NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.
If you want to suppress air defences you also need ecm planes like growlers and very skilled pilots. So its not possible. That doesnt mean F16 are usless. They can intercept missiles and you can use HARM together with larger drones to give AA a real headache. I think it should also be possible to lobb guided bombs like they do with rockets.
Most importantly you can mount NATO weapons so you can truck stand-off weapons like glidebombs from the polish border to the frontline effectivly.
Poland to send Ukraine 60 modernized PT-91 Tanks, as well as Leopards.
Poland will send an additional 60 tanks to Ukraine on top of the 14 German-made Leopard 2 tanks it has already pledged, the Polish prime minister has said in an interview.
Warsaw, which has positioned itself as one of Kyiv's staunchest allies, had pressed hard for Germany to send Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine and to allow other countries to do so as well, a demand which Berlin agreed to on Wednesday.
"Poland sent 250 tanks as the first country half a year ago or even more than that," Mateusz Morawiecki told Canada's CTV News.
"Right now, we are ready to send 60 of our modernised tanks, 30 of them PT-91.
"And on top of those tanks, 14 tanks, Leopard 2 tanks, from in our possession."
The PT-91 is a Polish-made battle tank that came into service in the 1990s.
It was developed from the Soviet-era T-72 range, of which Ukraine has hundreds.
The remainder of the tanks that will be sent are upgraded T-72s.
Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy thanked Poland on Twitter for the decision to supply the additional tanks.
On Thursday, Canada announced that it would send four Leopard 2 battle tanks to Ukraine.
Norway has also said it will send Leopards, while Spain says it is open to providing them.
Ukraine has said it needs hundreds of the Leopards to drive Russia from its territory.
On Friday, Poland's Deputy Defence Minister Marcin Ociepa told private broadcaster RMF FM that it would be around three months before Leopard tanks reached Ukraine.
"It depends what country we are talking about, but I would estimate that we are talking about around a quarter … until those tanks can really be on Ukrainian territory and go into battle," he said.
A plausible analysis of the state of Russian military.
Let's not get carried away. The Russian army is far from collapsing. It remains to be seen how widespread such issues are. If anything, the disparity quality of gear among the Russian troops is as bad as in Russia itself. On one end you have L/DNR cannon fodder with WW1/WW2 equipment and Wagner penal battalion with hardly anything, and on the other end you have elite Wagner troops with their own aircraft and Chechen tiktokers. The rest fall somewhere in-between.
In recent days I've been seeing an increasing number of reports about Russian war crimes (in particular torture). Tens of thousands of leads have been reported. It is said that Kherson is even worse than Bucha and Irpin, and that the main perpetrator is the Wagner group. I don't want to look up details, maybe some of you people can stomach it.
On January 29 2023 03:33 Magic Powers wrote: In recent days I've been seeing an increasing number of reports about Russian war crimes (in particular torture). Tens of thousands of leads have been reported. It is said that Kherson is even worse than Bucha and Irpin, and that the main perpetrator is the Wagner group. I don't want to look up details, maybe some of you people can stomach it.
It's Russia. They probably don't see it as a war crime, and just as how you are supposed to handle people who don't do what you tell them to.
But yeah, i don't want to look up any details, either.
I'd imagine the same thing is being quietly pushed in Paris, and Amsterdam. Although training Far different, and I would like to think, more complicated compared to Tanks.
A contingent of military officials is quietly pushing the Pentagon to approve sending F-16 fighter jets to Ukraine to help the country defend itself from Russian missile and drone attacks, according to three people with knowledge of the discussions.
Ukraine has kept American-made F-16s on its weapons wish list since the Russian invasion last year. But Washington and Kyiv have viewed artillery, armor and ground-based air defense systems as more urgent needs as Ukraine seeks to protect civilian infrastructure and claw back ground occupied by Russian forces.
As Ukraine prepares to launch a new offensive to retake territory in the spring, the campaign inside the Defense Department for fighter jets is gaining momentum, according to a DoD official and two other people involved in the discussions. Those people, along with others interviewed for this story, asked not to be named in order to discuss internal matters.
Spurred in part by the rapid approval of tanks and Patriot air defense systems — which not long ago were off-limits for export to Ukraine — there is renewed optimism in Kyiv that U.S. jets could be next up.
“I don’t think we are opposed,” said a senior DoD official about the F-16s, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive debate. The person stressed that there has been no final decision.
However, Ukraine has yet to declare that fighter jets are its top priority, the official stressed, noting that the Pentagon is focused on sending Kyiv the capabilities it needs for the immediate fight.
But fighter jets may be moving to the top spot soon. Kyiv has renewed its request for modern fighters in recent days, with a top adviser to the country’s defense minister telling media outlets that officials will push for jets from the U.S. and European countries.
A top Ukrainian official said Saturday that Ukraine and its Western allies are engaged in “fast-track” talks on possibly sending both long-range missiles and military aircraft.
One adviser to the Ukrainian government said the subject has been raised with Washington, but there has been “nothing too serious” on the table yet. Another person familiar with the conversations between Washington and Kyiv said it could take “weeks” for the U.S. to make a decision on shipments of its own jets and approve the re-export of the F-16s from other countries.
“If we get them, the advantages on the battlefield will be just immense. ... It’s not just F-16s: fourth generation aircraft, this is what we want,” Yuriy Sak, who advises Defence Minister Oleksii Reznikov, told Reuters.
A White House spokesperson declined to comment for this story, but pointed to remarks by deputy national security adviser Jon Finer. He said the U.S. would be discussing fighter jets “very carefully” with Kyiv and its allies.
“We have not ruled in or out any specific systems,” Finer said on MSNBC Thursday.
“We have nothing to announce regarding F-16s,” said a DOD spokesperson. “As always, we’ll continue to consult closely with the Ukrainians and our international Allies and partners on Ukraine’s security assistance needs to enable them to defend their country.”
Ukraine wants modern fighters — U.S. Air Force F-16s or F-15s, or their European equivalents the German Tornado or Swedish Gripen — to replace its fleet of Soviet-era jets. Dozens of the more modern planes will become available over the next year as countries such as Finland, Germany and the Netherlands upgrade to U.S. F-35 fighters.
Despite the age of Ukraine’s jets, Kyiv’s integrated air defenses have kept Russia from dominating its skies since the Feb. 24 invasion.
But now, officials are concerned that Ukraine is running out of missiles to protect its skies. Once its arsenal is depleted, Russia’s advanced fighter jets will be able to move in and Kyiv “will not be able to compete,” said the DoD official involved in the discussions.
Modern fighter jets could be one solution to this problem, argues a group of military officials in the Pentagon and elsewhere. F-16s carry air-to-air missiles that can shoot down incoming missiles and drones. And unlike the Patriots and National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile Systems the West is currently sending, fighter jets can move around an area quickly to protect different targets.
“If they get [F-16] Vipers and they have an active air-to-air missile with the radar the F-16 currently has with some electronic protection, now it’s an even game,” the DoD official said.
Even if the U.S. decided not to send the Air Force’s F-16s, other Western nations have American-made fighters they could supply. For example, Dutch Foreign Affairs Minister Wopke Hoekstra told the Dutch parliament last week that his Cabinet would look at supplying F-16s, if Kyiv requests them. But the U.S. must approve the transfer.
Senior Pentagon officials acknowledge that Ukraine needs new aircraft for the long term. But for now, some argue that Ukraine has a greater need for more traditional air defenses, such as the Patriots and NASAMs that the U.S. and other countries are supplying, because jets may take months to arrive.
Sending Ukraine F-16s “does not solve the cruise missile or drone problem right now,” the senior DoD official said.
Pretty sure the US already publicly said they would have no issue with other countries sending F-16's when the notion of the Netherlands sending some first popped up.
Not sure where to post this, but since Iran's been supplying drones to Russia, I figured here would be okay. A ton of weapons factories, ammo caches, and oil depots have been bombed across the country. Unconfirmed reports of Israeli fighter jets spotted over Iran. Not sure of the extent yet
Pretty sure the only way for Israel to reach said destinations in Iran would be to use Saudi Arabia as a launching point. Weirder things have happened. Could even be Azerbaijan given the embassy attack yesterday... though I doubt Turkey would support such an action.
On January 29 2023 09:10 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Pretty sure the only way for Israel to reach said destinations in Iran would be to use Saudi Arabia as a launching point. Weirder things have happened. Could even be Azerbaijan given the embassy attack yesterday... though I doubt Turkey would support such an action.
I wouldn't put it past the Azeris to open their airspace or for MBS to knock out a major Saudi rival, but it's going to be interesting to see what all happened in the morning in Iran
On January 29 2023 09:57 ZeroByte13 wrote: Fooking hell... is this a start of an open Israeli-Iran conflict?
Not sure at the moment. The Iranian Security Council is meeting right now presumably to discuss a response, but I think that should this be the work of the Israelis, it'll be another Six-Day War situation
On January 29 2023 09:01 plasmidghost wrote: Not sure where to post this, but since Iran's been supplying drones to Russia, I figured here would be okay. A ton of weapons factories, ammo caches, and oil depots have been bombed across the country. Unconfirmed reports of Israeli fighter jets spotted over Iran. Not sure of the extent yet
On January 29 2023 09:01 plasmidghost wrote: Not sure where to post this, but since Iran's been supplying drones to Russia, I figured here would be okay. A ton of weapons factories, ammo caches, and oil depots have been bombed across the country. Unconfirmed reports of Israeli fighter jets spotted over Iran. Not sure of the extent yet
Could be both, an Israeli air strike, like they said they would do if Iran continued, and revolutionaries trying to take advantage of the situation.
And yeah I don't see this sparking an actual conflict. Israel is by far the dominant military force in the region and that is before you add the support from particularly the US they would have. The reason Israel can make threats about bombing Iran and then following through on those threats is because Iran has no hope of winning a direct conflict, tho it may certainly cause an increase in their support of terrorism against Israel.