[Patch 1.0.0.134: Nautilus] General Discussion - Page 19

On February 15 2012 08:15 Senx wrote:


Or he reached that elo by just playing GP. Who knows

On February 15 2012 08:24 NeoIllusions wrote:
Yeah, time to trust TL more than those friends of yours.

On February 15 2012 08:17 Slayer91 wrote:



That's got nothing to do with anything and it sounds like random rage at pirate being OP, which he isn't really. Every champ can seem OP in certain situations, just turns out GP can be in lanes and snowballs easily off abusing strong levels 1-3.

On February 15 2012 08:28 Senx wrote:


Yeah it does, the fact that he didnt shove the lane with saintvicious implies he's stupid which is where my GP comment came from. You're gonna deny that GP is a straightfoward and easy champ to play?

Never said he was OP btw stop putting words in my mouth.

On February 15 2012 08:27 NeoIllusions wrote:
You still R > Q > W > E, lane or jangle.
It's slow but you never need to back unless it's to buy.

Edit: You said your friends were 1600-1900. Smash and Slayer91 blow them out of the water I'm sure.

On February 15 2012 08:38 Two_DoWn wrote:
And I dunno if we do actually just need to have a list of posters at the top of the thread or something that are designated as experts. Our forum is growing, so people might not realize that arguing with certain people is akin to arguing the sky isnt blue or that humans dont need oxygen to live.

On February 15 2012 08:28 Senx wrote:


Yeah it does, the fact that he didnt shove the lane with saintvicious implies he's stupid which is where my GP comment came from. You're gonna deny that GP is a straightfoward and easy champ to play?

Never said he was OP btw stop putting words in my mouth.

On February 15 2012 08:21 TheKefka wrote:
I don't know what you people are on but that was such a dick move by saint rofl.
Gp had a perfect creep hold just out of range of his turret,saint got mad that he waited for nothing and just taxed the fucking lane to make up for the lost time.It was just a selfish move from SV.

There's like,taxing lanes and there's taxing lanes.
The way I do it I never touch creeps from the top guy,and if I do its only after a kill or something and I make sure its pushed all the way up to the turret,I only tax mid and bot,but hey what do I know I'm not a 2k elo guy.

On February 15 2012 08:30 Cloud9157 wrote:
Also seems that theres a hidden change on Lee Sin. Something about Q doing 45 damage now?

No more Cass dominance now.

On February 15 2012 08:38 Two_DoWn wrote:
And I dunno if we do actually just need to have a list of posters at the top of the thread or something that are designated as experts. Our forum is growing, so people might not realize that arguing with certain people is akin to arguing the sky isnt blue or that humans dont need oxygen to live.

On February 15 2012 08:54 Chiharu Harukaze wrote:

We probably do. Two issues come to mind. Firstly, how do we show this? Secondly, what is the criteria for being a recognised poster? Is it just community consensus, or some defined criteria? (The second question is probably less important.)

Re: Showing who's trustworthy. Blue highlighting like in the SC2 Strat Forums I think isn't optimal because it encourages people to want to ignore non-blue posters, even if they have a lot of good things to say but aren't blue. It also means when they're speaking on something they don't have expertise in, they're still highlighted. For example, while Smash probably understands the ideas behind supports, I wouldn't auto-accept what he'd say necessarily. (Or if he's on a little rant, like pre-nerf top lane Lee Sin circa Patch 1.0.0.118, lol.)

Stars next to quality posters is an alternative, since it's discrete but still carries weight. But does that dilute the TL Stars, since it's just for our subforum? Having custom user icons to replace the SC:BW portraits could also work, but again, potentially dilutes its meaning just for our own subforum purposes. Unless it would be possible to have custom avatars that would appear only in our subforum? But that might not be worth TL Web Staff time to code since they're likely busy with more important things.

Having something in signatures is another possibility, but there's no quality control and no one should be forced to have something in their signature just to participate in a discussion. A list of quality posters as a stickied thread (potentially as an update to our Rules Sticky?) could work, but feel inelegant. New posters might not even read it. The big white message box at the top of threads could remind people and new members to read the sticky. But I do dislike the big message box at the top. (They remind me too much of SC2 Tourney Threads, urgh. Hate them intensely.)

I dunno. None of these solutions seem elegant or efficient enough. Maybe calling out bad posts like we currently do works, even if it's rather laborious and also inefficient.