| Forum Index > LoL General |
|
thenexusp
United States3721 Posts
On December 19 2013 08:54 onlywonderboy wrote: I don't think that's true, I feel like a lot of the PBE stuff ends up going live. Easily over 50% Hmm. If they change the values of a champ twice during PBE, first a hard nerf, then a slight buff so that the overall result is just a slight nerf, do you count that as 100% of that change going live or 50% of that change going live? | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35144 Posts
On December 19 2013 09:09 thenexusp wrote: Hmm. If they change the values of a champ twice during PBE, first a hard nerf, then a slight buff so that the overall result is just a slight nerf, do you count that as 100% of that change going live or 50% of that change going live? Yes. | ||
|
NotYango
United States719 Posts
On December 19 2013 07:29 phyvo wrote: Riot is quite aware that PBE testing has its limitations and is mostly about bug fixes/low-level balance. From reading red posts you can't really fault them. That doesn't mean the quality of their balance testing/philosophy isn't above reproach, though. The thing is PBE doesn't provide users with the tools to do anything BUT test balance changes. If they're looking for bug-fixes, the tools they provide are pretty limited, seeing as there's no combat log or even test mode that allows you to give levels/gold to quickly test certain interactions repeatedly in a controlled environment. The only real way to practically use PBE is to play out real games, which is not a good way to reproduce potential bugs. | ||
|
kainzero
United States5211 Posts
Apparently their normal ELO is so high that we constantly get matched against Diamonds and streamers. Good Lord. Also I'll say it again, S4 Syndra Support is broken. swim can vouch for me. | ||
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
On December 19 2013 09:09 thenexusp wrote: Hmm. If they change the values of a champ twice during PBE, first a hard nerf, then a slight buff so that the overall result is just a slight nerf, do you count that as 100% of that change going live or 50% of that change going live? This would go against my point, but I still think over half of the changes avoid this. Or maybe I'm wrong, but I follow the PBE blog posts pretty religiously. | ||
|
UnKooL
Korea (South)1667 Posts
| ||
|
nafta
Bulgaria18893 Posts
 .Dont think runes should be an issue.You can get 4/5 champs and runes from leveling to 30 np. | ||
|
suicideyear
Ivory Coast3016 Posts
| ||
|
Amethyst21
Canada7032 Posts
On December 19 2013 10:52 suicideyear wrote: are they still playing from china? No from a LAN centre in LA Reddit link here | ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
On December 19 2013 10:45 UnKooL wrote: How is LMQ losing in ranked 5s? Someone said they have no runes and masteries this true? I've seen some LMQ guys play in KR server in challenger but I dont think its the same guys... Their LoLKing page says they are 17-0 http://www.lolking.net/summoner/na/49739407#profile | ||
|
GolemMadness
Canada11044 Posts
| ||
|
Dusty
United States3359 Posts
On December 19 2013 11:18 onlywonderboy wrote: Their LoLKing page says they are 17-0 http://www.lolking.net/summoner/na/49739407#profile they're 23-1 and the one game they lost they were trolling.. no way in hell would they possibly lose to doomtrobo or dudeimazn in a real game. in fact the next time the played it was a completely one sided stomp | ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
On December 19 2013 13:34 Dusty wrote: they're 23-1 and the one game they lost they were trolling.. no way in hell would they possibly lose to doomtrobo or dudeimazn in a real game. in fact the next time the played it was a completely one sided stomp Where is this more reliable data? LoL King has failed me. | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
| ||
|
Lord Tolkien
United States12083 Posts
On December 19 2013 14:19 Sufficiency wrote: Played Ezreal the first time after.... 2 years? Dat W so thin wtf... can't hit anything. Nerf nerf nerfnerfnerf nerf. Should've played him during League of Ezreal era (aka late S2). AP Ezreal was also borderline viable back when Muramana did magic damage/before stacking nerfs. | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
On December 19 2013 14:35 Lord Tolkien wrote: Nerf nerf nerfnerfnerf nerf. Should've played him during League of Ezreal era (aka late S2). AP Ezreal was also borderline viable back when Muramana did magic damage/before stacking nerfs. It was an ARAM. I played him AP. Seriously though I had a far better time playing as Cassiopeia. Cass Q far easier to hit I swear >__> | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On December 19 2013 14:35 Lord Tolkien wrote: Nerf nerf nerfnerfnerf nerf. Should've played him during League of Ezreal era (aka late S2). AP Ezreal was also borderline viable back when Muramana did magic damage/before stacking nerfs. Should have played back when W healed 100% of the damage dealt for allies hit. TSM looking better than expected in the games I saw of them vs Lemondogs. Dyrus in the second game also showing what Cruzer should have been able to do vs Wickd with that matchup, still beyond me how he didn't. | ||
|
GolemMadness
Canada11044 Posts
 | ||
|
TheHumanSensation
Canada1210 Posts
| ||
|
Ryuu314
United States12679 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV European League
PiGosaur Monday
OSC
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
The PondCast
Online Event
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
Online Event
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
.
