[Review] Razer Moray (earbuds) - Page 4
Forum Index > General Forum |
stalife
Canada1222 Posts
| ||
zoLo
United States5896 Posts
| ||
Eminencia
Singapore162 Posts
![]() | ||
PobTheCad
Australia893 Posts
On April 13 2009 02:19 Tal wrote: In the next few months I'm looking to get some high end headphones -as an audiophile, what would you recommend if i have around 100 UK Pounds to play with? I'm mainly a rock music fan, but have recently been getting very into classical, and slightly into jazz. Will I have to compromise on which genre I want to hear best? Also, this may sound like a stupid question, but is there a significant difference in sound quality between different MP3 players? I have between 100-150 pounds to spend on one. sennheiser hd-25 | ||
rredtooth
5459 Posts
| ||
Clow
Brazil880 Posts
| ||
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
On April 13 2009 07:55 frankbg wrote: I'm puzzled as to why people would want to buy 250$ earbuds ... honestly, get regular headphones? I'm puzzled as to why people would want to buy regular headphones ... honestly, get better IEMs that have higher sound quality? | ||
decafchicken
United States20019 Posts
On April 13 2009 02:19 Tal wrote: I'm really glad I read this thread. That would definitely include me, for the simple reason that in the UK, the only headphone adverts I ever see are bose. Apparently trusting people who's intent is to sell me their stuff isn't smart ![]() In the next few months I'm looking to get some high end headphones -as an audiophile, what would you recommend if i have around 100 UK Pounds to play with? I'm mainly a rock music fan, but have recently been getting very into classical, and slightly into jazz. Will I have to compromise on which genre I want to hear best? Also, this may sound like a stupid question, but is there a significant difference in sound quality between different MP3 players? I have between 100-150 pounds to spend on one. For in ear buds at that price range (someone already mentioned these) the phonek audeo pfe are a good buy. Another good choice is Future sonics atrio m5. Those would be my picks for IEM based on what i've read. If you'rel ooking for headphones (over the ear) just pick the sennheiser model that fits in you're budget, you wont be disappointed ^_^ Also, mp3 players make a big difference. Currently the sansa clip (very small/cheap player) has probably the best sound on the market. ipod is generally on the lower end of sound quality. other brands that generally have good quality are creative and cowon. another thing that is supposed to make a huge difference is a headphone amplifier, can't say i've ever tried one though. | ||
jgad
Canada899 Posts
http://www.headphone.com/products/headphones/in-ear-monitor/denon-ah-c351k.php Image Comparison : + Show Spoiler + ![]() ![]() Headphone.com agrees with your appraisal if they are : We feel these miniaturized mobile-application cans equal the audio performance of some ECHs at double the cost. The AH-C351k have very potent, smooth, and well-expressed musical detail high & low although they are somewhat recessed in the mid-ranges. This may be a clinker especially for the picky audio geek who prefers vocals & female voices out front but for most listeners wanting a giant knock-down audio AND in-ear fit improvement to the earbuds or ECHs that came with your iPod or Mp3 player, the DENON C351k are a guaranteed can't miss. And the very affordable price sure sounds darn good too. | ||
jgad
Canada899 Posts
On April 13 2009 02:19 Tal wrote: I'm really glad I read this thread. That would definitely include me, for the simple reason that in the UK, the only headphone adverts I ever see are bose. Apparently trusting people who's intent is to sell me their stuff isn't smart ![]() In the next few months I'm looking to get some high end headphones -as an audiophile, what would you recommend if i have around 100 UK Pounds to play with? I'm mainly a rock music fan, but have recently been getting very into classical, and slightly into jazz. Will I have to compromise on which genre I want to hear best? Also, this may sound like a stupid question, but is there a significant difference in sound quality between different MP3 players? I have between 100-150 pounds to spend on one. If you want a great place to research, check out headphone.com http://www.headphone.com/ Priced in USD, but you can get most of those in the UK as well. The information is what's important. I've got a pair of Sennheiser HD-280 Pros which I adore - they're big and full-ear headphones, mind, but the sound is stellar for a low price. They may not be ideal for jazz or classical, though, being closed headphones. You'd probably want something open like the Sennheiser HD595. Bliss on your ears, and you can get them for a ton at Amazon UK - bargain! shit... I think I'm going to buy a pair now, lol! Been eyeing an open set for a while, haha. | ||
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
On April 14 2009 01:43 jgad wrote: I doubt Razer is actually producing headphones of their own. Those look a hell of a lot like rebranded Denon AH-C351Ks. http://www.headphone.com/products/headphones/in-ear-monitor/denon-ah-c351k.php Image Comparison : + Show Spoiler + ![]() ![]() Headphone.com agrees with your appraisal if they are : We feel these miniaturized mobile-application cans equal the audio performance of some ECHs at double the cost. The AH-C351k have very potent, smooth, and well-expressed musical detail high & low although they are somewhat recessed in the mid-ranges. This may be a clinker especially for the picky audio geek who prefers vocals & female voices out front but for most listeners wanting a giant knock-down audio AND in-ear fit improvement to the earbuds or ECHs that came with your iPod or Mp3 player, the DENON C351k are a guaranteed can't miss. And the very affordable price sure sounds darn good too. Yeah those look exactly the same, that's probably what's going on. Strange though, afaik the Mako is made by Razer themselves, and every single thing I've heard about the Mako is positive. | ||
![]()
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
hey jgad i'm a razer employee and the morays were designed in the office i'm currently sitting in, they are not rebranded as far as i know | ||
Exteray
United States1094 Posts
| ||
Exteray
United States1094 Posts
| ||
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
On April 14 2009 19:10 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote: its moray not mako! hey jgad i'm a razer employee and the morays were designed in the office i'm currently sitting in, they are not rebranded as far as i know I know that's what I'm saying is that the Mako is designed by razer themselves, so they definitely have the sound technology to be able to make the Morays. | ||
![]()
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
i thought you were just messin' up | ||
jgad
Canada899 Posts
On April 14 2009 19:10 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote: its moray not mako! hey jgad i'm a razer employee and the morays were designed in the office i'm currently sitting in, they are not rebranded as far as i know Then Razer are a bunch of design pinching thieves, lol. It's the exact same headset - look at it. The "design" couldn't have been more than deciding where to put the logo. | ||
jgad
Canada899 Posts
On April 14 2009 19:32 -orb- wrote: I know that's what I'm saying is that the Mako is designed by razer themselves, so they definitely have the sound technology to be able to make the Morays. I don't know about the Mako, all I can say is that the Morays look like imports. Big speakers are easier to "design" anyway - you buy the drivers, get someone to make a few injection moulds and assemble - job done. Buying good full-size naked drivers is not a small market to fish in. I don't think anyone making in-ear phones, though, sells their hi-def drivers - you get the whole thing and that's it. In both cases, I don't think anyone was "designing" anything related to the audio - at least not like what would happen at Sennheiser or Cerwin Vega - more just buying pieces and putting them together. | ||
![]()
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
| ||
jgad
Canada899 Posts
| ||
| ||