On September 28 2012 03:30 HomeWorld wrote: There must be something really shady related to this stuff, I fail to understand why a father would offer millions of dollars to the person who will marry his daughter. From the category: "Too good to be true".
You didn't see a problem with a father GOING TO THE INTERNATIONAL PRESS about his daughter's marital status? Because you know, that's exactly the type of thing a father should do instead of paying personal attention and responsibility to the daughter's personal life and potential romantic interests himself.
Homosexuality is known to have both genetic and environmental factors, meaning there's no surefire way to make someone gay, and also there's no single "gay gene" that causes it. In fact there's no comprehensive biological or psychological theory for homosexuality whatsoever.
It's also not binary. Some homosexuals are more so than others, some change their sexuality even as adults, some are bi, and so on. I don't think Huragius is wrong in wanting to convince his (hypothetical) child to become straight, as long as he accepts that it might not work.
On September 28 2012 03:34 Tanukki wrote: Homosexuality is known to have both genetic and environmental factors, meaning there's no surefire way to make someone gay, and also there's no single "gay gene" that causes it. In fact there's no comprehensive biological or psychological theory for homosexuality whatsoever.
It's also not binary. Some homosexuals are more so than others, some change their sexuality even as adults, some are bi, and so on. I don't think Huragius is wrong in wanting to convince his (hypothetical) child to become straight, as long as he accepts that it might not work.
although remember that homosexuality has been observed in around 1500 different animal species, which might help the 'gene' argument
On September 28 2012 03:30 HomeWorld wrote: There must be something really shady related to this stuff, I fail to understand why a father would offer millions of dollars to the person who will marry his daughter. From the category: "Too good to be true".
You didn't see a problem with a father GOING TO THE INTERNATIONAL PRESS about his daughter's marital status? Because you know, that's exactly the type of thing a father should do instead of paying personal attention and responsibility to the daughter's personal life and potential romantic interests himself.
That's the exact reason I said "there's something really shady about this" But what do we know ?!
On September 28 2012 03:30 HomeWorld wrote: There must be something really shady related to this stuff, I fail to understand why a father would offer millions of dollars to the person who will marry his daughter. From the category: "Too good to be true".
You didn't see a problem with a father GOING TO THE INTERNATIONAL PRESS about his daughter's marital status? Because you know, that's exactly the type of thing a father should do instead of paying personal attention and responsibility to the daughter's personal life and potential romantic interests himself.
That's the exact reason I said "there's something really shady about this" But what do we know ?!
On September 28 2012 03:16 sparkk51 wrote: Notice how he chose to award $65,000,000 and not 50,000,000 or any other guessable amount. He hopes to appear calculative and... rational.
it's simply 500 mill hong kong dollars. not everyone is calculating in US-$ -.-
E: since I don't have anything substantial to say, i just continue my white&nerdycrusade
On September 28 2012 03:09 th3_great wrote:
On September 28 2012 03:07 sGSuperSlinkY wrote: looks like im moving to china then
*hong kong
Hong kong is a part of China.
Oh right, just went by the op.
its actually complicated and in my opinion makes more sense to use hong kong than china because of how different Hong Kong is than the rest of China.
Not complicated enough that it's not its territory. Hawaii's pretty different than US. Quebec is pretty different from Canada. It's not even disconnected from the mainland. Also opinions don't matter much when it comes to territory. Just ask Japan. Just my opinion.
On September 28 2012 03:34 Tanukki wrote: Homosexuality is known to have both genetic and environmental factors, meaning there's no surefire way to make someone gay, and also there's no single "gay gene" that causes it. In fact there's no comprehensive biological or psychological theory for homosexuality whatsoever.
It's also not binary. Some homosexuals are more so than others, some change their sexuality even as adults, some are bi, and so on. I don't think Huragius is wrong in wanting to convince his (hypothetical) child to become straight, as long as he accepts that it might not work.
basically what your saying is talking about the act of having homosexual relations and experimentation as opposed to actually being a homosexual. if youactually are only attracted to people of the same sex than there's nothing that can be done and attempting to convince you to be straight is going to probably lead to some form of psychological trauma as a result of telling you that what your doing is wrong when it isn't. it's fin having discussions about it but you should be trying to help them figure out who they actually are instead of trying to convince them of something.
On September 28 2012 03:16 sparkk51 wrote: Notice how he chose to award $65,000,000 and not 50,000,000 or any other guessable amount. He hopes to appear calculative and... rational.
it's simply 500 mill hong kong dollars. not everyone is calculating in US-$ -.-
E: since I don't have anything substantial to say, i just continue my white&nerdycrusade
On September 28 2012 03:09 th3_great wrote:
On September 28 2012 03:07 sGSuperSlinkY wrote: looks like im moving to china then
*hong kong
Hong kong is a part of China.
Oh right, just went by the op.
its actually complicated and in my opinion makes more sense to use hong kong than china because of how different Hong Kong is than the rest of China.
Not complicated enough that it's not its territory. Hawaii's pretty different than US. Quebec is pretty different from Canada. It's not even disconnected from the mainland. Also opinions don't matter much when it comes to territory. Just ask Japan. Just my opinion.
i know but i was talking about political differences and yes it's technically part of china i just think that when someone says china it brings to mind the areas closer to the capital with more oppressive government intervention. i wasn't trying to argue with you and im sorry that my response was worded poorly. i wasnt trying to imply that it wasnt part of China.i was simply trying to say that saying china might give someone the wrong impression.
On September 28 2012 03:16 sparkk51 wrote: Notice how he chose to award $65,000,000 and not 50,000,000 or any other guessable amount. He hopes to appear calculative and... rational.
it's simply 500 mill hong kong dollars. not everyone is calculating in US-$ -.-
E: since I don't have anything substantial to say, i just continue my white&nerdycrusade
On September 28 2012 03:09 th3_great wrote:
On September 28 2012 03:07 sGSuperSlinkY wrote: looks like im moving to china then
*hong kong
Hong kong is a part of China.
Oh right, just went by the op.
its actually complicated and in my opinion makes more sense to use hong kong than china because of how different Hong Kong is than the rest of China.
Not complicated enough that it's not its territory. Hawaii's pretty different than US. Quebec is pretty different from Canada. It's not even disconnected from the mainland. Also opinions don't matter much when it comes to territory. Just ask Japan. Just my opinion.
i know but i was talking about political differences and yes it's technically part of china i just think that when someone says china it brings to mind the areas closer to the capital with more oppressive government intervention. i wasn't trying to argue with you and im sorry if my response was worded poorly.
It's cool. With all the territories people try to make distinct from China, be it tibet, taiwan, hongkong, nw china, I feel a bit antsy especially considering the issues with Japan. Really don't want a war but it feels awfully dangerous. Really fearful because people talk about war like it's a video game. Anyway, it's off subject, back to the subject of something about lesbians...
On September 27 2012 22:09 Diks wrote: If I was the father I would make sure my girl is married with someone who the family name is Nore. So I can gain the ultimate baller status with a daughter called Gigi Nore
Lol.
I think that the $65 million would get in the way of people actually trying to woo her though wouldn't it? She would know that any man hereafter who tries to woo her would probably know of the woo bounty on her head. Therefore she probably wouldn't meet any men to actually marry her for her personality. Terrible move by her father. Besides, she's lesbian anyway. Idk why some people just refuse to accept the fact that there are homosexual people.
I do have a really cool idea about a person who might woo woo woo / you know it, a person well known by our community but I'm quite afraid to mention the name. Let's just say I had a bad experience in the past with TL moderation
On September 28 2012 03:30 HomeWorld wrote: There must be something really shady related to this stuff, I fail to understand why a father would offer millions of dollars to the person who will marry his daughter. From the category: "Too good to be true".
There are 2 options:
1. His "daughter" is transgender.
2. Chao Sze-tsung is really Shang Tsung and he wants to get acces to the realm of earth by forming a union between his daughter and a mortal soul from earth.
On September 28 2012 03:34 Tanukki wrote: Homosexuality is known to have both genetic and environmental factors, meaning there's no surefire way to make someone gay, and also there's no single "gay gene" that causes it. In fact there's no comprehensive biological or psychological theory for homosexuality whatsoever.
It's also not binary. Some homosexuals are more so than others, some change their sexuality even as adults, some are bi, and so on. I don't think Huragius is wrong in wanting to convince his (hypothetical) child to become straight, as long as he accepts that it might not work.
basically what your saying is talking about the act of having homosexual relations and experimentation as opposed to actually being a homosexual. if youactually are only attracted to people of the same sex than there's nothing that can be done and attempting to convince you to be straight is going to probably lead to some form of psychological trauma as a result of telling you that what your doing is wrong when it isn't. it's fin having discussions about it but you should be trying to help them figure out who they actually are instead of trying to convince them of something.
Incorrect. As he said, homosexuality is not binary. No one is 100% gay or straight.
On September 28 2012 03:34 Tanukki wrote: Homosexuality is known to have both genetic and environmental factors, meaning there's no surefire way to make someone gay, and also there's no single "gay gene" that causes it. In fact there's no comprehensive biological or psychological theory for homosexuality whatsoever.
It's also not binary. Some homosexuals are more so than others, some change their sexuality even as adults, some are bi, and so on. I don't think Huragius is wrong in wanting to convince his (hypothetical) child to become straight, as long as he accepts that it might not work.
basically what your saying is talking about the act of having homosexual relations and experimentation as opposed to actually being a homosexual. if youactually are only attracted to people of the same sex than there's nothing that can be done and attempting to convince you to be straight is going to probably lead to some form of psychological trauma as a result of telling you that what your doing is wrong when it isn't. it's fin having discussions about it but you should be trying to help them figure out who they actually are instead of trying to convince them of something.
Incorrect. As he said, homosexuality is not binary. No one is 100% gay or straight.
Hence the thrill that comes with an attempt at getting a lesbian woman to switch teams. Alas, heartbreak is always soon to follow.