This movie is gonna be sick, I highly suggest TL to check it out; can't wait till I finish my exams and watch it...
Just a little background, it is a semi biography of Bruce Lee's initiator teacher Ip Man and his Wing Chun style martial art. Now His Wing Chun style has several million practioners around the globe and growing..
On December 04 2008 09:16 ulszz wrote: Singapore 18 December 2008 China 19 December 2008 Hong Kong 19 December 2008
that's the release info. from imdb. anyone know if it will be released in US, and if so when?
UK got green light, I doubt they will release it in US... A lot of Chinese martial arts movie don't get screen time, they just get released on DVDs etc..
I haven't seen any previews on TV or anything so probably not in so cal theatres. Although there is this private theatre down the street that shows classic movies, indy movies, and some new movies.
damn (i's and L's) i thought it as LP movie, and thought it was about LiquidPoker haha. But nonetheless this looks fucking sick. Def. gonna try to get a copy of it legally or illegally somehow.
On December 04 2008 09:16 ulszz wrote: Singapore 18 December 2008 China 19 December 2008 Hong Kong 19 December 2008
that's the release info. from imdb. anyone know if it will be released in US, and if so when?
UK got green light, I doubt they will release it in US... A lot of Chinese martial arts movie don't get screen time, they just get released on DVDs etc..
So if this is released in the UK there will be eng subs which is damn good news cause this movie looks really good.
ok hate to rain on anybody's parade, but the trailers made it look like Fist of Fury/Fist of Legend/Fearless with Yip Man and wing chun. i think i've seen enough movies with chinese v. japanese MUs.
On December 04 2008 12:14 intoyourrainbOW wrote: ok hate to rain on anybody's parade, but the trailers made it look like Fist of Fury/Fist of Legend/Fearless with Yip Man and wing chun. i think i've seen enough movies with chinese v. japanese MUs.
its almost exactly like fearless, still gonna watch it.
On December 04 2008 09:29 CaucasianAsian wrote: damn (i's and L's) i thought it as LP movie, and thought it was about LiquidPoker haha. But nonetheless this looks fucking sick. Def. gonna try to get a copy of it legally or illegally somehow.
On December 04 2008 12:14 intoyourrainbOW wrote: ok hate to rain on anybody's parade, but the trailers made it look like Fist of Fury/Fist of Legend/Fearless with Yip Man and wing chun. i think i've seen enough movies with chinese v. japanese MUs.
If the Indians defended against the settlers, we will be watching many movies of Indians vs Anglo-American MUs
On December 04 2008 12:14 intoyourrainbOW wrote: ok hate to rain on anybody's parade, but the trailers made it look like Fist of Fury/Fist of Legend/Fearless with Yip Man and wing chun. i think i've seen enough movies with chinese v. japanese MUs.
If the Indians defended against the settlers, we will be watching many movies of Indians vs Anglo-American MUs
I'm not really into martial arts movies, although I do have few favourites like Drunken Master; but I found this to be intriguing, I'd be interested in seeing a subtitled version if nothing else.
wwowowowowowowo that looks amazing, anyone know a site where I can see this? Bittorrent link? I'm in the USA and if I dont see this movie I'm gona shit a brick
I just watched it - it is really well made. Reminded me alot of Fighter in the wind. The Subs were terrible though at least what I got from the japanese translation...
On January 04 2009 07:54 CommanderFluffy wrote: the only complaint i've heard thus far was from my dad: + Show Spoiler +
He was like the Japanese guy at the end got owned too quickly.
It's rather realistic imho - a real fight doesn't last that long afaik. This wasn't sparring or a superior fighter playing around - to equals fought each other without holding back. Once he broke through he sealed his advantage with never stopping attacks.
I love the scene in the beginning where this banditguy challanges Ip Man in his house and his son comes around: "Mom says if you wont attack all things in the house will be broken." (hard to explain, you gotta have watched it)
oh man, i was hoping in the end you'll see a young boy or teenage begging ipman to teach him and then when IP Man asks his name, the young boy would go "Bruce Lee"(english translation, chinese is different)
Cuz for those who doesn't know, Ip Man is bruce lee's original master before Bruce came to the west.
great movie, musical score was one of the best i've heard in recent memory, only flaws that were readily apparent was the mandarin dubbing which ofc isn't AWFUL but still, it's nice to have the original, and my vid file sound seemed to be out of sync with the punches but these aren't complaints about the actual movie itself . Gonna def re-dl or buy a cantonese dvd rip whenever it's out.
didn't realise there is a thread for this -_- its good but slightly unrealistic. it is rather poor compare to Flashpoint, I guess my expectation is too high since I have watched that one
for me HERO was way way better, I was expecting something more from Ip man than typical ku beating the shit out from all his oponents, other thing is that Ip man was almost invincible i thought that last fight wont be so one sided, dont get me wrong this film is good but nothing more than others. nothings epic in it.
On January 03 2009 23:14 liosama wrote: lol wing chun looks cool and all, but that's all it really is. Cool looking.
lol this is a great example of someone talking right out of their ass
wing chun is probably one of the most stupid looking martial art with high practicality. do some research before you blurt things out
anyway movie looks cool. gona watch it.
Sorry to bust your bubble but wing chun is pathetic and absolutely useless in a real fight scenario against a competent fighter, MMA has proven over time that most martial arts are absolutely stupid and useless with the exeption of Jiujitsu.
However even Jiujiutsu was far from practical and the brazilians took the japanese jiujitsu and created a superior and more practical way called brazilian jiujiutsu (BJJ).
Muay Thai is another devastating style but its not a martial art rather than a competitive fighting style.
On January 03 2009 23:14 liosama wrote: lol wing chun looks cool and all, but that's all it really is. Cool looking.
lol this is a great example of someone talking right out of their ass
wing chun is probably one of the most stupid looking martial art with high practicality. do some research before you blurt things out
anyway movie looks cool. gona watch it.
Sorry to bust your bubble but wing chun is pathetic and absolutely useless in a real fight scenario against a competent fighter, MMA has proven over time that most martial arts are absolutely stupid and useless with the exeption of Jiujitsu.
However even Jiujiutsu was far from practical and the brazilians took the japanese jiujitsu and created a superior and more practical way called brazilian jiujiutsu (BJJ).
Muay Thai is another devastating style but its not a martial art rather than a competitive fighting style.
Calling Muay Thai a fighting style and not a martial art... What is the difference? I honestly don't know so if anyone could clue me in on how to discern between the two and why the distinction matters, that would be great [:
On January 03 2009 23:14 liosama wrote: lol wing chun looks cool and all, but that's all it really is. Cool looking.
lol this is a great example of someone talking right out of their ass
wing chun is probably one of the most stupid looking martial art with high practicality. do some research before you blurt things out
anyway movie looks cool. gona watch it.
Sorry to bust your bubble but wing chun is pathetic and absolutely useless in a real fight scenario against a competent fighter, MMA has proven over time that most martial arts are absolutely stupid and useless with the exeption of Jiujitsu.
However even Jiujiutsu was far from practical and the brazilians took the japanese jiujitsu and created a superior and more practical way called brazilian jiujiutsu (BJJ).
Muay Thai is another devastating style but its not a martial art rather than a competitive fighting style.
Calling Muay Thai a fighting style and not a martial art... What is the difference? I honestly don't know so if anyone could clue me in on how to discern between the two and why the distinction matters, that would be great [:
Mainly because Muay Thai even if started as a martial art it evolved as a SPORT, Thailand's national sport, it is fought in a ring with rules alike box.
Muay Thai is also big in MMA, one could say Muay thai has almost perfected the stand-up fighting, however it lacks ANY defense on the ground so you need a back-up in a real fight, most Muay Thai fighters that go into MMA, they train in either BJJ, Wrestling, Sambo etc to complete their incomplete sport.
The existance of MMA (Pride, UFC, Affliction etc) since the early 90s showed the world which ones were the fighting styles that were actually useful in real fights.
Martial arts such as: Taekwondo (in which by the way i have a black belt), KungFu, Wushu, Wing Chun, Hapkido etc were quickly dismissed because they lacked many fundamentals.
Some of them were absolutely retarded like Taekwondo or Wing Chun some were relatively decent like Kung Fu but their forms were just "art" and not practical, their stances were dumb (hands down etc, unpractical foot positioning) the punches and kick lacked power and so on, and also they were almost all useless on the ground.
So those were quickly eliminated as useful in real fights in Mixed Martial Arts but some survived like:
Of those remaining ones, Jiujitsu was too weak, as an easter martial art it also contained "art" and forms and so called spirituality which the Brazilians took out and made a much better fighting style, BJJ.
BJJ does fine in submissions but the takedowns are weak, its still incomplete in the sense that it cannot fight on their feet however its probably the most efective fighting style if you had to choose only one.
Judo did ok for some time but it then proved to be inferior to BJJ and Wrestling also so it dissapeared.
Sambo does well to date but its not very widespread, it lacks on punching tho so its incomplete.
Muay Thai is almost perfect standing up but its incomplete because it doesnt teach any ground.
Wrestling does good but its really bad for submissions so its used more as a complementary defense against BJJ or offence against people with bad ground game.
To date the most predominant styles that mixed seem to dominate others are Muay Thai + BJJ
On January 05 2009 06:50 travis wrote: can ground and pound be considered a style?
or is it not really a fighting style on it's own?
Yeah it could be called a style however styles nowadays are almost non-existant since people who GnP usually do other stuff in the mix like submission attempts like Fedor does, the tendency is the erradication of "styles" and "martial arts", just pure fighting, styles after all are only useless forms to archieve an end and that is to win a fight, so in the end there will be no styles.
MMA is designed to show who will win in a 1 on 1 fight. Martial arts in general didn't have that requirement about them. Generally speaking if you get taken to the ground against a group of opponents, regardless of whether or not you have friends around you're probably getting a steel toed boot to the brain, and you're out of the fight.
Honestly who gives a shit how practical they are? Learning martial arts isn't about being able to beat up other professional fighters in duels. I'll get out my gun and kill you if I want to beat you. Martial arts is a system of training mind/body. MMA is one of the most useless things to come out of western culture in the last 100 years.
This one funny fact to consider, do you know what is the strongest muscle in a human body? MMA and all other forms of martial art competition prevent the usage of that muscle, in real fights human are allow to use that.(even Bruce lee said in an interview he would use that muscle if he had to in a real fight)
and please do not talk about what style is better than other style in a real fight, that serves no purpose. The "better" you are talking about is in the man, not in the "style" if you know what I am getting at.
Just because all your narrow eyes see are Fedor domination in MMA doesn't mean that there isn't an Vietnam vet somewhere that can kill him in a split second in a real fight. A chinese saying: "There is always a higher mountain elsewhere."
I agree with baal that styles are all use to achieve the same end, but i do not agree with the "useless" part, the arts you see in martial art demonstrations or daily practices are used to build up different muscles in strength, as well as timing of the move (ever heard of "shadow boxing"?)
Back in the days people do not have modern equipments to train a specific muscle in order preform a move better, so they rely on doing that move over and over so that same muscle can build up over time. (The hardest muscles to train are the Smooth muscle aka involuntary muscle)
Do you know there are many many moves in jujitsu that they are not allow to preform in MMA? just like many many moves in mui tai that would deal legal damage in merely one hit. In real fight they aim for 1 hit kill, there is no ground and pound, Fador would kill the guy in a second instead of riding him for 10 minutes.
On January 05 2009 07:23 FzeroXx wrote: Honestly who gives a shit how practical they are? Learning martial arts isn't about being able to beat up other professional fighters in duels. I'll get out my gun and kill you if I want to beat you. Martial arts is a system of training mind/body. MMA is one of the most useless things to come out of western culture in the last 100 years.
i gotta agree with this. MMA portrays martial arts incorrectly because they leave out the "boring " moral and philosophies of martial arts.
Thanks for the informative post baal. What do you think of Bruce Lee's fighting style? It's a mix of other martial arts, so it shouldn't have the specific weaknesses of only taekwando or kung fu, etc. Also, I think the strength of the user should be considered in the fact that to perform certain techniques that make say JJ > kung fu (arbitrary example) would be impossible due to the level of mastery of the kung fu user. Is this somewhat true? I'm not knowledgeable about the details of trained fighting so I'm just wondering.
On January 05 2009 07:23 FzeroXx wrote: Honestly who gives a shit how practical they are? Learning martial arts isn't about being able to beat up other professional fighters in duels. I'll get out my gun and kill you if I want to beat you. Martial arts is a system of training mind/body. MMA is one of the most useless things to come out of western culture in the last 100 years.
You stupid ignorant moron, first of all MMA came from the EASTERN culture for example Pride.
Training mind and body? what a load of bullshit, then go to the gym, work the body in a better way and read a book.
On January 05 2009 07:23 FzeroXx wrote: Honestly who gives a shit how practical they are? Learning martial arts isn't about being able to beat up other professional fighters in duels. I'll get out my gun and kill you if I want to beat you. Martial arts is a system of training mind/body. MMA is one of the most useless things to come out of western culture in the last 100 years.
You stupid ignorant moron, first of all MMA came from the EASTERN culture for example Pride.
Training mind and body? what a load of bullshit, then go to the gym, work the body in a better way and read a book.
Is it true that training your body in the gym is not the same as through martial arts training (in terms of increasing fighting capabilities) because it trains muscles that are not necessarily used in practical combat? Once again I am going on minimal knowledge and assumption.
On January 05 2009 07:23 L wrote: MMA is designed to show who will win in a 1 on 1 fight. Martial arts in general didn't have that requirement about them. Generally speaking if you get taken to the ground against a group of opponents, regardless of whether or not you have friends around you're probably getting a steel toed boot to the brain, and you're out of the fight.
BJJ =/= MMA, true, jiujitsu does poor against many oponents, but everything does, if you are facing 4 guy of your size that are not pussies ur going to get ur ass stomped.
so again MMA is not jiujitsu, the majority of the MMA fighters dont go for takedowns as their weapons they rather stand but are competent on the ground.
Also if u want to only stand-up facing multiple enemies the only option is Muay Thai, not retarded martial arts.
On January 05 2009 07:57 rei wrote: This one funny fact to consider, do you know what is the strongest muscle in a human body? MMA and all other forms of martial art competition prevent the usage of that muscle, in real fights human are allow to use that.(even Bruce lee said in an interview he would use that muscle if he had to in a real fight)
and please do not talk about what style is better than other style in a real fight, that serves no purpose. The "better" you are talking about is in the man, not in the "style" if you know what I am getting at.
Just because all your narrow eyes see are Fedor domination in MMA doesn't mean that there isn't an Vietnam vet somewhere that can kill him in a split second in a real fight. A chinese saying: "There is always a higher mountain elsewhere."
I agree with baal that styles are all use to achieve the same end, but i do not agree with the "useless" part, the arts you see in martial art demonstrations or daily practices are used to build up different muscles in strength, as well as timing of the move (ever heard of "shadow boxing"?)
Back in the days people do not have modern equipments to train a specific muscle in order preform a move better, so they rely on doing that move over and over so that same muscle can build up over time. (The hardest muscles to train are the Smooth muscle aka involuntary muscle)
Do you know there are many many moves in jujitsu that they are not allow to preform in MMA? just like many many moves in mui tai that would deal legal damage in merely one hit. In real fight they aim for 1 hit kill, there is no ground and pound, Fador would kill the guy in a second instead of riding him for 10 minutes.
Depends how do you judge the muscle strenght, if its for applied pressure then it is the jaw muscle, about sheer power is the Quadricepts.
You know absolutely nothing about fighting, there are better styles you idiot, its not the man also the style, why do you see hundreds of fighters using Muay Thai in MMA and not a single one using WuShu?, coincidence?
Id like to know those Jiujitsu moves not allowed in MMA, because past UFC (and current asosiation like RioHeroes) had pretty much only 2 rules:
1.- No biting 2.- No eye gouging.
They even allowed groin punches/kicks.
I can see your ignorance about fighting because you are the clasical dumb kid who believes in martial art movies and the " 1 hit kill " there is no such thing you moron, you sure could punch an untrained person in the chest and break his spleen.
Also its a retarded concept if its a fight to death ur goal is to knock them out, becaus as soon as they are out you can just stomp them to death, or to just break an arm or a join, because they are as good as dead.
There is no Vietnam vet who will kill fedor in a split of a second ROFL what int he fuck haha.
Sorry I'm not a thug like you baal. Not everyone has the same opinions and its pretty incredible that you're willing to dismiss thousands of years of culture for a TV phenomenon of hitting people for bloodsport.
I think the guy playing Ip man is so undeserving of his part..... all his other movies suck ass... oh well atleast he'll have one good movie for me to watch
On January 05 2009 08:52 fanatacist wrote: Thanks for the informative post baal. What do you think of Bruce Lee's fighting style? It's a mix of other martial arts, so it shouldn't have the specific weaknesses of only taekwando or kung fu, etc. Also, I think the strength of the user should be considered in the fact that to perform certain techniques that make say JJ > kung fu (arbitrary example) would be impossible due to the level of mastery of the kung fu user. Is this somewhat true? I'm not knowledgeable about the details of trained fighting so I'm just wondering.
Could current fighters take down Bruce Lee?
Bruce Lee was definitelly walking the right path and you could see he was one of the fathers of MMA.
He actually tried to get rid of all the martial arts "bullshit" and created Jun Fan Jee Kune Do.
Bruce Lee actually said that the perform of Katas and forms were like trying to learn how to swim in dry land, and he even trained some grappling techniques for the ground.
So Bruce Lee is actually a mixed martial artist, however since he were raised in them and he had no one to really compete against in a sport-like envirmoent like current MMA, he didnt develop the exact right techniques, he over emphatized the importance of speed and still used old and useless stands and techniques.
On your question about Bruce Lee competing in modern MMA, well the "old" Lee, lets say you revive him with no new training, he would be a competent fighter in his weight class, he would be definitely beating by the top fighters in his weight class tho.
If u revive Lee and let him train with a modern MMA concept he would probably be champion of his weight class in a short time.
He would get absolutely destroyed regardless of any kind of training in higher weight classes like light heavy weight or heavy weight on current MMA, the weight difference is just simply too big.
On January 05 2009 09:14 FzeroXx wrote: Sorry I'm not a thug like you baal. Not everyone has the same opinions and its pretty incredible that you're willing to dismiss thousands of years of culture for a TV phenomenon of hitting people for bloodsport.
MMA is not a TV phenomenon you idiot, UFC, which is only 1 organization of MMA in the US got really famous in USA, thats pretty much it, PRIDE in Japan existed looooooooooooong before UFC and long before the media exposure.
Also who gives a shit about culture, im not discussing the importance or anything related to chinese or asian culture, that is meaningless, the fact is that most martial arts are plain inefficient and MMA has proved that over and over and over.
On January 05 2009 08:52 fanatacist wrote: Thanks for the informative post baal. What do you think of Bruce Lee's fighting style? It's a mix of other martial arts, so it shouldn't have the specific weaknesses of only taekwando or kung fu, etc. Also, I think the strength of the user should be considered in the fact that to perform certain techniques that make say JJ > kung fu (arbitrary example) would be impossible due to the level of mastery of the kung fu user. Is this somewhat true? I'm not knowledgeable about the details of trained fighting so I'm just wondering.
Could current fighters take down Bruce Lee?
Bruce Lee was definitelly walking the right path and you could see he was one of the fathers of MMA.
He actually tried to get rid of all the martial arts "bullshit" and created Jun Fan Jee Kune Do.
Bruce Lee actually said that the perform of Katas and forms were like trying to learn how to swim in dry land, and he even trained some grappling techniques for the ground.
So Bruce Lee is actually a mixed martial artist, however since he were raised in them and he had no one to really compete against in a sport-like envirmoent like current MMA, he didnt develop the exact right techniques, he over emphatized the importance of speed and still used old and useless stands and techniques.
On your question about Bruce Lee competing in modern MMA, well the "old" Lee, lets say you revive him with no new training, he would be a competent fighter in his weight class, he would be definitely beating by the top fighters in his weight class tho.
If u revive Lee and let him train with a modern MMA concept he would probably be champion of his weight class in a short time.
He would get absolutely destroyed regardless of any kind of training in higher weight classes like light heavy weight or heavy weight on current MMA, the weight difference is just simply too big.
I see, another great post. Thanks!
What do you mean the over-emphasis of speed? I figured that that would be his strength in competing against current MMA fighters, seeing as he had some record-breaking fighting speeds (straight jab from resting, I believe). Are you saying that it's too much of a power sacrifice? Wouldn't speed help him land more hits and counter the opponent better? Please elaborate if you have the time.
Also I read in another one of your posts about the vs. 4 guys of the same weight as you. Is there any form of martial art or fighting style that is specifically designed or is just significantly better for fighting vs. multiple targets? I'm assuming that styles that are based heavily on grappling are weaker than pure standing fighting techniques, but I may be wrong. I'd like to hear your take on this [:
EDIT: Also, why is that style better than others? Thanks n_n
On January 05 2009 07:23 FzeroXx wrote: Honestly who gives a shit how practical they are? Learning martial arts isn't about being able to beat up other professional fighters in duels. I'll get out my gun and kill you if I want to beat you. Martial arts is a system of training mind/body. MMA is one of the most useless things to come out of western culture in the last 100 years.
You stupid ignorant moron, first of all MMA came from the EASTERN culture for example Pride.
Training mind and body? what a load of bullshit, then go to the gym, work the body in a better way and read a book.
Is it true that training your body in the gym is not the same as through martial arts training (in terms of increasing fighting capabilities) because it trains muscles that are not necessarily used in practical combat? Once again I am going on minimal knowledge and assumption.
On January 05 2009 09:24 baal wrote: the fact is that most martial arts are plain inefficient and MMA has proved that over and over and over.
Your logic is wrong, your "fact" can only support Most martial arts are plain ineffecient in MMA with MMA rules, and MMA has proved that over and over and over again.
read my post in the last page see and give me a reply plz.
So PRIDE wasn't aimed at an audience? Who gives a shit if it wasn't on TV in the USA. You're still pitting two people against each other in a fight for an audience. It has nothing to do with anything important besides learning the best way to hurt someone else. I'm sorry if I don't back that. Who gives a shit about culture? Probably one of the most moronic statements on TL.
"I'm not dismissing..." "That is meaningless"
I'm not arguing the viability of martial art in a fighting arena. Martial art is not about a showcase of skill for an audience or anything you would consider valuable. I'm just trying to explain that not everyone is going to see the world in the way you do, so your argument of dismissal of a valuable part of half the world's culture is pretty insane.
On January 05 2009 07:23 FzeroXx wrote: Honestly who gives a shit how practical they are? Learning martial arts isn't about being able to beat up other professional fighters in duels. I'll get out my gun and kill you if I want to beat you. Martial arts is a system of training mind/body. MMA is one of the most useless things to come out of western culture in the last 100 years.
You stupid ignorant moron, first of all MMA came from the EASTERN culture for example Pride.
Training mind and body? what a load of bullshit, then go to the gym, work the body in a better way and read a book.
Is it true that training your body in the gym is not the same as through martial arts training (in terms of increasing fighting capabilities) because it trains muscles that are not necessarily used in practical combat? Once again I am going on minimal knowledge and assumption.
like what muslces you dont train in MMA??
cuz they seem pretty well built imo
I meant in the gym, not in MMA. Like if you are doing benchpresses it won't necessarily enhance your fighting capability as well as you would if you were doing MMA/traditional martial arts training. Is this true/logical?
On January 05 2009 09:33 rei wrote: Your logic is wrong, your "fact" can only support Most martial arts are plain ineffecient in MMA with MMA rules, and MMA has proved that over and over and over again.
read my post in the last page see and give me a reply plz.
Some people only base their perception of what martial art is about with what they see in MMA, and call that all there is to martial art, in the same time insist on everything that does not work in MMA is utterly useless. There is a saying in Chinese for these kind of people, "A frog sitting under a well can only see a very very small portion of the sky."
On January 05 2009 07:23 FzeroXx wrote: Honestly who gives a shit how practical they are? Learning martial arts isn't about being able to beat up other professional fighters in duels. I'll get out my gun and kill you if I want to beat you. Martial arts is a system of training mind/body. MMA is one of the most useless things to come out of western culture in the last 100 years.
I was about to say the same, if my goal is to "beat" you I'm just gonna shoot you in the head...lol
Martial arts are not only about how to best brutalize an individual in a fight for TV
And christ listening to Baal is fucking irritating, he calls everyone a faggot and an idiot constantly
I think if I knew him in real life iId find it hard NOT to shoot him in the face
na just turn his false logics side way, shine it up real nice, and shove it his candy ass.
Making someone realize they are wrong for so long can hurt much more than a punch in the face, Because they will realize how stupid they were. The more they clinch to their mistakes and biatches at people who pointed out their wrongs, the more they will suffer, because they know deep inside that they are wrong, but they just can't let themselves be wrong, they have a face to save. The only thing left to do is insult anyone who make them realize how wrong they are, in an attempt to make themselves feel better.
How did this turn into a argument thread? did you not pay attention to what Donnie said in the movie when he fought the guy in his house, "it has nothing to do with style rather the person".
Also if u want to only stand-up facing multiple enemies the only option is Muay Thai, not retarded martial arts.
No it isn't, that's the problem. Muay Thai is the best option against unarmed assailants who don't have a large reach or weight advantage, but there are plenty of situations in which you'll need to deal with grapples and armed opponents in real fights which Muay Thai simply won't help you with. Even then, Krav Maga is better in the above situation, and in most fights in general.
On January 05 2009 10:20 Magibon wrote: How did this turn into a argument thread? did you not pay attention to what Donnie said in the movie when he fought the guy in his house, "it has nothing to do with style rather the person".
That's exactly what I tried to say in my other post
On January 05 2009 07:57 rei wrote: This one funny fact to consider, do you know what is the strongest muscle in a human body? MMA and all other forms of martial art competition prevent the usage of that muscle, in real fights human are allow to use that.(even Bruce lee said in an interview he would use that muscle if he had to in a real fight)
and please do not talk about what style is better than other style in a real fight, that serves no purpose. The "better" you are talking about is in the man, not in the "style" if you know what I am getting at.
Just because all your narrow eyes see are Fedor domination in MMA doesn't mean that there isn't an Vietnam vet somewhere that can kill him in a split second in a real fight. A chinese saying: "There is always a higher mountain elsewhere."
I agree with baal that styles are all use to achieve the same end, but i do not agree with the "useless" part, the arts you see in martial art demonstrations or daily practices are used to build up different muscles in strength, as well as timing of the move (ever heard of "shadow boxing"?)
Back in the days people do not have modern equipments to train a specific muscle in order preform a move better, so they rely on doing that move over and over so that same muscle can build up over time. (The hardest muscles to train are the Smooth muscle aka involuntary muscle)
Do you know there are many many moves in jujitsu that they are not allow to preform in MMA? just like many many moves in mui tai that would deal legal damage in merely one hit. In real fight they aim for 1 hit kill, there is no ground and pound, Fador would kill the guy in a second instead of riding him for 10 minutes.
How is BAAL wrong? The defense you guys use is "thousands of years of culture" which is suppose to mean what?
Are there any visual evidence of these stunning martial artists and their feats against competent fighters? Cause there is with MMA...
I thought we were talking about fighting, no need to bring up that MA is a way of life crap.
L - surprised no one had brought up Krav Maga until now.
ps. Before anyone spaz, I mean this as an honest inquiry. I thought Baal was making a point of saying that MMA would be more effective in a fight than many of the old martial arts. Somehow that point seems to have shifted to include other considerations.
On January 05 2009 09:24 baal wrote: the fact is that most martial arts are plain inefficient and MMA has proved that over and over and over.
Your logic is wrong, your "fact" can only support Most martial arts are plain ineffecient in MMA with MMA rules, and MMA has proved that over and over and over again.
read my post in the last page see and give me a reply plz.
Nobody in this thread is arguing that MMA fighters can beat Martial artists. I don't see how you can misunderstand this. We're arguing that throwing out martial arts as a whole is a fucking idiotic thing to say. At least that's what I'm arguing. You're calling martial art useless because it sucks in MMA.
thats actually a pretty valid point like, i always think its "funny" when people claim that "lol fedor would get raped by a real kung fu fighter they're just not allowed to fight in MMA cuz they kill their opponents" cause it's obviously an ignorant claim to make
but it's really annoying when people dismiss more traditional martial arts because they "dont make you as great of a fighter" as mixed martial arts training does; this is hardly the sole, or even main purpose of traditional martial arts.
^Rei: You raise a good point; somehow I missed that post.
Still, it would be nice to actually see some of these martial artists. Rei, you must admit, the idea of some vietnam vet killing a competent fighter in a split second is lol. All we have is conjecture
FzeroXx - Obviously MA is about more than fighting. However, I was just looking for a comparison of the fighting component.
Drone, I honestly didn't get that latter vibe from baal's posts, they are just stating that traditional vs. mixed martial arts, the mixed wins in a fight of competent masters of each. He wasn't saying anything about the spiritual or philosophic aspects of martial arts being trash (except the one post about reading a book instead, but this still acknowledges the presence of these aspects). It was a purely physical comparison. People started getting defensive about how he wasn't addressing the wider picture of martial arts, which clearly wasn't his purpose.
BJJ is good for 1 on 1 defense and incapacitation imo. Of course, on trained practitioners it would be very difficult, but to average people who don't practice bjj it would be pretty easy to choke them out. But for fights against multiple opponents... well... that's just unfair, seriously. But I would have to say a more brute martial art would work better against multiple opponents. Like boxing or muay thai or krav maga. I also heard that taekwondo is useful against multiple opponents, but who knows...
anyone know how to get subtitles to work on GOM Player? my WMP plays the movie super quiet (even on max everything is barely audible)
edit: I tried the Alt+E to open the subtitle screen but it loads and stuff but I still don't see any subtitles... and why is it in Mandarin in the first place? If it was in canto I wouldn't need subtitles... (all 3 audio tracks are mando)
On January 05 2009 09:14 baal wrote: Depends how do you judge the muscle strenght, if its for applied pressure then it is the jaw muscle, about sheer power is the Quadricepts.
You know absolutely nothing about fighting, there are better styles you idiot, its not the man also the style, why do you see hundreds of fighters using Muay Thai in MMA and not a single one using WuShu?, coincidence?
Id like to know those Jiujitsu moves not allowed in MMA, because past UFC (and current asosiation like RioHeroes) had pretty much only 2 rules:
1.- No biting 2.- No eye gouging.
They even allowed groin punches/kicks.
I can see your ignorance about fighting because you are the clasical dumb kid who believes in martial art movies and the " 1 hit kill " there is no such thing you moron, you sure could punch an untrained person in the chest and break his spleen.
Also its a retarded concept if its a fight to death ur goal is to knock them out, becaus as soon as they are out you can just stomp them to death, or to just break an arm or a join, because they are as good as dead.
There is no Vietnam vet who will kill fedor in a split of a second ROFL what int he fuck haha.
I didn't even read this until now, poor baal, you got owned man, saying all those to insult me doesn't save you from that fact that your entire argument is brought down in one sentence. I'm not saying I know a lot about martial art or fighting, all i am saying is that you are wrong in logic.
On January 05 2009 09:24 baal wrote: the fact is that most martial arts are plain inefficient and MMA has proved that over and over and over.
Your logic is wrong, your "fact" can only support Most martial arts are plain ineffecient in MMA with MMA rules, and MMA has proved that over and over and over again.
read my post in the last page see and give me a reply plz.
ouch Baal, what now? more insults coming my way? I can taste it already boy.
while the trailers look awesome, i'm afraid it's gonna be like fearless/hero, or big budgeted action flicks with shitty story/acting/direction but awesome fight scenes. The mandarin dub already sounds awkward as hell. Should get Ang Lee to direct every martial arts movie imo.
It would be fairly stupid IMO to put together a great drama and intersperse it with fight scenes. You either have a good drama or a good kung fu movie. Combining them doesn't work.
On January 05 2009 08:52 fanatacist wrote: Thanks for the informative post baal. What do you think of Bruce Lee's fighting style? It's a mix of other martial arts, so it shouldn't have the specific weaknesses of only taekwando or kung fu, etc. Also, I think the strength of the user should be considered in the fact that to perform certain techniques that make say JJ > kung fu (arbitrary example) would be impossible due to the level of mastery of the kung fu user. Is this somewhat true? I'm not knowledgeable about the details of trained fighting so I'm just wondering.
Could current fighters take down Bruce Lee?
Bruce Lee was definitelly walking the right path and you could see he was one of the fathers of MMA.
He actually tried to get rid of all the martial arts "bullshit" and created Jun Fan Jee Kune Do.
Bruce Lee actually said that the perform of Katas and forms were like trying to learn how to swim in dry land, and he even trained some grappling techniques for the ground.
So Bruce Lee is actually a mixed martial artist, however since he were raised in them and he had no one to really compete against in a sport-like envirmoent like current MMA, he didnt develop the exact right techniques, he over emphatized the importance of speed and still used old and useless stands and techniques.
On your question about Bruce Lee competing in modern MMA, well the "old" Lee, lets say you revive him with no new training, he would be a competent fighter in his weight class, he would be definitely beating by the top fighters in his weight class tho.
If u revive Lee and let him train with a modern MMA concept he would probably be champion of his weight class in a short time.
He would get absolutely destroyed regardless of any kind of training in higher weight classes like light heavy weight or heavy weight on current MMA, the weight difference is just simply too big.
I see, another great post. Thanks!
What do you mean the over-emphasis of speed? I figured that that would be his strength in competing against current MMA fighters, seeing as he had some record-breaking fighting speeds (straight jab from resting, I believe). Are you saying that it's too much of a power sacrifice? Wouldn't speed help him land more hits and counter the opponent better? Please elaborate if you have the time.
Also I read in another one of your posts about the vs. 4 guys of the same weight as you. Is there any form of martial art or fighting style that is specifically designed or is just significantly better for fighting vs. multiple targets? I'm assuming that styles that are based heavily on grappling are weaker than pure standing fighting techniques, but I may be wrong. I'd like to hear your take on this [:
EDIT: Also, why is that style better than others? Thanks n_n
The punching technique used by Bruce Lee was ineficient, it was based in Kung Fu.
We can say that the "perfect punching technique" is boxing, i dont think any smart person will deny that, its a COMPETITIVE SPORT that has been over a century evolving, the hooks, the jabs the uppercuts etc, none of them resemble a Bruce Lee or martial art punch
let me give u a silly example, punching like this, witht he fist in that position thumb pointing to the sky:
That is an absolutely wrong way to punch, you cannot project as much strenght as if you punch correctly like they do in Box, you will never see a boxer throwing this kind of punches.
Also his punches carry no body weight into them, they are quick movements almost whip like the knock out power of these for obvious reasons is very low, they carry no weight compared to a full hook where you twist your entire body and all your mass is on the punch.
im really going unnecesarely "deep" here, the thing is, Bruce Lee tried to evolve martial arts into real fighting (MMA), he is one of the fathers of MMA, he obviously lacks the understanding of true fighting we have today.
On January 05 2009 09:24 baal wrote: the fact is that most martial arts are plain inefficient and MMA has proved that over and over and over.
Your logic is wrong, your "fact" can only support Most martial arts are plain ineffecient in MMA with MMA rules, and MMA has proved that over and over and over again.
read my post in the last page see and give me a reply plz.
and what are the difference between a street fight and MMA ? as i mentioned earlier basically:
- No biting - No eye gouging
Which indeed are very very poweful weapons, however i dont see many martial arts teaching biting and eye gouging techniques (a real self defense technique should).
So please tell me an scenario where a martial artist is better suited for a fight than a MMA fighter.
On January 05 2009 07:23 FzeroXx wrote: Honestly who gives a shit how practical they are? Learning martial arts isn't about being able to beat up other professional fighters in duels. I'll get out my gun and kill you if I want to beat you. Martial arts is a system of training mind/body. MMA is one of the most useless things to come out of western culture in the last 100 years.
You stupid ignorant moron, first of all MMA came from the EASTERN culture for example Pride.
Training mind and body? what a load of bullshit, then go to the gym, work the body in a better way and read a book.
Is it true that training your body in the gym is not the same as through martial arts training (in terms of increasing fighting capabilities) because it trains muscles that are not necessarily used in practical combat? Once again I am going on minimal knowledge and assumption.
like what muslces you dont train in MMA??
cuz they seem pretty well built imo
I meant in the gym, not in MMA. Like if you are doing benchpresses it won't necessarily enhance your fighting capability as well as you would if you were doing MMA/traditional martial arts training. Is this true/logical?
well yeah in the gym u loose flexibility etc.
but if its about the body and mind, then training gymnastics and reading Kafka is much better than any martial art.
On January 05 2009 07:23 FzeroXx wrote: Honestly who gives a shit how practical they are? Learning martial arts isn't about being able to beat up other professional fighters in duels. I'll get out my gun and kill you if I want to beat you. Martial arts is a system of training mind/body. MMA is one of the most useless things to come out of western culture in the last 100 years.
I was about to say the same, if my goal is to "beat" you I'm just gonna shoot you in the head...lol
Martial arts are not only about how to best brutalize an individual in a fight for TV
And christ listening to Baal is fucking irritating, he calls everyone a faggot and an idiot constantly
I think if I knew him in real life iId find it hard NOT to shoot him in the face
Yes carring a gun is an effective method of self defense, however its very inconveniant and it usually causes unncesary death etc.
If somebody gets drunk and takes a swing at me i rather KO him than blow hims brains out.
Also if u want to only stand-up facing multiple enemies the only option is Muay Thai, not retarded martial arts.
No it isn't, that's the problem. Muay Thai is the best option against unarmed assailants who don't have a large reach or weight advantage, but there are plenty of situations in which you'll need to deal with grapples and armed opponents in real fights which Muay Thai simply won't help you with. Even then, Krav Maga is better in the above situation, and in most fights in general.
Krav Magra is indeed decent, its a practical fighting style so i shouldnt be against me.
Agreed Muay Thai is not the best aginst armed oponents, against a single armed oponent probably BJJ is the best.
However lets get real... against MULTIPLE oponents who also got ARMS, you are fucked dude, do you seriously think you can beat up 5 guys each one with a baseball bat? you are going to get mauled to death no matter what you do.
Anybody with a brain would ralize that, unless u are a retarded fanboy that thinks on godly Bruce Lee or somthing taht can beat 30 armed guys, sorry but that wont happen.
On January 05 2009 10:48 Liquid`Drone wrote: thats actually a pretty valid point like, i always think its "funny" when people claim that "lol fedor would get raped by a real kung fu fighter they're just not allowed to fight in MMA cuz they kill their opponents" cause it's obviously an ignorant claim to make
but it's really annoying when people dismiss more traditional martial arts because they "dont make you as great of a fighter" as mixed martial arts training does; this is hardly the sole, or even main purpose of traditional martial arts.
First of all i know all these guys will claim bullshit but i studied TaeKwonDo for 6 years as i mentiond earlier i am a black belt and you know what? i feel robbed, why?....
Well because a guy who trains 3 months of BJJ is going to absolutely destroy me in a fight, i "lost" 6 months of my life doing retarded forms, breaking wood etc.
Also many people are not familiar with the bullshit of martial art, let me put this example:
In TaeKwondo theres this kick, (i dont remember the name it was many years ago) where you swing your leg (withouth hitting) the highest you can, and then you "pull" it in an axe movement like.
What in the fuck!!!?!?! that is the biggest oxymoron ive seen as a kick, the force of that kick is stupid, it is ridiculously weak, also the slowest kick and the one you are going to get your leg caught very often.
That is why im absolutely against stupid traditional martial arts, some guy is going to try that kick on a street thug and he is going to get his ass handed to him because idiotic TaeKwonDo didnt teach him proper self defense.
Also the "spirituality" of Martial Arts is crap ffs, i studied 6 years and never came across anything relevant, read Kafka in a couple of weeks and that has 9283479 times more insights than martial arts.
So basically, train MMA and read books, you will train your body and mind and also you wont get your ass destroyed by a semi-decent fighter as u would by learning retarded martial arts.
On January 05 2009 09:24 baal wrote: the fact is that most martial arts are plain inefficient and MMA has proved that over and over and over.
Your logic is wrong, your "fact" can only support Most martial arts are plain ineffecient in MMA with MMA rules, and MMA has proved that over and over and over again.
read my post in the last page see and give me a reply plz.
and what are the difference between a street fight and MMA ? as i mentioned earlier basically:
- No biting - No eye gouging
Which indeed are very very poweful weapons, however i dont see many martial arts teaching biting and eye gouging techniques (a real self defense technique should).
So please tell me an scenario where a martial artist is better suited for a fight than a MMA fighter.
How is that even remotely relevant to defend your false logic? You made a claim, I owned your argument by pointing out your illogical conclusion.
Tell me how you can savage
On January 05 2009 09:24 baal wrote: the fact is that most martial arts are plain inefficient and MMA has proved that over and over and over.
you have no credibility if you can't even defend your own logic and yet run your mouth about Mr. Baal knows it all.
Just downloaded it; the movie didn't sync up well for me; I can here the sounds a split second before the actual fighting. Can anybody tell me how to fix this & thanks.
On January 05 2009 14:27 Athos wrote: Just downloaded it; the movie didn't sync up well for me; I can here the sounds a split second before the actual fighting. Can anybody tell me how to fix this & thanks.
I had the same problem but only in full-screen on DivX.
On January 05 2009 14:27 Athos wrote: Just downloaded it; the movie didn't sync up well for me; I can here the sounds a split second before the actual fighting. Can anybody tell me how to fix this & thanks.
you can manually delay or enhance the audio sync using vlc, its in audio options, advanced
Martial arts ceased to be an effective real life hand to hand combat training long time ago. It is very hard to argue that any kung fu or karate or anything from Asia with the exception of Muay Thai to be an effective.
This is not surprising given the training and science available to fighters today. However, kungfu and other eastern arts have also evolved. Take a look at Sanda for example, a real combat tool developed for Chinese army. No karate or taekwondo or Wushu fighters last 30 secs against that... but that is also not surprising.
Even Chinese say that Wushu have become a dance show now days. It is still useful as a tradition and a way to physical improve oneself but one should not confuse it with serious close combat fighting.
On January 05 2009 14:27 Athos wrote: Just downloaded it; the movie didn't sync up well for me; I can here the sounds a split second before the actual fighting. Can anybody tell me how to fix this & thanks.
you can manually delay or enhance the audio sync using vlc, its in audio options, advanced
On January 05 2009 14:27 Athos wrote: Just downloaded it; the movie didn't sync up well for me; I can here the sounds a split second before the actual fighting. Can anybody tell me how to fix this & thanks.
you can manually delay or enhance the audio sync using vlc, its in audio options, advanced
Thanks guys for all your help. That was a lot better than I thought it would be. At first I was like...this is a light-hearted kids movie but then the tone suddenly shifted into a serious confrontation between the Chinese and the Japanese. Pretty well done overall, it's almost like the Japanese are the new Nazi's now.............Wait a minute...............
On January 05 2009 20:10 intrigue wrote: i just watched it, found it quite enjoyable. fun! i hear there'll be a sequel too, and i'll be watching that one too.
sequel?? how??
they get liberated from the japanese after that incident..
guess he culd jus keep fighting against randoms but that'll be lame..
On January 05 2009 09:24 baal wrote: the fact is that most martial arts are plain inefficient and MMA has proved that over and over and over.
Your logic is wrong, your "fact" can only support Most martial arts are plain ineffecient in MMA with MMA rules, and MMA has proved that over and over and over again.
read my post in the last page see and give me a reply plz.
and what are the difference between a street fight and MMA ? as i mentioned earlier basically:
- No biting - No eye gouging
Which indeed are very very poweful weapons, however i dont see many martial arts teaching biting and eye gouging techniques (a real self defense technique should).
So please tell me an scenario where a martial artist is better suited for a fight than a MMA fighter.
How is that even remotely relevant to defend your false logic? You made a claim, I owned your argument by pointing out your illogical conclusion.
On January 05 2009 09:24 baal wrote: the fact is that most martial arts are plain inefficient and MMA has proved that over and over and over.
you have no credibility if you can't even defend your own logic and yet run your mouth about Mr. Baal knows it all.
I think Baal is saying that what we (or a lot of people in the U.S.) see now as "traditional" martial arts (kung-fu, karate, tae kwon do) doesn't seem to be very practical in actual fight situations. If you argue thats not the main point of these martial arts, baal is saying then that you can get the same effects of confidence building, discipline, mind, etc by doing other things without the false sense of security that you can actually fight.
BTW, i think muay thai is hella traditional, even though its not seen as it. I mean the wai kru dance they do is all based on tradition.
I was a bit disappointed with the movie actually. I was expecting another "fist of legend" caliber fighting. It was still good, just not as epic yet as old kung fu movies. (Donnie rocked in Iron Monkey haha)
baal, everyone knows taekwondo is an inefficient martial art. However, this doesnt mean everything else is inefficient. Best MMA fighters did stick to a specific martial art for years, even though they list a bunch of. They add the important elements of other styles in later on, only to match the MMA rules and be prepared for something their style lacks. And yes, MMA has rules besides biting, thus its not the "ultimate fighting". If you think MMA represents best worlds fighters, youre fucking wrong. Explaining this might take weeks, but i know for a fact that MANY people capable of defeating MMA top performers wont even take part in it. Theres many people like Klichko, Shakuta who wont even be interested in doing it. Top worlds wrestlers would destroy 2/3 of the MMA hands down. Theres just so much more outside this semi-staged show, just keep your eyes open.
movie looks awesome, definitely going to check it out
On January 07 2009 12:32 food wrote: baal, everyone knows taekwondo is an inefficient martial art. However, this doesnt mean everything else is inefficient. Best MMA fighters did stick to a specific martial art for years, even though they list a bunch of. They add the important elements of other styles in later on, only to match the MMA rules and be prepared for something their style lacks. And yes, MMA has rules besides biting, thus its not the "ultimate fighting". If you think MMA represents best worlds fighters, youre fucking wrong. Explaining this might take weeks, but i know for a fact that MANY people capable of defeating MMA top performers wont even take part in it. Theres many people like Klichko, Shakuta who wont even be interested in doing it. Top worlds wrestlers would destroy 2/3 of the MMA hands down. Theres just so much more outside this semi-staged show, just keep your eyes open.
movie looks awesome, definitely going to check it out
LOL you are retarded seriously why do you post when u have no idea whatsoever what you are talking about.
you are not talking about MMA, you are talking about UFC; there are many MMA asociations with virtually no rules (except obv no biting and eyes) like RIOHEROES, they fight bare handed like they did in early UFC.
Klichko? are you serious? a boxer with barely any experience in a cage, lol yeah i want to see him fight on the ground lol.
Top wrestlers? MMA has many olypmic and national champions in wrestling like Randy Cotoure, Fedor (4 times consecutive world champ of Sambo) etc etc etc.
Semi-staged? how is it semi staged you moron?
Actualy Klichko himself adviced Floy Mayweather (37-0) considered by many the best boxer of all time NOT TO FIGHT IN MMA or he would get seriously injured:
IBF heavyweight champion Wladimir Klitschko is against Floyd Mayweather Jr's possible entrance into the world of mixed-martial-arts. As quoted in a recent ESPN interview by writer Michael David Smith, Klitschko is afraid that Mayweather will get seriously hurt if he decides to follow through with his plans for a mixed-martial-arts debut.
"Please, Floyd, don't do it," Klitschko said. "I think he'd get hurt. There are so many difficulties from changing one sport you've been doing for a long time and swithcing to something else. ... I wish he'd stick with boxing."
On January 07 2009 12:32 food wrote: baal, everyone knows taekwondo is an inefficient martial art. However, this doesnt mean everything else is inefficient. Best MMA fighters did stick to a specific martial art for years, even though they list a bunch of. They add the important elements of other styles in later on, only to match the MMA rules and be prepared for something their style lacks. And yes, MMA has rules besides biting, thus its not the "ultimate fighting". If you think MMA represents best worlds fighters, youre fucking wrong. Explaining this might take weeks, but i know for a fact that MANY people capable of defeating MMA top performers wont even take part in it. Theres many people like Klichko, Shakuta who wont even be interested in doing it. Top worlds wrestlers would destroy 2/3 of the MMA hands down. Theres just so much more outside this semi-staged show, just keep your eyes open.
movie looks awesome, definitely going to check it out
LOL you are retarded seriously why do you post when u have no idea whatsoever what you are talking about.
you are not talking about MMA, you are talking about UFC; there are many MMA asociations with virtually no rules (except obv no biting and eyes) like RIOHEROES, they fight bare handed like they did in early UFC.
Klichko? are you serious? a boxer with barely any experience in a cage, lol yeah i want to see him fight on the ground lol.
Top wrestlers? MMA has many olypmic and national champions in wrestling like Randy Cotoure, Fedor (4 times consecutive world champ of Sambo) etc etc etc.
Semi-staged? how is it semi staged you moron?
Actualy Klichko himself adviced Floy Mayweather (37-0) considered by many the best boxer of all time NOT TO FIGHT IN MMA or he would get seriously injured:
IBF heavyweight champion Wladimir Klitschko is against Floyd Mayweather Jr's possible entrance into the world of mixed-martial-arts. As quoted in a recent ESPN interview by writer Michael David Smith, Klitschko is afraid that Mayweather will get seriously hurt if he decides to follow through with his plans for a mixed-martial-arts debut.
"Please, Floyd, don't do it," Klitschko said. "I think he'd get hurt. There are so many difficulties from changing one sport you've been doing for a long time and swithcing to something else. ... I wish he'd stick with boxing."
owned?
as you know, they Klitchko brothers so while one of them was focusing entirely on boxing, another one won couple kickboxing competitions. You didnt know that why type "owned" actually i can use it now but i wont i liked the part about wrestling, some unknown people who noone heard of before especially couture cracks me up, hes one hell of a clown u typed etc etc etc like theres anything behind those words, hate to say it, ure full of shit. Name couple known people in wrestling world who went into MMA besides "fedor" isnt it funny "fedor" dominating in it? he was indeed pro sambo, i didnt say theres NONE involved. He wouldnt stand a chance vs someone like Karelin( throwing this one out since im not familiar with current champs), it would in fact be laughable if he challenged him( it never wouldve happened, since he was in classic wrestling) actually out of pure interest i just looked up couture bio, he never won anything. He was a garbage wrestler, state champion and got somethign in olympic trials? haha well baal, you know a lot indeed. I apologize for the language, this was your response, exact same wording you didnt get "owned", you just didnt know enough thats no problem
edit: and dont mention gracies, they were good as fuck and owned UFC, no surprise they quit the circus and who says Mayweather wouldnt be successful? he would sweep whole fucking top 20 list maybe besides 2-3 people
I loved the choreography, it was very good, and the wing chun moves were very authentic.
BUT I feel it was very, very racist against Japanese, implying that they would never be able to master the superior Chiense martial arts because they're hardwired to be assholes.
Response to FOOD, placed in spoiler to avoid excessive thread derailing. + Show Spoiler +
You know, I've lurked TL.net since the day it was made and I hardly ever post, but the ignorance in food's post has provoked a response out of me, despite my strong belief that I'm merely feeding a troll.
Food, top MMA competitors dominate because they excel at the myriad of dimensions that comprise the sport of Mixed Martial Arts. Anyone who lacks well-roundedness will be unsuccessful, no matter how great their mastery of a specific, one-dimensional combat art might be. Since you asked for examples, I provide them.
Wrestling
Kevin Jackson Jackson won a gold medal in Freestyle wrestling at the 1992 Summer Olympics. He has an MMA record of 4-2, including a 16 second loss to Frank Shamrock by armbar. Hardly consituttes blowing away the competition of the time. His wins are all by submission, indicating some level of cross-training in any case, so he's not even a pure wrestler.
Rulon Gardner Gold medalist at the 2000 Summer Games, defeating Alexander Karelin. Gardner quit MMA after one fight (which he won), because he disliked being hit in the face - which wrestling in no way prepares one for.
Judo
There have been several elite judoka, including Olympic and world champions, that have competed in MMA. By and large, none of them have accomplished any great success against top competition. Naoya Ogawa, Hidehiko Yoshida and Pawel Nastula all have judo world championships and olympic medals to their credit. None have beaten top competition in MMA or held a major title.
Kickboxing
Numerous elite strikers have competed under MMA rules. Examples include:
Mirko 'Crocop' Filipovic Mirko is the most succesful fighter to transition from kickboxing to MMA. Whilst his rapid accumulation of take-down and submission defense elevated Cro Cop to the upper echelons of MMA, he has lost to most top 10 heavyweights he has fought, and never captured a major title.
Mark Hunt Probably the second most well-known K-1-cum-MMA competitor behind Cro Cop. K-1 World Grand Prix 2001 and multiple time World GP finalist. In MMA, has a record of 5-5, losing all fights he had against notable competition bar a ludicrous gift decision against Wanderlei Silva. Has been submitted in the first round multiple times.
Badr Hari One of the top dogs in K-1 currently, former K-1 heavyweight champion. MMA record is 0-1, lost to some fighter I've never heard of - by forearm choke, in 22 seconds.
BJJ/Gracie Jiu-Jistu Despite your claims, many, many of the Gracie clan remain active competitors in the world of MMA, with several having fought in the last twelve months - in fact too many for me to bother attempting to list. None of them are or will be top contenders, with the possible exception of Roger Gracie, who, given time to develop a more well-rounded skillset remains a potential heavyweight prospect. Not since the early days of the UFC has a 'pure' BJJ/GJJ fighter been able to sit atop the MMA world without rounding out their striking and wrestling skills. The only possible exception I can think of is Masakazu Imanari, who has had quite a lot of success at 145lb and below as pretty much a pure submission artist, but he has yet to be tested against the top names at those weights and has lost to more well-rounded fighters in the past.
Conclusion No-one who focuses exclusively or even predominantly in one particular, limited combat sport has had any significant or lasting success against mixed martial artists who do. Yes there are athletes outside the MMA world who - if they had or would focus on a sophisticated regime of cross-training - potential would or could have become better MMA fighters than the current crop of UFC / Dream / WVR / Shooto etc competitors. But not without training in a manner fundamentally identical to the manner that those fighters do. Fedor is the best because he is highly skilled in the three major components of MMA: striking, wrestling and ground-work, and weaves them together so well. No athlete coming from a pure one-dimensional art is going to pose anything other than a fluke threat to him, or to any other top MMA competitor.
On topic: The trailer for Ip Man looks good, can’t wait to check it out! Hope it's released in Aus, or is otherwise available with English subs.
On January 07 2009 23:49 MassArbiterFTW wrote: Response to FOOD, placed in spoiler to avoid excessive thread derailing. + Show Spoiler +
You know, I've lurked TL.net since the day it was made and I hardly ever post, but the ignorance in food's post has provoked a response out of me, despite my strong belief that I'm merely feeding a troll.
Food, top MMA competitors dominate because they excel at the myriad of dimensions that comprise the sport of Mixed Martial Arts. Anyone who lacks well-roundedness will be unsuccessful, no matter how great their mastery of a specific, one-dimensional combat art might be. Since you asked for examples, I provide them.
Wrestling
Kevin Jackson Jackson won a gold medal in Freestyle wrestling at the 1992 Summer Olympics. He has an MMA record of 4-2, including a 16 second loss to Frank Shamrock by armbar. Hardly consituttes blowing away the competition of the time. His wins are all by submission, indicating some level of cross-training in any case, so he's not even a pure wrestler.
Rulon Gardner Gold medalist at the 2000 Summer Games, defeating Alexander Karelin. Gardner quit MMA after one fight (which he won), because he disliked being hit in the face - which wrestling in no way prepares one for.
Judo
There have been several elite judoka, including Olympic and world champions, that have competed in MMA. By and large, none of them have accomplished any great success against top competition. Naoya Ogawa, Hidehiko Yoshida and Pawel Nastula all have judo world championships and olympic medals to their credit. None have beaten top competition in MMA or held a major title.
Kickboxing
Numerous elite strikers have competed under MMA rules. Examples include:
Mirko 'Crocop' Filipovic Mirko is the most succesful fighter to transition from kickboxing to MMA. Whilst his rapid accumulation of take-down and submission defense elevated Cro Cop to the upper echelons of MMA, he has lost to most top 10 heavyweights he has fought, and never captured a major title.
Mark Hunt Probably the second most well-known K-1-cum-MMA competitor behind Cro Cop. K-1 World Grand Prix 2001 and multiple time World GP finalist. In MMA, has a record of 5-5, losing all fights he had against notable competition bar a ludicrous gift decision against Wanderlei Silva. Has been submitted in the first round multiple times.
Badr Hari One of the top dogs in K-1 currently, former K-1 heavyweight champion. MMA record is 0-1, lost to some fighter I've never heard of - by forearm choke, in 22 seconds.
BJJ/Gracie Jiu-Jistu Despite your claims, many, many of the Gracie clan remain active competitors in the world of MMA, with several having fought in the last twelve months - in fact too many for me to bother attempting to list. None of them are or will be top contenders, with the possible exception of Roger Gracie, who, given time to develop a more well-rounded skillset remains a potential heavyweight prospect. Not since the early days of the UFC has a 'pure' BJJ/GJJ fighter been able to sit atop the MMA world without rounding out their striking and wrestling skills. The only possible exception I can think of is Masakazu Imanari, who has had quite a lot of success at 145lb and below as pretty much a pure submission artist, but he has yet to be tested against the top names at those weights and has lost to more well-rounded fighters in the past.
Conclusion No-one who focuses exclusively or even predominantly in one particular, limited combat sport has had any significant or lasting success against mixed martial artists who do. Yes there are athletes outside the MMA world who - if they had or would focus on a sophisticated regime of cross-training - potential would or could have become better MMA fighters than the current crop of UFC / Dream / WVR / Shooto etc competitors. But not without training in a manner fundamentally identical to the manner that those fighters do. Fedor is the best because he is highly skilled in the three major components of MMA: striking, wrestling and ground-work, and weaves them together so well. No athlete coming from a pure one-dimensional art is going to pose anything other than a fluke threat to him, or to any other top MMA competitor.
On topic: The trailer for Ip Man looks good, can’t wait to check it out! Hope it's released in Aus, or is otherwise available with English subs.
I appreciate you singling out my post out of a debate started by baal, made a lot of sense calling me a troll regarding this now pay attention. How many fighters are there in MMA world? thousands. How many pro wrestlers did you find, trembling in a lame attempt to prove your shitty point and insult me? Two. How many of them respected names in wrestling? I remember Gardner beating Karelin, that was big at that time. Its funny thought you bring this up, he won his only fight in MMA, so how did my argument fail? its like the only examples you got actually support my point completely. Then its Kevin Jackson, 5.10 guy who was like 35 when he lost, one olympic medal, thats all he ever did. And he lost to an armbar? How hilarious is that. So thats it? TWO fucking wrestlers out of thousands and thousands "fighters"? And they not even unsuccessful? What did u point out haha why all the kickboxers? wtf that aint even a serious "martial art", i said myself that Klitchko took part in a competition and won it. Its like you have to post the only things you can find no matter if they relevant or not LOL about gracies, i meant them quitting UFC, obviously talking about the ones that made names in jiu jitsu world, i dont care which ones in the "family" try what and where nowadays, its irrelevant, chances are they not even good I loved the conclusion, which had no connection whatsoever with the post itself. Only "well rounded" "fighters" can succeed at MMA. And then you name fedor, who came out of sambo exclusively. Hahhaha. You have to use different elements to win, cuz you get in these situations where you have to. But he ultimately is a fucking sambo specialist, not some clown that took "MMA training". Style takes years to develop, if someone wants to learn to fight in a fucking cage, he might attend "MMA school", but he will achieve nothing above people who were specialists in their field so make it somewhat logical atleast, your post sucked and all your googling added up to poor 2-4 things that you scraped up out of all the MMA history. Embarrassing you even tried.
Baal's debate taught me a lesson, whether you are right or wrong, you need not to be condescending toward each other. Go make an MMA tread and go to town with it, this is a movie,
like myself many people are offended by baal when he bashed Martial arts other than the ones they use in MMA. I'm Chinese, I am well educated in Chinese version of history in China. When someone trash my national hero, of course I feel anger, it's a natural reaction. But all you really need to do is point out the logical mistakes like I did, there is no need to be condescending.
I was warn by plexa in my heated debate with baal that i was being too condescending, which i am totally agree. and I have already apologized to Baal via pm.
Right or wrong, give each other respect, even enemies that are fighting a war against each other gives each other respect why shouldn't we?
We should acknowledge that Baal is right about MMA, Kickboxing welting and bjj are favored under rules of MMA.
and Baal you should also acknowledge history, even if you don't belief martial art from China is useful in the modern age, traditional martial arts(any form of combat skill, eastern and western) have been used world wide as the only means of defense until guns came along, nothing you can say is going to erase this historical fact
let's be honest with ourselves, we are bunch of people who don't have a good understand of the arts of combat, we are talking about something we see and we read about, not something we do everyday for a living. And if one of you do this for a living you won't be debating with us, it would be a serious waste of your time trying to enlighten some one over the internet, because you understand that whatever you say would not matter in their minds without proving to them that you are the authority.
Let us just drop this whole thing in this thread, this is a thread about Ip Man the movie, not about MMA > Chinese national hero. Make your own thread if you insist in debating this.
Plexa will seriously start banning, even I get a warning considering i'm one of the first members of TL.net. So drop it and be civilized
Ill end my thoughts on the fact that while kungfu/karate/tkd/etc fight have been effective/badass likes rei states in history maybe, i think nowadays its been too mass commercialized and watered down. Thats why a lot of people think its ineffective.
I mean shit, in Ip-man you had people challenging dojo masters left and right, sparred each other all the time. A lot of places don't fight, they do katas, hold snazzy looking demonstrations, break thin boards, etc. And unfortunately, this happens more often in the 'traditional' martial arts than in muay thai/mma ones (my opinion)
I started this thread to inform you guys of a great action movie, I did not intent this to be a debate/argument to whether kungfu, martial arts is superior/infrior to MMA and all that jazz. Start another thread if you want to debate superiority, I thought thread trolling is bannable, post count shouldn't matter in this case.
On January 08 2009 04:02 ilovehnk wrote: I started this thread to inform you guys of a great action movie, I did not intent this to be a debate/argument to whether kungfu, martial arts is superior/infrior to MMA and all that jazz. Start another thread if you want to debate superiority, I thought thread trolling is bannable, post count shouldn't matter in this case.
Me and Baal been around for a very long time, the admins give us a little more space than others.
According to Donnie Yen, this is the first part of the story arc. there are 2 more in coming.
The movie was ok. Lacked some deeper plot and major kickass (maybe 1-2 good fighting scenes there). I'll give it 6/10, you won't waste your time watching it but you won't be overly satisfied either. Good stuff to pass some time and forget about it.
thoughts of the movie, I watched it in Mandarin, no subs. (cant understand Jpn conversation) + Show Spoiler +
The movie began with Yeh owning a hot wife, grand house, and godly YunChun*. Just seems fucking too perfect, how did this happen? lol. KinSanShan* (the hillbilly from North) had a great fight in the beginning, but after the Japanese invaded, it was shitass for him to comeback. Should be fighting against the Japanese, instead of robbing the cotton factory and getting his/their ass kicked -_-
good thing he didnt died like HuaYuanCha (main char in Fearless), or else we wouldnt have Bruce Lee today.
On January 07 2009 23:49 MassArbiterFTW wrote: Response to FOOD, placed in spoiler to avoid excessive thread derailing. + Show Spoiler +
You know, I've lurked TL.net since the day it was made and I hardly ever post, but the ignorance in food's post has provoked a response out of me, despite my strong belief that I'm merely feeding a troll.
Food, top MMA competitors dominate because they excel at the myriad of dimensions that comprise the sport of Mixed Martial Arts. Anyone who lacks well-roundedness will be unsuccessful, no matter how great their mastery of a specific, one-dimensional combat art might be. Since you asked for examples, I provide them.
Wrestling
Kevin Jackson Jackson won a gold medal in Freestyle wrestling at the 1992 Summer Olympics. He has an MMA record of 4-2, including a 16 second loss to Frank Shamrock by armbar. Hardly consituttes blowing away the competition of the time. His wins are all by submission, indicating some level of cross-training in any case, so he's not even a pure wrestler.
Rulon Gardner Gold medalist at the 2000 Summer Games, defeating Alexander Karelin. Gardner quit MMA after one fight (which he won), because he disliked being hit in the face - which wrestling in no way prepares one for.
Judo
There have been several elite judoka, including Olympic and world champions, that have competed in MMA. By and large, none of them have accomplished any great success against top competition. Naoya Ogawa, Hidehiko Yoshida and Pawel Nastula all have judo world championships and olympic medals to their credit. None have beaten top competition in MMA or held a major title.
Kickboxing
Numerous elite strikers have competed under MMA rules. Examples include:
Mirko 'Crocop' Filipovic Mirko is the most succesful fighter to transition from kickboxing to MMA. Whilst his rapid accumulation of take-down and submission defense elevated Cro Cop to the upper echelons of MMA, he has lost to most top 10 heavyweights he has fought, and never captured a major title.
Mark Hunt Probably the second most well-known K-1-cum-MMA competitor behind Cro Cop. K-1 World Grand Prix 2001 and multiple time World GP finalist. In MMA, has a record of 5-5, losing all fights he had against notable competition bar a ludicrous gift decision against Wanderlei Silva. Has been submitted in the first round multiple times.
Badr Hari One of the top dogs in K-1 currently, former K-1 heavyweight champion. MMA record is 0-1, lost to some fighter I've never heard of - by forearm choke, in 22 seconds.
BJJ/Gracie Jiu-Jistu Despite your claims, many, many of the Gracie clan remain active competitors in the world of MMA, with several having fought in the last twelve months - in fact too many for me to bother attempting to list. None of them are or will be top contenders, with the possible exception of Roger Gracie, who, given time to develop a more well-rounded skillset remains a potential heavyweight prospect. Not since the early days of the UFC has a 'pure' BJJ/GJJ fighter been able to sit atop the MMA world without rounding out their striking and wrestling skills. The only possible exception I can think of is Masakazu Imanari, who has had quite a lot of success at 145lb and below as pretty much a pure submission artist, but he has yet to be tested against the top names at those weights and has lost to more well-rounded fighters in the past.
Conclusion No-one who focuses exclusively or even predominantly in one particular, limited combat sport has had any significant or lasting success against mixed martial artists who do. Yes there are athletes outside the MMA world who - if they had or would focus on a sophisticated regime of cross-training - potential would or could have become better MMA fighters than the current crop of UFC / Dream / WVR / Shooto etc competitors. But not without training in a manner fundamentally identical to the manner that those fighters do. Fedor is the best because he is highly skilled in the three major components of MMA: striking, wrestling and ground-work, and weaves them together so well. No athlete coming from a pure one-dimensional art is going to pose anything other than a fluke threat to him, or to any other top MMA competitor.
On topic: The trailer for Ip Man looks good, can’t wait to check it out! Hope it's released in Aus, or is otherwise available with English subs.
Also don't want to derail the thread, but just wanted to comment that this was a great post. I know very little about fighting styles and fighters but this helped me learn a little something, thanks!
Saw the trailer, it looks very interesting. Will try to see it soon.
On January 08 2009 04:16 pokeyAA wrote: Who here saw flashpoint, another one of Donnie's movies? Story/acting wasn't too great, but damn the fighting scenes were awesome
On January 08 2009 06:50 anch wrote: thoughts of the movie, I watched it in Mandarin, no subs. (cant understand Jpn conversation) + Show Spoiler +
The movie began with Yeh owning a hot wife, grand house, and godly YunChun*. Just seems fucking too perfect, how did this happen? lol. KinSanShan* (the hillbilly from North) had a great fight in the beginning, but after the Japanese invaded, it was shitass for him to comeback. Should be fighting against the Japanese, instead of robbing the cotton factory and getting his/their ass kicked -_-
good thing he didnt died like HuaYuanCha (main char in Fearless), or else we wouldnt have Bruce Lee today.
during those times, if youre a sifu, you earn a lot of respect. with respect = people praise you = riches. no lie lol its like being a hero, but what they left out was that he was actually a police officer to begin with. ive done some research. maybe this was just a little bit later in his life:
plus, his family was wealthy and shit like that. thus he was wealthy himself. what wikipedia didnt note and the movie did was that, he wasnt one of those people that likedhaving a student or whatever but he did teach his friends and families. his wife knows kung fu, too.
On January 08 2009 08:18 gm.tOSS wrote: I really like the acting and character of Hiroyuki Ikeuchi, but I can't seem to find anything of ths stuff he starred in online - any1 knows?
As others have kindly pointed out we risk derailing the thread so this will be my last post on the topic @food + Show Spoiler +
On January 08 2009 02:01 food wrote: What did u point out haha
Your argument, as I understood it, was that various individuals who were succesful in specific combat sports would dominate top MMA competitors. I provided you with a multitude of examples that I feel disproved that contention. Olympic gold medalists and world champions in various combat sports - ie people who were at the very top of those sports - have routinely failed to defeat top MMA fighters in MMA bouts. I picked several examples that were known to me. Of course I did not give you thousands, because there are not thousands of olympic and world champions competing in MMA. I chose the most accomplished wrestlers/judoka/kickboxers that I could think of because they best prove my point - none of them dominated the MMA world with their original skillset alone, despite their accomplishments in their respective arts.
And actually another wrestler that I have seen fight escaped me, likely because it was such a forgettable fight: Karam Ibrahim, 2004 gold medalist, is 0-1 in MMA losing very badly to Kazuyuki Fujita.
I challenge you to provide any examples that support your argument - that top wrestlers/boxers/etc without extensive MMA training would dominate top MMA fighters under MMA rules. You won't be able to - those examples don't exist.
Calling you a troll may have been unwarranted, but at the very least imho you don't know what you're talking about and people that make long posts with no evidence on things they know little about tend to be trolls - or there is little difference between the two. edit: I don't mean that with any malice or insult. If I did, I wouldn't have wasted two lengthy posts trying to enlighten you. I just think you have a lot to learn about combat sports and have done my best to impart some of my knowledge to you.
On topic: Is there any mention of the dreaded wing-chun lineage wars in this movie? Ip Man would probably be spinning in his grave if he knew what became of his art in the present day...
Navy seals may be tough in water, and armed combat, but just because they're trained physically, will not make them a better fighter any more than other athletes. You fight as you train.
Shaolin is more demonstration/artistic than fighting nowadays. I'm sorry to say i think it'd get owned, and not just against fedor, but from probably any muay thai fighter in thailand. That hurts me to say as i grew up watching kung fu and jet li/jackie chan movies, and while it looks cool im pretty sure they'll get owned.
P.S. I put way more credit for sanshou/sanda for chinese martial arts than kung fu nowadays
i dont think foreigners really understand martial arts because it's portrayed in such a magical/comical way and most of the exposure is from movies, video games and cartoons. it has become something like a joke and just special effects and "WHOOAAAHaaaaa" bruce lee scream punchlines.
martial arts is so much more about speed, reflexes, trapping, accuracy, hand sensitivity, breathing, footwork, counters, mindset etc. watching mma i see so many fighters who can't even do a proper roundhouse kick without losing their balance. some people even do a roundhouse kick, miss, then do a full turn all the way around, yet the other person does not attack when his opponent's back is turned to him simply because he is not fast enough.
an analogy would be starcraft. trying to explain to someone why going 4 gate pure zealots is a bad idea on iccup then he counters with "that fancy 1 gate tech doesn't work in the real world, you'll just be taken down with brute force".
I'm not saying anyone can pull off 1 gate tech. It is not easy. It requires high apm, good scouting, good reading abilities, good micro. the same way martial arts requires a lot of groundwork and years of hard work to back it up, and that doesn't mean just going to the gym and working out and getting a lot of muscle mass.
but to the newbie who doesn't want to learn all the hotkeys and spend years learning the timings, the builds and everything in the game, of course four gate hardcore zealots will seem like the only viable option for fighting.
anyway i think mma and such things are still evolving and changing. it's still quite a new fad and i expect it to evolve just like starcraft where people get faster and faster and the old styles that relied on brute force get discarded.
[QUOTE]On January 08 2009 11:55 MassArbiterFTW wrote: As others have kindly pointed out we risk derailing the thread so this will be my last post on the topic @food + Show Spoiler +
On January 08 2009 02:01 food wrote: What did u point out haha
Your argument, as I understood it, was that various individuals who were succesful in specific combat sports would dominate top MMA competitors. I provided you with a multitude of examples that I feel disproved that contention. Olympic gold medalists and world champions in various combat sports - ie people who were at the very top of those sports - have routinely failed to defeat top MMA fighters in MMA bouts. I picked several examples that were known to me. Of course I did not give you thousands, because there are not thousands of olympic and world champions competing in MMA. I chose the most accomplished wrestlers/judoka/kickboxers that I could think of because they best prove my point - none of them dominated the MMA world with their original skillset alone, despite their accomplishments in their respective arts.
And actually another wrestler that I have seen fight escaped me, likely because it was such a forgettable fight: Karam Ibrahim, 2004 gold medalist, is 0-1 in MMA losing very badly to Kazuyuki Fujita.
I challenge you to provide any examples that support your argument - that top wrestlers/boxers/etc without extensive MMA training would dominate top MMA fighters under MMA rules. You won't be able to - those examples don't exist.
Calling you a troll may have been unwarranted, but at the very least imho you don't know what you're talking about and people that make long posts with no evidence on things they know little about tend to be trolls - or there is little difference between the two. edit: I don't mean that with any malice or insult. If I did, I wouldn't have wasted two lengthy posts trying to enlighten you. I just think you have a lot to learn about combat sports and have done my best to impart some of my knowledge to you.
hah. Noone needs your enlightenment, we all familiar with "i only could think of", go google some more, it wont help. Your list ran out real fast. I laughed at you copy pasting biographies of few participants like it creates a point in itself somewhere. Its worthless work and you didnt "enlighten" anyone, besides yourself. Fedor is the first example of dominating MMA without specific "MMA" training, he did get ready for it in his own gym but there is nothing called "MMA training" in Russia. If he learned to punch more and worked on a bag to be prepared that doesnt mean he transformed himself into some pseudo form of combat to be prepared for MMA fights. This is a load of shit, he was and he still is a sambo specialist who worked on extra elements to have more variety in his arsenal. I was arguing with Baal since he said "well who the fuck needs traditional martial arts since u can do 10x better at MMA gym in less time" I said, best fighters in MMA came out of specific martial arts, Fedor and Silva are brightest examples. Red Scorpion was sick. Buakkaw is fucking sick. Even pure mixed martial arts fighters like GSP and Arlovski had dominant styles throughout their lives, be it jiu jitsu or sambo or w/e else. You want me to give you examples of top wrestlers conquering MMA world, but there were none, they just dont take part in this. You can literally count known professionals that participated in MMA on fingers, i said it 3 times and i dont understand what the fuck you reading and where. You did not "provided you with a multitude of examples that I feel disproved that contention. Olympic gold medalists and world champions in various combat sports", there is no multiple, they not famous, they garbage ultimately 1 time wonders who either snapped a medal at the olympics or some shitty inside tournament. They not big names in sports, dont even imply that, its not true. They tried, they did moderately well, they gone. It is not an example of top worlds wrestler coming into MMA, it woulda been a fucking sensation. Grow up. dont give me examples of kick boxers, judo, etc, its all irrelevant. It was proven to be inefficient, just like taekwondo, but there are MANY martial arts that ARE efficient, like muay thai, jiu jitsu, sambo. And yes, THERE ARE thousands of olympic champions/world medalists, u will never keep track of everyone who scored a medal at euro/world/asiam games. Theres big names out there BUT U DIDNT MENTION ONE. I dont care for whole troll passage - keep it to yourself, i was talking concepts here. So in the end what did you spill about the "combat sports"? I dont see anything even remotely useful, bunch of shit that you googled or heard while watching shitfest on TV.
Ok i just finished watching this movie, and i don't want to add any spoilers, but if you liked Fearless, you'll like this one aswell, in my opinion the acting is really great in IP man as well as the story, there is a very unique feeling to the movie that i've yet to see in any martial arts movie. The fights.. well lets just say they got me excited.
On January 12 2009 06:51 Senx wrote: Ok i just finished watching this movie, and i don't want to add any spoilers, but if you liked Fearless, you'll like this one aswell, in my opinion the acting is really great in IP man as well as the story, there is a very unique feeling to the movie that i've yet to see in any martial arts movie. The fights.. well lets just say they got me excited.
A very well balanced movie. Watch it!
I think it's because the last two fights are so brutal, you rarely see that level of brutality in a movie like Fearless. You are more likely to see it in a Tony Jaa film, which lacks any depth at all so it has to have beast fighting to make up for naptime between battles. It's like two people exchanging armies then re-macroing for 20 minutes because they suck and exchanging again, rinse and repeat.
On January 08 2009 13:40 pyrogenetix wrote: i dont think foreigners really understand martial arts because it's portrayed in such a magical/comical way and most of the exposure is from movies, video games and cartoons. it has become something like a joke and just special effects and "WHOOAAAHaaaaa" bruce lee scream punchlines.
martial arts is so much more about speed, reflexes, trapping, accuracy, hand sensitivity, breathing, footwork, counters, mindset etc. watching mma i see so many fighters who can't even do a proper roundhouse kick without losing their balance. some people even do a roundhouse kick, miss, then do a full turn all the way around, yet the other person does not attack when his opponent's back is turned to him simply because he is not fast enough.
an analogy would be starcraft. trying to explain to someone why going 4 gate pure zealots is a bad idea on iccup then he counters with "that fancy 1 gate tech doesn't work in the real world, you'll just be taken down with brute force".
I'm not saying anyone can pull off 1 gate tech. It is not easy. It requires high apm, good scouting, good reading abilities, good micro. the same way martial arts requires a lot of groundwork and years of hard work to back it up, and that doesn't mean just going to the gym and working out and getting a lot of muscle mass.
but to the newbie who doesn't want to learn all the hotkeys and spend years learning the timings, the builds and everything in the game, of course four gate hardcore zealots will seem like the only viable option for fighting.
anyway i think mma and such things are still evolving and changing. it's still quite a new fad and i expect it to evolve just like starcraft where people get faster and faster and the old styles that relied on brute force get discarded.
This is totally ignorant, MMA DID evolve, MMA was crowded obv with martial artists trying to prove their style is best, it quickly evolved and most shitty martial arts didnt work and its a much mroe balanced and better than it was.
Also i dont fit in those foreigners group you mention since ive studied martial arts for many years, once again im a black belt in taekwondo.
Also your point on the round house kick is extremely ignorant, im quite well versed on kicks (read again, taekwondo) where they rarely turn after the kick however taekwondo doesnt put emphasis in kick power since the sport part is based on a point system also you cant catch the leg and own him, also the position where u are left after the kick is not very dangerous since you cant be taken down etc.
A REAL powerful roundhouse kick in MMA or MuayThai contains much more momentum so spinning after totally missing is usually better than "pulling" the leg and get into an unconfortable position, also spinning is really good since the oponent jumps back to avoid the kick or ducks also when you spin you are watching ready to throw a back punch if he just launches to you.
Seriously why do people who have no idea whatsoever about fighting post in here its just retarded, just watch Muay Thai where REAL kicks happen and watch how they turn very very often after they attempt a big KO head kick.
The pace is about right, not too fast, not too slow. No abuse of slow motion / camera switching.
All elements (character development, story telling, action, historical background..) are evenly focused and revolving around the main character of the film, Master Ip.
Overall, the movie is a solid 8.0/10
But as a fan of old-school material art movies, I'd give it a 8.5/10.
This movie has the fucking best fight scene I've seen in a long time. Probably top five. I really liked the movie, despite it's obvious political message.
This movie was so educational!! I didn't know that China won WWII ! [/sarcasm] Way to ruin a good movie
Loved it as a martial arts movie with great fight scenes and a lot of interesting characters; Although in the end the political undertones and message ruined the experience for me : /
Next person to post about some stupid martial arts debate rather than the movie gets my super-titanium-axe-ban-to-the-face maneuver, handed down to me by my scottish forefathers, holders of the silent light gleaming path monkey brain kilt fighting book.
I can't wait to see the movie, but it will never come out here
On January 15 2009 13:26 Manifesto7 wrote: Next person to post about some stupid martial arts debate rather than the movie gets my super-titanium-axe-ban-to-the-face maneuver, handed down to me by my scottish forefathers, holders of the silent light gleaming path monkey brain kilt fighting book.
I can't wait to see the movie, but it will never come out here
On January 03 2009 22:00 haduken wrote: they really need to stop this china vs japan crap in MA movies.
yes. Since its obvious that china>>>>>>>>>>>>>japan and anything overall in MA movies. China action cinema is epic.
and this film has sammo hung coreographing or something right? Epic. I actually torrented this film but havent watched it yet :p
Also there was some talking about MMA vs other styles right? Of course a wrestler or a boxer or a judoka won't beat a MMA champion? Why? Wrestrels only grab each other and stuff right? Boxers only hit, they don't grab, or even use their feet (except kickboxing) Judokas just throw each other around right? Ofc its not all THAT simple, but thats just the way it is.
Also kungfu nowadays is just an exhibition sport or something right? And its actually called wushu.
And i have to add that the best fighters are those who actually don't get theirselves into fights
On January 18 2009 08:37 deathgod6 wrote: omg my dl is going so slow. =( how long does it normally take to torrent this movie?
I think i downloaded it in 1 day or something, not sure. It could have been 2 days. It was a slow torrent though.
I also realised that in this thread they were talking about china vs japan... i thought it meant china vs japan in terms of who makes better movies lol =D Anyway its just a movie. If an american film has middle easterns, they are usually hated for being terrorists or something (not sure though) Or like russians or something. Its just the way it is.
And japanese did do some bad stuff back then to china i may assume, so it's okay to portray it in a film, from a chinese point of view.
What i would really like to see is a pure martial arts movie without the nationalistic crap. The Wuxia novels does this really well so i don't see how they can't at least replicate this on the screen.
martial arts should be about adversaries. The fighter vs the fighter and the strive to be the ultimate fighter. Films like this feels like a video game when the Japanese is the grunt and in the end you defeat some mega Japanese boss.
How about they develop some depth on the Villains.
On January 15 2009 13:26 Manifesto7 wrote: Next person to post about some stupid martial arts debate rather than the movie gets my super-titanium-axe-ban-to-the-face maneuver, handed down to me by my scottish forefathers, holders of the silent light gleaming path monkey brain kilt fighting book.
I can't wait to see the movie, but it will never come out here
On January 08 2009 03:33 rei wrote: Baal's debate taught me a lesson, whether you are right or wrong, you need not to be condescending toward each other. Go make an MMA tread and go to town with it, this is a movie,
like myself many people are offended by baal when he bashed Martial arts other than the ones they use in MMA. I'm Chinese, I am well educated in Chinese version of history in China. When someone trash my national hero, of course I feel anger, it's a natural reaction. But all you really need to do is point out the logical mistakes like I did, there is no need to be condescending.
I was warn by plexa in my heated debate with baal that i was being too condescending, which i am totally agree. and I have already apologized to Baal via pm.
Right or wrong, give each other respect, even enemies that are fighting a war against each other gives each other respect why shouldn't we?
We should acknowledge that Baal is right about MMA, Kickboxing welting and bjj are favored under rules of MMA.
and Baal you should also acknowledge history, even if you don't belief martial art from China is useful in the modern age, traditional martial arts(any form of combat skill, eastern and western) have been used world wide as the only means of defense until guns came along, nothing you can say is going to erase this historical fact
let's be honest with ourselves, we are bunch of people who don't have a good understand of the arts of combat, we are talking about something we see and we read about, not something we do everyday for a living. And if one of you do this for a living you won't be debating with us, it would be a serious waste of your time trying to enlighten some one over the internet, because you understand that whatever you say would not matter in their minds without proving to them that you are the authority.
Let us just drop this whole thing in this thread, this is a thread about Ip Man the movie, not about MMA > Chinese national hero. Make your own thread if you insist in debating this.
Plexa will seriously start banning, even I get a warning considering i'm one of the first members of TL.net. So drop it and be civilized
DLing movie now. I'm quite excited for it. The only criticism I have for the first movie is that the fight choreography was poorly done. Every fight is extremely simple and one sided. I never felt any thrill from any of the action scenes since there was a lack of struggle. It's just him punching some guy really really fast. I hope they improve on that aspect in the sequel. Even if not, the plotline of the first movie was more than enough to make a great movie, and I hope the second movie's plotline is just as good.
On May 05 2010 12:16 Chairman Ray wrote: DLing movie now. I'm quite excited for it. The only criticism I have for the first movie is that the fight choreography was poorly done. Every fight is extremely simple and one sided. I never felt any thrill from any of the action scenes since there was a lack of struggle. It's just him punching some guy really really fast. I hope they improve on that aspect in the sequel. Even if not, the plotline of the first movie was more than enough to make a great movie, and I hope the second movie's plotline is just as good.
well hes the best. Id rather have him dominate everyone then to see him losing somehow then in the last minute all of a sudden be better then the guy
On May 05 2010 12:16 Chairman Ray wrote: DLing movie now. I'm quite excited for it. The only criticism I have for the first movie is that the fight choreography was poorly done. Every fight is extremely simple and one sided. I never felt any thrill from any of the action scenes since there was a lack of struggle. It's just him punching some guy really really fast. I hope they improve on that aspect in the sequel. Even if not, the plotline of the first movie was more than enough to make a great movie, and I hope the second movie's plotline is just as good.
well hes the best. Id rather have him dominate everyone then to see him losing somehow then in the last minute all of a sudden be better then the guy
The problem is, he's trying to accurately depict Wing Chun. And Wing Chun is actually a very limited martial arts in terms of offense. =\ I do kind of agree that the fight scenes (if compared to some really good kung fu flicks) are really lackluster (or vs Tony Jah!) but yah.
No luck on PPStream, i'm on an old version though.... but all the ip man 2's are trailers except/excerpts of the "making of the video" and theres this one where it was like a "world premiere" thing? but it was like 1 hour long so i thought that couldn't be the movie
It's awesome - even if other aspects (dialogue and construction) are a little poorly executed. It's still awesome to watch aestheticized violence, especially when it's so one-sided.
Just saw the movie with some pretty horribly translated English subs, but it was watchable (readable) enough to understand most of it (funny that they translated some of the names too).
My take on the movie (will try to avoid spoilers): + Show Spoiler +
It was good. Not as good as the first movie, which was even really good. It lacked a few things, and I also thought the fat kung fu master (as stated before, I don't know the names...) in the middle of it all somehow split the focus of it all. He wasn't impressive to watch at all, simply because it didn't look credible when he fought. I don't mind him really, but he took up way too much space. I also feel the big time ending of the movie only really got built up to by the end of the movie, while there was lots of stuff going on in the beginning that didn't really play a part in the end (but not as extreme as in the first movie, where it felt like watching two different movies). Overall it also felt like they toned down the brutality of it all though, kinda understandable considering the change of context but it felt watered down. The Chinese pride talk kind of annoyed me too, but more from the context that it seems to be so common in Chinese movies that I've seen lately (even more so than American freedom speeches in American moveis), I suppose it fits with context of Hong Kong and all.
The fight scenes were not as impressive either. What I *really* liked in the first movie, which in my mind made it unique and really cool, was how brutal the fight scenes were when Ip Man got serious. And how clearly they showed the brutality of it. This was never done here. Also, some fight scenes were too dragged out, without the real punch they had (read brutality) in the first movie. It all felt watered down. The only fights I really enjoyed was the first vs his student-to-be and the last, which I still would have enjoyed more had it been more brutal like the last fight in the first movie. I also missed some one Ip Man vs ten Japanese dudes fight scene, or that kind of.
Enough of the critisism. It was a good movie. I just felt it was watered down to make it more appealing to a wider audience (younger+families), instead of keeping with the brutality that made the first movie unique. But still, it's still one of the best new martial arts movies out there. Donnie Yen is extremely good, and I look forward to see him again.
Btw, is it only me that gets annoyed by his wife? Doesn't affect the movie, but she seems like a really boring person!
I don't understand or get these types of martial arts movies. The fighting doesn't even look real - there's like zero force behind their punches and kicks. Some guy is just making dazzle fingers real fast at people and they stop and then fly back. If it were a real fight one vs ten the ten men would literally just pile on him and bear him down by sheer weight of ten bodies. No silly dance could make them all fly back.
On May 06 2010 02:45 garmule2 wrote: I don't understand or get these types of martial arts movies. The fighting doesn't even look real - there's like zero force behind their punches and kicks. Some guy is just making dazzle fingers real fast at people and they stop and then fly back. If it were a real fight one vs ten the ten men would literally just pile on him and bear him down by sheer weight of ten bodies. No silly dance could make them all fly back.
F=ma faster you accelerates harder it hits given the mass is constant. On a serious note, just enjoy the movie, it's base on a real person, you can find historical evidence of some of these event they talked about on old news papers in HK Achieves. Of course some of the details are exaggerated.
The movie is damn good. I don't care that it's watered down, but it's jam packed with action and showed how effective Wing Chun is. The characters are portrayed well as Ip Man was gentle in nature despite his godlike skills (love the way he used the two butcher knife in the fish market - butterfly knife technique perfection). Only Sammo Hung was out of place since he's so damn fat.
The movie invoked the theme of humility, but standing up for what you believe in when the situation arises and stand behind your friends/students/colleagues no matter what. Donnie played the role extremely well and his Wing Chun is top notch. The fight with the boxer was awesome and loved the way he punched the crap out of him at the end.
other masters want to bout, so Ip Man hands it to them foreigner stirring up troubles Just after Ip Man become good bro with the other master, he dies Ip Man owns foreigner, in their own game
The boxing match was fuckign crooked, punch after the bell, and disabled kicking. wtf! Well played at the end, but weird how it ended like that.I thought the crooked ref would call break after machine gun beating on Twister's head, cuz he was already down.
so same story as the one movie with jet lee? some chinese hero raping all foreigners for freedom or something and finally owns some japanese guy and dies or something?
loved the first one, loved this one as well. too bad the one i got was the one released in mainland china, so its in mandarin. still waiting for the cantonese one!!! + Show Spoiler +
had a pretty cool showcase of different martial arts; like the last one, wingchun is portrayed really well, and i loved watching hung gar too. great fight scenes, beautiful butterfly knife action.
the one problem i had with it was why yipman would only think to attack the white dudes biceps (like he told hung) when he was almost ko'd. given the way he is, he should be intelligent and calculating, formulating a strategy before the fight - they even showed this where he is sitting in his home next to the wooden dummy, pondering the fight.
still a fantastic fight scene though. its a nice change to see a more even and brutal fight. loved the last bit where he throws in some fancy non-wingchun moves lol.
Second movie is only as good as fight scenes, other than that its complete garbage dialog/acting/plot wise (especially how westerners are portrayed, god it was painful to watch).
On May 07 2010 22:18 Jusciax wrote: Second movie is only as good as fight scenes, other than that its complete garbage dialog/acting/plot wise.
Martial arts movies that are not "complete garbage dialog/acting/plot wise" is a rare, rare exception. Of course, most of them are complete garbage when taken as a whole as well, so it's not much of a surprise either way.
The Twister was a faggot and seriously, this is a kung-fu flick - therefore boxers are only allowed to be meat-headed sidekicks who are there for comical effect and have their asses kicked by the Chinese (see Born to Defence by Jet Li). If this was a real martial arts movie the boss would have been some rich white guy in a suit who tells his goons to step-aside and throws away his gun because for some reason he has incredible kung-fu skills.
I saw this movie at the movie theater (Australia) today which was packed with 90% Chinese. The guy sitting behind me was swearing at 'Twister' as if he harmed his little sister and a lot of people were clapping when IP man finally took Twister down. The movie itself was throughly enjoyable with high calibre action sequences but personally there were too much Chinese pride for me to handle. They should have named it 'Foreign devil and the Chinese angel.'
On May 07 2010 22:18 Jusciax wrote: Second movie is only as good as fight scenes, other than that its complete garbage dialog/acting/plot wise.
Martial arts movies that are not "complete garbage dialog/acting/plot wise" is a rare, rare exception. Of course, most of them are complete garbage when taken as a whole as well, so it's not much of a surprise either way.
Lol at everyone saying there was too much "Chinese pride" and nationalism :p
How about Hollywoodmovies hmm?
Spiderman 3 for example... Somewhere near the end he swings by an american flag flapping in the wind (Ruined the scene tbh) Almost every Hollywood movie has an american flag/nationalism in there somewhere... (Doesn't take away from the fact that I like most Hollywood movies though)
I liked Ip Man, it gave some more insight in their culture in those days. And it showed great fighting.
Also I recommend everybody Ong Bak, that movie rules :p
On May 09 2010 05:31 pokeyAA wrote: You guys need to watch FlashPoint where Donny Yen does MMA stuff. The fighting in that movie owned.
Actually no they don't - they only need to search for the final fight scene in that movie on YouTube which will save them from sitting through two hours of police drama boredom. I was angrier about the plot being so fucking shit than when so and so died in such and such scene.
I thought the fight in the middle was pretty fun too, when he started doing takedowns and wrestling lol. Youre right the story sorta sucked, but it wasn't that bad. That or maybe I'm used to bad martial arts movie stories from watching them growing up.
The most memorable thing about flashpoint for me is that move Donny did in the market place, where he charge from the front of the guy and then did that move from Tekken wrestler Character King, in which he swings his entire body around with the other guy's body as pthe other guy at full speed and does a suplex! Can't describe it with words so here
watched it like an year ago and recommended to a friend. then he bought it on blu-ray for 50 bux. that is how good this movie is. Original language is Cantonese, watch it in that
On May 09 2010 01:23 1tym wrote: I saw this movie at the movie theater (Australia) today which was packed with 90% Chinese. The guy sitting behind me was swearing at 'Twister' as if he harmed his little sister and a lot of people were clapping when IP man finally took Twister down. The movie itself was throughly enjoyable with high calibre action sequences but personally there were too much Chinese pride for me to handle. They should have named it 'Foreign devil and the Chinese angel.'
lol which part of Australia u at? Saturation of chinese means Sydney?
I wanted to watch it in cinema, but haven't gotten round to deciding which to go. Apparently, there's only 2 or 3. Trying to find one that's the least dodgy.
Last option is to wait for the DVD version. Not sure i can wait though.
On May 09 2010 01:23 1tym wrote: I saw this movie at the movie theater (Australia) today which was packed with 90% Chinese. The guy sitting behind me was swearing at 'Twister' as if he harmed his little sister and a lot of people were clapping when IP man finally took Twister down. The movie itself was throughly enjoyable with high calibre action sequences but personally there were too much Chinese pride for me to handle. They should have named it 'Foreign devil and the Chinese angel.'
lol which part of Australia u at? Saturation of chinese means Sydney?
I wanted to watch it in cinema, but haven't gotten round to deciding which to go. Apparently, there's only 2 or 3. Trying to find one that's the least dodgy.
Last option is to wait for the DVD version. Not sure i can wait though.
Hahaha yeah, I went to Sunnybank in Brisbane to see it (Ip Man 2), 1 of my three friends and I made up the entire 2 white people in the cinema.
Really good film, go see it if you have the chance!
On May 07 2010 22:18 Jusciax wrote: Second movie is only as good as fight scenes, other than that its complete garbage dialog/acting/plot wise (especially how westerners are portrayed, god it was painful to watch).
Westerners portrayed as corrupt colonialists in the movie is actually not too far off in Hong Kong at the time. There are quite a few Hong Kong movies where westerner colonialists are the antagonists so it's not that new due to the relationship the two have. I disagree with people who take it over the top and take it too far with their anger with their national pride, but it's not like the western devil character type did not exist back in the day. Let's face it, there was a war amongst cultures in colonial times and to some extent even now western media sometimes portrays Western culture as the superior, this movie actually is one of the more subtle in its showing of superiority. Rather than saying it is the best, it gives itself as an alternative. Ip Man wasn't aiming to beat the living hell out of Twister, he was more proving a point to prove that Chinese culture was no push-over. It wasn't inferior, but at the same time not necessarily superior.
Bigots exist even now, Twister's character for the time the movie was set in was not that huge of a stretch, neither was the cop and mind you the cop's superior was actually trying to mend things with the Chinese.
Also, I feel bad since I got the movie via DVD rip from a shady asian outlet, it does nothing to help the asian film industry, thus I plan to buy a real copy when I can asap. Very awesome production.
On May 09 2010 03:31 DwmC_Foefen wrote: Lol at everyone saying there was too much "Chinese pride" and nationalism :p
How about Hollywoodmovies hmm?
Spiderman 3 for example... Somewhere near the end he swings by an american flag flapping in the wind (Ruined the scene tbh) Almost every Hollywood movie has an american flag/nationalism in there somewhere... (Doesn't take away from the fact that I like most Hollywood movies though)
I liked Ip Man, it gave some more insight in their culture in those days. And it showed great fighting.
Also I recommend everybody Ong Bak, that movie rules :p
Agreed, everyone thought I was being non patriotic when spiderman 3 came out and I pointed that out but I'm glad to see someone agrees with me. Also, new ironman movie has the same thing with the flag.
Just saw the sequel recently, a little different than the first in fight scenes. I don't know if I enjoyed it better than the first but it was still good I thought.
On May 09 2010 01:23 1tym wrote: I saw this movie at the movie theater (Australia) today which was packed with 90% Chinese. The guy sitting behind me was swearing at 'Twister' as if he harmed his little sister and a lot of people were clapping when IP man finally took Twister down. The movie itself was throughly enjoyable with high calibre action sequences but personally there were too much Chinese pride for me to handle. They should have named it 'Foreign devil and the Chinese angel.'
lol which part of Australia u at? Saturation of chinese means Sydney?
I wanted to watch it in cinema, but haven't gotten round to deciding which to go. Apparently, there's only 2 or 3. Trying to find one that's the least dodgy.
Last option is to wait for the DVD version. Not sure i can wait though.
Hahaha yeah, I went to Sunnybank in Brisbane to see it (Ip Man 2), 1 of my three friends and I made up the entire 2 white people in the cinema.
Really good film, go see it if you have the chance!
LOL! you go to a suburb in brisbane where pretty much all the shops have asian characters in their names, and complain about the high percentage of asians in the cinema... sorry, but that's a bit silly
(for those of you who dont know brisbane/sunnybank, the population of that suburb is seriously 90-95% asians... not wanting to be racist or anything, it just is...)
Just watched Ip Man 1 and 2. The first was definitely better than the second, as with most movies with sequels. Both great movies with great storytelling and fighting scenes nonetheless.
just watched these two films. have a question though. wouldn't kung fu totally own western boxing considering it has so many moves that boxing makes illegal? in particular punching people's arms and joint and pressure points.. etc.?
On April 06 2012 17:14 adeezy wrote: just watched these two films. have a question though. wouldn't kung fu totally own western boxing considering it has so many moves that boxing makes illegal? in particular punching people's arms and joint and pressure points.. etc.?
Pretty much any fighting style would own boxing....because boxing was meant to be a sport, not to be used to hurt people with.
On April 06 2012 17:14 adeezy wrote: just watched these two films. have a question though. wouldn't kung fu totally own western boxing considering it has so many moves that boxing makes illegal? in particular punching people's arms and joint and pressure points.. etc.?
Pretty much any fighting style would own boxing....because boxing was meant to be a sport, not to be used to hurt people with.
boxing is a decent enough foundation for the man on a street to defend himself in a fight. How to punch, tuck your chin, protect your chest. However, the "fight" most people have in their heads between two styles is a no holds barred affair, where there are no rules and no hesitation, and everything goes. weapons, kicks, under the belt punching, there are so many things western boxing doesn't account for.
That's where "real world" martial arts like krav maga come into play. These are for dealing with real world self defence situations, where the other person has a weapon, or there are several of them, etc etc. Who cares how good the gracie family is at groundfighting; if the other guy comes at you with a spanner no amount of BJJ is going to stop the other person from putting some serious hurt on you.
Sure, kung fu could be useful on the street. there are throws, punch techniques, kicks and even point strikes that could help you out. most street thugs probably can't use kicks very well, and kicks really really require skill and technique, so that added range could help you break someone's kneecap or something before they get close, as bruce lee once advocated in an interview.