|
holy shit guys.... this is what i put in... (of which Wolfram gave the correct response)
Q: limit as x approach 0, sin x / x Q: to be or not to be Q: limit as x approach infinity, (1+1/x)^x Q: cos(pi) + i sin(pi) + 1 //AKA Euler's Identity Q: e^pi > pi^e Q: mass of neutron - mass of proton - mass of electron Q: plot sqrt(x^2) Q: integrate e^x/x! Q: differentiate e^x/x! Q: the next solar eclipse
|
Q: What does WolframAlpha do? A: Wolfram|Alpha isn't sure what to do with your input.

|
|
lol let that do assignments for u
|
i want to use this site during my algebra 2 test tomorrow
|
stupid son of a bitch website totally killed my fucking processor
i typed in "list all the numbers of pi"
and it came up with a fucking snotty "no results could be found, if you are an expert on this topic, click here"
and then briefly later my whole comp froze
way2fuckinghandlememoryprocessing,dipshits@mathematic
|
I wish it could "solve P = NP" =)
|
|
|
after trying to calculate me integral exp(-a/x^2) dx i actually like this :D
|
Oh okay. Yep they are completely different
|
On May 18 2009 04:03 HeadBangaa wrote:Show nested quote +On May 17 2009 05:10 Badjas wrote:On May 17 2009 04:12 HeadBangaa wrote: Question: How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
Answer: A woodchuck would chuck all the wood he could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
Almost. I asked about maximum capacity, not intent. Actually it gave you an answer just fine. No, you are wrong. Show nested quote + Question: How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
Answer: A woodchuck would chuck all the wood he could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
Seems to be an ambiguous sentence. You read it as A woodchuck will chuck all the wood he could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood. I read it as A woodchuck chucks all the wood he could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
Though my English is not up to par with an English language teacher.
|
It says ln(x) = log(x). WTF?
|
On May 18 2009 15:23 Garnet wrote: It says ln(x) = log(x). WTF?
Yes, because that's the convention in Mathematica. WolframAlpha does return the correct deriv, indef integral, max, min and all that (of the natural logarithim, that is)
|
|
On May 18 2009 15:23 Garnet wrote: It says ln(x) = log(x). WTF? because that's what it is.
|
Haha, It can't solve i^i :D But still a great site!
|
On May 16 2009 09:55 Cambium wrote: spent 10 minutes playing with it, it's really not that good.
|
On May 18 2009 17:42 Rhaegar99 wrote: Haha, It can't solve i^i :D The query i^i gives me information that i^i is transcendental and a decimal approximation as well an exponential representation.
What else did you want to know?
|
|
|
|
|