|
i've only been able to get through the last 15 pages or so, does anyone know the page the first day post is on? there's just so much spamming going on. if it's a hassle don't worry, i can just continue to look through posts later today.
i'll wait to make analysis based on the next day's post/ what comes of this night. i hate basing analysis on clues primarily, but i haven't played with many of you so i think i determining guilt/innocence through interpreting behavior at first would be a mistake.
i would have to agree that the spamming is a serious issue. there have been some accusations made that got lost pages ago because of this, and i haven't even had the chance to read everything yet. it leads to a lack of follow up because people can just pretend they never saw it. hopefully (some) people will change their posting behavior.
|
nvm on the day post question, found the link in the first post on the first page
|
hey all....i already sent a PM to the mod apologizing for my lack of posting but i figured i should do it publically as well, since i usually participate more often when i do play. i've got a pre-LSAT test tmw morning and my car got broken into last night plus working 60+hrs this week....fml.
i'll try to contribute more over the weekend/ sunday. yay! for the lynching/modkill.
|
On February 21 2010 02:24 Foolishness wrote:Show nested quote +On February 20 2010 15:50 tree.hugger wrote:My activity is pretty easily explained, I'm currently in a production of Marat/Sade which is now in tech week. I have barely enough time to read this thread, let alone do the wonderful clue and behavioral analysis that this game has shown so far. Doesn't mean I'm not happy to see such a bountiful harvest of red, due to the diligent labor this thread has produced. NOBODY CARESThe very least you could do is to try to defend yourself here. Ver has posted ample evidence indicating how suspicious you are based on your behavior, and your retaliation is "oh sorry i'm so inactive waa waa". Guess what? NOBODY CARES! You have yet to deny any claim that you are mafia. Considering Ver has the inside scoop on the town it's much more sensible we listen to him at this point. I was hoping that somewhat else would be observant enough, but since everyone playing seems to have the attention span of a four year old: a bodyguard is dead!. What does this mean? One of the mafia substituted a member in. This could mean a variety of things we must look out for. We don't know which family substituted the member in, and it's very possible that even more of the bodyguards are mafia.
I'm glad someone else saw this!!
The rules say the Mayor can substitute their family members for BGs, and if you look @ the first post, there are 3/4 of BGs left, but no blues are marked as BGs.
any answer for this, redtooth?
also, my top suspect for now is L. in the beginning, he was trying to attribute clues to ace and Dr. H was backing him up on this; lo and behold, ace is green and Dr. H is red.
|
On February 21 2010 06:32 L wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2010 06:22 Versatile wrote:On February 21 2010 02:24 Foolishness wrote:On February 20 2010 15:50 tree.hugger wrote:My activity is pretty easily explained, I'm currently in a production of Marat/Sade which is now in tech week. I have barely enough time to read this thread, let alone do the wonderful clue and behavioral analysis that this game has shown so far. Doesn't mean I'm not happy to see such a bountiful harvest of red, due to the diligent labor this thread has produced. NOBODY CARESThe very least you could do is to try to defend yourself here. Ver has posted ample evidence indicating how suspicious you are based on your behavior, and your retaliation is "oh sorry i'm so inactive waa waa". Guess what? NOBODY CARES! You have yet to deny any claim that you are mafia. Considering Ver has the inside scoop on the town it's much more sensible we listen to him at this point. I was hoping that somewhat else would be observant enough, but since everyone playing seems to have the attention span of a four year old: a bodyguard is dead!. What does this mean? One of the mafia substituted a member in. This could mean a variety of things we must look out for. We don't know which family substituted the member in, and it's very possible that even more of the bodyguards are mafia. I'm glad someone else saw this!! The rules say the Mayor can substitute their family members for BGs, and if you look @ the first post, there are 3/4 of BGs left, but no blues are marked as BGs. any answer for this, redtooth? also, my top suspect for now is L. in the beginning, he was trying to attribute clues to ace and Dr. H was backing him up on this; lo and behold, ace is green and Dr. H is red. Uh, actually, the rules don't say that. they say that either family before the first day ends can select people to put in as bodyguards. Show nested quote +Each mafia family has the option, by the time of the Mayor election, to substitute up to two of their members for Bodyguards. As far as the Ace thing; 1) Look how the thing started; Someone basically took one of my remarks and upped the ante. 2) Ver wanted me to push Ace. 3) I wanted to get a read on redtooth, who's been afk for like a year and now has a clue stuck to him. I also thought nemY and Empyrean were mafia. So if someone can; Someone find someone who attaches to the stain killer. The only people I can see being fingered by the clue are redtooth (which is is horrendous bad) via ketchup stain, or meeple because he basically has what I'd imagine would be the end result of the stain spreading. Frankly, i'm not 100% sure on either, but no one's even bothering to talk about it which is a good indicator that mafia are going to try and use the low activity in the thread to just ignore threats to them.
i thought you were a supposedly good player? why would you do something someone else (Ver) told you to, so early in the game, not knowing of he is mafia or innocent, when the blame would clearly come back to you? just as it has now.
how the hell does that make sense?
|
and i'm sorry, why are we pushing for a double lynch when we don't even have one for sure mafia lined up?
it seems to me we're risking killing innocents.
|
On February 21 2010 07:41 L wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2010 07:03 Versatile wrote:On February 21 2010 06:32 L wrote:On February 21 2010 06:22 Versatile wrote:On February 21 2010 02:24 Foolishness wrote:On February 20 2010 15:50 tree.hugger wrote:My activity is pretty easily explained, I'm currently in a production of Marat/Sade which is now in tech week. I have barely enough time to read this thread, let alone do the wonderful clue and behavioral analysis that this game has shown so far. Doesn't mean I'm not happy to see such a bountiful harvest of red, due to the diligent labor this thread has produced. NOBODY CARESThe very least you could do is to try to defend yourself here. Ver has posted ample evidence indicating how suspicious you are based on your behavior, and your retaliation is "oh sorry i'm so inactive waa waa". Guess what? NOBODY CARES! You have yet to deny any claim that you are mafia. Considering Ver has the inside scoop on the town it's much more sensible we listen to him at this point. I was hoping that somewhat else would be observant enough, but since everyone playing seems to have the attention span of a four year old: a bodyguard is dead!. What does this mean? One of the mafia substituted a member in. This could mean a variety of things we must look out for. We don't know which family substituted the member in, and it's very possible that even more of the bodyguards are mafia. I'm glad someone else saw this!! The rules say the Mayor can substitute their family members for BGs, and if you look @ the first post, there are 3/4 of BGs left, but no blues are marked as BGs. any answer for this, redtooth? also, my top suspect for now is L. in the beginning, he was trying to attribute clues to ace and Dr. H was backing him up on this; lo and behold, ace is green and Dr. H is red. Uh, actually, the rules don't say that. they say that either family before the first day ends can select people to put in as bodyguards. Each mafia family has the option, by the time of the Mayor election, to substitute up to two of their members for Bodyguards. As far as the Ace thing; 1) Look how the thing started; Someone basically took one of my remarks and upped the ante. 2) Ver wanted me to push Ace. 3) I wanted to get a read on redtooth, who's been afk for like a year and now has a clue stuck to him. I also thought nemY and Empyrean were mafia. So if someone can; Someone find someone who attaches to the stain killer. The only people I can see being fingered by the clue are redtooth (which is is horrendous bad) via ketchup stain, or meeple because he basically has what I'd imagine would be the end result of the stain spreading. Frankly, i'm not 100% sure on either, but no one's even bothering to talk about it which is a good indicator that mafia are going to try and use the low activity in the thread to just ignore threats to them. i thought you were a supposedly good player? why would you do something someone else (Ver) told you to, so early in the game, not knowing of he is mafia or innocent, when the blame would clearly come back to you? just as it has now. how the hell does that make sense? I thought Ace was mafia too, and if he wasn't I sure as fuck wanted to know how redtooth would have reacted to it given his chummy disposition towards Ace. I was kinda hoping to use the mayoral lynch on Ace while Redtooth would be pardoner while saying I wanted to kill emp in the thread to see how redtooth would react. Also, blindly trust ver? Me? Are you joking? Go read the thread instead of saying afk until day 3 before jumping in with accusations.
I'm sorry, maybe you misunderstood. Let me break it downnnnnnnnnnnnnnn.
1. you said, in what i assume was an attempt to explain your actions early on in the game, "Ver wanted me to push Ace".
2. i was asking, maybe not clearly enough, why you do something like that so early in the game when you cannot determine if they are mafia or innocent? In this case, you did what Ver told you to. Again, I ask, why?
3. lmao @ the righteous indignation. i didn't say anything about "blindly trust Ver", so maybe you oughta do some reading yourself, and avoid misrepresenting what i'm asking to you, please and thanks.
and as far as Ver goes, i'm currently inclined to believe he's innocent. even if he's not, he's been quite helpful to the town.
|
so L pushes for ace's death, ace = green.
L aligns himself with Dr. H and Dr. H = mafia.
L pushes for redtooth's death, and redtooth = medic.
wtf, are you people blind? eff clues, LOOK @ BEHAVIOR.
this only reinforces that the other players he was pushing for lynching (chez, caller, ver) are more than likely innocent.
|
On February 22 2010 09:40 L wrote: Well, I'm dead. Peace.
wat?
|
On February 22 2010 09:38 Fishball wrote:Show nested quote +On February 22 2010 09:30 Versatile wrote: so L pushes for ace's death, ace = green.
L aligns himself with Dr. H and Dr. H = mafia.
L pushes for redtooth's death, and redtooth = medic.
wtf, are you people blind? eff clues, LOOK @ BEHAVIOR.
this only reinforces that the other players he was pushing for lynching (chez, caller, ver) are more than likely innocent. Just to be fair, L pushing for Redtooth's death had nothing to do with clues. It was your so called "behavioral" analysis. If you want to talk about clues, we have johnnyspazz, which his behavioral analysis also matches up as mafia.
what behavior analysis of mine are you referring to?
|
omg, can i vote to lynch myself?
wtf kinda moronic buffonery.....
|
On February 23 2010 13:56 QuickStriker wrote:Well it's time for me to leave for tonight to sleep for tomorrow. So I assume this is what the town wishes and states and will agree with my plan. Unfortunately as noted from the mod above, I can't be instant mod-killed. But my role as a player in this game ends here regardless or not because I don't care single god damn thing about what happens to this game and whether the town or either mafia team win is not my concern anymore. Besides, I don't even have time to check tomorrow for mafia with my full schedule until 10 PMish EST which is the end of the day anyway. Thus with the final agreement and solution as stated on my previous post, I will force myself a mod-kill so for the town, I pray your safety and luck to win despite the situation. If everyone still wants to vote for me, by all means go ahead. I'm forcing a mod-kill anyway by not voting so it's up to anyone left in this game to use that strategical advantage or not. GG. Show nested quote +On February 23 2010 13:07 Scamp wrote: If you just vote for a double-lynch, you don't get modkilled. Then I won't vote double lynch. Thanks. Show nested quote +On February 23 2010 13:23 Versatile wrote: omg, can i vote to lynch myself?
wtf kinda moronic buffonery..... Lynching yourself and forcing a mod-kill yourself is 2 different things. Plus you clearly didn't read my post of my good will intention but then again I don't care. I just want a nice closure from all parties of this game, no flaming, no BMs, just some nice happy "^_^" ending for me so please do not criticize my methods. It's a cowardly one but no one came forth to tell me otherwise and I just want everyone to not think badly of me. Thanks for understanding.
i wasn't directing my words @ you/ to you. my post was more of a "dang, can i get killed due to the insane collective stupidity in this thread?" post.
|
On February 23 2010 23:26 dozko wrote: Seeing as how this town doesnt like to think for themselves but likes to rather blindly follow joe public's ideas here is the definitive guide on who to kill. Double lynching is of course necessary.
Today: Lynch QS Tomorrow: Lynch jspaz, decafchicken
Look at my post from Feb 21 to see why we should be lynching jspaz and decaf already. L im virtually certain is townie but is playing rather badly and whats even worse people trusted him "cause hes a vet". I think a better solution than lynching him is just to ignore whatever he says, although if the above 3 all turn sumiyoshi we can safely take our nerdrage out on him, just not now.
do you have brain damage?
L is a veteran.....but he's a townie playing stupid? this is "virtually" impossible. being a vet means you know how to play this game, and he just killed our mayor/medic. you think he did that "by accident"? gtfo.
this is the kind of idiocy i'm talking about.
|
On February 24 2010 04:30 Amber[LighT] wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2010 03:59 L wrote: Hmm.
Players 12, 14, 17, 18, 24, 32, 34 and 48.
You all seem to be a team. Please post more. post more shitty clue analysis so we can lynch more townies
ROFL.
|
we should be discussing these people:
Tredmasta Decaf scamp cynanmachae opz shockeyy tree hugger
they were Ver's other top suspects, and we need to determine which one(s) of them are sumiyoshi.
|
On February 26 2010 10:39 Scamp wrote: Well you did tell Fishball "you'll find out tomorrow" and you've already posted seven times today with no mention of why Cynan or Versatile were the ones protected by the medics who claimed to you within two hours.
At this point, you're spamming the thread more than Chezinu is. Not to mention you haven't pressed Chez for any info whatsoever. You also don't seem to mind that he's being his usual waste of space. Your only plan to see about his legitimacy has been to kill me.
On top of all that, you never apologized for being wrong about Redtooth, and now you want to lead the town again? Plain and simple: you're not good for the town.
wat.
when was i protected? are you telling me a had a chance to get out of this game and someone effed it up for me?
there is no god.
|
PS: just 'cuz two days have passed doesn't mean we shouldn't kill L.
we were going to kill him yesterday, and for those of you who are Ver worshippers, he also said he wanted L to be lynched.
i mean, it's simple logic people.
L = veteran player VP= someone who doesn't eff up by killing a medic/mayor by behavioral analysis. SWDEUBKAMMBBA= not L.
either way, that's an unforgivable move. besides, L volunteered to die if he was wrong, probably because he knew he'd be able to manipulate the lot of you with Ver dead. I say it's time for him to pay up.
go vote to kill L. Obama gave the Repubs 6 wks on healthcare. i give you whatever incog gave you.
now scoot!
|
anad wtf @ voting amber[light]. i know i mostly skim most of these retarded posts, but where did that come from? why the hell is he/she more viable a candidate than that people we've been discussing for the last few days?
on another note, apparently my LSAT classes are working, 'cuz my logic radar is more dead than usual when reading these here pages.
|
oh, and lastly, if you guys are not going to lynch L, i would really like to be lynched so the other mafia can kill him.
since dumb ass #9540239432 outted me as BG however long ago, let's get on with it. i think i may be more useful to the town dead.
|
wtf is this trash? are you crying? i'm sorry if i struck a nerve, didn't mean to hurt your itty bitty feelings. no need to get personal. stop bitching.
anyway. you're playing like shyt. i've said you're mafia for ages. i've been advocating you should die for ages. don't act like this is brand new.
but since i have your attention, why would you have a medic protect me if you think i'm such a bad player? and if a medic told you they were protecting me why would you put it in the thread if you're really helping the town?
as far as your comment about only inactives and candidates voting for you, i'll point you to fishball's last few posts where he was advocating for your death and miraculous ended up dead himself. clearly it's more than a girl "PMSing" (btw, nice chauvinist dig, that must have taken quite a few brain cells on your part, good job!) and inactives. i mean, even you offered yourself up. time to follow through on your word.
|
On March 01 2010 10:28 Vivi57 wrote: ok, so right now we have:
5. johnnyspazz (gambino) 8. Vivi57 11. XeliN 16. dozko 19. ShoCkeyy 23. Chezinu (dt) 24. Scamp 29. ~OpZ~ 30. sidesprang 33. ohN 34. Abenson 45. Versatile 47. Malongo (bg) 50. Foolishness 51. madnessman
i'm 100% sure i'm missing some information here because I've been lazy about following the thread, but even with this, 6/10 unconfirmed people are sumiyoshi (or 5 + the gf). Johnnyspaz should post the name of the other gambino alive so we can medic prot both of them and eliminate even one more person from the list
ermm, if it will help, i was outted as bg by iaan with ver's PM to him, like 50+ pages ago.
|
ps: right now it's looking like i'm going to be voting for abenson and ~opz~.
i'll wait for more info/ town consensus before voting though.
|
why are you screaming my name? that usually only happens in the bedroom, owwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.
but anyway, i voted for who i think is mafia, based on posts and behavior.
is there an issue?
|
for the record, i also think xelin is mafia, and i'll switch my vote fro ~opz~ to him if that's how town is leaning.
|
okay, well in interests of helping the town:
if malongo did indeed claim BG, he's definitely mafia and he needs to be one of our lynches. (please note here, the only person i called to be lynched multiple times was L, and lo and behlod, he was mafia).
basically, it's simple math: 18 roles left, 15 players in= 2 mafia claiming BG, 1 innocent BG= me.
as for our other lynch candidate:
1. madnessman: when's the last time he posted? 2. abenson 3.opz/ xelin 4. foolishness
|
On March 02 2010 04:59 Scamp wrote: Oh, and since I didn't ask directly, please explain why you think Abenson and Opz are worthy of your vote.
posts and behavior. i already said that.
listen, i have no use for clues, i don't really believe in them in general, and they are especially useless to me when i play on TL because it's as if you all have your own languages based on the games you play. i don't understand 90% the profiles.
....'cept dude with the invictus quote.
so, i base my analysis on behavior and lack of logic. that's how i catch mafia.
for example, no one was talking about lynching opz before i said i was going to vote for him. then vivi and foolishness to a far larger degree, come along and advocate for his lynching. foolishness took the bait and i find that suspicious.
|
On March 02 2010 05:40 Chezinu wrote:Show nested quote +On March 02 2010 05:31 Versatile wrote: okay, well in interests of helping the town:
if malongo did indeed claim BG, he's definitely mafia and he needs to be one of our lynches. (please note here, the only person i called to be lynched multiple times was L, and lo and behlod, he was mafia).
basically, it's simple math: 18 roles left, 15 players in= 2 mafia claiming BG, 1 innocent BG= me.
as for our other lynch candidate:
1. madnessman: when's the last time he posted? 2. abenson 3.opz/ xelin 4. foolishness Since you claim BG, do you want us to lynch you?
okay so let me make this clear one final time. it was not my CHOICE for my role to be claimed. i was outted. yes, i was, indeed, in the closet about my role. but since it's been put out there i'm not going to lie about or deny it.
if you all lynch me, well, c'est la vie. somehow, i do believe i will get over it.
|
these were L's sumi suspects before he died. while he was mafia, he was gambino so i don't see why he would lie about these on the eve of his death:
Sumiyoshi: Scamp Tree.hugger--green ohN Amber[Light]--green Abenson Malongo-- mafia (imo)
i *think* scamp is innocent but we should look @ all three.
|
i take back what i said about madnessman not posting, saw a post of his a few pages back. still reads like mafia though.
|
yes, let's lynch me and waste an actual sumi lynch, scamp. that's smart.
the very fact that i've had no support from any player in any way throughout this entire game should tell you something; i have no allies.
in the event that sumiyoshi win, they have very little to be proud of seeing as how there's been a ridiculous amount of idiocy on both town and gambino side.
|
On March 02 2010 13:21 Abenson wrote:Show nested quote +On March 02 2010 10:38 Versatile wrote: yes, let's lynch me and waste an actual sumi lynch, scamp. that's smart.
the very fact that i've had no support from any player in any way throughout this entire game should tell you something; i have no allies.
in the event that sumiyoshi win, they have very little to be proud of seeing as how there's been a ridiculous amount of idiocy on both town and gambino side. You are voting for someone who is a confirmed innocent(ignoring GF possibilities obviously). How ironic is it that you are talking about wasting votes when you yourself are also wasting votes on a green. Obviously Chez is a DT, there's been no one contesting him. Versatile seems really sketchy, but he did claim bodyguard, so I'm not sure we should kill him.
can i ask you something? in what twisted, dumb ass world do you ignore a serious possibility?
"oi, they're innocent as long as you ignore the GF possibility". WHY THE HELL would you ignore a part of the equation?
wtf? how do you people not see the weaknesses in your arguments?
|
On March 02 2010 13:27 Scamp wrote: Versatile, when have you needed support? Give me a good answer to that and I'll remove my suspicion.
I also like the idiocy you so subtly hint at when you've done nothing all game to warrant such a statement. Come up with something brilliant to save the town or else you're mired in here with the rest of us.
Abenson: Claiming BG doesn't mean jack. Also why are you voting for Opz? Doing that just makes me want to kill you. you want something brilliant? you want the town to win?
foolishness is mafia. not only is he mafia, he is the mafia GF. end of story. you guys wanna win, vote foolishness.
chez, you have a mafia in your ranks.
scamp, i'm pretty sure you're just playing like a stupid townie. you're trusting all the wrong people.
further, based on voting patterns and posting, i've determined that ~opz~=innocent and xelin= possible innocent. add that to scamp and chez and me being innocent, and there's only two more townies out there.
johnnyspazz and foolishness are mafia, ixnay them. that's 8 people left, 6 of whom are mafia, 2 of whom are innocent.
if we can coordinate, we still have a chance of winning. but for goodness sake vote foolishness if you're serious about the town winning.
|
@ opz: malongo is mafia. he's a mafia who claimed BG. however, he's barely posting now because, from what i gather, he lives in Chile? if so, my prayers are with him and everyone else affected by this crisis.
but since he's not posting, he shouldn't be our main concern. we can lynch him later. we need to lynch mafia who are actively trying to mislead the town. ie) foolishness.
|
last post for a little bit, but based on analysis, only one of abenson and sidesprang are mafia. i suspect sidesprang is innocent and getting bandwagoned. so, we need to switch him out for a confirmed mafia. NOTE: i would prefer both of them being swapped out for foolishness and johnny, but i don't think that's feasible at this point. therefore, i suggest foolishness for sidesprang, since somehow some of you have decided johnnyspazz is worth saving.
my stance on this johnny thing: there's another gambino out there, one who's been smart enough to keep himself alive and hidden this entire time. who cares which gambino is alive as mafia is mafia. we want them all dead eventually, and to me, killing a confirmed mafia is smarter than killing a possible towny.
this is my list: there is, at most, one wrong name in each list, and if votes don't change, that will be cleared up in a few hours. thing is, after this lynch and night, sumi will most likely outnumber us and they'll run the town.
Mafia: Foolishness Johnnyspazz Malongo Dozko Madnessman Vivi Abenson
Towny: Chez Scamp Versatile Opz Shockeyy Xelin Sidesprang
just seriously read, think about, and PROCESS what i'm writing. look @ posts, voting patterns, and ignore wtf has been PMed to you. that's where a lot of you get mislead and end up effing the town.
|
On March 01 2010 19:11 Scamp wrote: Hey Foolishness, guess what? I just went through all of your posts and it seems to me that the case you made against Opz applies to yourself as well.
Opz made half-ass contributions to the game? Your contributions consist of the last second voting analysis and often stating "NO ONE CARES." By the way, what happened to that analysis? Way to bring it up and then never go back to it again.
Mafia plan: Come in when people are talking about you, make a few posts, disappear again. This is what you said, this is also what you've done. Maybe not to the extent where you only show when people are talking about you, but I noticed Ver pegging you on a small list of Sumiyoshi suspects.
Mafia plan: Kill people who are suspicious of you. Well guess who was killed: Ver. And guess who used Ver's analysis post-death as a reason to go after tree.hugger: You. Interesting. And guess who Ver suspected: You.
Your whole argument against Opz revolves around what Caller said way back early in the game. It really seems to me that Caller was talking about Opz in previous games, but you took it and made a really long argument with it about how he was expected to provide clue analysis. Because one person said so. The only part that seems clear to me is that Opz needs to participate more. That's pretty much it. Except perhaps the voting record.
So Opz hasn't voted for anyone that's mafia with the exception of Quickstriker. Guess who else fits that profile? You. Technically you get points for voting QS over redtooth, and I guess you voted for Bill Murray for mayor despite him not having a snowball's chance at that point. But you still have a highly suspicious record that now needs to be addressed.
Finally, you never explained why you voted for me yesterday other than to say that I'm more likely to be mafia over L and Chezinu. That's not what's wrong. You also mentioned MULTIPLE TIMES that L is CLEARLY INNOCENT and apparently you're trying to brush by that fact. You also were asked MULTIPLE TIMES by me to clarify HOW CHEZINU HAS PROVEN HIMSELF and you've just not addressed that at all.
Also nice contribution by telling J-spazz to just stop posting when he brought something up against Shockeyy.
So let's face it.....you really don't have the right to accuse someone like this when there's a lot of things you simply haven't addressed that have come up against you. I'd like an explanation please.
PS: scamp.... you caught foolishness in a BIG ASS lie and let him talk his way out of it. c'mon. you seriously can't think this guy is innocent.
|
On March 03 2010 09:40 Scamp wrote:Show nested quote +On March 03 2010 09:35 Qatol wrote:On March 03 2010 09:15 Scamp wrote: Oh wait never mind there he is. I guess you die because your name was posted first. GG town unless a certain statement is a lie. Actually the tiebreaker used was checking who had more votes at a time when they weren't tied. There was a point where spazz had 2 votes while chezinu had <2. Therefore, spazz died. It's kinda a crummy tiebreak, but it's the only fair one I could think of on the spot. Just something else to talk about after the game is over. Well it is consistent with the rules, so yeah. Plus now I get to blame Versatile for this. I'd say it's just something for the organizer to add for future games. Doesn't even really matter IMO what the ruling is as long as it's announced when the game starts. Kill both, kill one, kill neither are all fine.
4 mafia just died. blame me for what-the-hell-ever. there's still 1 gambino and pretty much all the sumi have been identified. seems like xelin and i got a nice little ball rolling on the sumi, aye? we say kill johnny, they gang up on him in the end, clearly marking themselves for the rest of you dummies who wouldn't vote for them the last round. cry to someone who cares.
<----going to finish reading.
|
On March 03 2010 11:05 Chezinu wrote: Did anyone else hear the fact that Dozko was rolechecked and turned up red?
jesus fckin' christ chez, yes! i'm sure they even heard you on other sites, shyt.
|
welp, our next lynch targets should be foolishness and madnessman, obviously. assuming gambino hits dozko.
|
|
|
|