|
kassadin blitz nidalee thresh all make people very uncomfortable because of how hard they punish mistakes and people dont want to have to worry that much about that
also lol@obesechicken trying to tell a former #1 EUW challenger (if on points and not mmr) that counterpicks dont matter because you can outplay
although agree with this statement to some extent the better you get the more they matter
and then you also misinterpret sponkz point, which was that you're acting as there is never any point discussing what champion is good or bad vs X because anyone can beat anyone which is a retarded argument
|
On November 26 2013 06:05 Slayer91 wrote: kassadin blitz nidalee thresh all make people very uncomfortable because of how hard they punish mistakes and people dont want to have to worry that much about that
also lol@obesechicken trying to tell a former #1 EUW challenger (if on points and not mmr) that counterpicks dont matter because you can outplay
although agree with this statement to some extent the better you get the more they matter
and then you also misinterpret sponkz point, which was that you're acting as there is never any point discussing what champion is good or bad vs X because anyone can beat anyone which is a retarded argument Lol, I can't see borders on TL discussions.
|
On November 26 2013 00:42 obesechicken13 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2013 20:09 Sponkz wrote: I talk about picking 5 random champions, because the way you address it, any champion can beat anyone. If i feel like playing tryndamere, then according to you, i shouldn't feel intimidated if the enemy picks teemo or malphite and just give 0 fucks? You're automatically assuming that:
a) Your opponent sucks in general b) Your opponent has no grasp of the champion he/she is playing c) Your opponent does not have experience with the match up
So if I assume this, why would I give a shit about what i pick? I can pick Soraka and beat Blitzcrank, I can pick Vladimir and beat Malzahar, I can pick Tryndamere and beat Teemo, but does that say anything about the pick(s) or the player I'm against?
You´re also generalizing way too much with your ideology of bans in solo queue. Most people actually prefer to ban shit that counters their own comfort-zone. It's way more common than just targeting fotm-champions and also the reason there's such a big diversity in bans across the tiers. Your conclusions don't make sense. Any champion can beat anyone, that's true. You should play who you're good at instead of picking random. I never said you should pick random. If bans were just for comfort zones I wouldn't be seeing Kassadin Nidalee Blitz Thresh bans every game.
? You are pretty much proving his point. Few if any soloq botlanes are confident going against Blitz even if Pros don't have a problem countering him. So because almost everyone hates playing against blitz and no one as first pick takes support he is usually banned. Same for thresh basically.
Nidalee and Kassadin are another case, notice that if the first pick is going mid he'll often leave kassa open if he is confident in playing a counter to him. If on the other hand the guy doing the bans is going to be adc/jungle/top he'll almost certainly ban kassa, simply because you don't have the confidence in random mid lane guys to either counter him or ward up properly to pull the teeth from his roaming.
Any champion can beat anyone is standard feelgood bullshit. Any champion in the hands of a significantly more skilled player can win even unfavorable matchups might be more correct. Your forgetting the fact that the matchmaking system tries its very best to make sure such gaps in skill don't enter the game though. So all things being normal (not a smurfing pro or a ebay boosted player) your opponent will roughly be in the same class as you.
That is the entire point why we discuss favorable matchups here, because in about 70% of your games you will be within the skill bracket where favorable and unfavorable can make a difference.
|
On November 26 2013 07:31 Tula wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2013 00:42 obesechicken13 wrote:On November 25 2013 20:09 Sponkz wrote: I talk about picking 5 random champions, because the way you address it, any champion can beat anyone. If i feel like playing tryndamere, then according to you, i shouldn't feel intimidated if the enemy picks teemo or malphite and just give 0 fucks? You're automatically assuming that:
a) Your opponent sucks in general b) Your opponent has no grasp of the champion he/she is playing c) Your opponent does not have experience with the match up
So if I assume this, why would I give a shit about what i pick? I can pick Soraka and beat Blitzcrank, I can pick Vladimir and beat Malzahar, I can pick Tryndamere and beat Teemo, but does that say anything about the pick(s) or the player I'm against?
You´re also generalizing way too much with your ideology of bans in solo queue. Most people actually prefer to ban shit that counters their own comfort-zone. It's way more common than just targeting fotm-champions and also the reason there's such a big diversity in bans across the tiers. Your conclusions don't make sense. Any champion can beat anyone, that's true. You should play who you're good at instead of picking random. I never said you should pick random. If bans were just for comfort zones I wouldn't be seeing Kassadin Nidalee Blitz Thresh bans every game. ? You are pretty much proving his point. Few if any soloq botlanes are confident going against Blitz even if Pros don't have a problem countering him. So because almost everyone hates playing against blitz and no one as first pick takes support he is usually banned. Same for thresh basically. Nidalee and Kassadin are another case, notice that if the first pick is going mid he'll often leave kassa open if he is confident in playing a counter to him. If on the other hand the guy doing the bans is going to be adc/jungle/top he'll almost certainly ban kassa, simply because you don't have the confidence in random mid lane guys to either counter him or ward up properly to pull the teeth from his roaming. Any champion can beat anyone is standard feelgood bullshit. Any champion in the hands of a significantly more skilled player can win even unfavorable matchups might be more correct. Your forgetting the fact that the matchmaking system tries its very best to make sure such gaps in skill don't enter the game though. So all things being normal (not a smurfing pro or a ebay boosted player) your opponent will roughly be in the same class as you. That is the entire point why we discuss favorable matchups here, because in about 70% of your games you will be within the skill bracket where favorable and unfavorable can make a difference. TL GD recently just had a phase where we were talking about how playing one champion was better for improving than playing multiple champions and trying to counterpick. You get less variables to worry about.
Now you guys are telling me that you'll win 70% of your games if you don't stick to one champion and just counterpick.
Maybe you are favored to beat a Silver 1 Teemo playing Teemo for the first time in 50 games and for the 3rd time in his career if you're playing Tryndamere as a Silver 1 playing Tryn for your 40th game in the past 50.
|
I agree, that you should focus on 1 champion if you can, but you shouldn't blindly pick it, if the match-up heavily favors your opponent. You're just gonna rely on your opponent being really bad, which is a bad assumption and causes bad habits. Have respect for your opponent and always assume that he/she is of an equal skill-level as you and then pick your preferred champion.
|
The common consensus was that you should stick to 1 role if possible (top, mid etc.) and a maximum of 5 chars within that role. Maybe 2 other champions (1 support, 1 jungle) for obstinate teammates in picks and bans
|
On November 26 2013 07:01 obesechicken13 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2013 06:05 Slayer91 wrote: kassadin blitz nidalee thresh all make people very uncomfortable because of how hard they punish mistakes and people dont want to have to worry that much about that
also lol@obesechicken trying to tell a former #1 EUW challenger (if on points and not mmr) that counterpicks dont matter because you can outplay
although agree with this statement to some extent the better you get the more they matter
and then you also misinterpret sponkz point, which was that you're acting as there is never any point discussing what champion is good or bad vs X because anyone can beat anyone which is a retarded argument Lol, I can't see borders on TL discussions.
you shouldn't need to the fact should have been irrelevant to the discussion but you your argument was based on him being silver 5 and even then it doesnt make too much sense when discussing in a champ thread specifiically
|
On November 26 2013 08:12 Tula wrote: The common consensus was that you should stick to 1 role if possible (top, mid etc.) and a maximum of 5 chars within that role. Maybe 2 other champions (1 support, 1 jungle) for obstinate teammates in picks and bans That makes sense. If you're versed in a number of roles in one lane I can see counterpicking being more important. Then there's people like Boxbox who only play one champion but I guess they're the exception. I've been focusing on trying to have one champion for each role now except I have two junglers. Sejuani for when the team needs a tank and Rengar otherwise and I feel that's helped. So I can see your point here. I don't know if I'll have time to diversify my tops though.
This was one of the most civilized discussions I've had on TL in a long time. If anyone wants to continue we can make another thread. We've gotten off topic from Teemo counters.
|
On November 26 2013 13:50 obesechicken13 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2013 08:12 Tula wrote: The common consensus was that you should stick to 1 role if possible (top, mid etc.) and a maximum of 5 chars within that role. Maybe 2 other champions (1 support, 1 jungle) for obstinate teammates in picks and bans That makes sense. If you're versed in a number of roles in one lane I can see counterpicking being more important. Then there's people like Boxbox who only play one champion but I guess they're the exception. I've been focusing on trying to have one champion for each role now except I have two junglers. Sejuani for when the team needs a tank and Rengar otherwise and I feel that's helped. So I can see your point here. I don't know if I'll have time to diversify my tops though. This was one of the most civilized discussions I've had on TL in a long time. If anyone wants to continue we can make another thread. We've gotten off topic from Teemo counters.
I actually think boxbox is the norm. Top level players troll a lot but if you had them get serious and play for the absolute best chance of winning their pools would be 2-3 champs just like boxbox (lee sin/riven), sirhcez (nasus/singed) and all the other "gimmicky" top tier players. The idea that players should be good at all roles and have huge champ pools is probably the most toxic advice steadily streaming out of top tier players. Competent at all roles is all you need as far as diversity is concerned, 1-2 champs is realistic for getting to D1 for most players.
|
Can we stop this pointless debate which has nothing to do in our beloved teemo thread ? Lets talk 3.14 Teemo.
I feel he is quite decent in solo queue right now because nobody fucking wards because people are still used to supports spamming wards. Guess what they can't anymore ! Teemo brings great map control/vision with shrooms and since oracles are gone and nobody buys pinks/reveal trinket : shrooms are even more annoying.
Teemo doesn't really need to start with a ward anymore thanks to the ward trinket, allowing him to go boots 4 pots or dblade 1 pots depending on the matchup. I tried a bit of everything and I've had way more success mid because it allows him to control the map/dragon, also dblade start against a lot of mid can be abused, auto the minions to get a faster level 2 and then just stand behind him and his minions.
I ran mostly 30/0/0, ap quints, flat ap blues, armor yellows, hybrid pen reds E poison procs the weaving thing each tick taking the "bullyness" to a whole other level. Of course he's still squishy as fuck and has very few room for errors.
|
On November 26 2013 13:50 obesechicken13 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2013 08:12 Tula wrote: The common consensus was that you should stick to 1 role if possible (top, mid etc.) and a maximum of 5 chars within that role. Maybe 2 other champions (1 support, 1 jungle) for obstinate teammates in picks and bans That makes sense. If you're versed in a number of roles in one lane I can see counterpicking being more important. Then there's people like Boxbox who only play one champion but I guess they're the exception. I've been focusing on trying to have one champion for each role now except I have two junglers. Sejuani for when the team needs a tank and Rengar otherwise and I feel that's helped. So I can see your point here. I don't know if I'll have time to diversify my tops though. This was one of the most civilized discussions I've had on TL in a long time. If anyone wants to continue we can make another thread. We've gotten off topic from Teemo counters.
You should create it, you were the most confused person in this discussion xD <3
|
On November 26 2013 22:24 RouaF wrote: Can we stop this pointless debate which has nothing to do in our beloved teemo thread ? Lets talk 3.14 Teemo.
I feel he is quite decent in solo queue right now because nobody fucking wards because people are still used to supports spamming wards. Guess what they can't anymore ! Teemo brings great map control/vision with shrooms and since oracles are gone and nobody buys pinks/reveal trinket : shrooms are even more annoying.
Teemo doesn't really need to start with a ward anymore thanks to the ward trinket, allowing him to go boots 4 pots or dblade 1 pots depending on the matchup. I tried a bit of everything and I've had way more success mid because it allows him to control the map/dragon, also dblade start against a lot of mid can be abused, auto the minions to get a faster level 2 and then just stand behind him and his minions.
I ran mostly 30/0/0, ap quints, flat ap blues, armor yellows, hybrid pen reds E poison procs the weaving thing each tick taking the "bullyness" to a whole other level. Of course he's still squishy as fuck and has very few room for errors.
If you want an abusive lane bully start why would you go dblade and not dring? Dblade offers more sustain, but -- unless it changed in the last patch -- dring gives you more damage on autos than dblade (assuming E start). You lose the on-hit hp, but you get to buy an extra potion, and if you're bullying then the added damage on Q will matter too.
|
|
Oh shit. No oracles means you're basically top tier again huh?
Gotta get on that AP Teemo again.
|
On November 27 2013 14:50 obesechicken13 wrote: Oh shit. No oracles means you're basically top tier again huh?
Gotta get on that AP Teemo again.
Top tier is questionable but viable for sure. There were two things holding AP teemo back in season 3, his weak early game and shrooms having limited viability when your opponent is winning (see: spamming oracles). The trinket and new masteries really help his early game a lot and while people do use red trinket and pink wards at my level, that only works well when pushing in lane. I have updated my guide on lolking (summoner name: QFT) but I'm not sure if I am allowed to link it here
|
do you all go nashors on teemo? if not, how much CD do you usually end up with and what CD items do you buy? I started going away from it because prolly the best eu teemo(fullon morning) doesnt do it going for straight ap is just crazy high burst + I also dont start dorans blade that much anymore due to it getting nerfed in s4.
wow just played a teemo vs vlad ranked, vlad beat me in lane. He got first tower and was 6/4 me 4/6. Alot of times we ended up trading kills. Similar CS.
Usually a teemo/vlad lane is supposed to be early domination + possible 50+ cs advantage for teemo but after a certain point (prolly lvl 9 vlad mainly) he will start dominating and most likely killing you
but late game shrooms are so damn OP. 900 dmg shrooms with no oracles/limited pinks is ridiculous. I also went twin shadows so if anyone landed on a shroom it was an easy pick (especially with a morgana on my team). Teemo is just so good for jungle control.
agreed there but I still think that a huge part of teemos strength is people getting used to oracles lense, so many people dont know that its basically an oracle for 10s so if you would get several of them you prolly can kindof have oracles for ~50% of the time up which counteracts a lot of teemos strength.
|
Is Jayce considered a hard counter to Teemo? One of the my games as Teemo I had to face a Jayce and I wrecked him so hard by just dodging his EQ combo every time he tried it.
|
no I think it is a bit in favor of teemo but could also swing the other way
|
On November 29 2013 10:52 LightningStrike wrote: Is Jayce considered a hard counter to Teemo? One of the my games as Teemo I had to face a Jayce and I wrecked him so hard by just dodging his EQ combo every time he tried it.
Jayce falls into the same category as Nasus, Vladimir, Singed and a number of others. These are people that if you give teemo a small advantage he dumpsters them but if they get ahead they dumpster you. A lot of super high scaling top laners like teemo have this issue (Jax vs Renekton for example) but are still good picks with competent jungling.
|
I feel this champ does not provide as much to a teamfight as the champs he is only laning against. Its as if people pick teemo to win lane so they can convice themselves that it was them who carried the game or are not to blame in the case of a loss, this is of course, unless they picked teemo to troll which can be seen as the same thing I suppose.
That being said, I like the champion, hes a funny little guy.
|
|
|
|