| Forum Index > General Forum |
NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. | ||
|
Magic Powers
Austria4478 Posts
On September 16 2023 04:35 hexhaven wrote: Moving on from the Is that the same guy who buried his personal doctor alive? | ||
|
maybenexttime
Poland5914 Posts
On September 16 2023 04:22 captainwaffles wrote: Yes. I'm okay with any decontextualized hypothetical you have to make to make sense of the world. I'm also perfectly okay with Russia protecting the Donbas from Kiev and it's Azov thugs with tens of thousands of artillery shells per day. By "protecting" you mean sending tens of thousands of men from Donbas to certain death (they make up by far the worst equipped units) and bombing Eastern Ukrainian cities to dust? Care to explain how what Russia is doing now is preferable to a couple dozen casualties per year (stats from 2021)? | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15743 Posts
On September 16 2023 04:42 captainwaffles wrote: I was being sarcastic. I'm not trying to win any arguments, I'm just here to spit facts. Check my twitter account in my signature and see how serious I am or aren't. I don't know what you mean, so I checked your twitter and it seems to be mostly just standard stuff I'd expect from your post history. But this seemed like a really weird thing to say | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Sermokala
United States14220 Posts
On September 16 2023 05:07 Magic Powers wrote: Is that the same guy who buried his personal doctor alive? For presumably poisoning him, which might be why he's now in a coma. | ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
Magic Powers
Austria4478 Posts
On September 16 2023 11:31 JimmiC wrote: If it’s true that a double agent helped Ukraine strike the port then I’m not a huge fan of this story. However, if not true way to plant the seed of doubt on everybody in the know! https://ca.yahoo.com/news/ukrainian-partisans-double-agent-russian-172659737.html It's not like Russia can take any further measures after hearing this story. They were already paranoid about double agents. And so is Ukraine. It's just part of war. | ||
|
sertas
Sweden890 Posts
| ||
|
Sadist
United States7328 Posts
On September 16 2023 08:18 Mohdoo wrote: I don't know what you mean, so I checked your twitter and it seems to be mostly just standard stuff I'd expect from your post history. But this seemed like a really weird thing to say https://twitter.com/CaptainWaffless/status/1652095851060183041 His twitter account is batshit crazy and/or full of troll posts. I wish there was a mute button because after seeing his twitter nobody should respond to any of his posts. | ||
|
Excludos
Norway8281 Posts
On September 16 2023 11:31 JimmiC wrote: If it’s true that a double agent helped Ukraine strike the port then I’m not a huge fan of this story. However, if not true way to plant the seed of doubt on everybody in the know! https://ca.yahoo.com/news/ukrainian-partisans-double-agent-russian-172659737.html There's absolutely zero chance anyone on either side would just go and admit "Hey, we used spies for this! He's in this X unit!" It would be completely self defeating. Information gathering 101 is that you don't tell your opponent how you got it, giving them a chance to fix their holes. The only way this makes sense is if they got the information in a completely different way that they don't want to draw attention to | ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
Excludos
Norway8281 Posts
On September 17 2023 06:07 JimmiC wrote: An interesting article about how it’s clear Russia is not threatened by NATO because if they were they could have less than 1/5th of the forces in the artic they had before the war. They know NATO won’t attack. https://ca.yahoo.com/news/russian-forces-near-norway-20-171622974.html There's a bit of an unspoken "duh" there. If NATO invaded, which they won't because nukes, it wouldn't really matter if Russia had pre-war forces at the border or the current 20%. The outcome would be remarkable similar. Meanwhile, they have an actual threat in the war they themselves started. It just wouldn't make sense to not move the forces they have, from borders no one is going to attack from, to the active war they are currently losing in. The interesting number her is that Russia has pulled 80% of their forces from their borders. Meaning (As we already know), they've taken massive losses that needed to be replenished. But their continuous increase in age group for the conscriptions already told us that tho | ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
Simberto
Germany12086 Posts
On September 17 2023 10:13 JimmiC wrote: I get the whole duh part. But people like zeo like to justify the invasion as defensive, as if they didn’t do it nato would invade. But Russian leadership actions speak much louder than there words. Agree with rest. Well, how could Nato invade if they are losing all of their troops in Ukraine. Good thing Russia invaded so the threat of Nato invasion was prevented. (Reason doesn't reach people like zeo, you can always find a way to spin stuff if you try hard enough and don't really care about reality) | ||
|
Magic Powers
Austria4478 Posts
On September 17 2023 17:23 Simberto wrote: Well, how could Nato invade if they are losing all of their troops in Ukraine. Good thing Russia invaded so the threat of Nato invasion was prevented. (Reason doesn't reach people like zeo, you can always find a way to spin stuff if you try hard enough and don't really care about reality) Good thing Russia has nukes to prevent an attack by NATO into Russian homeland. It's just unfortunate that Russia isn't willing to use nukes to defend Russian homeland against NATO. | ||
|
zeo
Serbia6344 Posts
On September 17 2023 10:13 JimmiC wrote: I get the whole duh part. But people like zeo like to justify the invasion as defensive, as if they didn’t do it nato would invade. But Russian leadership actions speak much louder than there words. Agree with rest. I dont get the point of these low effort ad hominems and strawmans, they are easy to post sure but at least try to post something with any sembalance to reality or what Ive said in the past. Just on this page Im moving to Russia apparently and saying things ive never said to prove other things I never said being used as a prop to attack my character in a piss poor way. If Im living rent free in your head (like already in the Hitler guys head) at least make the boogie man vaguely resemble what Im saying, not just randomly tacking anything you dont like and building a strawman. | ||
|
sertas
Sweden890 Posts
He can't say : "I want to annex ukraine and restore sovjet union because my army is 100x stronger than ukraine therefore the war will be over very soon and i will be remembered as a great russian leader" It's obvious to anyone with a brain that this was the thought process, then you can make up any number of reasons to invade, if you give 10 different reasons as long as 1 reason is good enough for some russian person then that's good enough. | ||
|
sertas
Sweden890 Posts
On September 17 2023 20:22 zeo wrote: I dont get the point of these low effort ad hominems and strawmans, they are easy to post sure but at least try to post something with any sembalance to reality or what Ive said in the past. Just on this page Im moving to Russia apparently and saying things ive never said to prove other things I never said being used as a prop to attack my character in a piss poor way. If Im living rent free in your head (like already in the Hitler guys head) at least make the boogie man vaguely resemble what Im saying, not just randomly tacking anything you dont like and building a strawman. You don't think it's interesting how 99% of people, even most russians dont agree with you, no surely you are correct and everyone else is wrong | ||
|
zeo
Serbia6344 Posts
On September 17 2023 20:26 sertas wrote: You don't think it's interesting how 99% of people, even most russians dont agree with you, no surely you are correct and everyone else is wrong Please send the source that 99% of people and most Russians dont agree with me. 99% of a small buble echo chamber maybe, who knows. Or maybe you think Africans, South Americans, Asians and the population in Europe that dont agree with warmongering are not people. | ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
OSC
ByuN vs MaxPax
herO vs Krystianer
Percival vs Shameless
LetaleX vs YoungYakov
Nicoract vs Gerald
GgMaChine vs ArT
PiGosaur Cup
INu's Battles
ByuN vs Classic
3D!Clan Event
The PondCast
KCM Race Survival
WardiTV Invitational
OSC
Ultimate Battle
CranKy Ducklings
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
