
[Patch 1.0.0.147: Syndra] General Discussion - Page 96
Forum Index > LoL General |
Antyee
Hungary1011 Posts
![]() | ||
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
I like that they want to buff Cait. I think they need buff on Q in late game, in lane it was working fine. If Q gets too much buff early on, her already strong lane dominance will be stupid good. | ||
Shiv.
3534 Posts
On September 19 2012 07:34 Alaric wrote: Also Nunu > Yorrick because playing Nunu is fun. The sheer idea of his ult makes him fun. The way he walks makes him fun. His laugh makes him fun. Towerdiving people and tanking the shots is fun... well, it is to some people (Udyr/Panth/Mundo ftw, towerdive all day). Yorrick doesn't have nearly as much "personality" as a champ. :/ Yeah but that doesn't exactly change the fact he's an asshole to deal with, which is what people bothers so much about Yorick. I haven't heard anyone say ''FUCK, THAT YORICK GUY HAS A LAME LORE AND IS A CHAMPION WITH NO PERSONALITY, I HATE THAT ABOUT HIM''. It's always ''he's annoying to deal with in lane, too much sustain, unmovable, blablabla'' which describes Nunu perfectly, too. Iunno man. | ||
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
| ||
![]()
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On September 19 2012 04:47 gtrsrs wrote: nah, shaco and vlad are probably the two worst champion designs i think riot has even said that vlad is the one champ they wish they could remove from the game/never have added him 0% chance that those two would be released today. rumble and yorick follow closely behind though (and kennen a not-so-distant 5th) Shaco is a fantastic design, IMO, it's just a design that RIOT hates. | ||
WhiteDog
France8650 Posts
| ||
Craton
United States17250 Posts
Also, @Soniv: choochoo, Sep 18 15:40 (PDT): Hello <CROUTON'S REAL NAME>, Thank you for contacting me about this. We are aware of the issue with Special Runes not granting statistical bonuses, and we will be deploying a fix for this later today. I am very sorry for the inconvenience this issue has caused you. I realize that not having correct Runes can greatly affect your game play, which is why getting this fix out for you was an absolutely priority for us. I hope this helps! If you run into any further issues, be sure to let me know and I would be glad to give you a hand. | ||
MooMooMugi
United States10531 Posts
| ||
Craton
United States17250 Posts
On September 18 2012 16:27 Shiragaku wrote: Dan Dihn has always been my favorite player out of the really unpleasant personalities in the LoL pro scene and I feel really bad for saying this, but he just seems awful now. Even in solo queue, he is doing bad for his standards. Ya, Kobe and Dan #1 for free Elo if on enemy team. | ||
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
| ||
Craton
United States17250 Posts
On September 19 2012 07:52 jcarlsoniv wrote: Oh, good. Thanks crouton Oh, they sent me a followup. Apparently they're applying the fix to accounts alphabetically 3 letters a day. | ||
Flakes
United States3125 Posts
On September 19 2012 07:34 Perplex wrote: hotfix patch preview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4u21_zBif8 blehhh all the Rengar buffs are good for AP Rengar Other than that, I like all the changes they mentioned, especially the Ziggs buff -- there just isn't a lot going on with satchel charge play atm. | ||
Craton
United States17250 Posts
CITE YOUR SOURCE OR GO INTO POLITICS. I had a like 1500 word rant on this the other day that basically comes out to any method they used for determining this is almost guaranteed to be biased such that respondents aren't going to say they're going for IP. | ||
Zess
Adun Toridas!9144 Posts
| ||
Lmui
Canada6213 Posts
I like the maokai fix but i wish they'd fix a slew of other bugs. There were a lot of invisible skillshots added because of the last patch, I've seen invisible boomerangs, invisible lux skills, ezreal ultis moving in reverse and also, skillshots out of bushes seem to remain invisible for a lot longer than they used to. Rengar got enough QoL changes that building him as a bruiser might become viable. Coupled with ulti, he'll be a tankier version of shaco with more farm and the ramifications of that are pretty bad overall for game balance. edit:: thinking about it, the MF change is pretty big. She's even stronger in lane than she was before and her mobility in the midgame is insane. She might be one of the few carries that can be seen bottom at 25 minutes and not-incite a baron attempt. | ||
Parametric
Canada1261 Posts
On September 19 2012 08:03 Craton wrote: "We discovered the vast majority of people don't come to tribunal for IP CITE YOUR SOURCE OR GO INTO POLITICS. I had a like 1500 word rant on this the other day that basically comes out to any method they used for determining this is almost guaranteed to be biased such that respondents aren't going to say they're going for IP. wouldn't they be able to see how long a person spent on each case? So if a person hit punish/pardon right when the timer let them they'd be flagged for wanting IP, while people who took their time would be flagged as "not wanting IP"? That's the only way I could see it, because I doubt many people would say no to IP for spending time cleaning up the game. | ||
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
| ||
Parametric
Canada1261 Posts
| ||
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
On September 19 2012 08:09 WirelessWaffle wrote: wouldn't they be able to see how long a person spent on each case? So if a person hit punish/pardon right when the timer let them they'd be flagged for wanting IP, while people who took their time would be flagged as "not wanting IP"? That's the only way I could see it, because I doubt many people would say no to IP for spending time cleaning up the game. I don't know what other people do. I only tribunal because of IP. However, I examine cases. I do it during downtime on my laptop when I can't play. Honestly, its fairly easy for me because I adopted some rules: 1. 1 game of reports + fewer than 3 in that game = pardon. I don't care what went on in a single game, if only 2 people were offended, you get off. I dont care how badly those 2 people were offended. 2. If reports are for feeding/assisting enemy team, and player's KDR isn't terrible > Pardon. 3. If for AFK, and AFK confirmed by stats > Punish. 4. Language related offenses = read chat. | ||
kainzero
United States5211 Posts
So you get points for going on a streak, but they're not IP? What are these points? Brownie points? | ||
| ||