General Discussion/Off-topic - Page 1123

On July 23 2011 03:40 JackDino wrote:
About the annie pic, annie had around 130 AP, guessing 30 mpen with runes and 15% from teh mastery, brand had 78 mres, that means he has 48 mres, with the 15% that brings it down to around 41 which is around 29% magic resistance.
Rank 2 tibbers does 325+.7*130=416 dmg.
The aoe from tibbers did 10*(35+.2*130)=610 damage.(assuming tibbers was in range the whole 10 seconds)
With resistances that's 729 damage.
If you add in some autoattacks in those 10 seconds the damage could come close to 1300, in no way did tibbers deal double damage.
I'm a retard, she had even more AP than that, tibbers really didn't deal double damage.

On July 23 2011 03:48 TheYango wrote:

Why do people make up situations for this?

Do you really think someone can't tell the difference between insta-dying and herpderping around for 10 seconds?

On July 23 2011 03:48 Ryuu314 wrote:
Im just disappointed Monkey King isn't more original. Too many of his skills seem like rehashes.

On July 23 2011 03:51 Mogwai wrote:

*shrugs* I like the kit. It has a fun feel to it.

On July 23 2011 03:48 TheYango wrote:

Why do people make up situations for this?

Do you really think someone can't tell the difference between insta-dying and herpderping around for 10 seconds?

This isn't a screenshot someone randomly pulled off the forums--this is a screenshot taken from a game played by multiple TLers.

On July 23 2011 03:51 Mogwai wrote:

*shrugs* I like the kit. It has a fun feel to it.

On July 23 2011 03:40 JackDino wrote:
It's not that I don't believe it, it's that that makes more sense to me than tibbers doing double dmg, considering it's way more than a double tibbers. That's all.

On July 23 2011 03:57 Ryuu314 wrote:

I mean I'm not saying it's not fun to use. A Garen DEMACIIAAAA that knocks shit up? Yes please. It's just that his Q is super uninspired as is his ulti. His passive is also a bit meh, seems really similar to Irelia's imo but w/e.

Just a little sad that they didn't use more stuff from Monkey King (the myth) lore. Like riding on clouds and the extending pole shit.

On July 23 2011 03:53 JackDino wrote:
It's not that I don't believe it, it's that that makes more sense to me than tibbers doing double dmg, considering it's way more than a double tibbers. That's all.

On July 23 2011 04:00 Celestial wrote:
To me Wukong seems like a better jax for the lane phase in terms of harassment, mostly cause it looks like he'd decoy out. However that's assuming his jump auto and q can do comparable burst.

On July 23 2011 03:51 Southlight wrote:


>_> He looks like Xin Zhao to me, to be honest.

On July 23 2011 04:02 TheYango wrote:

Blaze and 5hit lying in tandem to TL makes more sense than it being a bug?

On July 23 2011 04:26 UniversalSnip wrote:
just to weigh in



testimony is the lowest form of evidence. When I see people complaining about a ranked game on here I assume it's only tangentially related to what actually happened, than I'm supposed to apply a lower standard to a bug which is more significant, whut?

The death recap screen is completely unreliable.

And the official lol forums are... the official lol forums.

So while I'm perfectly willing to believe annie is bugged...

A) I'm not willing to say I feel certain about it based on those three pieces of evidence. A replay would do it I think.

B) If she is bugged, there's no way we can reach conclusions about what the bug is, how it works, whether it's reproducible, etc, based on the above evidence.

On July 23 2011 04:30 Southlight wrote:


The difference is that complaint about losing a game is QQ and no one really gives a shit, which is why I often make a mockery of the QQ thread.

Accusing the game of a bug and starting discussion is a different matter, especially when a screenshot (admittedly a screenshot relying on bugged information due to unreliability of the mechanism being screenshotted) is provided. That said, the testimony in this case is "instant death" vs "someone took 10 seconds to die and complained that Tibbers was BS." The point was made that Blaze and 5hit are most likely not dumb enough to mistake a 10 second bleeding death to Tibbers with an instant nuke death, and that they're also not likely to lie about it being an instant death as opposed to a bleeding death.