|
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread |
Ah that must be the bit that had me seeing headlines of "New security strategy US is frontal attack upon Europe"
Guess most of it was written by Putin.
And just after working to defuse to Ukraine-Russia 'surrender deal' the EU diplomatic corp can now work to defuse the next crisis.
I feel sorry for those people constantly running from Trump crisis to Trump crisis.
|
The Monroe Doctrine will never die, it seems. The strategy also feels a lot like pushing for creating these massive continent-spanning empires with colonies and vassal states. Europe is just too far away, and it is harder to convince people that the Germans need to be subjugated. Much easier to sell the idea that the USA is entitled to having control over South America, as those are the lands of the invaders at the southern border. They clearly can't take care of themselves. Giving up on colonies was the greatest mistake made after WW2. The USA should have taken the colonies for itself from the falling European powers. This is similar to Putin's Russian imperialism.
Not surprising that there is still this desire for grandeur among people. It fits well with the tone of any diplomatic exchange and the transactionality of the demanded deals. If Europe does not elect Trump-supporting far-right leaders, then they can be abandoned. Europe needs to pay the USA for NATO protection. If you have a trade deficit, you must pay it with tariffs.
|
I mean, basically the new US National Security Strategy is Putin's "multipolar world".
Trump is basically giving him everything he wanted, the only issue being that Europe and EU is much more important and holds way more cards then either of them like to pretend they do.
The writing has been on the wall since at least the election, it's all in the project 2025 and other Heritage foundation documents, or if you wanna look in the other direction in the Foundations of Geopolitics by Dugin, phase 1, get UK to kick itself out of EU, use racial and other division to undermine US to the point where they appoint someone like Trump as president, try to dismantle the EU by stoking up anti immigrant rhetoric etc.
It's pretty depressing that it's very rare that European leaders are willing to point this out, the Portugese guy did but nothing really came out of it, Macron's been saying it as it can be seen from the leaked conversations, if only they actually did something about it, that'd be swell.
|
Northern Ireland26194 Posts
On December 06 2025 21:04 Manit0u wrote:On a more serious note the US has published it's NSS (National Security Strategy) and it's kinda terrifying. Basically throwing decades of diplomatic work out the window. Some key takeaways: - US is stepping away from the role of global hegemony and concentrating solely on the western hemisphere.
- The world is divided into three zones of influence, separated by the oceans.
- Europe becomes an important but secondary theater of operations that requires forced stabilization because it's unable to make decisions for itself.
- Middle-East becomes marginalized with minimal US presence, Africa is omitted entirely for everything except resource extraction.
- International organizations are evil and should be abolished. US is giving Europe until 2027 to take over most of the conventional operations of NATO and says that EU should be abolished in favor of more nationalistic and patriotic countries. Basically, cooperation is bad, strong should rule over weak and all interests should be looked at in terms of one-on-one profits instead of a wider network. Also, everything is secondary to making profit, alliances mean nothing.
- US soft power is no longer a thing. Going back to isolationism, peace through strength, "elastic realism", country is more important than international organizations, reorganization through peace (achieving peace through business deals, without taking into account the context of the conflict)
- Europe should be forced to make peace with Russia because it's unable to do so on its own.
There's obviously much more than that, regarding national identity and security, stopping migration etc. but it's a very lengthy document. Sounds absolutely crazy to me and I can't stop and wonder what's going on through the current administration's heads with this. Is threatening allies you had for decades a good idea? What if EU actually takes offense and sells trillions of US debt it holds to China? What if they ban nVidia from European markets? US economy could collapse overnight. It’s crazy stuff.
I mean it’s not just that ideologically I don’t like it, practically as well it seems counter-productive.
It’s one thing to crack the whip and want allies to pull their weight, but this is more of a wholesale rejection of the idea of mutually beneficial alliances, to a degree that is actively self-sabotaging
|
On December 06 2025 22:26 WombaT wrote:Show nested quote +On December 06 2025 21:04 Manit0u wrote:On a more serious note the US has published it's NSS (National Security Strategy) and it's kinda terrifying. Basically throwing decades of diplomatic work out the window. Some key takeaways: - US is stepping away from the role of global hegemony and concentrating solely on the western hemisphere.
- The world is divided into three zones of influence, separated by the oceans.
- Europe becomes an important but secondary theater of operations that requires forced stabilization because it's unable to make decisions for itself.
- Middle-East becomes marginalized with minimal US presence, Africa is omitted entirely for everything except resource extraction.
- International organizations are evil and should be abolished. US is giving Europe until 2027 to take over most of the conventional operations of NATO and says that EU should be abolished in favor of more nationalistic and patriotic countries. Basically, cooperation is bad, strong should rule over weak and all interests should be looked at in terms of one-on-one profits instead of a wider network. Also, everything is secondary to making profit, alliances mean nothing.
- US soft power is no longer a thing. Going back to isolationism, peace through strength, "elastic realism", country is more important than international organizations, reorganization through peace (achieving peace through business deals, without taking into account the context of the conflict)
- Europe should be forced to make peace with Russia because it's unable to do so on its own.
There's obviously much more than that, regarding national identity and security, stopping migration etc. but it's a very lengthy document. Sounds absolutely crazy to me and I can't stop and wonder what's going on through the current administration's heads with this. Is threatening allies you had for decades a good idea? What if EU actually takes offense and sells trillions of US debt it holds to China? What if they ban nVidia from European markets? US economy could collapse overnight. It’s crazy stuff. I mean it’s not just that ideologically I don’t like it, practically as well it seems counter-productive. It’s one thing to crack the whip and want allies to pull their weight, but this is more of a wholesale rejection of the idea of mutually beneficial alliances, to a degree that is actively self-sabotaging
There are even mentions in there that any deal the US makes now that would be "fair" to both parties must make the other party put in more of their investment than the US as a kind of repayment for past favors the US has been doing everyone.
In other words, US is moving on from the role of a benevolent hegemon and changing into a mobster extortionist, strong-arming other countries into doing its bidding and also encouraging other so inclined nations to do the same (Russia and China).
|
That is clearly his mindset. Just look at Venezuela. He just needs Maduro to offer a big enough payment and he will stop. If he cared about drugs, he wouldn't pardon a leader who was a proven drug lord. It is not even about oil because Venezuela oil flooding the market likely is a bad for thing for the US with their production levels. It is about making Trump personally more rich, that is all he cares about.
|
Entirely fitting for an economic system that's reaching an end state before crumbling into chaos because it can't support its own engine any longer. How else will you get the resources for your hungry hungry hippos? At least in Europe, we're seemingly trying to become a little more at equilibrium. The US is just chugging along. The freight train that won't stop, no matter the obstacle.
|
On December 06 2025 23:48 Manit0u wrote:Show nested quote +On December 06 2025 22:26 WombaT wrote:On December 06 2025 21:04 Manit0u wrote:On a more serious note the US has published it's NSS (National Security Strategy) and it's kinda terrifying. Basically throwing decades of diplomatic work out the window. Some key takeaways: - US is stepping away from the role of global hegemony and concentrating solely on the western hemisphere.
- The world is divided into three zones of influence, separated by the oceans.
- Europe becomes an important but secondary theater of operations that requires forced stabilization because it's unable to make decisions for itself.
- Middle-East becomes marginalized with minimal US presence, Africa is omitted entirely for everything except resource extraction.
- International organizations are evil and should be abolished. US is giving Europe until 2027 to take over most of the conventional operations of NATO and says that EU should be abolished in favor of more nationalistic and patriotic countries. Basically, cooperation is bad, strong should rule over weak and all interests should be looked at in terms of one-on-one profits instead of a wider network. Also, everything is secondary to making profit, alliances mean nothing.
- US soft power is no longer a thing. Going back to isolationism, peace through strength, "elastic realism", country is more important than international organizations, reorganization through peace (achieving peace through business deals, without taking into account the context of the conflict)
- Europe should be forced to make peace with Russia because it's unable to do so on its own.
There's obviously much more than that, regarding national identity and security, stopping migration etc. but it's a very lengthy document. Sounds absolutely crazy to me and I can't stop and wonder what's going on through the current administration's heads with this. Is threatening allies you had for decades a good idea? What if EU actually takes offense and sells trillions of US debt it holds to China? What if they ban nVidia from European markets? US economy could collapse overnight. It’s crazy stuff. I mean it’s not just that ideologically I don’t like it, practically as well it seems counter-productive. It’s one thing to crack the whip and want allies to pull their weight, but this is more of a wholesale rejection of the idea of mutually beneficial alliances, to a degree that is actively self-sabotaging There are even mentions in there that any deal the US makes now that would be "fair" to both parties must make the other party put in more of their investment than the US as a kind of repayment for past favors the US has been doing everyone. In other words, US is moving on from the role of a benevolent hegemon and changing into a mobster extortionist, strong-arming other countries into doing its bidding and also encouraging other so inclined nations to do the same (Russia and China). The lack of accounting for our strategic and likely threats, namely Russia and China, is what's worrying. Trump's too interested in making deals, and lavishes compliments up to the point that he feels slighted or unable to reach a deal. That isn't good.
The rest is kind of expected from this admin. JD Vance already gave the same basic content at the 2025 Munich Security Conference. Europe is abandoning the values it shares with America. Censors social media. Jails and arrests its citizens for their speech. Doesn't have a sane policy on immigration and enforces double standards on its laws. Some parts of it true, but overstated!
The Trump Administration finds itself at odds with European officials who hold unrealistic expectations for the war perched in unstable minority governments, many of which trample on basic principles of democracy to suppress opposition. A large European majority wants peace, yet that desire is not translated into policy, in large measure because of those governments’ subversion of democratic processes. This is strategically important to the United States precisely because European states cannot reform themselves if they are trapped in political crisis.
Yet Europe remains strategically and culturally vital to the United States. Transatlantic trade remains one of the pillars of the global economy and of American prosperity. European sectors from manufacturing to technology to energy remain among the world’s most robust. Europe is home to cutting-edge scientific research and world-leading cultural institutions. Not only can we not afford to write Europe off—doing so would be self-defeating for what this strategy aims to achieve.
American diplomacy should continue to stand up for genuine democracy, freedom of expression, and unapologetic celebrations of European nations’ individual character and history. America encourages its political allies in Europe to promote this revival of spirit, and the growing influence of patriotic European parties indeed gives cause for great optimism.
Our goal should be to help Europe correct its current trajectory. We will need a strong Europe to help us successfully compete, and to work in concert with us to prevent any adversary from dominating Europe. I look at that and don't come away thinking "Europe requires forced stabilization because it's unable to make decisions for itself." It's more lamenting Europe's decisions in recent times and warning about the future. Which Europe is perfectly capable of dismissing and throwing up the middle finger. (The whole thing is nonsensical on Ukraine; the US doesn't have a means of forcing peace in the war that Europe is opposing. Just in case that wasn't obvious.)
Europe *ahem* warns America all the damn time about the track of the US under Trump, so I assume they do approve of hearing the same thing in reverse at some level.
One last reminder that presidential administrations are temporary, and this doesn't reflect some binding document that commits the next administration for adherence. I wouldn't expect compliments from the US on how Europe is managing its business until 2029. I'm sure Europeans are aware of that at some level.
|
Salman Fiqy, a Somali immigrant who aggressively campaigned for Trump in 2024, is severing all ties with the president over his recent remarks where he referred to Somali migrants as “garbage,” condemning them as “racist”: https://www.rawstory.com/somalia/
When people talk about what Democrats should do differently to win more elections, the only solution that seems realistic is to just lie a fuckton in order to win over dumbasses like this guy. Maybe if Harris had promised to deport eight trillion gang members and 40000% GDP growth she'd have won over more conservatives.
|
A real mobster would make a move with Venezuela to create a Caribbean OPEC that meets in port authur texas in the international zone to allow investment into the carribean's fossil fuels in dollars in exchange for all business being done in dollars. Would solve Venezuela's economic issues to have a real currency and not one dutch diseased to death. OPEC dies and the Petrodollar gets to live another century.
They're just evil idiots, otherwise known as facists.
|
The NSS is well received in Asia, especially in Taiwan and Japan.
It reconfirmed the strategically important position of Taiwan and the main challenger is China. Taiwan, Philippines and Japan in particular were talking about increase military spending already, this just gave a massive boast to go through with it.
As for South Korea and Australia, well both of them never derisk decoupled the economy with China same way Japan and Taiwan had. Hopefully the nexperia drama shows how not to decouple with China. But that's a lesson for europe to take a decade to learn and a other to implement solution
|
On December 07 2025 03:44 LightSpectra wrote: When people talk about what Democrats should do differently to win more elections, the only solution that seems realistic is to just lie a fuckton in order to win over dumbasses like this guy. Maybe if Harris had promised to deport eight trillion gang members and 40000% GDP growth she'd have won over more conservatives.
Democrats need their own woke, CRT, transgenderization, etc., narrative that they repeat constantly to the idiots.
|
On December 07 2025 04:18 ETisME wrote: The NSS is well received in Asia, especially in Taiwan and Japan.
It reconfirmed the strategically important position of Taiwan and the main challenger is China. Taiwan, Philippines and Japan in particular were talking about increase military spending already, this just gave a massive boast to go through with it.
As for South Korea and Australia, well both of them never derisk decoupled the economy with China same way Japan and Taiwan had. Hopefully the nexperia drama shows how not to decouple with China. But that's a lesson for europe to take a decade to learn and a other to implement solution
I'm a bit surprised with this. I read a few Western articles about the NSS and got the impression that the attitude toward China was surprisingly mild but the Asian allies should feel okay about it because the document still underlines their importance and isn't straight up hostile toward them as it is toward (western) Europe.
|
If some people see the US shitting all over its European allies, threaten them and collude with their enemy and they think America's pivot to the Pacific is gonna be good for them, they're in for a big disappointment.
|
yeah if China offers him a deal Trump wil happily give them Taiwan.
|
On December 07 2025 04:51 Sent. wrote:Show nested quote +On December 07 2025 04:18 ETisME wrote: The NSS is well received in Asia, especially in Taiwan and Japan.
It reconfirmed the strategically important position of Taiwan and the main challenger is China. Taiwan, Philippines and Japan in particular were talking about increase military spending already, this just gave a massive boast to go through with it.
As for South Korea and Australia, well both of them never derisk decoupled the economy with China same way Japan and Taiwan had. Hopefully the nexperia drama shows how not to decouple with China. But that's a lesson for europe to take a decade to learn and a other to implement solution I'm a bit surprised with this. I read a few Western articles about the NSS and got the impression that the attitude toward China was surprisingly mild but the Asian allies should feel okay about it because the document still underlines their importance and isn't straight up hostile toward them as it is toward (western) Europe. Yes and no I would say. it wasn't like "how to destroy China 101".
They are putting forth more actions to protect taiwan, just couple days ago when France is meeting up with Xi asking for more investment, Trump signed "Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act".
The NSS also specific the importance of keeping Taiwan safe, not just for the chips, but also the island chain strategy.
Taiwan president already made a statement thanking this.
There were doubters in Taiwan thinking Trump would quit Taiwan defense when they have Taiwan semiconductor manufacturing moved to the US. Can't rmb who but trump officials already pointed out it's an insurance, and no one want the house burning down even if they have an insurance.
There was a time when Taiwan officials couldn't reach to US, reason being the diplomat and several others were hostile to the Republicans, during the elections. It was a complete failure of diplomacy, completely ignoring Taiwan seeks bapastian support.
Sounds similar to how all the European leaders have been acting, isn't it? And lots of them trying to pin it on Trump. Remember Victoria Nuland leaks in 2014 (under Obama), and Obama calling EU free rider etc. You can be sure it didn't start with Trump thing. Trump is what happens when the lid is off.
Last couple of weeks the same taiwan diplomats are now on "war room" podcast to get involved with "far right/right wing" Americans and get to understand each other better.
Shin Godzilla is a great political movie showing the relationship between japanese gov and American from the perspective of japanese. Americans will always have their own interest as well, but they are the strongest allies if you respect and work with them.
That's why Japan and the US diplomacy get along so well for the past 40 years. They are in the same pacing and language. They don't "hurt" one and another.
|
Trump is 100% the reason countries are looking for stronger relationships with China, it’s not a question but a direct line. Canada went from ruining their relationship with China for arresting some one their best ally asked them too (US). To the US messing up their trade.
The US is unreliable, our economic policy is all around finding new and more reliable markets for our products.
The US can claim they are “fighting China” or whatever, but they are helping them massively.
|
On December 07 2025 09:13 Billyboy wrote: Trump is 100% the reason countries are looking for stronger relationships with China, it’s not a question but a direct line. Canada went from ruining their relationship with China for arresting some one their best ally asked them too (US). To the US messing up their trade.
The US is unreliable, our economic policy is all around finding new and more reliable markets for our products.
The US can claim they are “fighting China” or whatever, but they are helping them massively. Sure, do you think Japan would ever appease to China? Or Taiwan? These are security first alliance. It's ironic how Canadians voted a populist candidate to counter the populist US president. How do you think the Hong Kongers who emigrated to Canada feel about all this? That Canada is a reliable ally?
Instead of negotiation with the actual ally right next to continent, they want to build a tie with CHINA. Not far different than EU wanting that sweet sweet Russia gas. But you do you.
Who knows in a few years time, they will find out what Netherlands is going through now.
|
United States43322 Posts
Canadians not only didn’t vote for the populist, he lost his seat. They voted for the technocrat.
|
On December 07 2025 04:51 Sent. wrote:Show nested quote +On December 07 2025 04:18 ETisME wrote: The NSS is well received in Asia, especially in Taiwan and Japan.
It reconfirmed the strategically important position of Taiwan and the main challenger is China. Taiwan, Philippines and Japan in particular were talking about increase military spending already, this just gave a massive boast to go through with it.
As for South Korea and Australia, well both of them never derisk decoupled the economy with China same way Japan and Taiwan had. Hopefully the nexperia drama shows how not to decouple with China. But that's a lesson for europe to take a decade to learn and a other to implement solution I'm a bit surprised with this. I read a few Western articles about the NSS and got the impression that the attitude toward China was surprisingly mild but the Asian allies should feel okay about it because the document still underlines their importance and isn't straight up hostile toward them as it is toward (western) Europe.
China and Russia are no longer threats but rather friendly rivals in the dance of empires. This admin idea is for US to back off from being the top dog in the world (but at the same time not letting anyone else become the top dog) and split the world in 3 where each superpower can basically do what it wants. US can take South America, China can take Taiwan and other stuff, Russia can take Europe and Africa is there to just pillage and plunder its resources by anyone.
This is the new world order that they're envisioning.
|
|
|
|
|
|