[Patch 1.0.0.134: Nautilus] General Discussion - Page 20

On February 15 2012 08:30 Cloud9157 wrote:
Also seems that theres a hidden change on Lee Sin. Something about Q doing 45 damage now?

No more Cass dominance now.

On February 15 2012 08:54 Chiharu Harukaze wrote:

We probably do. Two issues come to mind. Firstly, how do we show this? Secondly, what is the criteria for being a recognised poster? Is it just community consensus, or some defined criteria? (The second question is probably less important.)

Re: Showing who's trustworthy. Blue highlighting like in the SC2 Strat Forums I think isn't optimal because it encourages people to want to ignore non-blue posters, even if they have a lot of good things to say but aren't blue. It also means when they're speaking on something they don't have expertise in, they're still highlighted. For example, while Smash probably understands the ideas behind supports, I wouldn't auto-accept what he'd say necessarily. (Or if he's on a little rant, like pre-nerf top lane Lee Sin circa Patch 1.0.0.118, lol.)

Stars next to quality posters is an alternative, since it's discrete but still carries weight. But does that dilute the TL Stars, since it's just for our subforum? Having custom user icons to replace the SC:BW portraits could also work, but again, potentially dilutes its meaning just for our own subforum purposes. Unless it would be possible to have custom avatars that would appear only in our subforum? But that might not be worth TL Web Staff time to code since they're likely busy with more important things.

Having something in signatures is another possibility, but there's no quality control and no one should be forced to have something in their signature just to participate in a discussion. A list of quality posters as a stickied thread (potentially as an update to our Rules Sticky?) could work, but feel inelegant. New posters might not even read it. The big white message box at the top of threads could remind people and new members to read the sticky. But I do dislike the big message box at the top. (They remind me too much of SC2 Tourney Threads, urgh. Hate them intensely.)

I dunno. None of these solutions seem elegant or efficient enough. Maybe calling out bad posts like we currently do works, even if it's rather laborious and also inefficient.

On February 15 2012 09:42 shenplayer420 wrote:
honestly guys ive been playing shen for 11 months now and he's still not very good, he's the reason im stuck in 1300 elo. i have the most optimal build down and he still sux. in lane i just get nuked to death and shens nuke is rly weak only like 50 damage and low range. when i use ulti i just lose 1-2 towers for free. i only play him cuz hes unpopular and wnat to feel unique, now every hipster plays him.

On February 15 2012 10:04 Cloud9157 wrote:
Yes, but I'm pretty much just assuming he still thinks I'm trying to be 100% right. Unless... I'm getting counter trolled.

Best support is still Soraka I'm thinking. People saying Sona is pretty garbage now.