• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:29
CEST 15:29
KST 22:29
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202532Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder8EWC 2025 - Replay Pack4Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced48BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025 Classic: "It's a thick wall to break through to become world champ" Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation Serral wins EWC 2025
Tourneys
LiuLi Cup Weeklies and Monthlies Info Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) TaeJa vs Creator Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
Which top zerg/toss will fail in qualifiers? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced 2025 Season 2 Ladder map pool Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 1 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL] Non-Korean Championship - Final weekend
Strategy
[G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
The Link Between Fitness and…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 604 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 3535

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 3533 3534 3535 3536 3537 5135 Next
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting!

NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.


If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44328 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-03-05 16:52:44
March 05 2022 16:49 GMT
#70681
On March 06 2022 01:40 WombaT wrote:
Regardless of how close, or not things came, it’s the fact that Trump could very conceivably be the nominee next time around.

Irrespective of things like criminal censure, he should be at least a political pariah, wholly unelectable. Which is demonstrably not the case.

It’s not like candidate Trump wasn’t problematic as all hell, but I could see how some of rhetoric definitely would appeal to certain groups of people, in legitimate ways on occasion.

It’s been 6 years of incompetence and moral bankruptcy in equal measure and well, people seem fine with it. But they also don’t want to be criticised for being fine with it, which is the rather odd part.

One can be a conservative and not vote Trump, or indeed reluctantly vote Trump in a lesser of no evils scenario, and also say, not defend his ‘stop the steal’ crusade.

Such things are eminently possible


I agree with everything you've said, and I think I'm even more worried about the fact that Trump has set a precedent that such behavior is acceptable - and even condoned - as a leader of the Republican party. Even if Trump loses the primary, he'd be losing to Ron DeSantis. Would a President DeSantis really be that much better? I honestly have no idea; he could even be worse than Trump. And then even when those two are gone, there's another one, and then another one. Their party is full of MTGs and Boeberts and other crazy, vile politicians. I don't know if playing whack-a-mole or cutting the head off a hydra is a more apt analogy, but I'm really worried about how it's not just about Trump anymore. Being Trump-like is how you win most Republican primaries.
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
Doc.Rivers
Profile Joined December 2011
United States404 Posts
March 05 2022 18:27 GMT
#70682
On March 05 2022 13:40 Husyelt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 05 2022 12:59 Doc.Rivers wrote:
I dare say that Trump stayed within the bounds of the law. Thus why the DOJ has not charged him, despite charging 700 others. He filed lawsuits, as opposed to calling in the national guard or the military. Neutral judges rejected those lawsuits. Even if Pence had acted out on January 6th, the states would presumably have just sent the electors back to dc. Or the Supreme court would have stepped in. Mostly what Trump did was to leave things up to judges. Then the crowd got out of hand on Jan 6th. But there is a reason the DOJ, after a thorough investigation and more than a year, has not charged Trump.

Mate, you gotta stop shrugging off the events. Trump spent weeks lying to not just his supporters but the entire country about a stolen election. Like why even downplay this at all? There's a thousand thousand reasons why Trump deserves the gutter, why pontificate the technicalities? The DOJ can't prosecute someone on pure lunacy, that's not an argument


I would not say that I shrugged off the events, but I did say that Trump probably didn't do anything illegal. You cite his lying about a very serious issue, but that's just not enough. People need to ask themselves why thr garland DOJ has not charged Trump. It's not because the DOJ is staffed by Republican partisans who have been brainwashed by fox news.
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44328 Posts
March 05 2022 18:36 GMT
#70683
On March 06 2022 03:27 Doc.Rivers wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 05 2022 13:40 Husyelt wrote:
On March 05 2022 12:59 Doc.Rivers wrote:
I dare say that Trump stayed within the bounds of the law. Thus why the DOJ has not charged him, despite charging 700 others. He filed lawsuits, as opposed to calling in the national guard or the military. Neutral judges rejected those lawsuits. Even if Pence had acted out on January 6th, the states would presumably have just sent the electors back to dc. Or the Supreme court would have stepped in. Mostly what Trump did was to leave things up to judges. Then the crowd got out of hand on Jan 6th. But there is a reason the DOJ, after a thorough investigation and more than a year, has not charged Trump.

Mate, you gotta stop shrugging off the events. Trump spent weeks lying to not just his supporters but the entire country about a stolen election. Like why even downplay this at all? There's a thousand thousand reasons why Trump deserves the gutter, why pontificate the technicalities? The DOJ can't prosecute someone on pure lunacy, that's not an argument


I would not say that I shrugged off the events, but I did say that Trump probably didn't do anything illegal. You cite his lying about a very serious issue, but that's just not enough. People need to ask themselves why thr garland DOJ has not charged Trump. It's not because the DOJ is staffed by Republican partisans who have been brainwashed by fox news.


Trump did several things that were illegal, starting with the fact that Trump literally called states he lost and asked their leaders for enough free, non-existent votes to flip those states. He literally tried rigging the election.

The question isn't whether or not Trump did anything illegal; it's well-documented that he did, and we're way past that question. The relevant questions are things like "Why isn't he being charged for the illegal things he did" or "How much more illegal crap would Trump have needed to do, before being finally charged?"
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15689 Posts
March 06 2022 01:59 GMT
#70684
One thing that’s great is all the whataboutism we used to see whenever someone would criticize Russia is completely out the window at this point. There is zero fuzziness around the idea of “who is better for the world? USA or Russia?” despite what edgelords on Twitter tried to push. There were times where there was enough fuzziness that their terrible little rants felt like they were slightly credible. It’s dead in the dirt. I am just so glad that politics can finally be discussed without having to address “well Russia is actually the good guys”.
gobbledydook
Profile Joined October 2012
Australia2603 Posts
March 06 2022 23:39 GMT
#70685
On March 06 2022 10:59 Mohdoo wrote:
One thing that’s great is all the whataboutism we used to see whenever someone would criticize Russia is completely out the window at this point. There is zero fuzziness around the idea of “who is better for the world? USA or Russia?” despite what edgelords on Twitter tried to push. There were times where there was enough fuzziness that their terrible little rants felt like they were slightly credible. It’s dead in the dirt. I am just so glad that politics can finally be discussed without having to address “well Russia is actually the good guys”.


I loved watching Tucker Carlson do a 180 and pretend he never supported Russia.
I am a dirty Protoss bullshit abuser
postcount69
Profile Joined September 2021
9 Posts
March 07 2022 00:47 GMT
#70686
I wonder if the people inside the FOX News sphere (that is, the people who watch it regularly. Who have it on in the background) even noticed. I suspect it's a "we have always been at war with Eastasia" situation.
Husyelt
Profile Blog Joined May 2020
United States832 Posts
March 07 2022 02:13 GMT
#70687
On March 07 2022 08:39 gobbledydook wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 06 2022 10:59 Mohdoo wrote:
One thing that’s great is all the whataboutism we used to see whenever someone would criticize Russia is completely out the window at this point. There is zero fuzziness around the idea of “who is better for the world? USA or Russia?” despite what edgelords on Twitter tried to push. There were times where there was enough fuzziness that their terrible little rants felt like they were slightly credible. It’s dead in the dirt. I am just so glad that politics can finally be discussed without having to address “well Russia is actually the good guys”.


I loved watching Tucker Carlson do a 180 and pretend he never supported Russia.

Tucker is the the literal replacements for They Live, or Society. He's not a person with opinions, it is playing it's part and will do another 180 turn if the cable news demands it. He's not a real human being, he is just another... thing. Long live the new flesh, eh Tucker?
You're getting cynical and that won't do I'd throw the rose tint back on the exploded view
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35147 Posts
March 07 2022 15:27 GMT
#70688
On March 06 2022 03:27 Doc.Rivers wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 05 2022 13:40 Husyelt wrote:
On March 05 2022 12:59 Doc.Rivers wrote:
I dare say that Trump stayed within the bounds of the law. Thus why the DOJ has not charged him, despite charging 700 others. He filed lawsuits, as opposed to calling in the national guard or the military. Neutral judges rejected those lawsuits. Even if Pence had acted out on January 6th, the states would presumably have just sent the electors back to dc. Or the Supreme court would have stepped in. Mostly what Trump did was to leave things up to judges. Then the crowd got out of hand on Jan 6th. But there is a reason the DOJ, after a thorough investigation and more than a year, has not charged Trump.

Mate, you gotta stop shrugging off the events. Trump spent weeks lying to not just his supporters but the entire country about a stolen election. Like why even downplay this at all? There's a thousand thousand reasons why Trump deserves the gutter, why pontificate the technicalities? The DOJ can't prosecute someone on pure lunacy, that's not an argument


I would not say that I shrugged off the events, but I did say that Trump probably didn't do anything illegal. You cite his lying about a very serious issue, but that's just not enough. People need to ask themselves why thr garland DOJ has not charged Trump. It's not because the DOJ is staffed by Republican partisans who have been brainwashed by fox news.

The Jan 6th mob was chasing one black officer down the other direction of a hallway from getting to congress people there to certify the election. Even if Trump had nothing to do with it, they were there for him and he was incredibly lax in stopping them. The smallest amount of competency on either the mob's part, or supposed interaction with a head of state, would have been all that was needed for a absolute tragedy.
Doc.Rivers
Profile Joined December 2011
United States404 Posts
March 07 2022 22:26 GMT
#70689
I don't think the mob was going to start slaughtering politicians if they came into contact. At the least the mob would have brought weapons if that was true.
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
March 07 2022 22:29 GMT
#70690
--- Nuked ---
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44328 Posts
March 07 2022 22:31 GMT
#70691
On March 08 2022 07:26 Doc.Rivers wrote:
I don't think the mob was going to start slaughtering politicians if they came into contact. At the least the mob would have brought weapons if that was true.


They brought plenty of weapons: https://www.npr.org/2021/03/19/977879589/yes-capitol-rioters-were-armed-here-are-the-weapons-prosecutors-say-they-used#:~:text=Capitol Riot Weapons Include Bear Spray, Fire Extinguishers,a false claim that rioters were not armed.

And while we can't predict how many politicians they would have killed, they were literally calling for the death of some of them, as they stormed the capitol, so.... o.O
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
Doc.Rivers
Profile Joined December 2011
United States404 Posts
March 07 2022 22:57 GMT
#70692
Yeah a couple people built a gallows for show, one guy brought bear spray, a couple people had stun guns, others had flagpoles. Still it was more of an unruly mob than an ISIS terror cell. When they actually made it to politicians, they got very quickly stopped by the people who were armed (the police).
Artisreal
Profile Joined June 2009
Germany9235 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-03-07 23:14:29
March 07 2022 23:11 GMT
#70693
You don't want to brush it aside and then do it anyway.
If secret service shooting and therebykill killing an insurrectionist who was trying to get to the Congresspeople is not enough of a sign for danger to life for you, I really don't know what is.

And also: just no
On March 08 2022 07:57 Doc.Rivers wrote:
Yeah a couple people built a gallows for show, one guy brought bear spray, a couple people had stun guns, others had flagpoles. Still it was more of an unruly mob than an ISIS terror cell. When they actually made it to politicians, they got very quickly stopped by the people who were armed (the police).


This post just shows how disingenuous you appear to me (or simply unaware of facts, that works too).
passive quaranstream fan
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44328 Posts
March 07 2022 23:17 GMT
#70694
On March 08 2022 07:57 Doc.Rivers wrote:
Yeah a couple people built a gallows for show, one guy brought bear spray, a couple people had stun guns, others had flagpoles. Still it was more of an unruly mob than an ISIS terror cell. When they actually made it to politicians, they got very quickly stopped by the people who were armed (the police).


They literally planted bombs in the area. The idea that these violent rioters weren't interested in hurting people is simply false.
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
Doc.Rivers
Profile Joined December 2011
United States404 Posts
March 07 2022 23:58 GMT
#70695
On March 08 2022 08:11 Artisreal wrote:
You don't want to brush it aside and then do it anyway.
If secret service shooting and therebykill killing an insurrectionist who was trying to get to the Congresspeople is not enough of a sign for danger to life for you, I really don't know what is.

And also: just no
Show nested quote +
On March 08 2022 07:57 Doc.Rivers wrote:
Yeah a couple people built a gallows for show, one guy brought bear spray, a couple people had stun guns, others had flagpoles. Still it was more of an unruly mob than an ISIS terror cell. When they actually made it to politicians, they got very quickly stopped by the people who were armed (the police).


This post just shows how disingenuous you appear to me (or simply unaware of facts, that works too).


Always fun when people trot out the "bad faith" or "disingenuous" arguments online in order to express strong disagreement. But it is a reasonable conclusion from the available facts that the mob was not there to slaughter politicians and would not have started slaughtering politicians if they came into contact.
RenSC2
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States1058 Posts
March 08 2022 00:02 GMT
#70696
On March 08 2022 08:58 Doc.Rivers wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 08 2022 08:11 Artisreal wrote:
You don't want to brush it aside and then do it anyway.
If secret service shooting and therebykill killing an insurrectionist who was trying to get to the Congresspeople is not enough of a sign for danger to life for you, I really don't know what is.

And also: just no
On March 08 2022 07:57 Doc.Rivers wrote:
Yeah a couple people built a gallows for show, one guy brought bear spray, a couple people had stun guns, others had flagpoles. Still it was more of an unruly mob than an ISIS terror cell. When they actually made it to politicians, they got very quickly stopped by the people who were armed (the police).


This post just shows how disingenuous you appear to me (or simply unaware of facts, that works too).


Always fun when people trot out the "bad faith" or "disingenuous" arguments online in order to express strong disagreement. But it is a reasonable conclusion from the available facts that the mob was not there to slaughter politicians and would not have started slaughtering politicians if they came into contact.

Yes, I’m sure they would have just stopped at beating a cop to death. Beating him to death was just for show, right? They totally just wanted to say mean things to the politicians.
Playing better than standard requires deviation. This divergence usually results in sub-standard play.
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35147 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-03-08 00:18:43
March 08 2022 00:17 GMT
#70697
It wasn't serious, but it was.
If it was they would have been armed, and they were.
More an angry mob than an ISIS terrorist cell, but planted bombs and made elected officials cower in fear due to a political aim.
Based on facts they weren't there to kill, but they did.

This is why people think you're full of hot air on this issue.

KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42685 Posts
March 08 2022 00:28 GMT
#70698
On March 08 2022 07:26 Doc.Rivers wrote:
I don't think the mob was going to start slaughtering politicians if they came into contact. At the least the mob would have brought weapons if that was true.

They did. You’ve not been paying attention.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25320 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-03-08 01:50:08
March 08 2022 01:49 GMT
#70699
On March 08 2022 08:58 Doc.Rivers wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 08 2022 08:11 Artisreal wrote:
You don't want to brush it aside and then do it anyway.
If secret service shooting and therebykill killing an insurrectionist who was trying to get to the Congresspeople is not enough of a sign for danger to life for you, I really don't know what is.

And also: just no
On March 08 2022 07:57 Doc.Rivers wrote:
Yeah a couple people built a gallows for show, one guy brought bear spray, a couple people had stun guns, others had flagpoles. Still it was more of an unruly mob than an ISIS terror cell. When they actually made it to politicians, they got very quickly stopped by the people who were armed (the police).


This post just shows how disingenuous you appear to me (or simply unaware of facts, that works too).


Always fun when people trot out the "bad faith" or "disingenuous" arguments online in order to express strong disagreement. But it is a reasonable conclusion from the available facts that the mob was not there to slaughter politicians and would not have started slaughtering politicians if they came into contact.

Not every reasonable conclusion needs to be stated.

Be they swept up by the adrenaline, the emotion, as so often happens with mobs, or if there were a pre-meditated intent to cause harm, there was certainly sufficient probable, nay likely risk of considerable physical harm to legislators.

Much as I find them largely reprehensible, misguided, or both, I would consider absolutely the vast majority weren’t going there to kill people.

Whether correct or not, this point you made has no actual link to the possibility that some of them, if they’d got close very much plausibly could have, and IMO would have.

We’ve had a few high-profile assassinations of legislators over here in the U.K. in recent years, by lone wolf types. In a U.K. that, while also trending that way has at least a considerably less toxic political environment, dangerous rhetoric from the media and leadership than that in the United States.

In a wider more poisionous political environment, in the middle of a mob who only turned out because they believed an election was stolen, to the degree they stormed the Capitol environment. With people who had not just lethal weapons, but other delights indicative of some sort of intent like cable ties. Some of whom were chanting delightfully about hanging folks.

In that environment, legislators weren’t in genuine jeopardy?

There’s such a confluence of common-sense breadcrumbs leading to the opposite conclusion that your assessment of cause, effect and risk is beyond questionable, at least as it pertains to this, or you are arguing in bad faith.

I don’t see any other reasonable conclusion I can draw here.

'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Doc.Rivers
Profile Joined December 2011
United States404 Posts
March 08 2022 03:11 GMT
#70700
As with everything else to do with Trump, many are prone to exaggerate the events of Jan 6th. The allegation that the crowd had intent to kill politicians, or was certain to do so, is one example. They were there to try to stop the certification of electors, not kill people. All of the known facts are consistent with that interpretation.
Prev 1 3533 3534 3535 3536 3537 5135 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
12:00
Playoff - Day 1/2
Zhanhun vs DewaltLIVE!
Mihu vs TBD
Fengzi vs TBD
ZZZero.O151
LiquipediaDiscussion
CranKy Ducklings
10:00
Sea Duckling Open #137
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko474
RushiSC 25
ForJumy 17
Aristorii 11
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 43962
Jaedong 2500
Sea 2101
BeSt 1073
Mini 804
Larva 609
ggaemo 423
Soma 365
GuemChi 363
ToSsGirL 323
[ Show more ]
Last 217
Nal_rA 205
Zeus 197
firebathero 194
Rush 179
hero 162
ZZZero.O 151
Mong 95
TY 91
ajuk12(nOOB) 44
Bonyth 42
Yoon 14
Noble 14
IntoTheRainbow 5
Terrorterran 4
Dota 2
Gorgc2948
qojqva2233
XcaliburYe419
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor269
Other Games
singsing2194
B2W.Neo1239
DeMusliM516
Happy227
byalli214
SortOf159
Hui .137
OptimusSC213
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH225
• Gemini_19 33
• Reevou 3
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Migwel
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix4
• Michael_bg 2
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2926
• WagamamaTV666
League of Legends
• Nemesis2685
• Jankos1206
Upcoming Events
WardiTV European League
2h 31m
ShoWTimE vs Harstem
Shameless vs MaxPax
HeRoMaRinE vs SKillous
ByuN vs TBD
Sparkling Tuna Cup
20h 31m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d
Bonyth vs TBD
WardiTV European League
1d 2h
Wardi Open
1d 21h
OSC
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
FEL Cracow 2025
Underdog Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
HCC Europe
CC Div. A S7
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CAC 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.