| Forum Index > Hearthstone General |
|
Nekovivie
United Kingdom2599 Posts
On February 24 2014 04:14 ibraishome wrote: If a Paladin has Repentance on, and the opponent Warlock plays Jaraxxus, does it reduce his health of the hero-Jaraxxus to 1? Never witnessed it personally - but a number of forum posts when google searching seem to imply it does. | ||
|
Melliflue
United Kingdom1389 Posts
On February 24 2014 20:10 Nekovivie wrote: Never witnessed it personally - but a number of forum posts when google searching seem to imply it does. It does work, and there are videos on youtube about it. For example; | ||
|
cYaN
Norway3322 Posts
| ||
|
pabe
Poland10 Posts
| ||
|
Blitzkrieg0
United States13132 Posts
On February 25 2014 08:12 pabe wrote: How to get on the non-featured streamer's list on liquidhearth.com? There is a simple button when i stream sc2 on teamliquid.com in the top left corner. Ten viewers and tag your stream as Hearthstone. It is added automatically rather than pressing a button. | ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
Edit: I just realized that the launcher says they're performing maintenance. So it's not me, just the server. | ||
|
schwza
67 Posts
Also if you silence a minion that has been hit with hunter's mark, my guess is that it still has 1 health (but can now be healed). Right? | ||
|
SsDrKosS
330 Posts
On February 25 2014 20:34 schwza wrote: Opponent plays Amani, pings it so it's a 5/2. I aldor peacekeeper it, and it becomes a 1/2. Why not a 4/2? Opponent pings it again and it becomes a 1/1. Why not a 4/1? Also if you silence a minion that has been hit with hunter's mark, my guess is that it still has 1 health (but can now be healed). Right? I understand the first part (it makes the attack 1 unless there is ongoing buff like stormwind champion on board) but it did not become 4/1 after the ping?!? that is strange. when I played my unbound element (which gets +1/+1 after overload), it does get his attack up after the humiliation. and no. it makes it goes up to its original health. | ||
|
SsDrKosS
330 Posts
On February 23 2014 05:37 Melliflue wrote: Secrets are generally classed as spells, they are made cheaper by Sorcerer's Apprentice and boosted by spell damage minions. So if a secret is played when Lorewalker Cho is on the board then is a copy of the secret given to the opponent? If so, when? Does it happen when the secret is played or when it is triggered? it gives you a 'copy' of secret 'card' to you. so not secret in effect but card. | ||
|
SsDrKosS
330 Posts
On February 23 2014 17:40 Jingoism wrote: I'm wondering if this is a bug for more than 2 people. My opponent (in a different game) and I had issues with the spell Demonfire. He used it on a Blood Imp and killed it, and I used it on a Succubus and it took 2 damage QQ. The damage part is working great :D but the buffing part is not. The minions were friendly to the respective spell users, and they are considered "Demons" so what's the problem with the buffing? demonfire only buffs friendly demons. http://wiki.teamliquid.net/hearthstone/Demonfire | ||
|
tomnov
Israel148 Posts
| ||
|
Osyrul
257 Posts
On February 25 2014 20:34 schwza wrote: Opponent plays Amani, pings it so it's a 5/2. I aldor peacekeeper it, and it becomes a 1/2. Why not a 4/2? Opponent pings it again and it becomes a 1/1. Why not a 4/1? Also if you silence a minion that has been hit with hunter's mark, my guess is that it still has 1 health (but can now be healed). Right? Because you Aldor'd Amani in his enraged state. Enrage trigger when your minion is not at full health. Not every time it gets damaged, like Gurubashi Berserker. | ||
|
Veriol
Czech Republic502 Posts
Right now you get ~3g/win in costructed with wich (to my knowledge) you can buy packs if you dont want to play arena. Wich is 50wins to get a pack .. thats pretty harsh. Arena garantuees a pack, card/gold/dust on top; even in 0-3 situation. So right now its just better to get into arena and retire right away to use the gold better than buying a pack. Thats seems odd to me. So what im asking has there been any feedback from devs regarding changing the system in constructed to be comparable to reward system we have in arena? | ||
|
Darthsanta13
United States564 Posts
On February 27 2014 03:39 Veriol wrote: Are there any planned changes regarding the constructed? Lets just say im someone who can get 7+ in are somewhat often but i just dont enjoy the arena.. Right now you get ~3g/win in costructed with wich (to my knowledge) you can buy packs if you dont want to play arena. Wich is 50wins to get a pack .. thats pretty harsh. Arena garantuees a pack, card/gold/dust on top; even in 0-3 situation. So right now its just better to get into arena and retire right away to use the gold better than buying a pack. Thats seems odd to me. So what im asking has there been any feedback from devs regarding changing the system in constructed to be comparable to reward system we have in arena? I think you're forgetting that packs are 100g, not 150g. The breakeven point for arenas being worth it is around ~4 wins. But to get to your point, I kinda agree that it's really hard to get packs doing only constructed. You really rely on the gold from dailies. I think giving more gold for winning at better ranks would be a good start. | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On February 27 2014 03:43 Darthsanta13 wrote: I think you're forgetting that packs are 100g, not 150g. The breakeven point for arenas being worth it is around ~4 wins. But to get to your point, I kinda agree that it's really hard to get packs doing only constructed. You really rely on the gold from dailies. I think giving more gold for winning at better ranks would be a good start. Apparently they don't want to upset the balance between arena and constructed in terms of which one people do more. However that said there is currently a lot of QQ on the battle net forums about people who are rank abusing and ruining the casual MMR so they can do dailies / earn gold quicker so the gold system may be re-evaluated at some point. (Although the argument is silly as everyone knows farming at rank 20 is better than farming in casual) | ||
|
ChumtheWaters
United States3 Posts
On February 27 2014 04:09 Drazerk wrote: (Although the argument is silly as everyone knows farming at rank 20 is better than farming in casual) I'm not doubting you or arguing with you but I'm just curious -- why do you say that? | ||
|
Amui
Canada10567 Posts
1/(3^8)..... | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On March 01 2014 16:57 ChumtheWaters wrote: I'm not doubting you or arguing with you but I'm just curious -- why do you say that? People don't take casual seriously so just instant concede when they get a match up they dislike etc etc because of this the casual MMR is completely imbalanced and you can get any level of enemy even if you have lost 1000 games in a row. | ||
|
tuestresfat
2555 Posts
Sorry I didn't really know where to post this, I didn't feel like it warrants its own thread and no one talks about mage in the constructed strategy section =[ | ||
|
WhX
Germany778 Posts
Once I'm past this score, I keep winning until 6-8 wins and lose once, thus ending my run. | ||
| ||
The PiG Daily
Best Games of SC
Rogue vs TriGGeR
Maru vs MaxPax
Rogue vs herO
Clem vs herO
Rogue vs Maru
PiGStarcraft536
[ Submit Event ] |
|
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
CranKy Ducklings
WardiTV Team League
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
IPSL
Hawk vs TBD
StRyKeR vs TBD
BSL
n0maD vs perroflaco
TerrOr vs ZZZero
MadiNho vs WolFix
DragOn vs LancerX
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Team League
OSC
BSL
Sterling vs Azhi_Dahaki
Napoleon vs Mazur
Jimin vs Nesh
spx vs Strudel
IPSL
Artosis vs TBD
Napoleon vs TBD
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
