|
On March 07 2013 01:56 Kukaracha wrote:Show nested quote +On March 07 2013 01:51 Slaughter wrote: Did he really think that he was being slowly poisoned? I don't even think the US government cares enough about him or his country to do that (not that they wouldn't but really? The US has 10000x bigger things to worry about). What, a potential oil supplier with the biggest reserves in the world as of 2013, a rock in the way of the FTAA, one of the only allies Iran has and a troublemaker in a continent considered to be the US' backyard? Venezuela is a pretty big problem, you know. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt=""
The US is fine with its oil supply. Sure it probably would like to have access to it but they aren't going to put that much effort into it when they are dealing with the Mid East as #1.
|
The US gets more oil from South America than the Middle East by a good margin.
|
On March 07 2013 02:51 DannyJ wrote: The US gets more oil from South America than the Middle East by a good margin. Add the fact that diplomatic relations with the Middle-East are worsening...
|
On March 07 2013 01:03 fleeze wrote:Show nested quote +On March 07 2013 00:39 Acertos wrote: A dictator died should i feel sad? No, not at all even if it means trouble for Venezuela for the next 10 yrs the madness must stop at one point. Civil rights and equality will rise sooner or later.
out of the subject : when i see Jean-Luc Mélanchon president of Le front de gauche making a tribute in name of all the french to Chavez it makes me puke. He didn't say anything about Stéphane Hessel never did our president but when a fake socialist dictator dies everybody speaks of him as a good man. I've always hated this old roting branch of socialism which still idolize communism, extreme socialism and these fake social and radical governments. What you write is 'slightly' contradicting in itself. especially: 'Civil rights and equality will rise sooner or later.' you seem to have no clue at all about venezuela if you think another president would have done more for civil rights and especially equality. Chavez was no saint, but he definately wasn't a mad dictator. people shouldn't believe what they read about venezuela in main stream media. there is also another side of the story.great insight post by Nevermind86 btw. Jjust because he was better than could have been others doesnt mean he must be put on a throne, he's still a dictator who shut every oponent to any of his decisions and manipulated the opinion. I'm believing that with the fall of Chavez perhaps venezuelians will ask for better governments in the future. And even if it takes a lot of time there will be a time for real democracy and a sort of equality. Look at Egypt (and the arabic spring in general), they threw Moubarak out and it was the beginning, now they have islamists in power but there are still riots everywhere and i'm sure the "brothers muslim" will fall too as they have no clue how to lead the country and try to lock people's freedom. In 5 yrs Egypt will surely have a government who care about something else than religious matter and try to stop poverty. It will also happen to Venezuela with the fall of chavez as its beginning.
|
On March 06 2013 07:21 sam!zdat wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2013 07:14 tshi wrote: I hope the next president is a bit more peaceful and works better with America/The world. I hope just the opposite!
I was looking out for your post on this sam.
You don't disappoint.
I'm reminded of a Zizek keynote where he reminded us all that it is always those in power that are the first to condemn violence.
EDIT:
On March 06 2013 08:27 Shiragaku wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2013 08:24 bohus wrote:On March 06 2013 08:22 Shiragaku wrote:On March 06 2013 08:18 funkie wrote:On March 06 2013 08:16 CoR wrote: r.i.p. one of the last big who hold against usa in worldbankeconomystuff and if you could say 1 thing about him, he was 100% NO puppet ! No puppet? Haha, that's a good one. You might call him Castro's puppet. He always did what they told him to do, and they were part of all this "scheme" to keep his death secret and have Maduro on the power as long as possible. Blah. Not to mention that he gladly brought in Chinese imperialist influence in South America. For example, he allowed 40 percent of the Venezuelan railroads to be privatized by China. "He allowed 40 percent of the Venezuelan railroads to be privatized by USA." That would be ok? We can debate whether it is okay or not, my point is that he is unbelievably hypocritical and is obsessed with anti-Americanism and anti-NATO. We are talking about a self-proclaimed socialist and Maoist on one occasion who allows foreign privatization. Also to give a direct answer, I think it would be horrible if the railroads were privatized by any nation. *Sigh* This man is worse than George Galloway.
No one is worse than George Galloway.
EDIT 2: thank you for this post:
On March 06 2013 09:52 Nevermind86 wrote: Being a Venezuelan, I'd like to explain shortly why we will always remenber him and what he meant to the country:
-His government was bad, crime is rampant, inflation, waste of resources, populism, all of it it's 100% true but the governments before were actually worse. He came to prominence as one of the heads of a coup d'etat in 1992 against a two-party system that served the same masters, the venezuelan economic powers, particularly the emerging nouveau rich bankers. Back then the country was comming out of a period similar to what the great depression was to the US because oil prices dropped to 7$, government debt was in a historic high, social spending was being dramatically cut and wages were dropped to the bottom, some 3 years before that, in february 27th 1989, FMI austerity measures were declared, that among other things increased the price of gasoline by 800%, the price of public buses went up accordingly and people that couldn't go to work rioted, the then pro-american government sent the army to the streets and around 3.000 were killed, of course the UN or any international body back then cared and nobody responsible went to jail. It was since then that the two party system was morally bankrupt, so Chávez's coup d'etat even though it was a failure got him on tv apologizing to the venezuelan people for doing it, people loved him since then because he admitted it was a mistake, after popular demand charges were dropped after 2 years in jail.
Then in 1993 a leftish presidential candidate that represented the people that supported Chavez won an election but electoral fraud was rampant and instead a well known extreme right winger took power, his government wasn't so bad until 1995 where banks were going bankrupt and he decided to bail them out, stimulus packet style but the banks still went bankrupt and another economic crisis started. Then in december 1998 Chavez wins the presidency with an actually pro-capitalist speech, he was a totally different kind of president back then and his popularity was huge, with time though, he started to change turning more and more leftish on the way, and being friendly with demonized people like Fidel Castro, but it wasn't until 2002 where he passed anti-latifundist, anti-bank monopoly (glass stegeal act-type) laws and an increase in taxes to foreign oil companies that the unrest that marked the rest of his government started, in 2002 a new right wing party with help from the CIA did a coup d'etat the next day after some people were killed in both pro and anti government protests, Chavez was kidnapped and forced to resign, all powers were dissolved and the president of Fedecamaras took oath as president, Fedecamaras being the biggest association of enterprises of the country. Too many bad things happened in those days, the army got videotapped practicing statements about doing the coup because people died on the streets before the first bullet was fired, the tv showed false videos blaming it on pro-Chavez crowds, the FMI approuved new loans to "rebuild the government from the Chavez regime" the same day the coup happened... it was all a joke. 2 days after the coup people were doing huge protests around the presidential palace demanding Chavez to be brought back, and he was, since then he radicalized his government. Then that same year, in chrismast, the same people that did the coup d'etat sabotaged the oil industry resulting in losses to the nation in the order of at least 20$ billions, scarcity in all products especially food pissed people off quite a lot, but this second attempt was even worse than the first because after 15 days the government re-started the oil production but politically the right wing took the blame of all the country's problems, to this day, basically.
After 2006 he became really power hungry since he won a second term destroying the opposition in the votings, nobody likes them to this day like I said before. In 2010 in the middle of a new economic crisis, this time created by the Chavez government and not due to the same old right wing people his popularity started to drop quite a lot, for the first time he got defeated in an election quite badly (Congress election) and things weren't looking good for his 'socialism', since then capitalism went back with a lot of strenght with a socialist speech of course, a lot of oil fields were privatized and oil companies from all over the world went back to the country to increase oil production, notably from the satanized US and Europe and the new allies Russia and China that were promoted as different types of capitalists because of their obvious backgrounds. That wasn't enough, so gold, iron, all sorts of minerals, etc, were given in a golden plate to other transnationals, even with this the economic recovery wasn't good enough, so in 2012 to win a third term Chavez started a huge policy of social spending, the thing is the government doesn't really have money to keep with this, so the only way to sustain this for a while was drowning in debt, the external debt increased quite a lot, and less than a month ago the currency had to be devaluated 46.5% to cheap the price of labour and debt in the local currency, so the government could keep the social spending with oil-dollars.
As you can see american friends, american intervention in coup d'etats usually goes wrong, if it wasn't for your CIA Chavez probably would have lost in the 2006 election because in 2002 his government wasn't doing good, but somehow warmongers in Venezuela and USA though that killing our people and putting a dictator in place was a great idea and that failed miserably, as if that wasn't enough they tried a second time that year sabotaging the oil industry, paralizing the country because there wasn't any gasoline to go around or gas to cook food, they though it was brilliant because people would blame that somehow on Chavez... obviously it was a huge mistake.
In case you wonder I did vote for Chavez all these years, i'm his supporter but his government was far from good, in comparison to the ones before, though, it was the best we had since 1956, back then we had a right wing dictator that wanted to do elections some day but as you guessed it, he was coup d'etaed with support of the CIA, so they could put a puppet in place. The venezuelan people always remenber that government as being the best of our history, and Chavez without a doubt the second best.
|
|
On March 07 2013 02:46 Slaughter wrote:Show nested quote +On March 07 2013 01:56 Kukaracha wrote:On March 07 2013 01:51 Slaughter wrote: Did he really think that he was being slowly poisoned? I don't even think the US government cares enough about him or his country to do that (not that they wouldn't but really? The US has 10000x bigger things to worry about). What, a potential oil supplier with the biggest reserves in the world as of 2013, a rock in the way of the FTAA, one of the only allies Iran has and a troublemaker in a continent considered to be the US' backyard? Venezuela is a pretty big problem, you know. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" The US is fine with its oil supply. Sure it probably would like to have access to it but they aren't going to put that much effort into it when they are dealing with the Mid East as #1.
I'm with this guy.
The US gets more oil from Canada than Venezuela or the ME. They would get even more oil from Canada if Keystone XL gets approved. Oil supply is not high on US' concern. North Dakota is forecasting to surpass Alaska for oil production. There is even talk that US can become an exporter if it realizes all its shale resources.
Venezuela's oil is heavy oil so the refineries that take on Venezuelan oil could take Canadian oil. I have family in Venezuela so I am impartial to this. In Canada a lot of Venezuelans have came here to work due to their expertise of heavy oil. I think that speaks to quality of life in Venezuela - although I have family who decided to stay in Venezuela (home is home?). In terms of stability I think the people of Venezuela will have power to choose their next leader. Look at previous dictator countries that took matter into their own hands. Syria, Libya, Egypt. I'm not a political science or history major so what do I know....
|
|
On March 07 2013 04:17 Banff wrote: I'm with this guy.
The US gets more oil from Canada than Venezuela or the ME. They would get even more oil from Canada if Keystone XL gets approved. Oil supply is not high on US' concern. North Dakota is forecasting to surpass Alaska for oil production. There is even talk that US can become an exporter if it realizes all its shale resources.
Venezuela's oil is heavy oil so the refineries that take on Venezuelan oil could take Canadian oil. I have family in Venezuela so I am impartial to this. In Canada a lot of Venezuelans have came here to work due to their expertise of heavy oil. I think that speaks to quality of life in Venezuela - although I have family who decided to stay in Venezuela (home is home?). In terms of stability I think the people of Venezuela will have power to choose their next leader. Look at previous dictator countries that took matter into their own hands. Syria, Libya, Egypt. I'm not a political science or history major so what do I know....
If you look at oil imports from Venezuela, you'll note that they have decreased since 1998, when the developments you speak of only date from 2012. The US (whos demand just keeps on growing) was under a lot of pressure, and I read that many American refineries invested a lot in crude oil equipment and so the demand for Venezuelan oil will remain steady for a while.
But it is true that oil no longer is such a big concern. In fact it's a concern for Venezuela, as prices may drop. However, it's sill a thorn in South American diplomacy.
What is interesting though is that African countries who used to export their oil to US companies will be left with no other choice but to turn completely to China, which is in desperate need for energy. It's a Chinese victory too, in a way, since it's on step more inside these countries. And they can even plan on using Venezuelan ressources more extensively in the future!
|
I hope he's having fun burning in hell.
User was warned for this post
|
It's not surprised that the poverty situation has improved after Hugo took office, with his social policy and the rise of black gold, that is why he was a popular president. However the economy of Venezuela did not improved (If you exclude the black gold), and it was only matter of time things dive for the worse again.
|
funny how people sometimes blinded by hatred for the U.S. is able to see Nevermind's post, yet somehow arent able to see mine, which i detailed why Chavez Govt. sucks.
Nevermind is pro Chavez
I am Anti Chavez
There is 2 sides of the coin and Venezuela is extremely divided because of it.
|
On March 07 2013 07:23 Swimcito wrote: funny how people sometimes blinded by hatred for the U.S. is able to see Nevermind's post, yet somehow arent able to see mine, which i detailed why Chavez Govt. sucks.
i think you are overestimating your post, pal! i didn't comment on it because i thought it wasn't so good that it was worthy of my praise, in fact i thought it was a rather poor post, but i did read it.
|
On March 07 2013 07:23 Swimcito wrote: funny how people sometimes blinded by hatred for the U.S. is able to see Nevermind's post, yet somehow arent able to see mine, which i detailed why Chavez Govt. sucks.
Nevermind is pro Chavez
I am Anti Chavez
There is 2 sides of the coin and Venezuela is extremely divided because of it. Because you post is terribad. :p
Your arguments are based on a deterioration of the level of life, when Chavez has fought poverty like mint toothpaste fights cats. Just look at the numbers. My guess is that you're middle class and that you don't really give a damn about those who couldn't affort medical care and who can now, and that you're more concerned with middle-class stuff. It's okay, but the majority of the Venezuelan population is, well, poor.
You then argue that the new prez doesn't have the required education, but he has the same backround as Lula, and there are many other "unusual" presidential candidates - like I said, Reagan was an actor, and yet he is the US' favourite president.
I mean, there are many, many, many arguments against Chavez, the country has basically no future and simply stands on its oil revenue, which is bound to decrease shortly, the economy is non-existent, etc. In my eyes you're invocating the wrong reasons, and while Nevermined tried to be at least somewhat objective, you're simply speaking with your heart.
|
Can someone from Venezuela or currently living there comment?
Source
|
On March 07 2013 07:43 Kukaracha wrote:Show nested quote +On March 07 2013 07:23 Swimcito wrote: funny how people sometimes blinded by hatred for the U.S. is able to see Nevermind's post, yet somehow arent able to see mine, which i detailed why Chavez Govt. sucks.
Nevermind is pro Chavez
I am Anti Chavez
There is 2 sides of the coin and Venezuela is extremely divided because of it. Because you post is terribad. :p Your arguments are based on a deterioration of the level of life, when Chavez has fought poverty like mint toothpaste fights cats. Just look at the numbers. My guess is that you're middle class and that you don't really give a damn about those who couldn't affort medical care and who can now, and that you're more concerned with middle-class stuff. It's okay, but the majority of the Venezuelan population is, well, poor. You then argue that the new prez doesn't have the required education, but he has the same backround as Lula, and there are many other "unusual" presidential candidates - like I said, Reagan was an actor, and yet he is the US' favourite president. I mean, there are many, many, many arguments against Chavez, the country has basically no future and simply stands on its oil revenue, which is bound to decrease shortly, the economy is non-existent, etc. In my eyes you're invocating the wrong reasons, and while Nevermined tried to be at least somewhat objective, you're simply speaking with your heart.
Is energy crisis a middle class problem !?, or does it affects all aspects of society??
Is insecurity a middle class problem?, on the contrary poor people is even more affected in "the barrios" where criminals are basically warlords. In Chacao, Baruta, and high class municipalities, crime rates are way lower.
Is inflation a middle class problem??, on the contrary, the poor is affected more and more with it. Whereas the rich just get US dollars or other hard currency to protect themselfes from inflation and devaluations.
Im middle-upper middle class, but i am so because i studied, im a systems engineer, currently a Java developer, chavez era has breed too many entitled people that want everything fucking handled to them.
I know Nevermind personally, he is educated, he is a lawyer, he isnt poor, and his experiences with goverment institutions have been crap. Like i said, he almost lost an arm in a public hospital. Yet somehow he is still a chavizta out of just fear that what may come may be worse. And as the other guy said, somehow the fact that chavez is/was (although this is subjective), better than other goverments doesnt mean he is good all this praising and bullshit needs to stop.
Some people has been even saying he is better than bolivar and that he needs to be in the national pantheom, thanks god constitution says it needs to pass 25 years since death to be in there.
You see there is now some kind of "cult" developing around Chavez, Maduro and its supporters are doing it because the guy is not charismatic and contrary to what you and nevermind think, He is fucking stupid. He doesnt even know how to talk. And he knows that, so he is just triying to get elected because of Chavez Parachute, not by his own perks.
|
On March 07 2013 07:43 Kukaracha wrote:Show nested quote +On March 07 2013 07:23 Swimcito wrote: funny how people sometimes blinded by hatred for the U.S. is able to see Nevermind's post, yet somehow arent able to see mine, which i detailed why Chavez Govt. sucks.
Nevermind is pro Chavez
I am Anti Chavez
There is 2 sides of the coin and Venezuela is extremely divided because of it. Because you post is terribad. :p Your arguments are based on a deterioration of the level of life, when Chavez has fought poverty like mint toothpaste fights cats. Just look at the numbers. My guess is that you're middle class and that you don't really give a damn about those who couldn't affort medical care and who can now, and that you're more concerned with middle-class stuff. It's okay, but the majority of the Venezuelan population is, well, poor. You then argue that the new prez doesn't have the required education, but he has the same backround as Lula, and there are many other "unusual" presidential candidates - like I said, Reagan was an actor, and yet he is the US' favourite president. I mean, there are many, many, many arguments against Chavez, the country has basically no future and simply stands on its oil revenue, which is bound to decrease shortly, the economy is non-existent, etc. In my eyes you're invocating the wrong reasons, and while Nevermined tried to be at least somewhat objective, you're simply speaking with your heart.
Also the whole pre chavez vs post chavez is being waaay too over simplified, when there are too many reasons for why things were the way they were and why things are the way they are now.
For Starters, Oil prices werent as high, somehow chavez has said that oil prices have been up because of him and thats just false, its because Sept. 11 and the whole War. Not Chavez.
There is so much you can do with oil at $100+, not much you can do with $12 (pre 1998)
Hell, in 2009 when oil got near end of the year close to $38, 2010 we got a 5% GDP Contraction.
So all this shit about Chavez being good is just bullshit, he was just lucky to be honest to be president in the best era to have been president
|
that's bullcrap, now who is gonna oppose bush?
|
On March 07 2013 16:39 aka_star wrote: that's bullcrap, now who is gonna oppose bush?
Im not happy about his death and i somehow praised his foreign policy
HOWEVER
and this is the big thing for me, is one thing is words the other one is actions
His goverment was very inneficient.
I mean seriously how can you have the biggest oil reserves in the world and have an Energy Crisis !?
|
So many really praise Chavez, hard to believe.
|
|
|
|