a nice majority on me and now you're getting squeamish? Throw your testicles back on your groins please. stop your QQing. Waiting for this guillotine to drop in silence is much appreciated. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
But my analysis has Impervious as more than suspicious. Believing bumatlarge with to be a detective with bum's ridiculous claim seems to me as someone who already knew bum wasn't Scum. I would have given him the benefit of the doubt if bum had a guilty result - but he believed him too readily for someone with a null result. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Not sure about darm just yet. I'll get to it when I wake up in the morning though. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Last night I shot GGQ and I know my bullet went through because I didn't get a message saying my hit failed. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On May 01 2011 13:19 Mr. Wiggles wrote: Then why does the day post say that the sleeper agents shot one of their own? If you were the head of the FBI and had an undercover agent on the inside would you tell the press? | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On May 02 2011 02:04 Jackal58 wrote: I don't think I'm buying this either. If a vig shot last night why would they shoot GGQ or you? I'm the one with a great big fucking target on my back. um...what target? Anyway I was going to shoot Impervious last night but switched to GGQ. 2 things that stood out to me: 1.) Asking about darmousseh. There are a couple of lurkers this game and he was the third person to ask about this specific lurker. 2.) My message intercepts As an undercover agent I intercepted parts of 2 messages so far: "watch the Canadian" "likes men's magazine" The first had something to do with either Impervious or Mr.Wiggles and I chose Impervious. The second I figured pointed to GGQ 3.) When GGQ asked me my opinion of Wiggles analysis on Impervious that was my gut shot. For someone barely in the thick of things all game he chose an opportune time to get involved. On May 01 2011 21:25 Jackal58 wrote: So you're claiming to be some sort of double agent with a gun??? Wtf kind of claim is that? And if it's true why the fuck would you claim that? That makes less sense than bum claiming DT so early.(wtf bum ![]() You seriously want us to believe you are vigi/sooper spy? Day 1 you call me scummiest player in the game. Day 2 you tear bum a new one and lead the charge on his lynch after he calls me scum. Yet according to you I'm the scummiest player in the game. Day 3 you claim vig/sooper spy. Day 3 I call bullshit. If you are on the "inside" as you say you're actions make no sense what so ever. You push the DT lynch over who you believe to be the scummiest player. If you are on the inside this just doesn't add up. You would have known bum and I were both town and pushed for a 3rd party for the lynch. Not one of us. I'm not buying it. If you have some sort of role that allows you to get info on the scum team and shoot them why would you claim it???? I'm an undercover Agent with 1 shot and get parts intercepted messages from the CL. So I have no more shots anyway and I'm pretty sure we're close to winning this especially seeing how panicked you are. If you are a townie you should be glad I chose correctly because if I missed I'd be automatically killed also. Something tells me you aren't though. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On May 02 2011 02:36 Impervious wrote: Lol, so that's why you're suspicious of me? Well thats not all of it. When you believed bum's claim so easily without a guilty result I found that ridiculous. If a detective pops up on Day 2 and says "player X is surely innocent!" does that sound believable? | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
I don't see the reasoning for a red claiming as DT. It seems like such a dumb move. It instantly paints a giant target on them when he's still alive the next day. And if the mafia don't eliminate him tonight, then they risk him actually finding a mafia (assuming that Jackal is green). And, of course, if he's green, it could be an interesting play, if you really had a strong read on someone. I don't think it's a good idea to lynch him. Voting for someone other than Jackal, based on some kind of analysis, would be fine if you don't believe bum, but lynching him is really fucking dumb right now. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Oh my bad, I guess posts like this don't mean you believe bum but that everyone else is stupid. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On May 03 2011 03:22 Mr. Wiggles wrote: This is a weird lynch. I'm not sure what to make of tnkted's claim of being a bullet-proof miller, as that seems really weird, and almost overpowered, as if he claims, he will never die if town believes him. I'm going to hold off on him though, because he isn't really important at the moment. So if ace and san, and then varp are town, then the scum team is something like Jackal/BB/Eii. I'm going to expect that all of the scum will know who each other are at this point. So that means that there's 4 scum maximum, maybe 2 minimum and 9 players. If there's 4, we're at MYLO already, so we need to be sure that we do this right. There's been associations drawn between people already, it seems. There's a strong relationship between Ace and San, as his claim relies on someone else being hit. There's also a relationship that I think exists with Varp, because of his quick agreement with Ace's claim, as well as the scum list he posted, which targets the other possibility of the scum team. So what I need to decide, is if the scum team is formed of active posters and coherent, or made up of lurkers and disorganized. Everyone's gone quiet, and Ace isn't really pushing hard for Jackal's lynch like he was for Bum's, which puts me on edge as well. People need to get talking more, because right now it seems like I'm the only one trying to figure things out while the lynch deadline is fast approaching. I was actually waiting to see if something else happened as I recognized we're pretty much "stuck" here if we screw this up. Still think our best bet is to cut dead weight and see how the night ends up. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On May 03 2011 04:44 tnkted wrote: Ok, I just went back through all of GGQ's posts and didn't find a single thing thats conclusive. I don't think scum used breadcrumbs this game., if what ace is saying about his interceptions is true. I think CL just sent things related to the people's profiles and meta. Is there a list somewhere where it shows who all is alive? because if there are 3 scum left and we have 7 players (by my count) this is lylo. IMO Jackal is a bad lynch. If what ace posted was true, CL didn't use breadcrumbs at all! Instead they used clues related to the person's identity. Specifically, "watch the canadian" and "likes mens magazines," the latter obviously pointing at GGQ. The question is, watch the canadian: whats up with that? Who is a well known canadian player playing in this game? Impervious is possible, but I'm more afraid of... #vote Mr. Wiggles The message could mean that a Canadian is Scum, to shoot a Canadian player, to watch what they post in the thread...who knows? Wiggles seems like the most Pro-town player in the game so far so I doubt anyone voting for him. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On May 03 2011 06:25 VarpuliS wrote: Reposting for emphasis: Ace, could you please post your pm so that we can compare it to tnkted's and sandroba's? Your role is the following: UNDERCOVER AGENT Your entire training in the FBI has come to this moment and it's time to put your skills into action. Since you are an expert at wiretapping every day you will intercept parts of a message the Cell Leader has sent to his Agent. Use these messages to try and stay one step ahead of the Sleeper Cells. Like all FBI Agents you carry a sidearm but you only have 1 bullet. If you shoot an Agent life will go on. However, if you shoot an innocent person then you will automatically alert an Agent in the area and be killed immediately. Good luck. On May 03 2011 05:56 sandroba wrote: I don't agree with you about lynching for information, but I took a closer look at tnkted role claim. Besides this role making no sense at all to me there are a couple things that stood out. First the colored tittle. I don't know about you guys, but my role pm has no color. He's putting emphasis on the fact that he is town. Second "Everything was going you way". Seriously, a gramatical error in a role pm? Third, and this is kind of minor, but I find it weird that his name is tnkted and there is "Then the economy tanked". It's like he's making fun of us. Well having a grammatical error in a role PM isn't damning. The thing is that as far as we know the Scum have 1KP and there are no medics. So for there to be a Veteran and Bulletproof role in the same game is eye raising isn't it? I think he put the color in there on purpose because my role PM didn't have color either. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On May 03 2011 13:06 VarpuliS wrote: f5f5f5f5f5 would quote it in green font but..ya know ^_^ | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
we need to hear from Brown Bear | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
But we need to hear from Brownbear aka Lurkerbear first. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Jackal is a prime suspect and I'm pretty sure this is LYLO. Problem is we can't lynch him because Brownbear who promised to post something has followed in the footsteps of darm. We'll probably be better off lynching Jackal anyway since he's scummier than the lurker at this point. I actually think between you, myself, sandroba and Wiggles we've got a decent core of "likely townies" to work from. Our best assumption is to operate on this belief and try to find Scum out of the Jackal, Eiii, Brownbear set. Then from there work on the group of us remaining 4 if we find enough Scum in that group. Otherwise I'm pretty sure the game is over. To sum up this is our working set: {Impervious, Ace, sandroba, Mr.Wiggles} {Jackal58, BrownBear, Eiii} The 2nd group has 2 lurkers and 1 active player. Our group has 3 active posters and 1 lurker who has a solid claim. I think we have to go after the 2nd group and take our chances there. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Like I said you are scummy but Brownbear's hardcore lurking act is even scummier. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
It's going to come down to dealing with lurkers anyway and if we're wrong about Jackal who IS active then it's game over. Also it's not like we haven't given Brownbear a chance to be active. Wasn't it him that was the popular lynch target before a few players vote switched to tnkted? We thought he would be modkilled but he wasn't so he was given a chance to redeem himself and still hasn't contributed. That right there is the real "tell" in this situation. This is what we're stuck with in tnkted's case: Votes Sandroba Jackal58 Mr. Wiggles 4 active players one of which is dead. The only saving grace here is that Jackal is also on this wagon. So that is another piece of evidence against him. So really this comes down to going with our best read right now (Jackal imo) or taking the read on Brownbear (just as scummy imo). The thing is Jackal's behavior can in some ways be looked at as town but Bear's can't because he just doesn't post. So we have to decide now and everyone go with it. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Waiting on BB and Eiii to post their thoughts of the game so far. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
FYI: I'm known for my town play more than my scum play. But both are so good I'm just a boss like that. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
likewise tnkted was lynched because no one believed his claim and he had a GREEN PM that no one else had. Keep up man ![]() | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
tnkted's and bum's situations? already argued to death So really you made us wait so long for you just to rehash old points? :/ Do you have anything NEW to bring to the table? If you're gonna accuse me of being scum at least make it interesting. Digging up old bones isn't what bears do ![]() | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
![]() 4 of us are in the "most likely town" pool and 3 of you are in the "probably scum" pool. When you didn't post for a while some of us took that as a sign that you surely are scum. Jackal has been active, and Eiii is...well I'm not sure what the difference between you and him is to be honest. He's gotten a free pass also. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
WHERE IS EVERYONE! | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
How come there isn't much fighting over this lynch? | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
![]() On May 06 2011 13:05 GGQ wrote: I still can't believe you fuckers shot me. I was so sad v_v But hey Jackal tried to shoot me twice so dont feel bad ^_^ | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On May 06 2011 13:16 GMarshal wrote: I almost shot Ace night 1, my gut told me he was scum, and then he shot me. FML should have shot, didn't expect to die. Also ace, the point of those lists was to get a read on who players were thought good to better distribute your kills right? what lists? | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
besides bum never had a concrete "ok these guys have to be scum and there is no other way" post On May 06 2011 13:18 GMarshal wrote: The whole "if you were a cell leader who would you message and what would you say?" That list was just me playing around to waste time. I thought Jackal was obvious scum and would get bagged Day 1 or 2 but he lived. By the way I never communicated any hidden messages in the thread. Day 1 I sent a hint to GGQ about me and Jackal being his allies, and then the next one was the same message to sandroba. Rean got modkilled (lulz) and I only sent taunts and death threats to Jackal. I wanted to keep at least 1 of the team completely in the dark so they wouldn't be caught by association. By the way sandroba gets major props for that vet claim. I was already planning to false claim as soon as I realized they killed GGQ. Next day sandroba busts out with that Vet claim and I'm like oh shit! Perfect claim! I never even messaged him about it he just did it out of no where. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
bulletproof townie is insane ![]() | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
@Impervious: You were so close a few times. When bum claimed and you believed him I was like "damn, guess I actually have to work to get this bastard DT lynched" @Igrok and chaoser: This setup has tons of potential. Probably just as good as normal mini mafia. If you draw scum in this game and aren't a CL I think you have a harder time than almost any other setup. Good for training tho! | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On May 06 2011 13:33 Jackal58 wrote: You prick. I played this whole thing in the dark. I voted you the second time cause I was damn near positive you were the cell leader. It was a very gentle "fuck you". ![]() I mean really. What was the point of keeping me in the dark? First time I ever play scum and I ended up trying to play it like an SK. I was clueless. you were so rabid that it actually helped us win! If myself or sandroba aka The Sand Man died you looked like a saint for raging hard on me. At one point I was like "god damn, if Jackal keeps going he's gonna get us all killed" but somehow it didn't happen. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On May 06 2011 13:44 bumatlarge wrote: I think I saved my additional sandroba analysis, I'll try to find it. I'm really angry at zorkmid, but I'm glad he didn't do more harm then he could have. He's going to have to come up with a helluva good reason if he ever wants to play here again, at least in the same game as me. like I said he ruined a possibly good moment v_v | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
looks like you'll be broke every Christmas @GGQ: what post? | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On May 07 2011 06:45 Jackal58 wrote: I had the advantage of knowing I voted to kill GGQ (sorry dude) and when he came up dead I knew it wasn't a coincidence. That's when I began to realize I was being left in the dark on purpose. I thought when I told you "I hope you die" that was clear enough :D On May 07 2011 03:21 Mr. Wiggles wrote: Yeah. For the record, I never thought San/Ace were town 100%. I should've just tried to lynch one, but I thought I could wait because BB was the third. I was actually thinking they were pretty scummy on the last day, where San kept coming in with Ace to push things, but I thought it was a bus, so I didn't say anything. Oh well, I haven't played green in like months, haha, so I'm pretty bad at it. I'll take responsibility for town getting raped. :p Thanks to the hosts for hosting, I had a lot of fun. Hopefully if we try again, there'll be less modkills, but it was still amusing. Thanks! If you thought it was a bus should have pointed it out. Just an FYI as something I do when I play scum, since it's done on purpose to deal with people that play town by vote and motive checking. When I'm scum and you should try it when you're Scum - get your team on different "sides" of the town. This game it seemed like myself and sandroba were "allied" to Wiggles at one point, in agreement with Impervious later on, and never in agreement with bum or Jackal. This is a simplified example since the game was much more fluid than I suggest but I hope you get the point. As town one of the best ways of catching Scum is grouping people based on what they agree on. Which is why sometimes you'll hear me say something about generating discussion like policy lynch or believing someone's claim. Once this happens then you can make sure that people's votes follow what they said. Then it also becomes easier to look at motives. For example: If bum and Jackal largely agree on bum's claim, then Jackal votes for bum, or doesn't vote for someone who disagrees with bum that doesn't have a good reason to then Jackal "stands out". As scum this is why it's helpful to get multiple players on different sides especially when they can argue: In the event someone gets caught in the "wrong group" if their motives and reasoning match their votes they just appear to be a townie that made a wrong play. All in all THIS is why of all the things in the game the one thing no one can argue about is where they placed their vote. If you're town and you have extra information then use this to pin Scum. If you're Scum before you vote just make sure your reasoning holds up. If the town has Vigilantes that look to votes or likes to hunt by eliminating players in a group you'll be sorry. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
So how does the town pick out who is Scum? ![]() And it does matter. Even though you lost it wasn't like we rampaged through the town. When GGQ died it just so happened that I already had a fakeclaim ready AND sandroba fake claimed. On May 08 2011 04:57 Impervious wrote: I wouldn't have pushed for your lynch, I would have pushed for sandroba's lynch instead. I could easily argue that the worst case scenario of him telling the truth would be a lynch of a townie rather than a vet, and we would confirm the undercover agent role at the same time. Explain this would work out? I think I know what you're saying but I need to see the scenario played out. | ||
| ||