|
Baa?21243 Posts
On October 25 2013 01:21 Slayer91 wrote: for example cheep says garen is useless ask anyone on EU now i dare you
eu is also well known for being awful at the game and thinking bad heroes are good
ill recant if we see a garen in pro play that does something other than sit there and spin and do nothing
|
On October 25 2013 01:22 Carnivorous Sheep wrote:Show nested quote +On October 25 2013 01:21 Slayer91 wrote: for example cheep says garen is useless ask anyone on EU now i dare you eu is also well known for being awful at the game and thinking bad heroes are good ill recant if we see a garen in pro play that does something other than sit there and spin and do nothing inc trick2g in LCS.
|
On October 25 2013 01:22 Carnivorous Sheep wrote:Show nested quote +On October 25 2013 01:21 Slayer91 wrote: for example cheep says garen is useless ask anyone on EU now i dare you eu is also well known for being awful at the game and thinking bad heroes are good ill recant if we see a garen in pro play that does something other than sit there and spin and do nothing
refer to roffles sig
|
Baa?21243 Posts
On October 25 2013 01:24 Slayer91 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 25 2013 01:22 Carnivorous Sheep wrote:On October 25 2013 01:21 Slayer91 wrote: for example cheep says garen is useless ask anyone on EU now i dare you eu is also well known for being awful at the game and thinking bad heroes are good ill recant if we see a garen in pro play that does something other than sit there and spin and do nothing refer to roffles sig
roffles is a shitposter and a shitgamer
|
self-stated that he is an imitation of you
edit: also take into account garen being heavily nerfed like irelia and likewise seeing less pro play
|
On October 25 2013 00:55 Ketara wrote:Show nested quote +On October 25 2013 00:09 Slayer91 wrote: theres a difference between broad game knowledge which is like knowing why lane swaps are good and what makes x jungler good over y jungler, which most people seem to think is really important. Specific game knowledge which requires a deeper understanding of the game such as how do i play this lane, how do i play this teamfight, should i gank here etc are whats a lot more important.
similarly in bw most people think they have brilliant stratgies but dont know enough about when to build workers when to expand when to attack how many production buildings to build etc it doesnt matter if your army comp is better if they have 2x as much stuff. those things were listed as "mechanics" but it was 90% game knowledge and 10% moving faster by knowing exactly what you had to do and why It sounds to me like you are agreeing with me that it's possible to have a very good understanding of the game without being a high level player. I mean, if you want to think the above is impossible, you're entitled to your opinion I suppose. I'm going to stand by the statement that you are obviously and demonstrably wrong, but whatever. What's strange to me is the people who go around calling Morello a silver league scrub but then praise the ideas of low league TLers. The hypocrisy is blatant and I wish there was a more mature level of conversation going on in the thread.
Well Morello is seriously incompetent, and being silver doesn´t really help his reputation. Like if he was good at being the freaking lead game designer, then yeah i don´t see a problem with him being silver, but you can easily draw lines between what he approves and his rating.
Abit unrelated to Morello, but you also gotta remember that most of the commentators are at a pretty decent level which also supports how they analyze the LCS games. It´s not that hard to see, that being at a higher level gives you a better understanding of the game as a whole.
|
why is morello incompetent, i dont the game has disimproved much from the changes. the jungle changes were all ove the place because they misimpreted mass ganking as a product of it being too easy to clear the jungle and not that ganking was really strong even against good players
|
Being better at the game making it easier to have a better understanding of the game is a legitimate standpoint to have, and something I already mentioned.
Saying that somebody who is not good at the game cannot understand the game is ignorant and incredibly wrong. Likewise, saying that somebody who is good at the game understands the game is also ignorant and incredibly wrong.
|
Baa?21243 Posts
i dont think morello is particularly incompetent, nor do i think he's personally responsible for even a fraction of the changes, he just gets hate cause he conducts himself in a very confrontational way and acts very obstinate, and as the mouthpiece of the design team he obviously gets all the blame
|
easy solution make soloq rating visible on posts so high rankers can mislead, but with authority
i remember there was some high elo blogger on rog (hashinshin? not sure) who wrote furious rants
they were the best
|
On October 25 2013 01:30 Ketara wrote: Being better at the game making it easier to have a better understanding of the game is a legitimate standpoint to have, and something I already mentioned.
Saying that somebody who is not good at the game cannot understand the game is ignorant and incredibly wrong. Likewise, saying that somebody who is good at the game understands the game is also ignorant and incredibly wrong.
you once again fail to distinguish understanding of the game and understanding of very board strategy if you understand the game you are good at he game period. there is no mechanical restrictions for anyone without severe arthritis.
if you are bad at the game you dont understand the game at nearly all levels i imagine most people who are bad and think they are good is becuase they watch pro play and know what is going on no better than the dad shouting at the football on tv
|
On October 25 2013 00:58 nafta wrote:Show nested quote +On October 25 2013 00:55 Ketara wrote:On October 25 2013 00:09 Slayer91 wrote: theres a difference between broad game knowledge which is like knowing why lane swaps are good and what makes x jungler good over y jungler, which most people seem to think is really important. Specific game knowledge which requires a deeper understanding of the game such as how do i play this lane, how do i play this teamfight, should i gank here etc are whats a lot more important.
similarly in bw most people think they have brilliant stratgies but dont know enough about when to build workers when to expand when to attack how many production buildings to build etc it doesnt matter if your army comp is better if they have 2x as much stuff. those things were listed as "mechanics" but it was 90% game knowledge and 10% moving faster by knowing exactly what you had to do and why It sounds to me like you are agreeing with me that it's possible to have a very good understanding of the game without being a high level player. I mean, if you want to think the above is impossible, you're entitled to your opinion I suppose. I'm going to stand by the statement that you are obviously and demonstrably wrong, but whatever. What's strange to me is the people who go around calling Morello a silver league scrub but then praising the ideas of low league TLers. The hypocrisy is blatant and I wish there was a more mature level of conversation going on in the thread. When someone consistently talks crap why would people not shit on him?It's not a hypocrisy.
If you consistently talk crap yourself, it is!
|
On October 25 2013 01:31 Carnivorous Sheep wrote: i dont think morello is particularly incompetent, nor do i think he's personally responsible for even a fraction of the changes, he just gets hate cause he conducts himself in a very confrontational way and acts very obstinate, and as the mouthpiece of the design team he obviously gets all the blame
This is a good post Cheep, I appreciate this and agree
|
Well he´s the LEAD game designer, which means he must be approving all the shit we´ve seen?
New warmogs, botrk, the new jungle items, jungle changes, champion releases, champion nerfs/buffs, all should be approved by him in the end (correct me if I´m wrong). Like even all the patch cycles to correct the many mistakes of overbuffing/overnerfing champions, everything points back to him. I don´t wanna make him the black sheep, but I´d rather see someone else in his position, someone who could potentially make something more interesting than flat line of 50 champions in a fotm-pool that constantly changes because of all these patches.
|
On October 25 2013 01:31 Carnivorous Sheep wrote: i dont think morello is particularly incompetent, nor do i think he's personally responsible for even a fraction of the changes, he just gets hate cause he conducts himself in a very confrontational way and acts very obstinate, and as the mouthpiece of the design team he obviously gets all the blame I think this needs to be highlighted. He heads the Live Design Team, but from past conversation, he merely greenlights proposed changes by the live design team (given how broad their focuses are on); he doesn't/no longer produces, balances, and tests the changes, from what I can tell.
So all the Morello hate is somewhat like shooting the messenger here.
|
EU used Lissandra first. I'll grant NA holding onto Rumble though.
On October 25 2013 01:21 Slayer91 wrote: for example cheep says garen is useless ask anyone on EU now i dare you Eh, first thing I thought when you posted about "broad vs specific knowledge" was "Why doesn't he call them out on his Diamond Garen expertise?" 
As for the whining on changes vs stating the positive, it's easier to discuss what's bad (plus he lets you vent) than to just say "Hey I like this one" because then there's not necessarily much to discuss.
As for my own statements it's true that we don't know the details yet—and I even admitted earlier than it can work out + Show Spoiler [In here] +"On the other hand maybe these are actually items like Seeker's Armguard, so that once they're stacked you don't have incentive to prioritise monsters but the commitment to killing camps is still too high for a laner to make it worthwhile. And they're balanced at low cost/low efficiency, so they're accessible early, and once stacked they're very cost-effective but only as slot-effective as standard laner items." . However, it doesn't refrain me from saying "If I have headache every morning because I drink too much and get hung over, taking aspirin will make the pain go away but won't fix the underlying issue, so it's not a solution", if it's clearer this way. Maybe the way supports can be the richest members of each team will work out because of how they generate the income! But it doesn't change the fact that giving supports gold artificially isn't the way to go at it.
(We have people suggesting items super cost-effective that lose stats everytime you last hit a minion more or less regularly in GD, well it's the same thing: laners won't buy these items, supports will have good itemisation without having to farm, problem solved! ... well, nope, that's still a bad idea if only because of how inelegant the design is.)
|
as opposed to a flat line pool that never changes
new warmogs is okay. it was too cost efficient. botrk is kinda silly, but its okay because it doesnt scale like the other ad items. jungle items are okay. champion releases are their business model, can't argue balance has been generally improving from what i see less bat shit op stuff.
very hard to not overbuff/overnerf champs considering how many nerfs/buffs they do.
|
On October 25 2013 01:08 Nos- wrote: What stops a rioter from enjoying the game I don't get it Most people hate their job and want to not think about it when they get off work outside of bitching about it. However, I'd be jazzed as all hell if I worked for Riot. Unfortunately I don't have any particular use to them for anything. lol
On October 25 2013 01:28 Sponkz wrote:Show nested quote +On October 25 2013 00:55 Ketara wrote:On October 25 2013 00:09 Slayer91 wrote: theres a difference between broad game knowledge which is like knowing why lane swaps are good and what makes x jungler good over y jungler, which most people seem to think is really important. Specific game knowledge which requires a deeper understanding of the game such as how do i play this lane, how do i play this teamfight, should i gank here etc are whats a lot more important.
similarly in bw most people think they have brilliant stratgies but dont know enough about when to build workers when to expand when to attack how many production buildings to build etc it doesnt matter if your army comp is better if they have 2x as much stuff. those things were listed as "mechanics" but it was 90% game knowledge and 10% moving faster by knowing exactly what you had to do and why It sounds to me like you are agreeing with me that it's possible to have a very good understanding of the game without being a high level player. I mean, if you want to think the above is impossible, you're entitled to your opinion I suppose. I'm going to stand by the statement that you are obviously and demonstrably wrong, but whatever. What's strange to me is the people who go around calling Morello a silver league scrub but then praise the ideas of low league TLers. The hypocrisy is blatant and I wish there was a more mature level of conversation going on in the thread. Abit unrelated to Morello, but you also gotta remember that most of the commentators are at a pretty decent level which also supports how they analyze the LCS games. It´s not that hard to see, that being at a higher level gives you a better understanding of the game as a whole.
If Rivington is anywhere above S5, I call bullshit.
|
On October 25 2013 01:37 Gahlo wrote:Show nested quote +On October 25 2013 01:28 Sponkz wrote:On October 25 2013 00:55 Ketara wrote:On October 25 2013 00:09 Slayer91 wrote: theres a difference between broad game knowledge which is like knowing why lane swaps are good and what makes x jungler good over y jungler, which most people seem to think is really important. Specific game knowledge which requires a deeper understanding of the game such as how do i play this lane, how do i play this teamfight, should i gank here etc are whats a lot more important.
similarly in bw most people think they have brilliant stratgies but dont know enough about when to build workers when to expand when to attack how many production buildings to build etc it doesnt matter if your army comp is better if they have 2x as much stuff. those things were listed as "mechanics" but it was 90% game knowledge and 10% moving faster by knowing exactly what you had to do and why It sounds to me like you are agreeing with me that it's possible to have a very good understanding of the game without being a high level player. I mean, if you want to think the above is impossible, you're entitled to your opinion I suppose. I'm going to stand by the statement that you are obviously and demonstrably wrong, but whatever. What's strange to me is the people who go around calling Morello a silver league scrub but then praise the ideas of low league TLers. The hypocrisy is blatant and I wish there was a more mature level of conversation going on in the thread. Abit unrelated to Morello, but you also gotta remember that most of the commentators are at a pretty decent level which also supports how they analyze the LCS games. It´s not that hard to see, that being at a higher level gives you a better understanding of the game as a whole. If Rivington is anywhere above S5, I call bullshit. He's likely higher than you iirc from his stream.
|
On October 25 2013 01:39 Alaric wrote:Show nested quote +On October 25 2013 01:37 Gahlo wrote:On October 25 2013 01:28 Sponkz wrote:On October 25 2013 00:55 Ketara wrote:On October 25 2013 00:09 Slayer91 wrote: theres a difference between broad game knowledge which is like knowing why lane swaps are good and what makes x jungler good over y jungler, which most people seem to think is really important. Specific game knowledge which requires a deeper understanding of the game such as how do i play this lane, how do i play this teamfight, should i gank here etc are whats a lot more important.
similarly in bw most people think they have brilliant stratgies but dont know enough about when to build workers when to expand when to attack how many production buildings to build etc it doesnt matter if your army comp is better if they have 2x as much stuff. those things were listed as "mechanics" but it was 90% game knowledge and 10% moving faster by knowing exactly what you had to do and why It sounds to me like you are agreeing with me that it's possible to have a very good understanding of the game without being a high level player. I mean, if you want to think the above is impossible, you're entitled to your opinion I suppose. I'm going to stand by the statement that you are obviously and demonstrably wrong, but whatever. What's strange to me is the people who go around calling Morello a silver league scrub but then praise the ideas of low league TLers. The hypocrisy is blatant and I wish there was a more mature level of conversation going on in the thread. Abit unrelated to Morello, but you also gotta remember that most of the commentators are at a pretty decent level which also supports how they analyze the LCS games. It´s not that hard to see, that being at a higher level gives you a better understanding of the game as a whole. If Rivington is anywhere above S5, I call bullshit. He's likely higher than you iirc from his stream. At least when I talk about the game I don't get as much wrong as he does. I also have no delusions at being good at this game.
|
|
|
|