TL Mafia XXVIII
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
Edit: On July 17 2010 09:05 Foolishness wrote: Depends. At least do we know the mafia count? The whole "let's not reveal how many of each role" is a rather recent thing on TL. Although I'm probably in a very small minority when I say I don't like it and think that role count should be revealed. I'd have to agree. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
I would like to point out that it may have been a good idea for a single "vet" to out himself. Here is where a detective would announce himself as vet. If there were any others, they could simply send a PM over to the alleged vet and ask if they are actually a different role posing as vet and alert them that they're going to counter-claim them. The "fake" vet could then ask the entire thread for any "vet" counter-claims because if there were another one, it'd basically give the village a 50/50 or on a double lynch a 100% chance of getting the mafia. However because the fake and real vet already know of each other, there would be no probable counter-claims. Once that has been established, the "fake vet" could then ask for role claims to be sent to him in the form of PMs and ask the doctor PMs to protect him in case the mafia is on to his scheme. He could then lead the village and have possible suspects in case the real roles PMed to him die. A little too late for it but I thought it'd be a good plan for maybe a future game now as it'd benefit the village I believe. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
##Vote Chaoser I would abstain but we can afford a mislynch now and we have a bit of information to work with especially because the detectives have their reports and we have a claim. This generally works in our favour as there hasn't been a lucky kill for the mafia and there is alot more text to read upon for scumtells. Also we get more info now. (Not quite sure how this works in my head but I imagine a detective claim from someone getting lynched day 2 is much more convincing than one on day 1 especially because they have a report now) | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 21 2010 11:30 chaoser wrote: You'll notice that 1) In my previous post I stated I no longer was that suspicious of him. 2) I'm not even voting for him anymore 3) I was initially arguing for BrownBear's lynch. So wrong on all three counts. Thanks for trying to misrepresent me though. 1) It could very well possible you act that way because of the pressure beginning to build on you now shown with 2 votes +mine. 2) Addressed that already. 3) WUT On July 21 2010 11:01 chaoser wrote: I didn't like the initial bandwagon on BrownBear On July 21 2010 11:30 chaoser wrote: Explain #3I was initially arguing for BrownBear's lynch. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 22 2010 08:52 chaoser wrote: think that's the vote, modified BM's to be more recent, well good bye town, take note of last minute votes on me Will do. Also thanks for keeping tabs of votes. I've actually very recently been considering other candidates for the lynch but I'm not prepared to go for a double lynch at the moment nor am I inclined to change my vote on you. If you have any info or suspicions and you're not mafia then please go ahead and tell us just before the day ends. Every little bit helps. Sorry for voting you out of the game so early (assuming it happens in 5hours). | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 22 2010 10:41 Subversion wrote: Look, I've already softclaimed blue. Which was obviously a mistake since I gave mafia information, I was told that was stupid via PM and I agree. It is NOT useful to lynch someone who has a valuable town skill! I guarantee you lynching me is not going to give you information, and is really going to set you back. Please fucking think about this now. I am NOT the best candidate. Lynching me is hugely risky, on account that I am telling the truth. Things we know about me: Claim blue Am noob - 1st mafia game essentially Vote based on one stupid remark, and a well defended day 1 vote Things we know about DTA: Claims not mafia, no claim of anything useful Highly skilled and experienced player Vote based on detailed post analysis and him playing out of character You lynch me, and I'm mafia, then you "apparently" have youngminii too. Any mafia is good so thats okay, although I disagree about youngminii. I really don't feel he's been a major supporter of mine. You lynch me, and I'm innocent, you lose a blue player, and gain zero information. You lynch DTA and he's mafia, then you have chaoser too. Since they did a little band together and vote for me trick, and chaoser seemed to jumkp on my bandwagon awfully fast. You also lynch a highly skilled and threatening player. You lynch him and he's innocent, you lose a vanilla townie who doesn't seem to be putting much effort into the game anyway, based on what people expect from him due to prior games. I am NOT the best lynch candidate, and the evidence against me is dismal. Wait why even claim blue? DTA is first on the lynch priority it seems for now. I don't quite see why chaoser would automatically be mafia if DTA is either. Sure they band-wagoned a bit but what kind of mafia would do that inside the official thread? I think you're jumping to conclusions here but I do believe that you're blue. Medic on him just in case? It seems more likely to me that one of them may be mafia and they could be utilizing the fact that the other player wants to stay alive as well and are thus band-wagoning on to you. I agree that you're not the best lynch candidate though. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
We should let DTA stay alive an extra day if he is the mad hatter in order to place an extra bomb and lynch him tomorrow. I then went back to page one to read about it an realized that the people he placed his bombs on would die when he was lynched as well so I removed the message in a hurry. Sorry for not only placing a stupid message but for editing my post. Please spare me the mod-kill D:. Hopefully someone read my post and can confirm this. It was up for a couple minutes I believe. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 22 2010 11:00 Subversion wrote: Also, I don't know what wifom means WIFOM= Wine in front of me Not sure how to explain it but it basically is the situation where you're thinking this could be a green or a blue hiding himself as a green to not get killed or a green hiding himself as a blue hiding himself as a green to protect the blues or a blue hiding himself as a green as a blue as a green.. etc | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
I try <3 | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 22 2010 11:13 chaoser wrote: THIS is WIFOM Sigh, I don't even know what to think anymore. At this point I feel like none of us are mafia ;_;. Since both DTA and Subversion are soft claiming blue, I don't mind if I get lynched. I'm only green btw. Subversion hard claimed blue. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 23 2010 08:00 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: Also, some collected important info: + Show Spoiler [Day 1 Votes] + Divinek Pandain SiNiquity bumatlarge Brownbear Subversion Youngminii (5) XeliN Amber[Light] Roffles Infundibulum Jayme Abstain (6) LaXerCannon tricode SouthRawrea chaoser protactinium zeks DTA (3) d3_crescentia Pyrrhuloxia tree.hugger ketomai (2) citi.zen lakrismamma Amber[Light] (1) BloodyCobbler (2) OpZ LaXerCannon (1) Misder Citi.zen (1) rastaban SiNiquity (1) Pandain (1) BloodyCobbler Infundibulum (1) youngminii + Show Spoiler [Day 2 votes] + Pyrrhuloxia XeliN zeks Subversion LaXerCannon rastaban OpZ Protactinium chaoser Pandain chaoser (8) youngminii Roffles SouthRawrea misder citi.zen BrownBear Divinek SiNiquity Subversion (7) tree.hugger bumatlarge jayme Amber[Light] Infundibulum d3_crescentia Amber[Light] (1) Bloody Cobbler Abstain (2) lakrismamma tricode People who overlapped on Hyperbola and DTA lynch votes: Pandain Subversion + Show Spoiler + Hyperbola's "Death Post" On July 19 2010 08:08 Hyperbola wrote: Guys, really? Okay so I'm pretty much lynched because you people can't take a joke. So I'm leaving this as my legacy: People I think are mafia or atleast seem fishy: Brown Bear Really dude? Jumping on a bandwagon before even reading the thread? youngminii You are entirely too defensive when a person puts a vote on you as a placeholder. Either you are scum or a very nervous blue. You also endorse no lynching on the first day to appear to be "pro-life" and "for the town". I really don't see your reasoning behind this because a random shot in the dark of inactives or suspicious players can in fact nab a red. And if it doesn't you only lose a green because a blue would at least roleclaim or try to join up with trust circles to avoid getting lynched in this manner. (Divided blues that don't make connections are really hindering the town). SiNiquity I had absolutely no evidence against you before but now you are starting to stink of scum at first you took my accusal of you as a joke and brushed it off, but when people started accusing me of being mafia you saw an opportunity and went into action to provide as much evidence as you could find against me by even looking into past games. Then you just completely shut your mouth and is now waiting for the situation to close to start talking again (afraid you'll say something to bring attention to you and me being the perfect scapegoat). Also your previous posts were really try-hard in my opinion. You contributed absolutely nothing by typing up lengthy posts that just summarized what everyone said. Besides that you clarified and discussed some rules of the game and such. You want to make it seem like you are contributing and keep a neutral and non aggressive stance like a reporter so no one would suspect you. This could just be your playstyle but it seems like a very cautious red one to me. LaXerCannon First LaxerCannon recommends lynching inactives but then goes ahead and abstains. Then he goes on again about how we should just line up inactives to lynch and doesn't change his vote. Then he vanishes. This is fishy for two reasons. First the obvious contradiction, and second, the effort to try and direct suspicion away from him. He keeps pushing the idea to lynch random inactive people while the town debates over a few suspects and really does nothing but push the town in the wrong direction: not analysing the game but killing off quiet people. Then he talks about playoffs and keeps endorcing random picking ideas. That is wayy too anti-town to be a blue. And if he's green he doesn't care about the game much. ------------------------------------------------------- this is all I have now and hope I at least contributed to the game before I die sorry about trying to have fun guys :/ j/k ~peace + Show Spoiler [DTA's "Death Post"] + On July 22 2010 12:14 DarthThienAn wrote: chaoser, I don't mind dying. Prefer not to, but it's all good if I do. People to look out for when I flip green: Pyrr. Subversion (still got it out for him). youngminii. tree.hugger who fed me the connection between Sub and youngminii. And if those two are guilty then check out Pandain and citi.zen too. People who haven't been posting that I remember: d3 zeks Jayme Laxer Amber (maybe?) I forget who else and can't be bothered to check right now. Most useful post during the entire night. + <3s. Saved me from backtracking again. I still say night posting is kind of dumb. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
Anyhow, let us assume that BC is town-aligned. If he were a blue role such as medic he may just be claiming to be hit to avoid having the mafia go for him during the night and instead go for another player to increase the chances of them hitting a blue role. This however is quite risky because BC runs the chances of being lynched. Although he may be a blue role that was actually saved in the night.(I'll come back to this in a second) In any case the prior can be ruled out as it's very unlikely. If he were a veteran this is a town-favouring claim as it doesn't suggest that he is veteran but it clears him to the extent that claiming veteran does without the negative effects of helping the mafia find the blues. If he were a normal villager, this is pretty self-explanatory as he's just telling the truth. If he were a saved blue/green, by announcing that he was saved he could come in contact with the doctor that saved him. In order for this to happen though, the vigilante would have to come out and announce who he shot. We could then build a circle of trust in the village making it much easier to lynch people as we would have a confirmed villager, a doctor claim or two (if the second is a mafia then we have a lynchee if the other doctor dies) and a confirmed vigilante as the mafia would need 3 KP for this scenario to be pulled off. Of course the doctor claim(s) would only come after the vigilante claim. The results are obvious if there is a cc, double lynch. If there is no cc, then we are cleared. The real vigilante should not be afraid to cc if a fake one claims either as if he does, he gets to use his life for one guaranteed mafia's life which is superior to his shooting skill as he might hit a villager and he essentially gets another shot after using his first one on BC. Once that is cleared up we would have a cleared villager and we could have claims going to him. If BC was mafia however: Vig would claim. If we get a cc, DL both of them and as mentioned before, the Vig would be making great use of his life but BC would be neither confirmed or unconfirmed. You would expect that the real vig would be the one saying that he didn't shoot and the fake would say that he did but it may work in the reverse as the mafia might want to take out the vig if they feel he is a dangerous player. In any case, the town definitely benefits from a vig claim. So read over this, give thoughts and if they are positive, vig claim please. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 25 2010 03:37 Pandain wrote: Yeah, pretty sure. I had been thinking about this for a while now(past 20 minutes) and I was thinking up a couple of ideas. Would it be good for everyone just to pm roleclaim to either Tricode/Citizen. I mean, they're both clean. This could really really help us. And in the chance that a mafia will counter claim to be a kp town, than we have 3 suspects to deal with. DONT ROLECLAIM YET, NEED FEEBACK Sorry I'm back, I slept in today. This has caught my eye though because I have no choice but to counter claim Citi.zen here as if I claim later, I will become less and less believable which is not really good to the town assuming that one of us is the mafia which is most likely. Again, sorry for not being on early enough to respond to his claim. It should be fine as long as the DTs have not yet claimed to Citi.zen. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
## Vote Citizen for now | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 24 2010 13:37 BloodyC0bbler wrote: southrawrea + Show Spoiler + On July 17 2010 10:48 SouthRawrea wrote: We should like.. have a village bonfire where we eat marshmallows and tell spookie stories in the afternoon. On July 17 2010 22:57 SouthRawrea wrote: ####Vote Abstain On July 19 2010 09:59 SouthRawrea wrote: My take on this is we should take it easy Day 1 and just individually take note of inactives/suspicious individuals until we get our power roles in action tonight. Sure we may end up lynching one of the Reds and it does indeed help to lynch scummy players in order to lessen the number suspects in a future lynch but Random Lynching on Day 1 also allows Reds to gain a foothold in swaying the opinions of players in a future 50/50 situation (ex: Player X is active since Day 1 and seems to be pro-town but is in actuality a mafia. Both him and a Player Y, a cop, counter-claim each other with conflicting reports several days later and the town is given a 50/50 shot at lynching the right person but the other cop hasn't been speaking as much in fear of revealing the fact that he is a cop to the mafia through unintentional, implicit clues. The rest of the village trusts Player X because he seems to be more Pro-Town than Player Y.) and we risk the possibility of lynching one of our power roles early on. Just my 2 cents on why I voted to abstain from lynching. On July 20 2010 08:04 SouthRawrea wrote: Talking at night is stupid D:. It takes away from what the game is supposed to be. On July 21 2010 11:19 SouthRawrea wrote: Um this is getting a bit too heated in my opinion but this may all just be coming from the fact that chaoser is furiously trying to get the town's suspicion placed on Subversion or he's reading wayyy too much into the words typed out by Subversion. This is his first game and I can emphasize with him because you don't quite think out every thing you type especially in your first game. If I try to help my team (because I've played a couple of forum games before) I generally type furiously without reading over what I've typed and trying to think how that would read to another player. Also, I'm pretty sure Subversion hasn't mentioned you. I do think you're trying too hard to tunnel him (not sure if that term is used here). However, it's not like you're voting him or anything which makes me inclined to think that you're just trying to defend yourself and help the village in general. I don't see why you'd go for Subversion instead of an inactive such as me. ##Vote Chaoser I would abstain but we can afford a mislynch now and we have a bit of information to work with especially because the detectives have their reports and we have a claim. This generally works in our favour as there hasn't been a lucky kill for the mafia and there is alot more text to read upon for scumtells. Also we get more info now. (Not quite sure how this works in my head but I imagine a detective claim from someone getting lynched day 2 is much more convincing than one on day 1 especially because they have a report now) On July 22 2010 08:40 SouthRawrea wrote: Maybe there's a fool in the game with the simple objective of trying to get lynched? Also, getting a fool/mafia vibe from DTA that can happen in the event that both are present in a game. Gonna assume there isn't one unless BM added one in secretly and consider DTA for lynching as well. I'll actually bandwagon if a lynch occurs later or perhaps start it on another day just because as I'm continuing to read, some of my suspicions are beginning to coincide with some of those who suspect him. Overall though, not a huge suspect on my list. On July 22 2010 12:00 SouthRawrea wrote: Gonna leave my vote the way it is. Gonna sleep for tonight gotta get up early tomorrow. On July 23 2010 09:29 SouthRawrea wrote: I mean it ruins the whole mafia game in a way. In old-school mafia in real life the people would like put their heads down while the night roles did stuff and no one would talk. It's dumb because it ruins the game's vibe I guess. Welcome to southrawrea, the classic case of a mafia member “being active”. I’m not sure how he has been missed this long as well, almost all his posts are useless, rehashing old information someone has said, or obvious filler posts to distract people from how inactive he has been. Considering he hasn’t been very active overall, and coupled with the style of posts he is making, I am sure he is mafia, and IMO someone we should consider lynching. If anyone doubts it, go read all his posts for yourself, you will see what I mean. If you refuse to go read his posts, take the sample I have given and make your decision off that. Not sure how this is completely representative of all my posts. You're missing a few actually. The type of mafia I'm used to is more fast paced and over a short period of time. I'm not entirely good with the analytical thing where you link the posts of people from 50 pages back and stuff which is what the "better" players seem to be doing. Also at citi.zen if you really are the Mad Hatter, why not announce who you placed your bombs on? If they're really innocent, no problemo and if they're mafia they'll think twice about shooting you and we have someone to lead. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 25 2010 05:35 SiNiquity wrote: I would very much like to see your backyard Ok just five minutes, need enough battery power on my camera and I'll PM you with it. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
I'll put it in the thread then. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 25 2010 06:25 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: How does that make any sense mafia is against a wall so they sacrificed someone who was going to be lynched anyway? if southrawrea is red it doesn't buy the mafia any extra time if he gets lynched What makes even less sense is how would the supposed mafia be against a wall? They've got 1 blue role and have lost no one so far. Not to mention we don't have any real clues as to who they are except suspicious behaviour. We've missed our lynches consistantly. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 25 2010 06:31 zeks wrote: 1. His claim is an effort to save himself and get our main man citi.zen killed in the process 2. SouthRawrea is obviously expendable 3. Town organization is becoming a LEGIT THREAT - we've forced the action on them so now they came up with an aggressive reply with South claiming. Scum probably wrote his posts up for him rofl Oh and took the pictures as well I suppose. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
http://s274.photobucket.com/albums/jj246/Vismaster1994/?action=view¤t=DSC02097.jpg http://s274.photobucket.com/albums/jj246/Vismaster1994/?action=view¤t=DSC02096.jpg | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 25 2010 06:46 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: Okay, I can see this line of thinking now. However, so far 1, seems to be backfiring since South has already garnered several votes. And i doubt he had his posts written for him; they're not persuasive at all. Put yourself in the mafias shoes. If citizen is really the hatter, how would you disrupt the plan? The strategies i detailed in my longish post on page 96 (i think its 96) involving false DT claims would be much more powerful and harder to combat than sending out SouthRawrea to meekly claim that he's the real Mad Hatter. Like I said before, never assume the mafia are idiots. The other possibility no one has mentioned is that BC and Tricode are both red and we have 2 Hatters (possible yes... realistic probably not) Oh wow.. never even considered 2 hatters... uh... | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 25 2010 06:50 Tricode wrote: There is only 2kp roles. So it's unlikely that there are 2 mad hatters when I'm the vig. Also instead of defending yourself, you seem to like to show your hard work that is irrelevant to this game and does not prove anything other then your busy. I just defended myself against zeks didn't I D | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 25 2010 06:57 Tricode wrote: You just asked Zek "why don't you suspect citizen", that isn't really a reason why not to look at you still. You were just trying to bounce off your FoS to citizen instead of defending yourself and giving valid reasons in why we should trust you over citizen. What I was implying was a mafia partnership going on and honestly if there really is only one Mad Hatter. It's either me or him. FOS is on both of us. I was merely FOSing Zeks as well. Now I could ask why doesn't Citizen give reasons to trust him but I'll humour you here. There are no real reasons why you should trust anybody as that is an unreasonable question. All you can do in mafia is show why the other person is guilty. It's like court without any evidence for the defense to use. I'm trustworthy because everything I've said so far is consistent though. I think it's best really to wait for citizen to come on to say something because so far he's been much too quiet. I know how that is though.. might be busy at the moment. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 25 2010 07:18 lakrismamma wrote: ¨ Citi.zen was cleared if no other claimed mad hatter. If he is clear then his DT should be clear if it is as he says? Now the situation is different. Misder was more of an observation. Im not so sure you are mafia now. Since I get to choose between citi.zen and Southrawrea south is far more likely and that would prove you right, Will you believe in citi.zen if South turns out red? Sure play the newbie card. What you really is trying to do here is make citi tell where he has his bombs right? WTF!! This is so mafia why should he tell where he placed his bombs. Only mafia has the need to know if the bombs are placed on them or not. You practicly told us you are mafia. ##unvote ##vote southrawrea Also.. fine go show me where I last played a forum mafia game.. right nowhere. Now this is where WIFOM comes into play. If I were mafia, and not a noob as you claim, wouldn't I know that it would be scummy to ask for where the bombs are placed if he really was the Hatter? More substance less jumping to conclusions please. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 25 2010 07:29 lakrismamma wrote: Wow I didn't see this until now. Why would he vote for now when its either him or citi.zen that is mafia. Notice where all the signs are pointing people! Why would I say "for now" if I were mafia? Neither makes sense. I just wanted to make it sound a bit dramatic. You know.. like... The supervillain is thwarted.. for now. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 25 2010 07:29 youngminii wrote: This is ridiculous, I can't believe this many people are actually voting for citi.zen. Let me say it one more time. There is more information to be gained if SouthRawr is lynched than if citi.zen is lynched. Also, you are a mafia noob, not just a mafia, not just a noob. That's not the only factor involved though. There is also likelihood based on who we're associating with. Don't we gain info on three total deaths if citi.zen is the mad hatter? There is much more potential info there then the 2 people we know will show up if I die. Also, if I were the mafia how do you gain info on Chaoser? Your supposed evidence that you gain is all circumstantial because of the nature of WIFOM. You sir are and idiot . | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 25 2010 07:33 chaoser wrote: I would just like to quote this again for people who are like, if south flips MH, we can just kill citi.zen the next day. If he's suicide bomber, it doesn't matter On July 25 2010 07:37 zeks wrote: I will personally vote for citi.zen first as soon as the next day starts if SR flips anything other than red. Way to post something after it has been proven to be an invalid option. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 25 2010 07:44 youngminii wrote: Mad hatter bomb deaths don't give any information. They give NOTHING. They are just needless deaths and bombs should be saved for the late game. Also, do you know what WIFOM means? I gave solid evidence linking you and chaoser, there's nothing WIFOM or circumstantial about it. I'm saying if I were mafia what if I were just chose someone random so that when I died and it showed I was mafia, people like you would jump on Chaoser's vote. Or if I were mafia and chose Chaoser but pretended it was someone random so that I could refute your argument like this. Or if I were mafia and chose someone random but pretended to choose Chaoser -> someone random so you would lynch them. You go around claiming people are noobs but it seems to me you're the real noob here. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 25 2010 08:01 youngminii wrote: Yeah let's all just go find the smallest, tiniest possibilities and argue from that point of view. It's not small if you consider the fact that the mafia would most likely send their Suicide Bomber forward to claim other than some random because he can blow people up after he gets the votes to go his way which is simple with your mafia crew voting with you? | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 25 2010 08:06 zeks wrote: Someone explain to me how citi.zen can take out multiple roles - maybe I'm missing something here He doesn't need to be medic protected He's been DT checked? Allegedly DT checked ACCORDING TO HIM.. which means nothing lol. Nice. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
I really don't understand how Youngminii thinks all his arguments are perfect. You're saying things that are illogical. Why would the mafia want to save me if I'm the "noobie mafia" that you say that I am. On July 25 2010 08:07 youngminii wrote: I call upon every player in this game to vote for either citi.zen or South. One of them is confirmed mafia. There is no hiding under this "I think they're all innocent" nonsense. Pick one. But more importantly, pick SouthRawrea. There are four possible outcomes: If we lynch citi.zen the Mafia: Then we've taken out one red. We have a town member to form a circle around (SouthRawrea), and this player is 100% new to forum mafia. If we lynch citi.zen the Mad Hatter: Then ASSUMING citi.zen's already given the second DT party (his inactivity cough) AND if we rule out the possibility of TWO DT groups claiming to him, then we have a town circle with a DT. Two people needlessly die and if you all really think that citi.zen's scumhunting abilities are so good, then why don't you trust him on his SouthRawrea hunt? If we lynch Southrawrea the Mafia: Then we gain a whole load of information with many implications (unfortunately no one listens to me anymore). We've got BC backed into a corner, we've got chaoser (imo) and a few more, AND we have a huge townie group with TWO DTs working together. If we lynch Southrawrea the Mad Hatter: Then chaoser dies. Only one death compared to two if citi.zen's Mad Hatter. I do think he's mafia and maybe you would too (directed at tree.hugger) if you got off your high horse and read my analysis posts once in a while. *** God I can't believe how fast you all just follow tree.hugger's bias 'situation report'. This especially. Even if I am 100% new, I can pick up pretty quick especially if I get this circle to help me out. Also, we get rid of one of the mafia's top members who could possibly have power over the DTs if he really got those claims. If he's blue, he should at least tell us if one of his bomb targets at this time is me so that the vilage knows what voting him would do. We then have many scum to pick on as you have pointed out so well. (Chaoser for example) and we get me supposing that I am mafia. If I'm mafia, I as well as a few others have already said why your line of reasoning was wrong. We do in fact gain more info from killing citizen as mafia rather than me. If I'm town, we get Chaoser who you ALREADY believe is red and we still have our Mad Hatter to place bombs while being directed by a new town circle. As well, because I'm such a noob, mafia may be reluctant to kill me immediately tonight which gives us a chance to get order in the town. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 25 2010 09:36 Pandain wrote: Oh yeah, turns out he's not just canadian but also canadian-korean. Boom case and point. Now we wait. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 25 2010 09:50 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: I'm starting to think there are no mafia and BM is just picking the kills at night That would be an epic game lol. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 26 2010 07:17 Pandain wrote: South, Post the PM's. One sec.. there's no rules against PM posting right? I vaguely remember something BM said. Also, I wouldn't be in this stupid problem if someone claimed green sooner >.> | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
We can use this as a mutual trust system. I'll leave you to your own posts but I'll help you from the sidelines. Sorry copy/paste only seems to bring out blank spaces so I typed it out manually. Also my bad.. can't count days.. I think it might've been Day 3... I was kinda lost for the first few of IRL days. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
In a seperate PM.. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 26 2010 11:27 flamewheel wrote: Please edit that message out, Subversion. You are dead. Burn | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
##Vote Zeks ##Vote BloodyC0bbler Because I have no clue what the hell is right anymore. This is stupid. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 26 2010 11:31 Subversion wrote: lol. can't wait for your little "red list" to be total crap. no more posting to me plz, im dead. No more posting in reply to people posting to you. You're dead. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
##Vote Zeks ##Vote BloodyC0bbler I can't believe I got played like this still. Shit. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On July 26 2010 11:34 zeks wrote: waiting on your scum buddies to vote me No scum buddies though so probably not gonna happen >.> | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
Just as planned. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
| ||