On March 07 2013 07:42 dAPhREAk wrote:
not terribly surprising considering the U.S. has always had the option to use the military against U.S. citizens on U.S. soil. the fact that it is a drone, instead of a guy walking around with a gun is legally irrelevant in my opinion.
not terribly surprising considering the U.S. has always had the option to use the military against U.S. citizens on U.S. soil. the fact that it is a drone, instead of a guy walking around with a gun is legally irrelevant in my opinion.
Only the national guard directed by a state governor is allowed to exercise any military power within the united states except under martial law. The general military has never been allowed to do that.