• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:19
CEST 02:19
KST 09:19
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL1Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator2[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task30[ASL19] Ro4 Recap : The Peak15DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Info & Preview21
Community News
Weekly Cups (May 19-25): Hindsight is 20/20?0DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack8[BSL20] RO20 Group Stage2EWC 2025 Regional Qualifiers (May 28-June 1)9Weekly Cups (May 12-18): Clem sweeps WardiTV May3
StarCraft 2
General
The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL Can anyone explain to me why u cant veto a matchup DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2025)
Tourneys
DreamHack Dallas 2025 [GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO12 - Group A SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void Mutation # 472 Dead Heat
Brood War
General
Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans? BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ GG Lan Party Bulgaria (Live in about 3 hours) BW General Discussion Recent recommended BW games
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL19] Ro8 Day 4
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy TL Mafia: Generative Agents Showdown Survivor II: The Amazon
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024 Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL.net Ten Commandments
Blogs
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Yes Sir! How Commanding Impr…
TrAiDoS
Poker
Nebuchad
Info SLEgma_12
SLEgma_12
SECOND COMMING
XenOsky
WombaT’s Old BW Terran Theme …
WombaT
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 11310 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 207

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 205 206 207 208 209 4975 Next
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting!

NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.


If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15485 Posts
May 17 2018 15:33 GMT
#4121
On May 17 2018 23:37 Plansix wrote:
All the reports I have read about those statements say that Trump attempting to talk about criminals and the MS-13, but did little to separate those folks from regular immigrants. The man has a hard time stringing coherent sentences together and the press is going to report on those sentences.

Also, it is poor reporting to not take into account the worst interoperation of that sort of statement. The claims that people are “looking for ways to make Trump seem racist” are true. Racist in the US are looking for any sign that Trump is there guy. And ham fisted statements like the one yesterday back up their belief that Trump is one of them.


I think from Trump's perspective, the difference doesn't matter. If you don't need brown people anyway, why even make the distinction. Just forget the whole thing. Sure you get a few engineers, but you get some rapists and criminals too, so just dump it all.

That being his thinking.
Kyadytim
Profile Joined March 2009
United States886 Posts
May 17 2018 15:43 GMT
#4122
On May 17 2018 15:54 Introvert wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 17 2018 15:44 Kyadytim wrote:
On May 17 2018 05:38 Plansix wrote:


So the master plan is to catch families of illegal immigrants, House their children separately and then go through the endless deportation process and hope no one fucks up during that time.

These deportation tactics get more draconian the longer Sessions and others run the show.

Don't worry, according to Trump Glorious Leader himself, "These aren't people. These are animals."
And it's totally okay to cram animals into structures like warehouses.
+ Show Spoiler +


/s

Using dehumanization rhetoric to armor the consciences of the subset of the population that they represent against the guilt of violence against the rest of the population and foreigners is not a good look for any nation. It's hard to not put this next to that IDF tweet.


You'd think posting in this thread this long would make one suspicious of getting an answer to a question without the actual question. Of course you went the extra (backwards) mile and didn't even quote a story which would enable anyone to follow up even a little bit.

He was talking about MS-13 gang members, as context makes clear. Although most of the news stories either bury that or just don't mention it. And this is why we get the moniker "fake news."

+ Show Spoiler +

go to 2:05

It wouldn't have mattered if he'd said MS-13 in both sentences instead of "These." Criminals and members of criminal organizations are still people, with all the rights and protections afforded people. Reducing them to animals justifies things such as violations of due process.
Kyadytim
Profile Joined March 2009
United States886 Posts
May 17 2018 15:47 GMT
#4123
On May 17 2018 16:51 Introvert wrote:
There have to be more important issues on which to burn all of one's credibility. It's not that he's "simple" or "stupid," it's that it's plain to everyone who can turn off the special Trump centers of their brains for 30 seconds that, when asked about MS-13, he responds by talking about MS-13. If he said "MS-13" he'd probably get criticized for saying it when the lady already said it. "He's so stupid he has to repeat what people say to him out loud!"

And it is certainly ridiculous for so many people and reporters to be presenting this as simply "Donald Trump's opinion on immigrants" without even allowing for an alternative interpretation. That's not journalism, it's advocacy. Considering that so many people don't read past the headline, it's espeically egregious.

I used to read several conservative news outlets regularly to avoid being entirely in a bubble, and there's been an increasing usage of phrases such as special Trump centers in the brain or Trump derangement syndrome that unsubtly imply that people who disagree with Trump have been driven insane by him.

Related, you just either called a bunch of people insane or implied that we disagree with Trump because we have brain cancer. That doesn't really contributed to amicable discussion.
Introvert
Profile Joined April 2011
United States4689 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-17 16:13:16
May 17 2018 16:09 GMT
#4124
On May 18 2018 00:47 Kyadytim wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 17 2018 16:51 Introvert wrote:
There have to be more important issues on which to burn all of one's credibility. It's not that he's "simple" or "stupid," it's that it's plain to everyone who can turn off the special Trump centers of their brains for 30 seconds that, when asked about MS-13, he responds by talking about MS-13. If he said "MS-13" he'd probably get criticized for saying it when the lady already said it. "He's so stupid he has to repeat what people say to him out loud!"

And it is certainly ridiculous for so many people and reporters to be presenting this as simply "Donald Trump's opinion on immigrants" without even allowing for an alternative interpretation. That's not journalism, it's advocacy. Considering that so many people don't read past the headline, it's espeically egregious.

I used to read several conservative news outlets regularly to avoid being entirely in a bubble, and there's been an increasing usage of phrases such as special Trump centers in the brain or Trump derangement syndrome that unsubtly imply that people who disagree with Trump have been driven insane by him.

Related, you just either called a bunch of people insane or implied that we disagree with Trump because we have brain cancer. That doesn't really contributed to amicable discussion.



But they have. Few on the right were harsher on Trump during the campaign for his rhetoric than I was. Yet for all the crap Trump has said, everyone has trouble stepping back for a few seconds and see what is actually being said. This happens a lot but I focused on that last night because I had a few minutes and it was such a ridiculous example.

As for "amicable discussion" I'd say that posting the conext-less clip you did then saying that a figure of speech was (or could be) implying you have cancer is arguing in very bad faith, and that's also pretty bad for discussion (and let's be real, "discussion" wasn't the objective when you posted that).
"It is therefore only at the birth of a society that one can be completely logical in the laws. When you see a people enjoying this advantage, do not hasten to conclude that it is wise; think rather that it is young." -Alexis de Tocqueville
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
May 17 2018 16:11 GMT
#4125
On May 18 2018 00:47 Kyadytim wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 17 2018 16:51 Introvert wrote:
There have to be more important issues on which to burn all of one's credibility. It's not that he's "simple" or "stupid," it's that it's plain to everyone who can turn off the special Trump centers of their brains for 30 seconds that, when asked about MS-13, he responds by talking about MS-13. If he said "MS-13" he'd probably get criticized for saying it when the lady already said it. "He's so stupid he has to repeat what people say to him out loud!"

And it is certainly ridiculous for so many people and reporters to be presenting this as simply "Donald Trump's opinion on immigrants" without even allowing for an alternative interpretation. That's not journalism, it's advocacy. Considering that so many people don't read past the headline, it's espeically egregious.

I used to read several conservative news outlets regularly to avoid being entirely in a bubble, and there's been an increasing usage of phrases such as special Trump centers in the brain or Trump derangement syndrome that unsubtly imply that people who disagree with Trump have been driven insane by him.

Related, you just either called a bunch of people insane or implied that we disagree with Trump because we have brain cancer. That doesn't really contributed to amicable discussion.


It’s a nit pick on one story. Meanwhile Introvert voted for the guy who called for banning all Muslims and creating a database of Muslims, but he still wants to believe there’s no overall thrust of bigotry coming from trump. It’s these and other defenses of Donald Trump as president that constitute abandoning one’s mental faculties.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12066 Posts
May 17 2018 16:12 GMT
#4126
It's a parenthesis but we seem to have accepted super easily that it would have been fine if Trump had been talking about MS-13 people when he said animals :/
"It is capitalism that is incentivizing me to lazily explain this to you while at work because I am not rewarded for generating additional value."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
May 17 2018 16:16 GMT
#4127
Completely valid point. Even calling gang members animals is unacceptable for anyone holding public office. This is how bad our discourse had become.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Kyadytim
Profile Joined March 2009
United States886 Posts
May 17 2018 16:16 GMT
#4128
On May 18 2018 01:12 Nebuchad wrote:
It's a parenthesis but we seem to have accepted super easily that it would have been fine if Trump had been talking about MS-13 people when he said animals :/

I noticed that, too. I just posted that it explicitly wasn't okay.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
May 17 2018 16:19 GMT
#4129
On May 18 2018 01:16 Plansix wrote:
Completely valid point. Even calling gang members animals is unacceptable for anyone holding public office. This is how bad our discourse had become.

I wonder how much tha tparticular point is a change; while many parts of discourse have gotten worse; calling gang members animals "feels" like it's been around for quite awhile to me. only a vague impression though so could easily be wrong.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
TheDwf
Profile Joined November 2011
France19747 Posts
May 17 2018 16:19 GMT
#4130
On May 18 2018 01:12 Nebuchad wrote:
It's a parenthesis but we seem to have accepted super easily that it would have been fine if Trump had been talking about MS-13 people when he said animals :/

Guantanamoization of the public debate...
Kyadytim
Profile Joined March 2009
United States886 Posts
May 17 2018 16:23 GMT
#4131
On May 18 2018 01:09 Introvert wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2018 00:47 Kyadytim wrote:
On May 17 2018 16:51 Introvert wrote:
There have to be more important issues on which to burn all of one's credibility. It's not that he's "simple" or "stupid," it's that it's plain to everyone who can turn off the special Trump centers of their brains for 30 seconds that, when asked about MS-13, he responds by talking about MS-13. If he said "MS-13" he'd probably get criticized for saying it when the lady already said it. "He's so stupid he has to repeat what people say to him out loud!"

And it is certainly ridiculous for so many people and reporters to be presenting this as simply "Donald Trump's opinion on immigrants" without even allowing for an alternative interpretation. That's not journalism, it's advocacy. Considering that so many people don't read past the headline, it's espeically egregious.

I used to read several conservative news outlets regularly to avoid being entirely in a bubble, and there's been an increasing usage of phrases such as special Trump centers in the brain or Trump derangement syndrome that unsubtly imply that people who disagree with Trump have been driven insane by him.

Related, you just either called a bunch of people insane or implied that we disagree with Trump because we have brain cancer. That doesn't really contributed to amicable discussion.



But they have. Few on the right were harsher on Trump during the campaign for his rhetoric than I was. Yet for all the crap Trump has said, everyone has trouble stepping back for a few seconds and see what is actually being said. This happens a lot but I focused on that last night because I had a few minutes and it was such a ridiculous example.

As for "amicable discussion" I'd say that posting the conext-less clip you did then saying that a figure of speech was (or could be) implying you have cancer is arguing in very bad faith, and that's also pretty bad for discussion (and let's be real, "discussion" wasn't the objective when you posted that).

Stop putting words in my mouth. Discussion of how the Trump administration is moving closer to being a totalitarian government by a subset of the population and against the rest of it was what I wanted. Instead I got you changing the discussion to how vague it is acceptable for Trump to be.

As for contextless:
In case I haven't been perfectly clear, there is NO context where the president of the United States saying "These aren't people. These are animals." about human beings is acceptable.
Introvert
Profile Joined April 2011
United States4689 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-17 16:28:07
May 17 2018 16:25 GMT
#4132
On May 18 2018 01:11 Doodsmack wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2018 00:47 Kyadytim wrote:
On May 17 2018 16:51 Introvert wrote:
There have to be more important issues on which to burn all of one's credibility. It's not that he's "simple" or "stupid," it's that it's plain to everyone who can turn off the special Trump centers of their brains for 30 seconds that, when asked about MS-13, he responds by talking about MS-13. If he said "MS-13" he'd probably get criticized for saying it when the lady already said it. "He's so stupid he has to repeat what people say to him out loud!"

And it is certainly ridiculous for so many people and reporters to be presenting this as simply "Donald Trump's opinion on immigrants" without even allowing for an alternative interpretation. That's not journalism, it's advocacy. Considering that so many people don't read past the headline, it's espeically egregious.

I used to read several conservative news outlets regularly to avoid being entirely in a bubble, and there's been an increasing usage of phrases such as special Trump centers in the brain or Trump derangement syndrome that unsubtly imply that people who disagree with Trump have been driven insane by him.

Related, you just either called a bunch of people insane or implied that we disagree with Trump because we have brain cancer. That doesn't really contributed to amicable discussion.


It’s a nit pick on one story. Meanwhile Introvert voted for the guy who called for banning all Muslims and creating a database of Muslims, but he still wants to believe there’s no overall thrust of bigotry coming from trump. It’s these and other defenses of Donald Trump as president that constitute abandoning one’s mental faculties.


Actually, while I kind of consider this personal info, in a manner, I actually didn't vote for either Trump or Clinton. I shouldn't have to say that, because my point on this comment isn't related. But apparently multiple people think it matters.


On May 18 2018 01:23 Kyadytim wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2018 01:09 Introvert wrote:
On May 18 2018 00:47 Kyadytim wrote:
On May 17 2018 16:51 Introvert wrote:
There have to be more important issues on which to burn all of one's credibility. It's not that he's "simple" or "stupid," it's that it's plain to everyone who can turn off the special Trump centers of their brains for 30 seconds that, when asked about MS-13, he responds by talking about MS-13. If he said "MS-13" he'd probably get criticized for saying it when the lady already said it. "He's so stupid he has to repeat what people say to him out loud!"

And it is certainly ridiculous for so many people and reporters to be presenting this as simply "Donald Trump's opinion on immigrants" without even allowing for an alternative interpretation. That's not journalism, it's advocacy. Considering that so many people don't read past the headline, it's espeically egregious.

I used to read several conservative news outlets regularly to avoid being entirely in a bubble, and there's been an increasing usage of phrases such as special Trump centers in the brain or Trump derangement syndrome that unsubtly imply that people who disagree with Trump have been driven insane by him.

Related, you just either called a bunch of people insane or implied that we disagree with Trump because we have brain cancer. That doesn't really contributed to amicable discussion.



But they have. Few on the right were harsher on Trump during the campaign for his rhetoric than I was. Yet for all the crap Trump has said, everyone has trouble stepping back for a few seconds and see what is actually being said. This happens a lot but I focused on that last night because I had a few minutes and it was such a ridiculous example.

As for "amicable discussion" I'd say that posting the conext-less clip you did then saying that a figure of speech was (or could be) implying you have cancer is arguing in very bad faith, and that's also pretty bad for discussion (and let's be real, "discussion" wasn't the objective when you posted that).

Stop putting words in my mouth. Discussion of how the Trump administration is moving closer to being a totalitarian government by a subset of the population and against the rest of it was what I wanted. Instead I got you changing the discussion to how vague it is acceptable for Trump to be.

As for contextless:
In case I haven't been perfectly clear, there is NO context where the president of the United States saying "These aren't people. These are animals." about human beings is acceptable.


Some grade A spin, "context doesn't matter." Fine.
"It is therefore only at the birth of a society that one can be completely logical in the laws. When you see a people enjoying this advantage, do not hasten to conclude that it is wise; think rather that it is young." -Alexis de Tocqueville
a_flayer
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Netherlands2826 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-17 16:29:03
May 17 2018 16:26 GMT
#4133
I thought about that when I put up the defense that I did. I agree with the notion that you shouldn't call people animals in a derogatory way, but in the end it's just nomenclature. I've thought to myself "these ISIS people are animals" in that way, so I decided to let it slide.

Of course, I don't consider myself fit for public office, so there's that...
When you came along so righteous with a new national hate, so convincing is the ardor of war and of men, it's harder to breathe than to believe you're a friend. The wars at home, the wars abroad, all soaked in blood and lies and fraud.
IyMoon
Profile Joined April 2016
United States1249 Posts
May 17 2018 16:29 GMT
#4134
On May 18 2018 01:26 a_flayer wrote:
I thought about that when I put up the defense that I did. I agree with the notion that you shouldn't call people animals in a derogatory way, but in the end it's just nomenclature. I've thought to myself "these ISIS people are animals" in that way, so I decided to let it slide.


Dehumanizing enemy combatants is pretty standard. its easy to kill something you don't see as human, a lot harder to kill a human with a family and hopes and dreams.
Something witty
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-17 17:00:29
May 17 2018 16:37 GMT
#4135
On May 18 2018 01:25 Introvert wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2018 01:11 Doodsmack wrote:
On May 18 2018 00:47 Kyadytim wrote:
On May 17 2018 16:51 Introvert wrote:
There have to be more important issues on which to burn all of one's credibility. It's not that he's "simple" or "stupid," it's that it's plain to everyone who can turn off the special Trump centers of their brains for 30 seconds that, when asked about MS-13, he responds by talking about MS-13. If he said "MS-13" he'd probably get criticized for saying it when the lady already said it. "He's so stupid he has to repeat what people say to him out loud!"

And it is certainly ridiculous for so many people and reporters to be presenting this as simply "Donald Trump's opinion on immigrants" without even allowing for an alternative interpretation. That's not journalism, it's advocacy. Considering that so many people don't read past the headline, it's espeically egregious.

I used to read several conservative news outlets regularly to avoid being entirely in a bubble, and there's been an increasing usage of phrases such as special Trump centers in the brain or Trump derangement syndrome that unsubtly imply that people who disagree with Trump have been driven insane by him.

Related, you just either called a bunch of people insane or implied that we disagree with Trump because we have brain cancer. That doesn't really contributed to amicable discussion.


It’s a nit pick on one story. Meanwhile Introvert voted for the guy who called for banning all Muslims and creating a database of Muslims, but he still wants to believe there’s no overall thrust of bigotry coming from trump. It’s these and other defenses of Donald Trump as president that constitute abandoning one’s mental faculties.


Actually, while I kind of consider this personal info, in a manner, I actually didn't vote for either Trump or Clinton. I shouldn't have to say that, because my point on this comment isn't related. But apparently multiple people think it matters.


Show nested quote +
On May 18 2018 01:23 Kyadytim wrote:
On May 18 2018 01:09 Introvert wrote:
On May 18 2018 00:47 Kyadytim wrote:
On May 17 2018 16:51 Introvert wrote:
There have to be more important issues on which to burn all of one's credibility. It's not that he's "simple" or "stupid," it's that it's plain to everyone who can turn off the special Trump centers of their brains for 30 seconds that, when asked about MS-13, he responds by talking about MS-13. If he said "MS-13" he'd probably get criticized for saying it when the lady already said it. "He's so stupid he has to repeat what people say to him out loud!"

And it is certainly ridiculous for so many people and reporters to be presenting this as simply "Donald Trump's opinion on immigrants" without even allowing for an alternative interpretation. That's not journalism, it's advocacy. Considering that so many people don't read past the headline, it's espeically egregious.

I used to read several conservative news outlets regularly to avoid being entirely in a bubble, and there's been an increasing usage of phrases such as special Trump centers in the brain or Trump derangement syndrome that unsubtly imply that people who disagree with Trump have been driven insane by him.

Related, you just either called a bunch of people insane or implied that we disagree with Trump because we have brain cancer. That doesn't really contributed to amicable discussion.



But they have. Few on the right were harsher on Trump during the campaign for his rhetoric than I was. Yet for all the crap Trump has said, everyone has trouble stepping back for a few seconds and see what is actually being said. This happens a lot but I focused on that last night because I had a few minutes and it was such a ridiculous example.

As for "amicable discussion" I'd say that posting the conext-less clip you did then saying that a figure of speech was (or could be) implying you have cancer is arguing in very bad faith, and that's also pretty bad for discussion (and let's be real, "discussion" wasn't the objective when you posted that).

Stop putting words in my mouth. Discussion of how the Trump administration is moving closer to being a totalitarian government by a subset of the population and against the rest of it was what I wanted. Instead I got you changing the discussion to how vague it is acceptable for Trump to be.

As for contextless:
In case I haven't been perfectly clear, there is NO context where the president of the United States saying "These aren't people. These are animals." about human beings is acceptable.


Some grade A spin, "context doesn't matter." Fine.

Context does matter. The fact that he is talking about criminals shouldn’t matter at all, to you or anyone else. The leader of our country referred to fellow human beings as animals. That is unequivocally an attempt to dehumanize them. Criminals or not, they deserve to be treated as humans. It is repugnant and unacceptable for the leader of our country to use that language, especially when the subject is about the government exercising its power to detaining people.

Edit: A reminder that ICE and the immigration courts are not perfect. They have arrested and detained legal immigrants and US citizens, sometimes holding them without access to legal counsel and due process for months. This recent display does not fill anyone with confidence that the Trump administration see those violation of civil rights as anything more than the cost of deporting all the illegal immigrants quickly.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Kyadytim
Profile Joined March 2009
United States886 Posts
May 17 2018 16:47 GMT
#4136
On May 18 2018 01:25 Introvert wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2018 01:11 Doodsmack wrote:
On May 18 2018 00:47 Kyadytim wrote:
On May 17 2018 16:51 Introvert wrote:
There have to be more important issues on which to burn all of one's credibility. It's not that he's "simple" or "stupid," it's that it's plain to everyone who can turn off the special Trump centers of their brains for 30 seconds that, when asked about MS-13, he responds by talking about MS-13. If he said "MS-13" he'd probably get criticized for saying it when the lady already said it. "He's so stupid he has to repeat what people say to him out loud!"

And it is certainly ridiculous for so many people and reporters to be presenting this as simply "Donald Trump's opinion on immigrants" without even allowing for an alternative interpretation. That's not journalism, it's advocacy. Considering that so many people don't read past the headline, it's espeically egregious.

I used to read several conservative news outlets regularly to avoid being entirely in a bubble, and there's been an increasing usage of phrases such as special Trump centers in the brain or Trump derangement syndrome that unsubtly imply that people who disagree with Trump have been driven insane by him.

Related, you just either called a bunch of people insane or implied that we disagree with Trump because we have brain cancer. That doesn't really contributed to amicable discussion.


It’s a nit pick on one story. Meanwhile Introvert voted for the guy who called for banning all Muslims and creating a database of Muslims, but he still wants to believe there’s no overall thrust of bigotry coming from trump. It’s these and other defenses of Donald Trump as president that constitute abandoning one’s mental faculties.


Actually, while I kind of consider this personal info, in a manner, I actually didn't vote for either Trump or Clinton. I shouldn't have to say that, because my point on this comment isn't related. But apparently multiple people think it matters.


Show nested quote +
On May 18 2018 01:23 Kyadytim wrote:
On May 18 2018 01:09 Introvert wrote:
On May 18 2018 00:47 Kyadytim wrote:
On May 17 2018 16:51 Introvert wrote:
There have to be more important issues on which to burn all of one's credibility. It's not that he's "simple" or "stupid," it's that it's plain to everyone who can turn off the special Trump centers of their brains for 30 seconds that, when asked about MS-13, he responds by talking about MS-13. If he said "MS-13" he'd probably get criticized for saying it when the lady already said it. "He's so stupid he has to repeat what people say to him out loud!"

And it is certainly ridiculous for so many people and reporters to be presenting this as simply "Donald Trump's opinion on immigrants" without even allowing for an alternative interpretation. That's not journalism, it's advocacy. Considering that so many people don't read past the headline, it's espeically egregious.

I used to read several conservative news outlets regularly to avoid being entirely in a bubble, and there's been an increasing usage of phrases such as special Trump centers in the brain or Trump derangement syndrome that unsubtly imply that people who disagree with Trump have been driven insane by him.

Related, you just either called a bunch of people insane or implied that we disagree with Trump because we have brain cancer. That doesn't really contributed to amicable discussion.



But they have. Few on the right were harsher on Trump during the campaign for his rhetoric than I was. Yet for all the crap Trump has said, everyone has trouble stepping back for a few seconds and see what is actually being said. This happens a lot but I focused on that last night because I had a few minutes and it was such a ridiculous example.

As for "amicable discussion" I'd say that posting the conext-less clip you did then saying that a figure of speech was (or could be) implying you have cancer is arguing in very bad faith, and that's also pretty bad for discussion (and let's be real, "discussion" wasn't the objective when you posted that).

Stop putting words in my mouth. Discussion of how the Trump administration is moving closer to being a totalitarian government by a subset of the population and against the rest of it was what I wanted. Instead I got you changing the discussion to how vague it is acceptable for Trump to be.

As for contextless:
In case I haven't been perfectly clear, there is NO context where the president of the United States saying "These aren't people. These are animals." about human beings is acceptable.


Some grade A spin, "context doesn't matter." Fine.

+ Show Spoiler +

Introvert provided a really good example of this. Introvert appears to be in favor of the president of the United States calling people animals, but doesn't want to say that outright. Instead, he changed the debate from "Is it okay for the President of the United States to call people animals, even if they're criminals such as MS-13?" to what the video refers to as the next argument: "Was the president talking about MS-13?" which is premised on an underlying assumption that if he was, it was okay to call them animals.

Once the conversation moved back to the original question, he called that spin.
iamthedave
Profile Joined February 2011
England2814 Posts
May 17 2018 17:27 GMT
#4137
On May 18 2018 01:09 Introvert wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2018 00:47 Kyadytim wrote:
On May 17 2018 16:51 Introvert wrote:
There have to be more important issues on which to burn all of one's credibility. It's not that he's "simple" or "stupid," it's that it's plain to everyone who can turn off the special Trump centers of their brains for 30 seconds that, when asked about MS-13, he responds by talking about MS-13. If he said "MS-13" he'd probably get criticized for saying it when the lady already said it. "He's so stupid he has to repeat what people say to him out loud!"

And it is certainly ridiculous for so many people and reporters to be presenting this as simply "Donald Trump's opinion on immigrants" without even allowing for an alternative interpretation. That's not journalism, it's advocacy. Considering that so many people don't read past the headline, it's espeically egregious.

I used to read several conservative news outlets regularly to avoid being entirely in a bubble, and there's been an increasing usage of phrases such as special Trump centers in the brain or Trump derangement syndrome that unsubtly imply that people who disagree with Trump have been driven insane by him.

Related, you just either called a bunch of people insane or implied that we disagree with Trump because we have brain cancer. That doesn't really contributed to amicable discussion.



But they have. Few on the right were harsher on Trump during the campaign for his rhetoric than I was. Yet for all the crap Trump has said, everyone has trouble stepping back for a few seconds and see what is actually being said. This happens a lot but I focused on that last night because I had a few minutes and it was such a ridiculous example.

As for "amicable discussion" I'd say that posting the conext-less clip you did then saying that a figure of speech was (or could be) implying you have cancer is arguing in very bad faith, and that's also pretty bad for discussion (and let's be real, "discussion" wasn't the objective when you posted that).


Then why aren't you just as harsh on him now? That rhetoric hasn't died down. Remember the Puerto Rico situation?

You say it's a ridiculous example, but you have to put it in context. That isn't a comment made in isolation; Trump has said disparaging things about immigrants and/or non-whites since he started running for office and he's done it while he's in office as well.

What has Trump done to earn him the benefit of the doubt? If you showed me a clip of Obama saying something racist, my first assumption would be that there's some context I'm missing, and to look into it, because the man has a track record of, well, not being racist. Trump has the exact opposite track record, and he's enthusiastically confirming his detractors as President of the United States.
I'm not bad at Starcraft; I just think winning's rude.
Introvert
Profile Joined April 2011
United States4689 Posts
May 17 2018 17:30 GMT
#4138
On May 18 2018 01:47 Kyadytim wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2018 01:25 Introvert wrote:
On May 18 2018 01:11 Doodsmack wrote:
On May 18 2018 00:47 Kyadytim wrote:
On May 17 2018 16:51 Introvert wrote:
There have to be more important issues on which to burn all of one's credibility. It's not that he's "simple" or "stupid," it's that it's plain to everyone who can turn off the special Trump centers of their brains for 30 seconds that, when asked about MS-13, he responds by talking about MS-13. If he said "MS-13" he'd probably get criticized for saying it when the lady already said it. "He's so stupid he has to repeat what people say to him out loud!"

And it is certainly ridiculous for so many people and reporters to be presenting this as simply "Donald Trump's opinion on immigrants" without even allowing for an alternative interpretation. That's not journalism, it's advocacy. Considering that so many people don't read past the headline, it's espeically egregious.

I used to read several conservative news outlets regularly to avoid being entirely in a bubble, and there's been an increasing usage of phrases such as special Trump centers in the brain or Trump derangement syndrome that unsubtly imply that people who disagree with Trump have been driven insane by him.

Related, you just either called a bunch of people insane or implied that we disagree with Trump because we have brain cancer. That doesn't really contributed to amicable discussion.


It’s a nit pick on one story. Meanwhile Introvert voted for the guy who called for banning all Muslims and creating a database of Muslims, but he still wants to believe there’s no overall thrust of bigotry coming from trump. It’s these and other defenses of Donald Trump as president that constitute abandoning one’s mental faculties.


Actually, while I kind of consider this personal info, in a manner, I actually didn't vote for either Trump or Clinton. I shouldn't have to say that, because my point on this comment isn't related. But apparently multiple people think it matters.


On May 18 2018 01:23 Kyadytim wrote:
On May 18 2018 01:09 Introvert wrote:
On May 18 2018 00:47 Kyadytim wrote:
On May 17 2018 16:51 Introvert wrote:
There have to be more important issues on which to burn all of one's credibility. It's not that he's "simple" or "stupid," it's that it's plain to everyone who can turn off the special Trump centers of their brains for 30 seconds that, when asked about MS-13, he responds by talking about MS-13. If he said "MS-13" he'd probably get criticized for saying it when the lady already said it. "He's so stupid he has to repeat what people say to him out loud!"

And it is certainly ridiculous for so many people and reporters to be presenting this as simply "Donald Trump's opinion on immigrants" without even allowing for an alternative interpretation. That's not journalism, it's advocacy. Considering that so many people don't read past the headline, it's espeically egregious.

I used to read several conservative news outlets regularly to avoid being entirely in a bubble, and there's been an increasing usage of phrases such as special Trump centers in the brain or Trump derangement syndrome that unsubtly imply that people who disagree with Trump have been driven insane by him.

Related, you just either called a bunch of people insane or implied that we disagree with Trump because we have brain cancer. That doesn't really contributed to amicable discussion.



But they have. Few on the right were harsher on Trump during the campaign for his rhetoric than I was. Yet for all the crap Trump has said, everyone has trouble stepping back for a few seconds and see what is actually being said. This happens a lot but I focused on that last night because I had a few minutes and it was such a ridiculous example.

As for "amicable discussion" I'd say that posting the conext-less clip you did then saying that a figure of speech was (or could be) implying you have cancer is arguing in very bad faith, and that's also pretty bad for discussion (and let's be real, "discussion" wasn't the objective when you posted that).

Stop putting words in my mouth. Discussion of how the Trump administration is moving closer to being a totalitarian government by a subset of the population and against the rest of it was what I wanted. Instead I got you changing the discussion to how vague it is acceptable for Trump to be.

As for contextless:
In case I haven't been perfectly clear, there is NO context where the president of the United States saying "These aren't people. These are animals." about human beings is acceptable.


Some grade A spin, "context doesn't matter." Fine.

+ Show Spoiler +
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CaPgDQkmqqM

Introvert provided a really good example of this. Introvert appears to be in favor of the president of the United States calling people animals, but doesn't want to say that outright. Instead, he changed the debate from "Is it okay for the President of the United States to call people animals, even if they're criminals such as MS-13?" to what the video refers to as the next argument: "Was the president talking about MS-13?" which is premised on an underlying assumption that if he was, it was okay to call them animals.

Once the conversation moved back to the original question, he called that spin.


I dare anyone to re-read your post and the one you were responding to and say that the conversation was about the humanity of gang members. You and so many others tried to make this about immigrants writ large, and now you back up and say that it doesn't matter, when it obviously does.

People use the language of animals all the time, flyer said as much. The conversation you claim we are having is not the one actually presented.
"It is therefore only at the birth of a society that one can be completely logical in the laws. When you see a people enjoying this advantage, do not hasten to conclude that it is wise; think rather that it is young." -Alexis de Tocqueville
Kyadytim
Profile Joined March 2009
United States886 Posts
May 17 2018 17:36 GMT
#4139
On May 18 2018 02:30 Introvert wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2018 01:47 Kyadytim wrote:
On May 18 2018 01:25 Introvert wrote:
On May 18 2018 01:11 Doodsmack wrote:
On May 18 2018 00:47 Kyadytim wrote:
On May 17 2018 16:51 Introvert wrote:
There have to be more important issues on which to burn all of one's credibility. It's not that he's "simple" or "stupid," it's that it's plain to everyone who can turn off the special Trump centers of their brains for 30 seconds that, when asked about MS-13, he responds by talking about MS-13. If he said "MS-13" he'd probably get criticized for saying it when the lady already said it. "He's so stupid he has to repeat what people say to him out loud!"

And it is certainly ridiculous for so many people and reporters to be presenting this as simply "Donald Trump's opinion on immigrants" without even allowing for an alternative interpretation. That's not journalism, it's advocacy. Considering that so many people don't read past the headline, it's espeically egregious.

I used to read several conservative news outlets regularly to avoid being entirely in a bubble, and there's been an increasing usage of phrases such as special Trump centers in the brain or Trump derangement syndrome that unsubtly imply that people who disagree with Trump have been driven insane by him.

Related, you just either called a bunch of people insane or implied that we disagree with Trump because we have brain cancer. That doesn't really contributed to amicable discussion.


It’s a nit pick on one story. Meanwhile Introvert voted for the guy who called for banning all Muslims and creating a database of Muslims, but he still wants to believe there’s no overall thrust of bigotry coming from trump. It’s these and other defenses of Donald Trump as president that constitute abandoning one’s mental faculties.


Actually, while I kind of consider this personal info, in a manner, I actually didn't vote for either Trump or Clinton. I shouldn't have to say that, because my point on this comment isn't related. But apparently multiple people think it matters.


On May 18 2018 01:23 Kyadytim wrote:
On May 18 2018 01:09 Introvert wrote:
On May 18 2018 00:47 Kyadytim wrote:
On May 17 2018 16:51 Introvert wrote:
There have to be more important issues on which to burn all of one's credibility. It's not that he's "simple" or "stupid," it's that it's plain to everyone who can turn off the special Trump centers of their brains for 30 seconds that, when asked about MS-13, he responds by talking about MS-13. If he said "MS-13" he'd probably get criticized for saying it when the lady already said it. "He's so stupid he has to repeat what people say to him out loud!"

And it is certainly ridiculous for so many people and reporters to be presenting this as simply "Donald Trump's opinion on immigrants" without even allowing for an alternative interpretation. That's not journalism, it's advocacy. Considering that so many people don't read past the headline, it's espeically egregious.

I used to read several conservative news outlets regularly to avoid being entirely in a bubble, and there's been an increasing usage of phrases such as special Trump centers in the brain or Trump derangement syndrome that unsubtly imply that people who disagree with Trump have been driven insane by him.

Related, you just either called a bunch of people insane or implied that we disagree with Trump because we have brain cancer. That doesn't really contributed to amicable discussion.



But they have. Few on the right were harsher on Trump during the campaign for his rhetoric than I was. Yet for all the crap Trump has said, everyone has trouble stepping back for a few seconds and see what is actually being said. This happens a lot but I focused on that last night because I had a few minutes and it was such a ridiculous example.

As for "amicable discussion" I'd say that posting the conext-less clip you did then saying that a figure of speech was (or could be) implying you have cancer is arguing in very bad faith, and that's also pretty bad for discussion (and let's be real, "discussion" wasn't the objective when you posted that).

Stop putting words in my mouth. Discussion of how the Trump administration is moving closer to being a totalitarian government by a subset of the population and against the rest of it was what I wanted. Instead I got you changing the discussion to how vague it is acceptable for Trump to be.

As for contextless:
In case I haven't been perfectly clear, there is NO context where the president of the United States saying "These aren't people. These are animals." about human beings is acceptable.


Some grade A spin, "context doesn't matter." Fine.

+ Show Spoiler +
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CaPgDQkmqqM

Introvert provided a really good example of this. Introvert appears to be in favor of the president of the United States calling people animals, but doesn't want to say that outright. Instead, he changed the debate from "Is it okay for the President of the United States to call people animals, even if they're criminals such as MS-13?" to what the video refers to as the next argument: "Was the president talking about MS-13?" which is premised on an underlying assumption that if he was, it was okay to call them animals.

Once the conversation moved back to the original question, he called that spin.


I dare anyone to re-read your post and the one you were responding to and say that the conversation was about the humanity of gang members. You and so many others tried to make this about immigrants writ large, and now you back up and say that it doesn't matter, when it obviously does.

People use the language of animals all the time, flyer said as much. The conversation you claim we are having is not the one actually presented.

The conversation was never about the humanity of gang members. That's not the discussion we're having. The discussion we're having that you keep trying to dodge out of is "Is it acceptable for the president of the United States to refer to human beings as animals?"

Regarding a_flayer, he acknowledged that there's a difference between him and someone holding public office.

So anyway, Introvert, is it acceptable for the president of the United States to refer to human beings as animals?
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
May 17 2018 17:37 GMT
#4140
Flyer also said that he isn't an elected official. But lets get down to pay dirt:

Introvert, are you attempting to argue that our elected officials and leaders calling suspected or proven criminals, US citizens or otherwise, animals is not a big deal? That people are over reacting to the language?
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Prev 1 205 206 207 208 209 4975 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
PiGosaur Monday
00:00
#33
PiGStarcraft476
CranKy Ducklings47
davetesta37
rockletztv 28
SteadfastSC23
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft476
RuFF_SC2 149
CosmosSc2 60
SteadfastSC 23
EnDerr 11
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 892
ZZZero.O 64
NaDa 16
Icarus 7
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm91
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
Fnx 2253
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0588
PPMD1
Heroes of the Storm
Grubby3929
Other Games
summit1g13181
tarik_tv12135
Day[9].tv1031
shahzam616
ViBE298
Maynarde182
Sick65
Trikslyr64
JuggernautJason61
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1160
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 73
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 19
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift5212
Other Games
• imaqtpie1738
• Scarra1342
• Day9tv1031
Upcoming Events
GSL Code S
9h 12m
Cure vs Zoun
Solar vs Creator
The PondCast
9h 42m
Road to EWC
9h 42m
Online Event
14h 42m
Clem vs ShoWTimE
herO vs MaxPax
HupCup
14h 42m
Road to EWC
15h 42m
Road to EWC
21h 42m
GSL Code S
1d 9h
GuMiho vs Bunny
ByuN vs SHIN
Road to EWC
1d 9h
Online Event
1d 12h
[ Show More ]
Road to EWC
1d 15h
Road to EWC
1d 21h
Replay Cast
1d 23h
Road to EWC
2 days
Road to EWC
2 days
Road to EWC
2 days
Road to EWC
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
Road to EWC
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Road to EWC
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 19
DreamHack Dallas 2025
Calamity Stars S2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
YSL S1
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL Season 17: Qualifier 1
2025 GSL S2
Heroes 10 EU
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025
ESL Pro League S21

Upcoming

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLAN 2025
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.