US Politics Mega-thread - Page 1827
Forum Index > General Forum |
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread | ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
brian
United States9619 Posts
this guy is the 1% and people still think he relates to them. that he’s got their best interests in mind. that’s how he’s gotten this far, i think? i wouldn’t have this same opinion two years ago, but we’ve gotten far enough down the road where those identifying specifically as a trump supporter (to make the clear distinction from just a republican supporting a republican) are probably not among the best and brightest on average. and if there’s anything he’s good at, it’s pandering. intentionally or instinctually. | ||
GreenHorizons
United States23222 Posts
(CNN)Cities from New York to Shanghai could see regular flooding, as sea levels rise faster than previously thought. Glaciers and ice sheets from the Himalayas to Antarctica are rapidly melting. And the fisheries that feed millions of people are shrinking. But over the last 40 years, the report finds that Arctic sea ice is very likely shrinking during all months of the year, which is driving further warming. The decrease observed in September sea ice is particularly significant and likely unprecedented for at least 1000 years. In nearly all regions, the scientists also found that snow cover is diminishing and glaciers are in retreat. Runoff from these sources provides drinking water to millions and is used to grow much of the food we eat. And permafrost, soil that stays frozen throughout the year and contains gigatons of potentially planet-warming carbon and methane, has also undergone record warming. The choices made now are critical to limit the future impacts, and avoid the escalating costs and risks that come with delayed action, the report says. www.cnn.com I hope if we do have manage to get some major infrastructure project off the ground it's done with consideration we may have to relocate entire cities in the next 100 years. | ||
Gorsameth
Netherlands21674 Posts
On September 28 2019 00:49 IyMoon wrote: Well I'm sure the state department, being a large bureaucratic organisation, has documentation dated prior to today that can back up these claims.Rudy has come out and say that he was acting on behalf of the state department in his talks with Ukraine, and is now asking for the state department to back him up on it. If this is true, why is the state department asking a private citizen to do its work? Are they talking about classified info with someone without security clearance? WTF is going on? https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/463340-giuliani-state-department-official-should-step-forward-i-wasnt I'd say subpoena them right now. Something tells me they don't exist. | ||
Mohdoo
United States15687 Posts
On September 28 2019 01:00 JimmiC wrote: I really don't understand why he still doesn't have like a intern or some low level person just review his tweets for spelling and grammar. He could instruct them to not change the message, but it would cause him to look much more intelligent. Then again, his base does not seem to care and just enjoys his fights so perhaps it works. Studies indicate people trust politicians who "speak candidly" significantly more than "proper" ones. No matter how you slice it, misspelling here and there is a net positive for Trump. Can't find the link now, but it was on /r/science recently and basically concluded Trump's style is a big reason voters trusted him over Clinton. Cussing and whatnot helps poll numbers. | ||
ZerOCoolSC2
8983 Posts
On September 28 2019 01:07 GreenHorizons wrote: UN put out a landmark report from scientists around the world saying that the oceans are rising and it appears it's happening faster than previous reports have predicted. www.cnn.com I hope if we do have manage to get some major infrastructure project off the ground it's done with consideration we may have to relocate entire cities in the next 100 years. Besides coastal cities and since the flooding of Katrina, most places have a 100-year flood plan that they attempt to follow in regards to building. If places are built deliberately below the flood plains or the projected 100-year plan, then that is on them, imo. Some places in South/SE Asia are in dire straits and that might be remedied. But it isn't something that can be done to satisfaction for some people. You may just lose the city and history as you migrate the people further inland. Tough shit | ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
Mohdoo
United States15687 Posts
On September 28 2019 01:48 JimmiC wrote: I guess that makes sense, it is just so hard to wrap my head around it because when I think of who I would want to be president it would be a very impressive, smart, well spoken person. I would want them to be an impressive person where even if I a disagreed with them on something I could still see that they were top notch. Trump is not impressive in almost anyway, he is simply famous and rich because his dad gave him tons of money. And the more he talks and the more that you look into actually how unsuccessful he has been in business it is embarrassing. But I guess I see how that makes him relatable, and I don't think it is only not unintelligent people who like him either. I suspect it has a lot to do with how freaking powerful confirmation bias is. There is a ton of research on how powerful it is and how unaware we are of it effecting ourselves. It is kind of a painful rabbit hole to go down because you end up really critically looking into many things you believe and why, all while understanding that even that act is shaded by confirmation bias. Rural America has been catered too in such gross excess that they are told their failings are admirable and glorious. The various ways "city folk" and "coastal elites" are demonized are also intended to glorify the "true American" nature of rural America. When you tell people they should be proud of rather than fix their faults, it is easier for them to feel good about themselves. It is empowering. That's why you see bumper stickers that say "like eating food? THANK A FARMER" as if they are some sort of league of super heroes. If you kiss their asses, they'll vote for you. | ||
Neneu
Norway492 Posts
On September 28 2019 01:43 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote: Besides coastal cities and since the flooding of Katrina, most places have a 100-year flood plan that they attempt to follow in regards to building. If places are built deliberately below the flood plains or the projected 100-year plan, then that is on them, imo. Some places in South/SE Asia are in dire straits and that might be remedied. But it isn't something that can be done to satisfaction for some people. You may just lose the city and history as you migrate the people further inland. Tough shit The problem is when those 100 year floods are expected to happen once each year, you have a new type of actual 100 year floods. What happens then is that what is built today for today's 100 year floods won't handle it. | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland25273 Posts
On September 28 2019 01:48 JimmiC wrote: I guess that makes sense, it is just so hard to wrap my head around it because when I think of who I would want to be president it would be a very impressive, smart, well spoken person. I would want them to be an impressive person where even if I a disagreed with them on something I could still see that they were top notch. Trump is not impressive in almost anyway, he is simply famous and rich because his dad gave him tons of money. And the more he talks and the more that you look into actually how unsuccessful he has been in business it is embarrassing. But I guess I see how that makes him relatable, and I don't think it is only not unintelligent people who like him either. I suspect it has a lot to do with how freaking powerful confirmation bias is. There is a ton of research on how powerful it is and how unaware we are of it effecting ourselves. It is kind of a painful rabbit hole to go down because you end up really critically looking into many things you believe and why, all while understanding that even that act is shaded by confirmation bias. It is a confusing one indeed, I’m curious as to what evolutionary benefits are conferred by our tendencies to such bias. It’s definitely augmented by one’s emotional connection to a subject as well, which is another phenomena I don’t really understand. I suppose if you gravitate to a figure who is trying to court you via your values, then for that figure to have flaws and you admitting them is admitting your values have flaws by proxy. | ||
ZerOCoolSC2
8983 Posts
On September 28 2019 03:44 Neneu wrote: The problem is when those 100 year floods are expected to happen once each year, you have a new type of actual 100 year floods. What happens then is that what is built today for today's 100 year floods won't handle it. When I studied urban design, we looked at flood plans that were miles away from oceans and major rivers. You'll get the occasional flooding from a particularly rainy season. The problem now, is that the 100 year floods are shorter than expected. With the climate change issue, the time we had to "shore up" the coastal areas is a much more grave concern. So where we find ourselves, in terms of urban planning/design, is figuring out the infrastructure upgrades needed to be able to withstand these. We're going to get a lot of freak of nature type events that sewers and pumps aren't meant to handle. I like to look at Tokyo as a way to draw an illustration of having preparations in place for these kind of events. the issue is and will always be if the mechanical components in place today or 10 years from now, can handle a certain freak event occurring. I'm going to say that besides New York (and this is still an if), not many places are going to be able to handle the level of rise we're going to see. Florida will sink and most of the gulf will not look the same in 15-20 years if current projections hold. | ||
Simberto
Germany11507 Posts
On September 28 2019 03:49 Wombat_NI wrote: It is a confusing one indeed, I’m curious as to what evolutionary benefits are conferred by our tendencies to such bias. It’s definitely augmented by one’s emotional connection to a subject as well, which is another phenomena I don’t really understand. I suppose if you gravitate to a figure who is trying to court you via your values, then for that figure to have flaws and you admitting them is admitting your values have flaws by proxy. Probably saving energy. I was recently at a talk where a professor of traffic (don't remember his actual title, but that was what he was doing) was talking about our brains. It is amazing just how much stupid shit a brain does to save energy. You are driving a car on a road you seem to know? Turn of the part that is responsible for three-dimensional imaging to save energy. Road ahead of you looks save? Turn of all of the critical thinking and active reasoning parts of the brain and work on lizard reflexes alone. Basically, whenever you feel uncomfortable and unsafe on the road, you are probably pretty save, because your brain is actually active, and it hates that, because that costs energy. Whenever you feel save, it is running on autopilot. This is also why your brain doesn't like actually learning new stuff unless it really has to, and tries to find shortcuts to prevent actual learning whenever possible. Our brain has been incredibly finetuned for performance/energy, not performance itself. If we were computers, we are whatever you put into server farms that runs on minimal energy, not a high-end gaming PC that is optimized for maximum performance. Edit: I can already see the energy savings here. If you pick a leader similar to you and follow him, your brain doesn't have to make decisions. Confronting your flaws and working to get rid of them costs energy, while simply claiming they are not a problem does not. | ||
Biff The Understudy
France7888 Posts
On September 28 2019 02:55 Mohdoo wrote: Rural America has been catered too in such gross excess that they are told their failings are admirable and glorious. The various ways "city folk" and "coastal elites" are demonized are also intended to glorify the "true American" nature of rural America. When you tell people they should be proud of rather than fix their faults, it is easier for them to feel good about themselves. It is empowering. That's why you see bumper stickers that say "like eating food? THANK A FARMER" as if they are some sort of league of super heroes. If you kiss their asses, they'll vote for you. Add to that anti-intellectualism. I think one of the reason people distrusted Clinton so much is that she looks and talks smart and wonkish, and the fact that Trump talks like a complete retard has significantly helped him in that election; a significant fraction of the electorate find that authentic and more relatable. Tell people that something is complicated, will take time and patience, and has no cheap, quick fix and they think that you are trying to screw them over. | ||
Biff The Understudy
France7888 Posts
On September 28 2019 04:49 Simberto wrote: Probably saving energy. I was recently at a talk where a professor of traffic (don't remember his actual title, but that was what he was doing) was talking about our brains. It is amazing just how much stupid shit a brain does to save energy. You are driving a car on a road you seem to know? Turn of the part that is responsible for three-dimensional imaging to save energy. Road ahead of you looks save? Turn of all of the critical thinking and active reasoning parts of the brain and work on lizard reflexes alone. Basically, whenever you feel uncomfortable and unsafe on the road, you are probably pretty save, because your brain is actually active, and it hates that, because that costs energy. Whenever you feel save, it is running on autopilot. This is also why your brain doesn't like actually learning new stuff unless it really has to, and tries to find shortcuts to prevent actual learning whenever possible. Our brain has been incredibly finetuned for performance/energy, not performance itself. If we were computers, we are whatever you put into server farms that runs on minimal energy, not a high-end gaming PC that is optimized for maximum performance. Edit: I can already see the energy savings here. If you pick a leader similar to you and follow him, your brain doesn't have to make decisions. Confronting your flaws and working to get rid of them costs energy, while simply claiming they are not a problem does not. Krugman has made a rather cruel case that people who relate to Trump do so not because they believe he champions their cause but because he represent what they would be and do were they as rich and powerful as he is, namely shitting in golden toilets, living a ridiculous, tacky and gilded life, fucking pornstars and supermodels while watching Fox News and eating KFC. It’s a brutal statement, but I think he actually kind of has a point. | ||
semantics
10040 Posts
| ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland25273 Posts
On September 28 2019 04:49 Simberto wrote: Probably saving energy. I was recently at a talk where a professor of traffic (don't remember his actual title, but that was what he was doing) was talking about our brains. It is amazing just how much stupid shit a brain does to save energy. You are driving a car on a road you seem to know? Turn of the part that is responsible for three-dimensional imaging to save energy. Road ahead of you looks save? Turn of all of the critical thinking and active reasoning parts of the brain and work on lizard reflexes alone. Basically, whenever you feel uncomfortable and unsafe on the road, you are probably pretty save, because your brain is actually active, and it hates that, because that costs energy. Whenever you feel save, it is running on autopilot. This is also why your brain doesn't like actually learning new stuff unless it really has to, and tries to find shortcuts to prevent actual learning whenever possible. Our brain has been incredibly finetuned for performance/energy, not performance itself. If we were computers, we are whatever you put into server farms that runs on minimal energy, not a high-end gaming PC that is optimized for maximum performance. Edit: I can already see the energy savings here. If you pick a leader similar to you and follow him, your brain doesn't have to make decisions. Confronting your flaws and working to get rid of them costs energy, while simply claiming they are not a problem does not. I like that hypothesis, not really a connection I’d made specifically to this phenomenon. I can get into states where overthinking leaves even mundane tasks difficult so the energy saving benefits of automaticity are definitely ones that resonate. I’d pondered that it was some kind of combination of social cohesion and succinctly passing down some necessary information to others. A group of people in ye olden days following the lead of some leader figure they deemed exceptional would probably run more smoothly than one pulling in all sorts of different directions. Plus, you don’t really want your toddler to be a skeptical soul when you’re telling them to stay away from that prowling tiger, there are definitely situations where blind deference is a useful mechanic for the species. | ||
Inrau
35 Posts
On September 28 2019 02:55 Mohdoo wrote: Rural America has been catered too in such gross excess that they are told their failings are admirable and glorious. The various ways "city folk" and "coastal elites" are demonized are also intended to glorify the "true American" nature of rural America. When you tell people they should be proud of rather than fix their faults, it is easier for them to feel good about themselves. It is empowering. That's why you see bumper stickers that say "like eating food? THANK A FARMER" as if they are some sort of league of super heroes. If you kiss their asses, they'll vote for you. Disagree on the "like eating food? THANK A FARMER" I grew up in a rural area and that sort of saying is simply to remind people that almost everything you get at the grocery store comes from a farm, (and delivered by trucks etc.) Its easy to forget that honestly, especially with groceries being delivered to your doorstep now. There is a reason they call the midwest fly over country, because the general news doesn't really cover that area. But I do agree with the opposite, where people distrust the ivory tower educated folk .. that sort of mindset only limits peoples perspectives. | ||
Gahlo
United States35144 Posts
On September 27 2019 23:35 Nouar wrote: I am rather confused. Could someone explain to me what "Liddle" means in this context? https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-news-twitter-cnn-spelling-liddle-impeach-today-a9122916.html Because what I found is... Not likely to be it? XD ![]() God, that video of him ranting is gold. Reminds me of another one I was reading on reddit about how MSNBC cut away from the "speech" because he was just lying his ass off and one of the comments said it felt like an acoustic Trump rally, followed by somebody chiming in "Anyway, here's borderwall." | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland25273 Posts
On September 28 2019 08:00 Inrau wrote: Disagree on the "like eating food? THANK A FARMER" I grew up in a rural area and that sort of saying is simply to remind people that almost everything you get at the grocery store comes from a farm, (and delivered by trucks etc.) Its easy to forget that honestly, especially with groceries being delivered to your doorstep now. There is a reason they call the midwest fly over country, because the general news doesn't really cover that area. But I do agree with the opposite, where people distrust the ivory tower educated folk .. that sort of mindset only limits peoples perspectives. I absolutely agree on that, there is that disconnect between food and the sources of food. Indeed everything is interconnected to a huge degree in society, everyone has their part. So yes, people should be more understanding of such things, on the other hand the whole chip-on-the-shoulder ‘we’re the real America’ bullshit is ignorant of everyone else’s role in the whole machine. There’s a discernible difference between ‘look at us, we exist’ and ‘we’re the salt of the earth and the real people’ rhetoric that’s as ignorant of the important role other sectors play as the ignorance you’re complaining about in the first place. | ||
Mohdoo
United States15687 Posts
On September 28 2019 08:00 Inrau wrote: Disagree on the "like eating food? THANK A FARMER" I grew up in a rural area and that sort of saying is simply to remind people that almost everything you get at the grocery store comes from a farm, (and delivered by trucks etc.) Its easy to forget that honestly, especially with groceries being delivered to your doorstep now. There is a reason they call the midwest fly over country, because the general news doesn't really cover that area. But I do agree with the opposite, where people distrust the ivory tower educated folk .. that sort of mindset only limits peoples perspectives. Everything you eat comes from a farm. Every medicine you take is developed by a biochemist. Every surgery you get is from a doctor. Every city's plumbing system is designed by a chemical engineer. We are all completely useless without every single other component. What if no one picked up the garbage? What if there were no teachers? Our entire society completely shits itself if any single component is removed. A country comprised entirely of doctors, lawyers, engineers, scientists and farmers would blow ass and can't nothing done. It would go belly up in a year. "LIKE FOOD? THANK A FARMER!!!!!!!" is making a conscious effort to point out the importance of perhaps the most obviously important thing on the planet: food. How many people do you think don't understand food is important? Fly over country is called fly over country because the nature of farming and agriculture necessitates an extraordinarily large amount of land not really be occupied by humans. It doesn't make it less important, but it does make it significantly less eventful. The tempo and direction of the country isn't determined in farms. Farms are still ***AMAZINGLY*** important, but it doesn't make them *eventful*. The focus of a culture does not reflect what said culture values or appreciates. Nebraska, Wyoming and South Dakota combined have less people than Oregon. New York City has DOUBLE the population of the entirety of Oregon. A state being less eventful does not mean it is less necessary and I honestly feel like most people fully understand farms are valuable. More people means more events and more culture and more of everything really. Humans create/contribute to stuff. Less people being there means less stuff happens, especially when these areas have been highly specialized for certain things. | ||
| ||