|
|
Northern Ireland23744 Posts
On October 10 2019 09:42 TaylorG wrote: imo, nobody here has the slightest clue as to how politics work.... my guess is anyone angry at this has issue themselves and just using this to justify their anger Jesus
|
This is an official statement by Netease, which represents Blizzard in China (but isn't Blizzard per se)
And in other news:
|
On October 10 2019 09:32 JimmyJRaynor wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2019 09:17 Kerotan wrote:On October 10 2019 08:59 RealityTheGreat wrote: Blizzard doesn't like to mix up politic and games. For example, no Blizzard Game bases on real world politic background.
Games and politics are always going to be related: They are quite happy to get into politics when they make Tracer a woman who likes woman. i'm pretty sure Blizzard only "celebrates" gay pride in certain countries it is not a global initiative.
On October 10 2019 09:33 Nakajin wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2019 09:17 Kerotan wrote:On October 10 2019 08:59 RealityTheGreat wrote: Blizzard doesn't like to mix up politic and games. For example, no Blizzard Game bases on real world politic background.
Games and politics are always going to be related: They are quite happy to get into politics when they make Tracer a woman who likes woman. Also, she isn't in China
MY POINT MY DUDES.
Blizzard gets into politics when its expedient. Slapping on rainbow paint to characters a little after release in markets where players are broadly queer friendly (and remember there were still people who didn't like Tracer as a WLW,)
Companies love to court a bit of controversy, when its fiscally expedient and maybe even tacitly supporting the right of an area to self govern might not be the right thing to do money wise, but it is still the right thing to do.
Further, we can be all solemn and say "Blitzchung he broke the rules, Blizz enforce rules end of", but that is to ignore that the rules are arbitrary: it is at blizzards sole discretion when to enforce them, so it is entirely right to question when Blizz decides to enforce the rules or not.
And right now, Blizzard if it means to or not, is siding with an authoritarian regime after coming down very heavy handed on everyone involved.
|
Northern Ireland23744 Posts
On October 10 2019 10:50 BerserkSword wrote: Blizzard was completely within its rights regarding the actions it took, and it did nothing wrong.
It is trying to maintain access to its 2nd/3rd biggest market, and likely its most rapidly growing market.
freedom of speech =/= saying whatever you want, whenever you want, without consequences.
The HS player hijacked Blizzard's platform, broke the ELUA, and jeopardized the ability of Blizzard to do business in one of its major markets.
Blizzard choosing to stay apolitical =/= complicity with China.
If the people who are outraged over this want to be consistent and non hypocritical, they should show this outrage to companies such as Apple, Nike, Ford, GM, Costco, Walmart, etc as well.
If you really want to go down the rabbit hole, the U.S. and its NATO cronies have engaged in practices that violate human rights as well. Might as well speak out against NATO countries and companies associated with them as well. It’s not apolitical at all, it’s overly punitive and clearly intended to curry favour with Chinese sensibilities.
One can go down the rabbit hole, ultimately Blizzard is one such entity I can actually withhold my consent from via my wallet, which I cannot directly do to even the government of my own country.
|
"We should separate politics and sports" - gamer brings politics into esports, gets banned. But somehow it's Blizzard's fault?
This is an interesting take. Can someone refute it?
|
On October 10 2019 06:29 chuchuchu wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2019 06:14 Penev wrote:On October 10 2019 06:08 chuchuchu wrote:On October 10 2019 05:53 Excludos wrote:On October 10 2019 05:47 chuchuchu wrote:On October 10 2019 05:43 Excludos wrote:On October 10 2019 05:33 chuchuchu wrote: Even Wikipedia has debates about whether there is a massacre in Tiananmen (1989). There are no debates on Wikipedia about whether the massacre happened. People are allowed to debate on the wiki debate page, and on there anyone and whomever can say whatever the heck they please. That never makes it onto the actual article itself, which requires sources for everything you post. And there are plenty of sources for Tiananmen square. There's fucking photos of it! And they have existed since before Photoshop was a thing. Are you questioning my ability to use the network? Yes. Quite profoundly: https://observers.france24.com/en/20120604-new-photos-emerge-showing-tiananmen-square-just-after-1989-massacre-china-student-protest-commemorationAnd thanks for making me google these for you. They make me sick to my stomach. There are more, btw. Any google search will do. They are not censored over here (yet) The "tank man" is from the day after the massacre, not from the massacre itself. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1561088272745847&wfr=spider&for=pcI really hope that you can look at these. What is the photo of the slaughter? What is evidence? What is the real slaughter However, it seems that it is hard to say clearly with Westerners and whites. After all, it is a country that relies on the slave trade and the ethnic groups of Africa and the Americas are extinct. I would like to know that Americans are afraid when they are lying on the land where Indians and blacks are buried. So far you have compared the Hong Kong protesters with the KKK, I think you called me stupid, it's hard to know for sure with your English, you are denying the tiananmen square massacre happened and now you start to get racist about "whites". I wonder where you'll go next! Westerners still believe that they are on the side of democracy and freedom. Instead of standing in the US-China trade war and the Sino-US dispute, it stands on the side of the United States. Hong Kong and the NBA are just a continuation of this struggle. You are like a high school student. Disappointed Is the fact of the statement racial discrimination? very funny. Just like you won't praise me for accepting the Cultural Revolution. Is it freedom of speech? When things are reversed, when a Chinese person in turn accuses the West of being racist, it is brainwashed and persecuted. I am only suspecting the tears of the crocodile. Because Western society is the beneficiary of the collapse of Chinese society. If I am racist, I will not mention that I love nasa and love Kennedy. As you are ridiculous about my remarks, I also treat your remarks like this. You call me the AI of high school students. Indeed, because my native language is Chinese, using Google Translate allows me to express a lot of things faster. I at least think that my English is better than your Chinese. Of course you won't care, but still laugh at my English. Emm, this is what I want to say. Because you are born to think that you are right, think that everyone should speak English and think that you are on the side of justice. Yes, I said it is a fact, and you should believe in what I believe. It is not difficult to explain why there are always many missionaries in the West, and even in the most glorious time in history, the East did not send a missionary to the West.
You can say all of those horrible things about westerners, and nobody will fire you from your job or take away things you've earned. You can peddle wild and offensive conspiracy theories that are refuted by literally hundreds of people who witnessed the events, moved away, and have been allowed to speak about their firsthand experiences, and suffer essentially no negative consequences at all. That's the difference between mainland China and the West. That's the whole point of why people in HK are upset.
|
On October 10 2019 11:09 Garnet wrote:Show nested quote +"We should separate politics and sports" - gamer brings politics into esports, gets banned. But somehow it's Blizzard's fault? This is an interesting take. Can someone refute it? That's a take?
Wut
|
On October 10 2019 09:17 Kerotan wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2019 08:59 RealityTheGreat wrote: Blizzard doesn't like to mix up politic and games. For example, no Blizzard Game bases on real world politic background.
Games and politics are always going to be related: They are quite happy to get into politics when they make Tracer a woman who likes woman. They want to avoid all the argument, but this(Tracer) is not a correct decision. When the player said those, Blizzard obey its rule, not for politic.
|
On October 10 2019 10:45 Yurie wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2019 10:40 emperorofwild wrote:On October 09 2019 16:11 pzlama333 wrote:On October 09 2019 15:37 abuse wrote:On October 09 2019 15:26 Haukinger wrote:On October 09 2019 15:19 abuse wrote: You say mixing up sports and politics is frowned upon, yet, Blizzard is allowed to be as political as they want. Do you know that in the Overwatch league the Taiwanese team isn't called Taiwan but "Chinese Taipei" and the players are not allowed to even use their own country's flag because Blizzard doesn't want to kiss up to China to enter their market, and China thinks Taiwan is still their territory.
And south tirolean athletes are forced to compete under the italian flag, and there's the organizer's egalitarian ads in soccer matches and so on. Of course, sports are used for political agitation, but that doesn't make adding to it less bad. First off, South Tyrol isn't a country(not recognized at least). Taiwan is. Second, you're just proving my point here. Organizations can do whatever the fuck they want, both in my case and . First, Taiwan is not a country. United Nation does not recognize it. United States does not recognize it. Russia does not recognize it. United Kingdom, France, and all European Union countries do not recognize it. Most countries in the world do not recognize it. Even Taiwan's own "constitution", claim itself as part of China, under the name of "Republic of China". Technically, the mainland and the government in the island are still at full war state, and there is not even a cease fire. Second, Blizzard has its rules and will follow it. Anyone who compete an official competition also must accept it. If someone break the rules, whatever it is cheating or insulting other people, Blizzard has and will use its power. Not only Blizzard, most major sports organizations all have such rules. One example is FIFA, which bans all politics in any soccer event. 3. The riots and terrorists in Hong Kong do not seek freedom of speech. They seek freedom of making crimes and separation by force. They burn subway and banks, loot shops, block airport, and attack police, tourists and random people on street. If anyone want to support such actions, I assume that they are no difference with 9/11 attackers. good for you! I can not believe these people go this far! No discussion about politic view is right or wrong,the rules are just no politics in game, isn't it clear enough? or the HK guy just said something you guys like to hear, rules are gone? so how abOut plAyers say Hk/TW belOngs to ChIna instead of glhf in game? I guess it's not OK because you guys are soso double standard It was not said in the game. It was said outside the game in the extra content section that I hardly ever watch in e-sports or normal sports. Secondly, the punishment is not proportional with the action. If the action was a warning (perhaps a minor fine) with the VOD up with a disclaimer added there would be no thread here. Third, if somebody is of that opinion and made it in the extra section that is there to tell you more about the players to personalize them I wouldn't think it is wrong. I would not agree with their opinion and likely lose respect for them as a person but would not request them to remove the VOD. It is not hate speech in either case. Somebody going out and saying kill all the police or kill all the Islamic people in China in a serious way would deserve a similar response as what this got. Especially if they pushed people to join them in the actions. Stating support with a moment that is mostly positive or pointing out current political problems doesn't really match that.
I don't think in-game or in pre/after game interviews are that different. The guy was using BLZ‘ platform to do this. IF this is ok, everyone can use it to state his/her views about politics,races,religions, or at least, some commercial ads. How about that ? These can be the Vioce Matters! Go hell the Games!
|
On October 10 2019 11:17 RealityTheGreat wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2019 09:17 Kerotan wrote:On October 10 2019 08:59 RealityTheGreat wrote: Blizzard doesn't like to mix up politic and games. For example, no Blizzard Game bases on real world politic background.
Games and politics are always going to be related: They are quite happy to get into politics when they make Tracer a woman who likes woman. They want to avoid all the argument, but this(Tracer) is not a correct decision. When the player said those, Blizzard obey its rule, not for politic.
They want to avoid all the argument
Well that went well lol.
Blizzard obey its rule, not for politic
Read the rule. All rules are political when it comes to enforcement. This one is especially so as the text of the rule emphasises its arbitrary nature. Sole discretion. Yes Blizzard are enforcing their rules, but when the rule is an arbitrary one people will call them out on it. The decision that blizzard made to enforce is political. No getting round it.
Blizzard could also ban a hearthstone player for saying "women deserve the right to vote". It would be a lot less of a contentious statement but there is a public out there who don't believe women should be allowed to vote, and thus at Blizzards sole discretion, they could penalise this theoretical hearthstone player too.
|
On October 10 2019 11:09 Meta wrote: You can say all of those horrible things about westerners, and nobody will fire you from your job or take away things you've earned. You can peddle wild and offensive conspiracy theories that are refuted by literally hundreds of people who witnessed the events, moved away, and have been allowed to speak about their firsthand experiences, and suffer essentially no negative consequences at all. That's the difference between mainland China and the West. That's the whole point of why people in HK are upset.
There is one thing you cannot say (at least in the United States) and that is "I want to organize a union at my workplace". Somehow, despite all the laws protecting employees who want to unionize, many are fired for having such an idea. That is because employee solidarity threatens capitalism. This incident is a good opportunity to push the video game industry towards a union and worker coop model of organization. We can demand Blizzard give employees more decision making power and gradually demand more and more until defacto ownership is in the hands of the employees (this plan might be difficult). A easier plan, at the same time we can encourage Blizzard employees to unite together and work towards a common goal. This unity can lay foundations for starting a union and give them more power over Actiblizz management. We should look for chances to pressure other companies in all industries to transform into coops and also encourage workers to organize action against business decisions they disagree with.
|
On October 10 2019 11:22 emperorofwild wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2019 10:45 Yurie wrote:On October 10 2019 10:40 emperorofwild wrote:On October 09 2019 16:11 pzlama333 wrote:On October 09 2019 15:37 abuse wrote:On October 09 2019 15:26 Haukinger wrote:On October 09 2019 15:19 abuse wrote: You say mixing up sports and politics is frowned upon, yet, Blizzard is allowed to be as political as they want. Do you know that in the Overwatch league the Taiwanese team isn't called Taiwan but "Chinese Taipei" and the players are not allowed to even use their own country's flag because Blizzard doesn't want to kiss up to China to enter their market, and China thinks Taiwan is still their territory.
And south tirolean athletes are forced to compete under the italian flag, and there's the organizer's egalitarian ads in soccer matches and so on. Of course, sports are used for political agitation, but that doesn't make adding to it less bad. First off, South Tyrol isn't a country(not recognized at least). Taiwan is. Second, you're just proving my point here. Organizations can do whatever the fuck they want, both in my case and . First, Taiwan is not a country. United Nation does not recognize it. United States does not recognize it. Russia does not recognize it. United Kingdom, France, and all European Union countries do not recognize it. Most countries in the world do not recognize it. Even Taiwan's own "constitution", claim itself as part of China, under the name of "Republic of China". Technically, the mainland and the government in the island are still at full war state, and there is not even a cease fire. Second, Blizzard has its rules and will follow it. Anyone who compete an official competition also must accept it. If someone break the rules, whatever it is cheating or insulting other people, Blizzard has and will use its power. Not only Blizzard, most major sports organizations all have such rules. One example is FIFA, which bans all politics in any soccer event. 3. The riots and terrorists in Hong Kong do not seek freedom of speech. They seek freedom of making crimes and separation by force. They burn subway and banks, loot shops, block airport, and attack police, tourists and random people on street. If anyone want to support such actions, I assume that they are no difference with 9/11 attackers. good for you! I can not believe these people go this far! No discussion about politic view is right or wrong,the rules are just no politics in game, isn't it clear enough? or the HK guy just said something you guys like to hear, rules are gone? so how abOut plAyers say Hk/TW belOngs to ChIna instead of glhf in game? I guess it's not OK because you guys are soso double standard It was not said in the game. It was said outside the game in the extra content section that I hardly ever watch in e-sports or normal sports. Secondly, the punishment is not proportional with the action. If the action was a warning (perhaps a minor fine) with the VOD up with a disclaimer added there would be no thread here. Third, if somebody is of that opinion and made it in the extra section that is there to tell you more about the players to personalize them I wouldn't think it is wrong. I would not agree with their opinion and likely lose respect for them as a person but would not request them to remove the VOD. It is not hate speech in either case. Somebody going out and saying kill all the police or kill all the Islamic people in China in a serious way would deserve a similar response as what this got. Especially if they pushed people to join them in the actions. Stating support with a moment that is mostly positive or pointing out current political problems doesn't really match that. I don't think in-game or in pre/after game interviews are that different. The guy was using BLZ‘ platform to do this. IF this is ok, everyone can use it to state his/her views about politics,races,religions, or at least, some commercial ads. How about that ? These can be the Vioce Matters! Go hell the Games! In sports, gaming, and exports, it is universally accepted in the west that it is a good, positive, healthy thing to allow the victor to speak in solidarity with groups like the protesters in Hong Kong just as Blitzchung did. It's been that way since my grandparents were born, and earlier. After you lift your trophy (literally or figuratively) you are given time to speak. In this case, the player said something objectively positive and in opposition to objectively inhumane behavior. Under normal circumstances, this would have been celebrated briefly with applause and kind comments theb, likely, largely forgotten about outside of Asia. Instead, Blizzard chose to start a shit storm.
|
On October 09 2019 20:10 Dangermousecatdog wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2019 20:06 Alejandrisha wrote:On October 09 2019 20:04 Dangermousecatdog wrote:On October 09 2019 20:00 Alejandrisha wrote: what a crock of shit. spineless executives bowing to communist regime. the people who own you are the people you cannot criticize. They aren't bowing to a communist regime. China is a capitalist regime and Blizzard's actions are fully in line with capitalism. They are still totally spineless of course, and they are fully aware that money owns them. there is no capitalism without free press. there are positive externalites in taking a stand against suppression of expression A free press is not an essential of capitalism, it is an essential of freedom. Two different concepts. Capitalism only needs the flow of money to be concentrated to be spent. And China and their ruling party understands capitalism oh so very well, which is why they can use it to their advantage. Their capitalistic system undergoes many different descriptions over time, but the most popular one seems to be "state capitalism" at the moment, if you want to read up on how exactly China has captured the world market with its capitalsim.
Wow, you really butchered and perverted the definition of Capitalism. Adam Smith is rolling in his grave.
cap·i·tal·ism /ˈkapədlˌizəm/ noun an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state. "an era of free-market capitalism"
China's trade and industry are heavily manipulated by the state.
|
On October 10 2019 12:01 BronzeKnee wrote: Wow, you really butchered and perverted the definition of Capitalism. Adam Smith is rolling in his grave.
cap·i·tal·ism /ˈkapədlˌizəm/ noun an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state. "an era of free-market capitalism"
China's trade and industry are heavily manipulated by the state.
China is known as state capitalism. It is similar to Bismark's Germany and Japan from Meiji era on wards. The state directs investment and controls major industries such as steel, coal, railways, etc. but operates these industries according to principals of capitalism: profit and expansion, rather than to satisfy human needs. Other sectors are dominated by private firms and operate also for profit.
|
This is quite similar in nature to both happenings in the NFL, and the NBA. In the NFL a number of players made political actions by refusing to stand for the national anthem. Some folks laud them for it, others dispise them for it.
In the NBA, an owner (of the Houston Rockets) also backed those in HongKong. At first, the NBA started to ostrasize him, but in the end, at least stood up for his freedom to do so. China, took severe action in response to this by cutting all tv of games there, as well as other punishments.
I think this is probably more similar to the latter due to the obvious financial losses that are possible now that companies are so integrated in the global market. Their bottom line is more important than another's freedom.
edit:spelling.
|
On October 10 2019 12:08 meiji_emperor wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2019 12:01 BronzeKnee wrote: Wow, you really butchered and perverted the definition of Capitalism. Adam Smith is rolling in his grave.
cap·i·tal·ism /ˈkapədlˌizəm/ noun an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state. "an era of free-market capitalism"
China's trade and industry are heavily manipulated by the state.
China is known as state capitalism. It is similar to Bismark's Germany and Japan from Meiji era on wards. The state directs investment and controls major industries such as steel, coal, railways, etc. but operates these industries according to principals of capitalism: profit and expansion, rather than to satisfy human needs. Other sectors are dominated by private firms and operate also for profit.
"State capitalism" doesn't exist, mutually exclusive concepts. It'd be like saying big government libertarians, it just makes no sense.
Have you not read The Wealth of Nations? Control doesn't have to mean ownership. There is no invisible hand when China is manipulating their currency. No invisible hand when tariffs are being applied.
The destruction of capitalism worldwide is threatening freedom. This case is no different, if people can't punish a company with the wallets then we are lost.
|
They should have just given him a warning. Or suspended him for a day or something. That would have appeased China enough but not created such an uproar.
Or, not said anything - I don't think there would have been a huge backlash. Its not like Blizzard said it, just one of their employees.
Everyone is scared because of the Dolce Gabana PR nightmare in China but that was actual Dolce Gabana making dumb statements toward China.
A random player on Hearthstone? This was way overkill and now they're taking a ton of backlash on the other side. Dumb move.
|
how is this even relevant to the actual game?
|
On October 10 2019 11:35 blunderfulguy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2019 11:22 emperorofwild wrote:On October 10 2019 10:45 Yurie wrote:On October 10 2019 10:40 emperorofwild wrote:On October 09 2019 16:11 pzlama333 wrote:On October 09 2019 15:37 abuse wrote:On October 09 2019 15:26 Haukinger wrote:On October 09 2019 15:19 abuse wrote: You say mixing up sports and politics is frowned upon, yet, Blizzard is allowed to be as political as they want. Do you know that in the Overwatch league the Taiwanese team isn't called Taiwan but "Chinese Taipei" and the players are not allowed to even use their own country's flag because Blizzard doesn't want to kiss up to China to enter their market, and China thinks Taiwan is still their territory.
And south tirolean athletes are forced to compete under the italian flag, and there's the organizer's egalitarian ads in soccer matches and so on. Of course, sports are used for political agitation, but that doesn't make adding to it less bad. First off, South Tyrol isn't a country(not recognized at least). Taiwan is. Second, you're just proving my point here. Organizations can do whatever the fuck they want, both in my case and . First, Taiwan is not a country. United Nation does not recognize it. United States does not recognize it. Russia does not recognize it. United Kingdom, France, and all European Union countries do not recognize it. Most countries in the world do not recognize it. Even Taiwan's own "constitution", claim itself as part of China, under the name of "Republic of China". Technically, the mainland and the government in the island are still at full war state, and there is not even a cease fire. Second, Blizzard has its rules and will follow it. Anyone who compete an official competition also must accept it. If someone break the rules, whatever it is cheating or insulting other people, Blizzard has and will use its power. Not only Blizzard, most major sports organizations all have such rules. One example is FIFA, which bans all politics in any soccer event. 3. The riots and terrorists in Hong Kong do not seek freedom of speech. They seek freedom of making crimes and separation by force. They burn subway and banks, loot shops, block airport, and attack police, tourists and random people on street. If anyone want to support such actions, I assume that they are no difference with 9/11 attackers. good for you! I can not believe these people go this far! No discussion about politic view is right or wrong,the rules are just no politics in game, isn't it clear enough? or the HK guy just said something you guys like to hear, rules are gone? so how abOut plAyers say Hk/TW belOngs to ChIna instead of glhf in game? I guess it's not OK because you guys are soso double standard It was not said in the game. It was said outside the game in the extra content section that I hardly ever watch in e-sports or normal sports. Secondly, the punishment is not proportional with the action. If the action was a warning (perhaps a minor fine) with the VOD up with a disclaimer added there would be no thread here. Third, if somebody is of that opinion and made it in the extra section that is there to tell you more about the players to personalize them I wouldn't think it is wrong. I would not agree with their opinion and likely lose respect for them as a person but would not request them to remove the VOD. It is not hate speech in either case. Somebody going out and saying kill all the police or kill all the Islamic people in China in a serious way would deserve a similar response as what this got. Especially if they pushed people to join them in the actions. Stating support with a moment that is mostly positive or pointing out current political problems doesn't really match that. I don't think in-game or in pre/after game interviews are that different. The guy was using BLZ‘ platform to do this. IF this is ok, everyone can use it to state his/her views about politics,races,religions, or at least, some commercial ads. How about that ? These can be the Vioce Matters! Go hell the Games! In sports, gaming, and exports, it is universally accepted in the west that it is a good, positive, healthy thing to allow the victor to speak in solidarity with groups like the protesters in Hong Kong just as Blitzchung did. It's been that way since my grandparents were born, and earlier. After you lift your trophy (literally or figuratively) you are given time to speak. In this case, the player said something objectively positive and in opposition to objectively inhumane behavior. Under normal circumstances, this would have been celebrated briefly with applause and kind comments theb, likely, largely forgotten about outside of Asia. Instead, Blizzard chose to start a shit storm. so finally,it is the problem of good or bad,and it MUST judged by YOU people? I think they are riots with “freedom”“democracy” in their mouth,gasoline bottles and sticks in their hands,can my idea be RIGHT? Can my voice be the voice matters? So before every e-sports or sports game,Lets talk about those things?everyplayer have same time,like 15 or 30min?
|
Canada8988 Posts
On October 10 2019 11:35 blunderfulguy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2019 11:22 emperorofwild wrote:On October 10 2019 10:45 Yurie wrote:On October 10 2019 10:40 emperorofwild wrote:On October 09 2019 16:11 pzlama333 wrote:On October 09 2019 15:37 abuse wrote:On October 09 2019 15:26 Haukinger wrote:On October 09 2019 15:19 abuse wrote: You say mixing up sports and politics is frowned upon, yet, Blizzard is allowed to be as political as they want. Do you know that in the Overwatch league the Taiwanese team isn't called Taiwan but "Chinese Taipei" and the players are not allowed to even use their own country's flag because Blizzard doesn't want to kiss up to China to enter their market, and China thinks Taiwan is still their territory.
And south tirolean athletes are forced to compete under the italian flag, and there's the organizer's egalitarian ads in soccer matches and so on. Of course, sports are used for political agitation, but that doesn't make adding to it less bad. First off, South Tyrol isn't a country(not recognized at least). Taiwan is. Second, you're just proving my point here. Organizations can do whatever the fuck they want, both in my case and . First, Taiwan is not a country. United Nation does not recognize it. United States does not recognize it. Russia does not recognize it. United Kingdom, France, and all European Union countries do not recognize it. Most countries in the world do not recognize it. Even Taiwan's own "constitution", claim itself as part of China, under the name of "Republic of China". Technically, the mainland and the government in the island are still at full war state, and there is not even a cease fire. Second, Blizzard has its rules and will follow it. Anyone who compete an official competition also must accept it. If someone break the rules, whatever it is cheating or insulting other people, Blizzard has and will use its power. Not only Blizzard, most major sports organizations all have such rules. One example is FIFA, which bans all politics in any soccer event. 3. The riots and terrorists in Hong Kong do not seek freedom of speech. They seek freedom of making crimes and separation by force. They burn subway and banks, loot shops, block airport, and attack police, tourists and random people on street. If anyone want to support such actions, I assume that they are no difference with 9/11 attackers. good for you! I can not believe these people go this far! No discussion about politic view is right or wrong,the rules are just no politics in game, isn't it clear enough? or the HK guy just said something you guys like to hear, rules are gone? so how abOut plAyers say Hk/TW belOngs to ChIna instead of glhf in game? I guess it's not OK because you guys are soso double standard It was not said in the game. It was said outside the game in the extra content section that I hardly ever watch in e-sports or normal sports. Secondly, the punishment is not proportional with the action. If the action was a warning (perhaps a minor fine) with the VOD up with a disclaimer added there would be no thread here. Third, if somebody is of that opinion and made it in the extra section that is there to tell you more about the players to personalize them I wouldn't think it is wrong. I would not agree with their opinion and likely lose respect for them as a person but would not request them to remove the VOD. It is not hate speech in either case. Somebody going out and saying kill all the police or kill all the Islamic people in China in a serious way would deserve a similar response as what this got. Especially if they pushed people to join them in the actions. Stating support with a moment that is mostly positive or pointing out current political problems doesn't really match that. I don't think in-game or in pre/after game interviews are that different. The guy was using BLZ‘ platform to do this. IF this is ok, everyone can use it to state his/her views about politics,races,religions, or at least, some commercial ads. How about that ? These can be the Vioce Matters! Go hell the Games! In sports, gaming, and exports, it is universally accepted in the west that it is a good, positive, healthy thing to allow the victor to speak in solidarity with groups like the protesters in Hong Kong just as Blitzchung did. It's been that way since my grandparents were born, and earlier. After you lift your trophy (literally or figuratively) you are given time to speak. In this case, the player said something objectively positive and in opposition to objectively inhumane behavior. Under normal circumstances, this would have been celebrated briefly with applause and kind comments theb, likely, largely forgotten about outside of Asia. Instead, Blizzard chose to start a shit storm.
It's not actually well recived, remember Kaepernick or Tommie Smith and John Carlos in Mexico? But obviously the problem here is more that the Chinese government is pressuring everyone they can to protect their image and close the revolution, good luck to those keeping up the fight, I hope China revel itself weaker than it look.
|
|
|
|