| Forum Index > LoL General |
|
Doctorbeat
Netherlands13241 Posts
On January 11 2013 06:44 Rookie6 wrote: wow anyone saw this? http://moscowfive.ru/en/news/lol-roster-leaves-moscow-five I wonder what will happen next. Best of luck to these guys! Yes, most speculate that Na'Vi is going to pick them up. | ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
On January 11 2013 06:42 Sufficiency wrote: Hypno's special att growth is way too low. And hes SLOW. In PVE better to just 1 shot them all day. In PvP, he sucks also. | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
| ||
|
SgtSquiglz
United States668 Posts
On January 11 2013 06:33 cLutZ wrote: Play Red/Blue. Get Kadabra. /game Pokemon games not dominated by Kadabra and his friends are not real. Someone with some sense in here! Back in the day i'd have like 3 Kadabras per playthrough. Who needs a variety when that guy was so damn good. | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
On January 11 2013 06:44 Doctorbeat wrote: Yes, most speculate that Na'Vi is going to pick them up. Didn't someone from Navi say they are not interested in picking them up? | ||
|
Rookie6
Brazil583 Posts
On January 11 2013 06:44 Doctorbeat wrote: Yes, most speculate that Na'Vi is going to pick them up. Oh I´ve not been following Lol so close these past days, so I was quite surprised when I read this. But I think it would be pretty cool if Na'Vi pick them up. | ||
|
phyvo
United States5635 Posts
On January 11 2013 06:28 jcarlsoniv wrote: I was never into all the theory behind Pokemon comps cuz I was too young when I played it a lot, and I haven't bought any of the recent ones. I know there's allll sorts of shit to think about when designing your team and leveling up your pokemon that I just have no clue about. In every pokemon game I ever played I had two criterion for my team: (a) that no team member be the same type as any other (b) my team should look SWEET, no ugly stupid pokemon on my team By ruby it was getting hard to fill out my team with pokemon I actually liked, but I managed it.. Recently I tried to play black/white (or was it diamond/pearl? I don't even know anymore), but I just lost interest 1/4th of the way through because all the pokemon were dull and I wasn't interested in catching them. Honestly the last "pokemon" game to grip me was Pokemon Mystery Dungeon. I look forward to someone pokerapping the LoL champion list though when we hit 150. | ||
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
LOL, I had to google this. You are too cool, TheKefka. hi5 | ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
On January 11 2013 06:45 SgtSquiglz wrote: Someone with some sense in here! Back in the day i'd have like 3 Kadabras per playthrough. Who needs a variety when that guy was so damn good. Ahh, but the key is really to get him to the level where his Psybeam can 1-shot most of the elite 4, and you save Psychic for like Dragonite. | ||
Live2Win
United States6657 Posts
Is that Locodoco @ 00:14? Did I miss some announcement or something?! (I thought he was planning to go back to Korea after leaving CLG?) | ||
|
MooMooMugi
United States10531 Posts
On January 11 2013 06:53 Live2Win wrote: http://youtu.be/sHeUKmUoJzc Is that Locodoco @ 00:14? Did I miss some announcement or something?! (I thought he was planning to go back to Korea after leaving CLG?) This was probably filmed when Loco was hanging out in the Curse mansion for a few weeks | ||
|
Roffles
Pitcairn19291 Posts
| ||
|
Seuss
United States10536 Posts
On January 11 2013 06:22 cLutZ wrote: The point is, though, you cannot just say, "Well we have no AD, the Assassin is worse." Because that is not true he just kills your AP Carry then and you have no teamfight engage. Or it become an AD Assassin-off where whoever gets the full combo in is the victor. Its like playing vs. a Twisted Fate that had a Magical 100% Lichbane uptime. I would argue it isn't as simple as "the enemy assassin kills your AP". For one, at least half the possible AP options can build fairly tanky while still accruing significant AP and burst potential. At the same time, it's a heck of a lot easier to protect one vulnerable champion than it is two or three. To top it all off, APs typically have a lot of burst themselves, so if the assassin fails to kill the AP instantly they're at risk. It's not as cut and dry, either way, as you might think. This is why I said it's a labyrinthine subject. We're talking on a fairly theoretical level, so it's easy to throw assertions onto the table because there's a definitive lack of hard data to use in support of or against an argument. This is practically philosophy. | ||
|
Diamond
United States10796 Posts
| ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
On January 11 2013 06:51 phyvo wrote: In every pokemon game I ever played I had two criterion for my team: (a) that no team member be the same type as any other (b) my team should look SWEET, no ugly stupid pokemon on my team By ruby it was getting hard to fill out my team with pokemon I actually liked, but I managed it.. Recently I tried to play black/white (or was it diamond/pearl? I don't even know anymore), but I just lost interest 1/4th of the way through because all the pokemon were dull and I wasn't interested in catching them. Honestly the last "pokemon" game to grip me was Pokemon Mystery Dungeon. I look forward to someone pokerapping the LoL champion list though when we hit 150. Actually, all you need are 3 real pokemon to beat the game. I usually go with fire (starter), water, and electric. After the game is beaten I start gathering and breeding semi-legendaries and other strong pokemon (either because they have high att/speed as a sweeper or has good defense/utility as a wall) so I can beat the battle tower. | ||
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
On January 11 2013 06:56 Seuss wrote: To top it all off, APs typically have a lot of burst themselves, so if the assassin fails to kill the AP instantly they're at risk. Reminds me of my early Viktor builds. WotA Rylai Zhonya QSS. Poke till you get caught/jumped, activate QSS, R, Zhonya. That item build had "FUCK YOU" written all over it (especially as they wait for Zhonya to end and you just Q a survivor immediatly). On the topic of masteries, I switched Artificer's 2 points and Vampirism's 3 points to ward 4 in Awareness and 1 in Explorer (the main purpose of the Explorer ward will be to avoid level 2 ganks or smiteless -> level 3 double buff ganks, I'll test this with the flask nerf to see if I can manage to open flask+pots and still get enough protection from the jungler, in case flask+pot+ward makes my sustain not strong enough to outdo boots+3 openings). | ||
|
thenexusp
United States3721 Posts
I just fire up pokemon online so I don't have to actually breed anything :< | ||
|
Antyee
Hungary1011 Posts
On January 11 2013 07:30 thenexusp wrote: you guys. I just fire up pokemon online so I don't have to actually breed anything :< But there are too many dumb people  | ||
|
phyvo
United States5635 Posts
On January 11 2013 07:22 Sufficiency wrote: Actually, all you need are 3 real pokemon to beat the game. I usually go with fire (starter), water, and electric. After the game is beaten I start gathering and breeding semi-legendaries and other strong pokemon (either because they have high att/speed as a sweeper or has good defense/utility as a wall) so I can beat the battle tower. My point kinda was that efficiency had little or nothing to do with my pokemon experience. I always had a team of 6 with my starter roughly 2 levels ahead of the rest of my team and I never bothered with "battle towers". Variety and coolness were more important than anything else, and if I were to play again still would be. | ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
On January 11 2013 06:56 Seuss wrote: I would argue it isn't as simple as "the enemy assassin kills your AP". For one, at least half the possible AP options can build fairly tanky while still accruing significant AP and burst potential. At the same time, it's a heck of a lot easier to protect one vulnerable champion than it is two or three. To top it all off, APs typically have a lot of burst themselves, so if the assassin fails to kill the AP instantly they're at risk. It's not as cut and dry, either way, as you might think. This is why I said it's a labyrinthine subject. We're talking on a fairly theoretical level, so it's easy to throw assertions onto the table because there's a definitive lack of hard data to use in support of or against an argument. This is practically philosophy. That is good, if your AP is an assassin Character, but what if its a Cassio or Anivia, more sustained casters? It is a given that burst damage is better than sustained damage. If someone is disputing that, then we have a plethora of problems. So burst needs to be discounted, and it is, usually, except for certain characters, right now. Moreover, if the enemy team, having 1 champ, requires your entire team to be tankier, that is an unbalance situation. If just because the emeny has Khazix, my Mid has to start: Cata>Rod>Chainvest>Zhonyas, and my AD has to go Dorans>Dorans>BT>GA/Warmogs then that is not a good situation. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
Replay Cast
RongYI Cup
Maru vs Cyan
Solar vs Krystianer
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
BSL 21
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
OSC
Replay Cast
WardiTV Invitational
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
