|
Everyone calm the Fuzzle Down
Honestly, the way things are going a bandwagon is going to happen any second. And people are just getting a bit personal now.
I'd suggest postponing debate until we get the night post. You can think up ideas of course, but I'm just highly cautious of a THIRD bandwagon happening(more than 3 probably).
It won't be that long for the night post to come out. I suggest we wait until we have that information.
|
On July 23 2010 13:42 youngminii wrote: I have to ask, why is everyone saying calm down?
Nothing's personal, no one's 'attacked' anyone verbally, the only things that have been happening are accusations and argumentative responses. The only thing I can see that may be seen as offensive is where infundiblxublxjum and I said read our posts, which isn't offensive at all, considering we didn't say anything like 'read my posts you fuckin dumb blind moron' or anything.
This is mafia. This is a game of deceiving and lying and scumhunting. Aggression is a style of play and I don't see why we're being told to tone it down.
The problem is no one's going to answer anything reasonably well if everyone's on the edge of killing each other.
|
Now that things have settled, I think now would be a good time for everyone who hasn't voted to double lynch to do so now. I really feel like we should've had it for this day, but I guess we'll have to wait.
Opinions? Anyone see why we SHOULDN'T double lynch? If not, I urge all of you to vote so now.
|
On July 23 2010 13:52 chaoser wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2010 13:51 Pandain wrote: Now that things have settled, I think now would be a good time for everyone who hasn't voted to double lynch to do so now. I really feel like we should've had it for this day, but I guess we'll have to wait.
Opinions? Anyone see why we SHOULDN'T double lynch? If not, I urge all of you to vote so now. can't vote right now btw, gotta wait till day
Thought it was day? It's past 12 EST. Or does he have to make the night post for it to be day?
|
On July 23 2010 13:58 Divinek wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2010 13:51 Pandain wrote: Now that things have settled, I think now would be a good time for everyone who hasn't voted to double lynch to do so now. I really feel like we should've had it for this day, but I guess we'll have to wait.
Opinions? Anyone see why we SHOULDN'T double lynch? If not, I urge all of you to vote so now. did you even explain why we should is it really so useful to blast 2 people even though we have no reason to truly believe two people to be red enough to use a double lynch? or are you just going on the hunch that we will find out enough today, either that seem pretty interesting
Well won't it activate after THIS day. So we'll have a night, and two days (including this) to make up our mind. I think we'll have plenty of information. Besides, we just mislynched for a second time in a row. If the mafia hits go well for them and they end up hitting blues, we need to have a chance to comeback.
No, we do not know enough to double lynch someone as of now. But I feel we will by the time double lynch is usable. Any other opinions?
|
On July 23 2010 14:00 BrownBear wrote: Double lynch is best used only if we have 2 people we are almost positive are mafia. It's really powerful, but we can end up screwing ourselves over if we doublelynch town.
So convince me we have 2 people we're pretty sure are scum before I vote dbllynch.
No the thing is it activates not this day, but next day.
Of COURSE we don't have enough information now. But we're activating it so that when we will, we can use it. If you're going to only vote doublelynch when you have 2 sure suspects, then double lynch becomes basically null, right?
It does activate the day after, correct?
|
*sigh* for some reason I feel like BM has fallen asleep >.<
|
Shit. I need to think about this. -.-
|
|
On July 23 2010 14:26 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Before this day turns into a giant flame fest like the last few pages.
I took a hit last night.
Holy crud. This is the info I was talking about.
Wait a second... then how did two people die. and a third got hit?
Was there a vigilante?
|
Yeah, I want someone to confirm this is a good idea before you do it, but I think vigi should claim who he hit. Then maybe BC, Vigi, and d3 could start a townie circle?
Also, does anyone think it would be a good idea for DT to pm any of those people with info he has? Or would it be too risky.
I'm new, so I want other players to comment on this before anyone does this.
|
On July 23 2010 14:36 youngminii wrote: Bad idea. Scum can easily counter-claim. BC could be scum faking the vigi hit. And what's with the d3 being included o.o?
He was hit, but yeah some pming and reminded me he hasn't spoken much either.
|
I think if the Vigi didn't make a hit, they should claim so now.
If they don't claim so now, then BC is NOT lying. I think that's a solid inference.
|
ebwop. And with that, as long as the vigi reads this, we have a confirmed townie or a confirmed scum.
|
On July 23 2010 14:40 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2010 14:38 Pandain wrote: I think if the Vigi didn't make a hit, they should claim so now.
If they don't claim so now, then BC is NOT lying. I think that's a solid inference. we can't do that since we might have 2 vigis. they would both have to claim and then we'd lose one of their hits. unless maybe both hits have been used and doubled up on someone somehow
Oh didn't realize we had two vigis. Frick I thought we finally had something to go on -.-
|
Seeing as we still don't have much to go on yet =,=, I'm going to go ahead with my plan of getting the least active people to talk more.
##Vote Zeks I'm keeping it there until you get more active.
This is NOT a vote of him being mafia, this is a threat vote that I will keep unless I see him to be more contributive.
*gets out his police stick.* It's business time.
|
On July 23 2010 15:16 SiNiquity wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2010 14:48 chaoser wrote: I do however know that a Vigi hit SOMEONE tonight. That Vigi should claim since they are regular townie now and say who they hit and why. Mafia doesn't gain anything from them claiming, I think. Also, if it's a false claim, real Vigi can always claim as well and then we have a 1 v 1. Either way, one mafia is dying if they fake claim. I'm also going to go to sleep but I feel I have enough evidence to compile a case against someone by tomorrow morning Despite my voting for you yesterday, this actually seems like a solid plan. Am I missing some clever loophole?
On July 23 2010 14:50 youngminii wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2010 14:48 chaoser wrote: I do however know that a Vigi hit SOMEONE tonight. That Vigi should claim since they are regular townie now and say who they hit and why. Mafia doesn't gain anything from them claiming, I think. Also, if it's a false claim, real Vigi can always claim as well and then we have a 1 v 1. Either way, one mafia is dying if they fake claim. I'm also going to go to sleep but I feel I have enough evidence to compile a case against someone by tomorrow morning There's no way of us knowing whether or not the claim is true or false. There may or may not be one or two Vigis and even then 2 scum can step up and counter claim.
|
On July 23 2010 15:57 chaoser wrote: The main reason for them claiming right now is so we have exact information on what happened last night. We can use them later if it turns out true. If a vigi has used a hit and we know them 100% to be vigi, they should always claim because then we have a 100% confirmed townie
Until we lynch them, which I am assuming we would do according to d3. -.-
|
Argh woke up at 4 -.-. Interesting developments...
Just thought I should put this out there that hitting BC does look like a very Tricode-esque move. From what I understand and from skimming previous mafia games Tricode has an innate hatred of BC and always wants to kill him. His actions thus far have proved this point.
I would like to hear my output on (i think) Tree.hugger's idea of getting the two DT's to PM Tricode so they can get in contact with each other. I feel Tricode is in a very dangerous spot right now. For me anyway, the chances are high that he will be killed tonight. Tricode could be a huge asset to the town right now, let's not forget him. I would advise, in my own humble, noob opinion, that we not lynch Tricode tonight if possible.
|
On July 24 2010 08:56 BloodyC0bbler wrote: + Show Spoiler +I am glad to see that today has been a lot more reasonable than the previous two days. I believe that the whole topic of myself/tricode will continue to be discussed, but I am glad at the logical conclusions thus far. However, the town also has to discuss places to begin for lynch targets. As a player who has been in a lot of mafia games, and well didn’t think I would have to outline something like this, I shall.
To begin with (ignore the fact its day 3 for the moment). Hosts will RNG roles and typically tweak the player list slightly. (making sure a group of first time players isn’t red vs a group of experienced players for instance). Some hosts will openly admit to doing this, some hosts will deny it. The truth of the matter is, every host does it. Be it by RNGing a role again, to physically swapping someones roles. (chuiu is exempt from this generalization as I know he didn’t).
Now, everyone would tweak things the same way, but I will do a briefly outline of how I would do it if I were a host.
Well known experienced players. (see names like ver, qatol, ace, caller, L, bloodyc0bbler, incognito, flamewheel, foolishness, etc…)
Basically players who have a lot of experience.
Not as well known experienced players (see names such as infundibulum, amber[light], opz, bumatlarge, chaoser, tree.hugger, d3, zeks)
Rising stars (see names such as youngminii, DTA, Korynee, etc..)
Completely new players (everyone else)
Now, at this point, in the case of very few well known experienced players, they typically will be given town roles (note, usually townie, or non major blue) as they can help create order, and teach new players, or help guide the flow of things. In the case of many, usually a small group is placed in red as to compete against those who are town.
In the case of a small group however, the mafia breakup is that of usually rising stars, or people who are experienced but can easily defend themselves in a pinch but rarely recognized to the general public. New players will be split among both groups as they need experience in every role still.
Now, as a player, as well as a host, part of my playing style always includes looking at how someone may have balanced the game. note everyone does it differently so the way I would do things is not the same as any other host . It does however give me a starting ground on how to start scum hunting.
In a game of this format, and even more specifically this game. I see of well known names most people would recognize as Myself, Citizen, and foolishness. We have all played in a fair amount of games and most new players at this point will most likely hear of our names quickly, read it in the thread, etc… We will usually be instantly distrustful of each other and be a balancing issue if we are town/red as we at our core will take longer to trust someone who is forced into a form of spotlight regardless of wanting to be there. Note: Pyrr isn’t included in this list as he may not be as well known after a large large break from mafia.
We then have a large group of experienced players who aren’t as well known, but have played in many many games. They make up the core of the players this game.
We have a few rising stars, and a smaller group of new players.
To begin with scum hunting I would look at the list of the big 3 and realize that either 1 or none of us are red. The possibility of there being one however is what keeps us wary of eachother all game.
Of the rising stars, I would say most likely with such a low count of them this game, also 1. As they would be expected to compete for top spot this game.
Of the newer players, most likely 1-2. As their role doesn’t matter as much as they have to learn from square one regardless.
Rest of the roles would be made up of people from the experienced group. Now, from there you have a general idea of lists breakups.
List of 3 (or 4 if you count pyrr) names where 0-1 is red Foolishness, bloodyc0bbler, citizen (pyrr)
A list of 2 where most likely 0-1 is red. Where 1 is more likely. DTA, Youngminii
A list of 6 where 1-2 will most likely be red Siniquity, Southrawrea, Pandain, subversion, misder, protactinium
T[hen everyone else to make up the last 2-4 red.
From this you have a generalized standpoint of where to start looking. And with those lists in mind you look at posting histories, styles, voting patterns and the like to best narrow down the red on that respective list. Once a # of reds has been found off a list of grouped players, you can generally ignore it briefly. (note some hosts may not do it as I have laid out, but this is merely a starting format to work from).
People will make slipups, imply or reveal they are working with so and so and one flips red then the other does, etc… It however gives everyone a generalized place to start and begin to try and narrow reds down as it puts the chances of nailing one earlier on higher than others.
With all this in mind, I will be going back over the thread and analyzing people. Expect another large post in the next few hours.
Just another thing I would add, the mafia gets to choose out of their team the GF, correct? So It is likely that they would choose a more experienced player to fit that role. So we should also be cautious of one of the high-experienced players being GF as well.
|
|
|
|