EPTUser was warned for this post
Women That Like Men with Money, Why is it Bad? - Page 14
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Cricketer12
United States13974 Posts
User was warned for this post | ||
|
Gijian
United States273 Posts
| ||
|
StreetWise
United States594 Posts
| ||
|
Wegandi
United States2455 Posts
I had this argument with my ex, that if she ever got 'fat' if I would dump her. Let's just say I tip toed around that one as much as possible. When we're 65 it is one thing (but hell, I still want to look like Robby Robinson when I'm 65!), but take some respect for yourself and your partner in the meantime. For reference: RR @ 64. ![[image loading]](http://i682.photobucket.com/albums/vv186/Super_2nd_Chance/39dc8afc.jpg) | ||
|
Tien
Russian Federation4447 Posts
On February 23 2013 13:22 StreetWise wrote: We call it superficial because is. Here is the definition: a (1) : of, relating to, or located near a surface (2) : lying on, not penetrating below, or affecting only the surface. Money is something that is outside of someone and not intrinsic to them. Looks however are a reflection of their biological makeup. People with good genes are attractive. It is below the surface as it is part of their DNA. There's more to attraction than just your biological makeup. | ||
|
yandere991
Australia394 Posts
| ||
|
Wegandi
United States2455 Posts
On February 23 2013 13:35 yandere991 wrote: To me it is all the same. Wanting someone for their looks has equal weighting to wanting someone for their money, both require no need to know the person on a deeper level so for one camp to call the other shallow is strange to me. Because one is needed for a successful relationship and the other isn't? As human beings we need sex. Obviously we need some amount of money, but when people flaunt money they're talking the girls who refuse to notice anyone who doesn't drive around in Ferrari's or own 4+ BR houses. | ||
|
Eufouria
United Kingdom4425 Posts
Men want an attractive woman because if you have children with an attractive woman then your children are more likely to be attractive, which means they will be more likely to have children in the future, passing your genes on. Also particular features most men find attractive like wide hips are more ideal for bearing children. Women look for more things, but at the end of the day their basic instinct is survival, so they will go for men with features that make them more likely to survive, although obviously the meaning of survival in a first world country is a lot different to the meaning when we lived in caves and hunted for our food. Attractiveness plays a part still because attractive man=more attractive children, but factors like money and a guys general alphaness are more important because a guy that displays these things will be a better provider. Also things change depending on the stage of live the man or woman is in. A younger man will still find more ideal mothers more attractiveness, but they will likely lower their standards because most young guys want sex but not children. A younger woman may rate attractiveness higher because it doesn't matter if the guy is also a poor student if you're not planning to have children for a few more years. | ||
|
yandere991
Australia394 Posts
On February 23 2013 13:46 Wegandi wrote: Because one is needed for a successful relationship and the other isn't? As human beings we need sex. Obviously we need some amount of money, but when people flaunt money they're talking the girls who refuse to notice anyone who doesn't drive around in Ferrari's or own 4+ BR houses. If your partners looks is such an important criteria for that relationship to exist I wouldn't say that this relationship is more "successful" than one that has wealth as the deciding criteria. | ||
|
Dbars
United States273 Posts
AND I HAVE BEEN SINGLE FOR 9 YEARS NOW BECAUSE I HAVNT HAD A GOOD JOB SINCE. tbh all girls can burn in hell and i have seen the true face of those blood sucking ass holes. | ||
|
zbedlam
Australia549 Posts
The only reason its looked down upon more with women is when a woman wants their potential partner to prove he can support them it costs him, leading to bitterness if there is a fallout. Whereas men know whether their prospective partner is suitable or not with no cost applied. Everyone is shallow though no shit, the only people I have met that have said they aren't shallow are either lying or ugly. But yeah, emotional compatibility should be considered as well when deciding long term partners, when people enter relationships based on what their loins tell them they usually break up or live unhappily ever after. | ||
|
Lysanias
Netherlands8351 Posts
On February 22 2013 03:55 WikidSik wrote: its only a problem when superficial factors are THE ONLY factors considered in starting/continuing relationships. I like to agree with this. | ||
|
LAN-f34r
New Zealand2099 Posts
| ||
|
sluggaslamoo
Australia4494 Posts
A gold digger isn't attracted to the man at all, she is there for the money. The difference is that a woman can be attracted to a man that is successful, and be with him, even if he is stingy with his money. If a gold digger was with a rich man, and the rich man didn't allow her to spend a ton of his money, she would leave in a heartbeat. If we were to apply the same logic to males. This would be like a male dating a female purely for looks, he would drag her around with his friends purely for showing off, but whenever the female wanted anything, even sex, he would say no unless he really had to. | ||
|
Cuce
Turkey1127 Posts
| ||
|
Shady Sands
United States4021 Posts
| ||
|
Geefking
Australia41 Posts
However this is of course after she passes the most important test regarding looks | ||
|
TAMinator
Australia2706 Posts
On February 23 2013 15:30 Dbars wrote: I have bought girls diamond rings, ear rings and necklaces. Along with hundreds of dollars worth of gift certificates to the shops they like to shop at. Always drove them around in the nicest SVUs or Trucks. Bought hundreds of dollars worth of roses and dinners. AND I HAVE BEEN SINGLE FOR 9 YEARS NOW BECAUSE I HAVNT HAD A GOOD JOB SINCE. tbh all girls can burn in hell and i have seen the true face of those blood sucking ass holes. gg no re | ||
|
Shady Sands
United States4021 Posts
On February 23 2013 16:12 Geefking wrote: Am I the only male who looks at the financial viability of a women and of course her future career prospects when considering dating? However this is of course after she passes the most important test regarding looks When I look at a girl, the first question I ask myself is "can I afford her?" | ||
|
bittman
Australia8759 Posts
And yet the majority of women are superficial about height which says nothing good about a man other than maybe you'll look great in photos together. Everyone has superficial needs. Things they appraise at face value. Also @ Dbars: best of luck with the future man. Stories like that though scared me off dating unless I knew a person really well for most of my life though haha. | ||
| ||
