EPTGame by flamewheel should be good, even if I don't know the exact details yet
I'm going to try to be more calm and analytical this game rather than jumping for tiny details lol
TL Mafia XXX
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Pandain
United States11922 Posts
Game by flamewheel should be good, even if I don't know the exact details yet I'm going to try to be more calm and analytical this game rather than jumping for tiny details lol | ||
|
Pandain
United States11922 Posts
Why do I have the feeling Flamewheels going to like make us all ninjas. | ||
|
Pandain
United States11922 Posts
On August 03 2010 09:34 Divinek wrote: oh god damn it i didnt notice pandain signed up for this one too That mean something? Hehe | ||
|
Pandain
United States11922 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States11922 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States11922 Posts
Has he even spoken yet? Will be compiling a list of his posts as evidence. Seriously though, is this the time when like all you pros be like "Hey, noobie noob noobs, some general advice." And then if someone gives bad advice, we can watch him. Or advice fitting his needs. Some general things I think I now: 1. Don't pm people your role (duh) that's about it. | ||
|
Pandain
United States11922 Posts
Doesn't mean I neccesarily think they're mafia, but at the very least like youngmini said above me it will pressure everyone to talk or be suspected. More talking=more information for us which =better for town. | ||
|
Pandain
United States11922 Posts
On August 06 2010 09:24 BrownBear wrote: I like this idea, but I think we should wait at least a few more hours or so. Right now, there's essentially only 4 of us posting (and I'm posting from work lol) Yeah that's why I'm not voting yet n.n. So people, start talking! | ||
|
Pandain
United States11922 Posts
On August 06 2010 09:43 Bill Murray wrote: in all likelihood the scummy players haven't posted yet unless it's someone like brownbear who knows it's ok to. noob scum will be like "what should i say?" as opposed to just playing. agreed. Probably deciding who's GF, making forum or IRC chat, or just plotting in general. PLOTTING I SAY!!!!!!!! Still, even if I get mafia vibes off LSB(which I do) I highly urge everyone not to vote for him. Right now we have a suspect, and it would be best to not vote him as of yet. Maybe day 2, when we have more evidence. But I still feel we should be getting the inactives to talk | ||
|
Pandain
United States11922 Posts
On August 06 2010 10:30 Divinek wrote: ya  i still like lynching inactives even if they turn out to be town cause the less misders we have in this game the better. Having an inactive POS townie is almost worse as the game goes on because then you have to suspect them ENTIRELY based on the fact they havent been posting which isnt much at all. At a point when you have information about other people that could actually be useful. anyways im voting for pandain, though i doubt he'll get lynched cause he posts like a 14 year old girl and people on the internet love them Lol... I can tell you're voting for me because of an underlying suspicion because you just said in that post you like to lynch inactives and yet I'm probably the least inactive here. So, my question is, what's your suspicion. | ||
|
Pandain
United States11922 Posts
On August 06 2010 10:44 Divinek wrote: my want for lynching pandain supersedes all wants to lynch inactives O God, I have a Tricode on my hands | ||
|
Pandain
United States11922 Posts
On August 06 2010 11:06 flamewheel wrote: That story is fucking terrible. It would be good, if the whole mafia thing wasn't a teacher strike thing. hahaha | ||
|
Pandain
United States11922 Posts
On August 06 2010 12:03 Bill Murray wrote: I proclaim the Random Voting Stage hereby dead. I am voting not for randomness, but because I actually believe Divinek is Mafia. Far too early to vote for someone because you think their mafia. Far too early, you have like what? 2 lines and a boatload of assumptions. You have no facts, no voting patterns, no motives, no big posts yet. A vote like this should not be made yet. I highly urge you to note vote Divinek based on this reasoning. I still believe we should be pressuring every inactive person by threatening to lynch an inactive person. right now, it is the easiest way for mafia to slither through. Make a vote, spread them all out, without making really much a post then and there. By threatening to vote inactives, we get EVERYONE talking, and with that we have the beginnings of real hard evidence, not silly suspicions. | ||
|
Pandain
United States11922 Posts
On August 06 2010 12:25 Bill Murray wrote: Pandain is #2 on my suspect list behind Divinek due to PM-land Says the guy trying to get me to reveal my role. | ||
|
Pandain
United States11922 Posts
On August 06 2010 13:07 Foolishness wrote: I think we should seriously take a look at this brodooski...he's yet to make any real contribution, despite an overflowing of posts. He got pretty defensive when divinek voted for him, which isn't fool proof I know, but it's definitely something to take note of. Bill Murray, I may not have any idea how you're playing these days, but I'd totally support you against this brodooski. Didn't really get defensive, just pointed out that he voted for me when he said we should lynch inactives, yet I've been one of the most active people. Just asked him what his real reason is. Not really defensive. And yes, sadly I have been less quality than normal. I'm trying to fix it this game by typing larger things and not just one liners. Though I did feel the one you quoted was justified. Still, need to improve. On August 06 2010 12:06 Pandain wrote: Far too early to vote for someone because you think their mafia. Far too early, you have like what? 2 lines and a boatload of assumptions. You have no facts, no voting patterns, no motives, no big posts yet. A vote like this should not be made yet. I highly urge you to note vote Divinek based on this reasoning. I still believe we should be pressuring every inactive person by threatening to lynch an inactive person. right now, it is the easiest way for mafia to slither through. Make a vote, spread them all out, without making really much a post then and there. By threatening to vote inactives, we get EVERYONE talking, and with that we have the beginnings of real hard evidence, not silly suspicions. This is the type of post I'm aiming for. Don't feel like I should be voted just because I'm not that good yet(second game.) Getting better, but as of yet do not feel I have the expierence to make the definitive "ok guys, this is what you should do." That's why I think the very first post after Flamewheel said "gogogo" I said, "ok pros, give advice now." | ||
|
Pandain
United States11922 Posts
On August 06 2010 13:17 youngminii wrote: I don't think he'd be too much of a threat if he was scum (no offense Pandain) and I dunno it would be his first time as scum wouldn't it? He'd drop scumtells all over the place imo. Its True Note: Kill Youngmini Tonight. | ||
|
Pandain
United States11922 Posts
On August 06 2010 13:25 Foolishness wrote: Why wait until tonight when we got a lynch today? Hehe......... Anyway, on the theme of being more useful and going along with my plan of getting all inactives to talk or be lynched, here's the list of people who haven't talked yet. Obviously this does not mean their mafia, not even close. This game has only been going for a couple hours and RL stuff can obviously be interfering or the such. Stilll, this kind of stuff is useful to keep track of. 1.Chezinu 2.Pyrrhuloxia(talked once) 3.Xelin 4.Jayme 5.Roffles 6.Hesmyrr 7.Infunblahblah 8.Laan Not sure(and hard to find profile thing) 1.Love1another 2.larjarse If you have posted, please say so and quote your post. So then this can be as accurate as possible. With that, everyone here start talking! | ||
|
Pandain
United States11922 Posts
On August 06 2010 14:54 Jayme wrote: I still hate voting for inactives on day one because it's so pointless. and the random voting stage is already over after only a few hours...???? Oh incoming bandwagon 1.Gets people talking(more info) 2.Force potential lurkers/mafia trying to hide to talk more, reveal stuff. 3.(going along with #1) Encourages people to talk and share opinions Compared with random lynching, in which case we have a 1/5 chance of hitting mafia 4/5 chance of NOT Depending on # of Ninjas (someone said 3? I'll go with that) than 1/10 chance of hitting ninja and more of a chance of hitting a blue than a red(on the assumption theres at least one blue of every role.) On August 06 2010 14:57 larjarse wrote: I would say BillMurray's concern about not being randomly voted to be killed justifies that he probably isn't a Townie. Yeah, because its a just cause to accuse someone of being mafia because they have 2 votes out of 30. Not that he's neccesarily innocent, but as of now we should lynch an inactive for the reasons I stated above. | ||
|
Pandain
United States11922 Posts
On August 06 2010 23:34 rastaban wrote: the other option is that if we have a counter claim we protect neither and have them both shoot each other, the vig dies taking out a red. I almost like this plan method better. Bad idea, mafia will just roleblock the real vigi since they will know. And then that Vigi can claim he killed other vigi. | ||
|
Pandain
United States11922 Posts
1.ahahahahahahah Chezinu <3 2.I highly urge everyone to vote the least active person here. that means the person who has not made a real quality contribution. I'm looking at you, love1another. One line saying "im townie! Don't kill me!" Is not enough to warrant us getting off your back. I am going to vote for said person 10 hours before deadline and I encourage everyone to help get people talking. 2.Vigi plan sounds...okay. I mean, like I said above there are some flaws. But I think we can work on it and make it work. | ||
| ||
