• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:25
CEST 08:25
KST 15:25
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL61Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?13FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event19Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster16Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? PiG Sty Festival #5: Playoffs Preview + Groups Recap
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Korean Starcraft League Week 77 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL ASL20 Preliminary Maps SC uni coach streams logging into betting site BGH Mineral Boosts Tutorial Video
Tourneys
[BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 512 users

The Venus Project - Page 5

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 15 16 17 Next All
GenghisKhan
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom68 Posts
May 28 2012 19:41 GMT
#81
On May 29 2012 04:32 DeliCiousVP wrote:

you should write the admin the open the thread and merge the others ones into it i think we could all have alot of fun with that.

These thread are nice or whatever but the creator of the threads is rarely active dont have the time or energy to structure it, I mss my trolls get the admins to open it up so we have somewhere to hang toasted .

Need you guys to keep me honest make me harder find inconsistences attack everything i say from every angle you can find this is good. Because at the end of the day im trying to convince people like you guys.


On a less serious note, the part made bold above worries me slightly...
The problem with the world is that fools are full of certainty, and wise men are full of doubt.
DeliCiousVP
Profile Joined September 2011
Sweden343 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-28 23:51:37
May 28 2012 20:19 GMT
#82
In addition, I'd like to add that at, in my opinion, at some point it will come about that some person(/s) will have more resources, or a more important or sought after resource than other people. When this point comes about (it will happen very fast, and this is assuming that: the change to this new technocracy could actually be manageable as an instant transition), human nature, which noone yet has found a way to change on a mass individual level will lead to problems. These problems could include; greed leading to stockpiling; greed leading to the demand for an unfair trade (in terms of true value in the technocracy) for the good that they have an overabundance of... etc.

As an adjunct to the above, i'd like to state that I think it's more important for idealist futurists such as Jacques to present how they are going to achieve their aims more prominently than what their aims actually are. If they just spout what people want to hear about a better society 'because it could happen, and we don't know without trying it' (as some people have said in this thread) then I do not trust them.
Luckily, I'm open minded and waiting for the day when they will actually provide some tangible evidence for their ideas coming to fruition out of the current society - the out of part being crucial (NOT over).


Check out the censored thread to see more about that a RBE is about
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=340572

On a less serious note, the part made bold above worries me slightly...

Its about solving problems isent it? and if people conceive something as a problem with this direction it matters little if they are right or not. Because it is a problem if they conceive something as wrong that is not.

And if they are right in what they say that is useful information that needs to acknowledge for maximun efficiency.

Either way please open my thread i want my peeps back.

User was warned for this post
www.youtube.com/user/DeliCiousTZM
Toasterbaked
Profile Blog Joined September 2011
United States160 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-28 21:11:37
May 28 2012 21:10 GMT
#83
Censored? Seriously? The admins closed it because there was already a thread on it.

He was joking on the second point, and clearly you're not getting it x.x

Demanding to open your thread won't get it reopened anyway. Add "can you" and "please" to that and the mods might think of it..
Aka lossmule.sky in east
DeliCiousVP
Profile Joined September 2011
Sweden343 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-28 23:17:45
May 28 2012 23:00 GMT
#84
Go to the search function and write in Resource based economy and see how many threads that pop up. The admins rather have several seperate threads talking about a RBE through diffrent organizations who are all working towards a RBE.

Isent it just better to put up a Resource based economy thread up that can have all the diffrent organizations represented? and if not i dont see why closing the Resource based economy thread that is actually the most accurate and important one gets shut down.

From what i can tell the admin/s got emotional and made an error based on the fact that there were alot of people "hmpfing" to get it closed when i was just trying to structure represent and conserve space in the threads.

How is it more efficient for me to make a long as comment like that and include all sources and information about it in every single resource based economy thread out there? And having to repeat or link people to it constantly oh you dont know what i mean ? want sources ? go back to page hmm let me look 56 check out collum 3 from top to down.

And what is peoples natural reaction "stop plugging that shit all the time" Well what choice do i have a new person is wondering where to look what to see and i dont own the original comment to begin with.

This all started when i tried to make such a post in Freeworldcharter and i saw people spaming comments till we were almost at the next page took me an hour to build and add sources and one second later it would all be forgotten.

are the admins censoring me on purpose? Maybe not but the results is still the same. And even tho we have threads that touch on the subject they dont go as deep as i wanted to go where i bring enginers in the answer your questions.

If you can read a touch of frustration im sorry i just liked the way my thread started to look
www.youtube.com/user/DeliCiousTZM
Dekoth
Profile Joined March 2010
United States527 Posts
May 28 2012 23:04 GMT
#85

On May 29 2012 03:25 Toasterbaked wrote:
The supporters of the Venus project (and the whole RBE project in general) are more about what it can do rather than how it would work.

Plausibility is much more important than what it can do.

The Venus project assumes superabundance- then the system makes sense.

...except that assuming superabundance is ridiculous from the beginning.


Don't sugar coat it..the supporters are morons with no grounding in reality.

On May 29 2012 04:32 DeliCiousVP wrote:

you should write the admin the open the thread and merge the others ones into it i think we could all have alot of fun with that.

These thread are nice or whatever but the creator of the threads is rarely active dont have the time or energy to structure it, I mss my trolls get the admins to open it up so we have somewhere to hang toasted .

Need you guys to keep me honest make me harder find inconsistences attack everything i say from every angle you can find this is good. Because at the end of the day im trying to convince people like you guys.


Most of us aren't trolling you, we are just laughing at you. There is a huge difference. The reason hardly anyone is bothering to have an intelligent debate with you is because there is nothing intelligent to debate. The entire concept is infantile and naive and anyone who believes it has either deluded themselves to the point of tinfoil hat crazy and or are con artists trying to rope in other dopes who aren't bright enough to see this for what it is.

Come up with an intelligent debate that has grounding in real world application and accounts for the "human" factor and I will gladly debate. Continue posting pure hypothetical nonsense that has zero chance of ever happening outside a small compound filled with cult members and I will just continue to mock you. Currently the only person trolling is yourself, sorry if the truth hurts.
DeliCiousVP
Profile Joined September 2011
Sweden343 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-28 23:50:30
May 28 2012 23:23 GMT
#86
Most of us aren't trolling you, we are just laughing at you. There is a huge difference. The reason hardly anyone is bothering to have an intelligent debate with you is because there is nothing intelligent to debate. The entire concept is infantile and naive and anyone who believes it has either deluded themselves to the point of tinfoil hat crazy and or are con artists trying to rope in other dopes who aren't bright enough to see this for what it is.

Come up with an intelligent debate that has grounding in real world application and accounts for the "human" factor and I will gladly debate. Continue posting pure hypothetical nonsense that has zero chance of ever happening outside a small compound filled with cult members and I will just continue to mock you. Currently the only person trolling is yourself, sorry if the truth hurts.


I had a guy who multiaccounted and went into the thread only to make sure the admins banned me. His first post ever was trying to get me banned. Obviously the admins caughtt him eventualy but not before i managed to get two warnings.

And i dont mind people "trolling" or not "trolling".

Its just i never made a comment or statement urging anyone to get silenced by some authority figure no matter what they say, Irrelevant personal attacks? i eat it i eat it all.

And it made sense to me as the conversation moved away from The freeworldcharter into a more of a RBE discussion to move the conversation to that appropiate thread which is something we might have should have done 60 pages earlier.

where people could get active sources and i could start piling the data people are asking for i can go into my other forums and drag stuff from there and insert it answering every question more efficiently.

You know what happends is that you provide sources and information to one person then 2 pages later another one comes up and say well you still havent showed us how you would solve this and the circle repeats every 2-5 pages. You go to find it and you cant because you cant remember if it were 5 pages or 10 or 17 ago.

www.youtube.com/user/DeliCiousTZM
Dekoth
Profile Joined March 2010
United States527 Posts
May 28 2012 23:30 GMT
#87
On May 29 2012 08:23 DeliCiousVP wrote:
Show nested quote +
Most of us aren't trolling you, we are just laughing at you. There is a huge difference. The reason hardly anyone is bothering to have an intelligent debate with you is because there is nothing intelligent to debate. The entire concept is infantile and naive and anyone who believes it has either deluded themselves to the point of tinfoil hat crazy and or are con artists trying to rope in other dopes who aren't bright enough to see this for what it is.

Come up with an intelligent debate that has grounding in real world application and accounts for the "human" factor and I will gladly debate. Continue posting pure hypothetical nonsense that has zero chance of ever happening outside a small compound filled with cult members and I will just continue to mock you. Currently the only person trolling is yourself, sorry if the truth hurts.


I had a guy who multiaccounted and went into the thread only to make sure the admins banned me. His first post ever was trying to get me banned. Obviously the admins caughtt him eventualy but not before i managed to get two warnings.

And i dont mind people "trolling" or not "trolling".

Its just i never made a comment or statement urging anyone to get silenced by some authority figure no matter what they say, Irrelevant personal attacks? i eat it i eat it all.

And it made sense to me as the conversation moved away from The freeworldcharter into a more of a RBE discussion to move the conversation to that appropiate thread which is something we might have should have done 60 pages earlier.

where people could get active sources and i could start piling the data people are asking for i can go into my other forums and drag stuff from there and insert it answering every question more efficiently.


Don't worry, I have no need to multiaccount nor sugarcoat my opinions. While I think this entire thing is laughable, I don't see any reason you should be banned. I would like to state that I wanted the other thread locked for consolidation purposes.
HellRoxYa
Profile Joined September 2010
Sweden1614 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-29 01:30:47
May 29 2012 01:29 GMT
#88
On May 29 2012 08:23 DeliCiousVP wrote:
You know what happends is that you provide sources and information to one person then 2 pages later another one comes up and say well you still havent showed us how you would solve this and the circle repeats every 2-5 pages. You go to find it and you cant because you cant remember if it were 5 pages or 10 or 17 ago.


First of all you never had any sources and you still don't. This has been explained to you (by others, not by me).

Secondly, concidering how much "debating" you're doing wouldn't it be prudent to keep all your "sources" on hand in a document or your favourites in your browser for easy access whenever someone asks for something? That's what I would do, if I was selling readymade propaganda packages like you are.

Lastly, your new thread didn't add anything new, nor did it consolidate anything. It didn't rehash any arguments, it didn't even explain what RBE entails. Seems like a real shitty OP for a thread on RBE then, doesn't it? But no matter, we have two other threads on the subject to keep me and everyone else entertained.
Mjolnir
Profile Joined January 2009
912 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-29 01:55:46
May 29 2012 01:54 GMT
#89

Skimmed OP, saw Zeitgeist references and immediately started to move on to next thread.

EDIT: Delayed to post a warning for all others: This thread contains Zeitgeist.

Talin
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Montenegro10532 Posts
May 29 2012 01:56 GMT
#90
On May 29 2012 10:54 Mjolnir wrote:

Skimmed OP, saw Zeitgeist references and immediately started to move on to next thread.


Pretty much this.

Unfortunately, the ideas presented in OP are still presented on a very immature and impractical level that they undermine the ideas they are built upon, rather than reinforcing them.
DeliCiousVP
Profile Joined September 2011
Sweden343 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-29 02:19:38
May 29 2012 02:03 GMT
#91
On May 29 2012 10:56 Talin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 29 2012 10:54 Mjolnir wrote:

Skimmed OP, saw Zeitgeist references and immediately started to move on to next thread.


Pretty much this.

Unfortunately, the ideas presented in OP are still presented on a very immature and impractical level that they undermine the ideas they are built upon, rather than reinforcing them.


http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=340572

I agree i started this thread it got closed shortly after.


First of all you never had any sources and you still don't. This has been explained to you (by others, not by me).

Got alot of sources but they cant efficiently fit it in a comment that becomes page 44 collum 3 10 minutes later thus forcing me to constantly repeat and refrence which is annoying for everyone.
Zeitgeist
http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/Zeitgeist, The Movie- Companion Guide PDF.pdf
Zeitgeist addendum
http://repository.zeitgeistvancouver.com/Articles/Zeitgeist Addendum Sources.pdf

Here is the source guide for the 1st/2nd movie. I answer and provide proof for almost all questions. But what happeneds is they either get ignored because Yuck it has a Z in it so they wont gonna watch that. so they dont and ask the same question again and once that happends it dont matter what i show anything that dont agree with what they belive will be rejected.

TL mods never get emotional. They are gods.

Yeah you dont say TL is renowned for their harsh moderaters. as god is not very forgiving hehe .
www.youtube.com/user/DeliCiousTZM
Toasterbaked
Profile Blog Joined September 2011
United States160 Posts
May 29 2012 02:09 GMT
#92
On May 29 2012 08:00 DeliCiousVP wrote:
Go to the search function and write in Resource based economy and see how many threads that pop up. The admins rather have several seperate threads talking about a RBE through diffrent organizations who are all working towards a RBE.

Isent it just better to put up a Resource based economy thread up that can have all the diffrent organizations represented? and if not i dont see why closing the Resource based economy thread that is actually the most accurate and important one gets shut down.

From what i can tell the admin/s got emotional and made an error based on the fact that there were alot of people "hmpfing" to get it closed when i was just trying to structure represent and conserve space in the threads.

How is it more efficient for me to make a long as comment like that and include all sources and information about it in every single resource based economy thread out there? And having to repeat or link people to it constantly oh you dont know what i mean ? want sources ? go back to page hmm let me look 56 check out collum 3 from top to down.

And what is peoples natural reaction "stop plugging that shit all the time" Well what choice do i have a new person is wondering where to look what to see and i dont own the original comment to begin with.

This all started when i tried to make such a post in Freeworldcharter and i saw people spaming comments till we were almost at the next page took me an hour to build and add sources and one second later it would all be forgotten.

are the admins censoring me on purpose? Maybe not but the results is still the same. And even tho we have threads that touch on the subject they dont go as deep as i wanted to go where i bring enginers in the answer your questions.

If you can read a touch of frustration im sorry i just liked the way my thread started to look

TL mods never get emotional. They are gods.
Aka lossmule.sky in east
HellRoxYa
Profile Joined September 2010
Sweden1614 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-29 02:36:19
May 29 2012 02:34 GMT
#93
On May 29 2012 11:03 DeliCiousVP wrote:
Show nested quote +

First of all you never had any sources and you still don't. This has been explained to you (by others, not by me).

Got alot of sources but they cant efficiently fit it in a comment that becomes page 44 collum 3 10 minutes later thus forcing me to constantly repeat and refrence which is annoying for everyone.
Zeitgeist
http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/Zeitgeist, The Movie- Companion Guide PDF.pdf
Zeitgeist addendum
http://repository.zeitgeistvancouver.com/Articles/Zeitgeist Addendum Sources.pdf

Here is the source guide for the 1st/2nd movie. I answer and provide proof for almost all questions. But what happeneds is they either get ignored because Yuck it has a Z in it so they wont gonna watch that. so they dont and ask the same question again and once that happends it dont matter what i show anything that dont agree with what they belive will be rejected.


Naturally you can conviniently ignore all the criticism because you "have sources", right?

While I'm at it, I find taking quotes from various sources (and often using them wholly out of context) to add an aura of legitimacy to your claims to be a ridicolous practice to say the least.

In any case these are sources to idiotic movies and not sources to back up your arguments. (Edit: If you want to use them as such you need to learn to be specific. Pick one area of sources, post those and make sure they say what you want them to say. You can't just link to whole movies and go "Well look, the answer's in there!". Not only has it not been in the movies you've linked it's also not a proper way to argue and it just shows that you lack understanding of whatever issue it is that you're trying to debate)
DeliCiousVP
Profile Joined September 2011
Sweden343 Posts
May 29 2012 02:58 GMT
#94
Naturally you can conviniently ignore all the criticism because you "have sources", right?

While I'm at it, I find taking quotes from various sources (and often using them wholly out of context) to add an aura of legitimacy to your claims to be a ridicolous practice to say the least.


First of you need to look at the sources and discriminate them before you can go on a tangeem about how everything is wrong and every source ever provided to you must be lies.

And when you come to the philisophical argument what is knowledge? then you have reached the last defence put up by your static identity you are one step away from it. Just stop shaking your head from left to right and try to see it from my perspective no matter how insane it seems to you.
www.youtube.com/user/DeliCiousTZM
Zinnwaldite
Profile Joined August 2010
Norway1567 Posts
May 29 2012 03:01 GMT
#95
dammit,, thought this project would be full of naked women for some reason... >_>
We promise with a view to hope, but the reason to "accomplish" what we promised would be fear.
HellRoxYa
Profile Joined September 2010
Sweden1614 Posts
May 29 2012 03:17 GMT
#96
On May 29 2012 11:58 DeliCiousVP wrote:
Show nested quote +
Naturally you can conviniently ignore all the criticism because you "have sources", right?

While I'm at it, I find taking quotes from various sources (and often using them wholly out of context) to add an aura of legitimacy to your claims to be a ridicolous practice to say the least.


First of you need to look at the sources and discriminate them before you can go on a tangeem about how everything is wrong and every source ever provided to you must be lies.

And when you come to the philisophical argument what is knowledge? then you have reached the last defence put up by your static identity you are one step away from it. Just stop shaking your head from left to right and try to see it from my perspective no matter how insane it seems to you.


Your perspective is detached from reality.

And no, all your sources aren't lies. Some of them are spot on, some are misquoted or misinterpreted, and some are flat out wrong. Might want to read the link I gave you. I would never blindly dismiss something out of hand. Fortunately RBE is based on the assumption that resources are abundant, which they are not, which essentially stops RBE in its tracks (as has been explained to you by others, repeatedly, in a variety of ways). As the guide shows when it comes to Zeitgeist, there are a lot of misunderstandings about the economic system and a lot of erronous calculations, often based on these misunderstandings.

The really interesting thing is that you will do the very thing you just accused me of. You will out of hand dismiss the criticism and call it untrue because you already know you have the real truth (in fact you already have).
Blennd
Profile Joined April 2011
United States266 Posts
May 29 2012 03:22 GMT
#97
On April 20 2012 22:28 gold_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2012 22:26 Dr.Lettuce wrote:
On April 20 2012 22:26 gold_ wrote:
On April 20 2012 22:19 Dr.Lettuce wrote:
I see this posted on my facebook quite a bit.

Jeesus christ, I truly hope people don't believe in this venus project.

This is the most unsustainable unrealistic economy I've ever seen. Look at the models they've created, how on earth is that a feasible way to live? It's incredibly inefficient. It absolutely cripples any sense of incentive to work above average or for personal reasons. I admire the idea of parts of a collectivized state, but this really isn't feasible.

Additionally, whilst the current system is under justified scrutiny, I find it laughable that anyone who believes in this system stumbles at this question. 'Can you tell me any problems under the venus project resource based economy that will occur?' Always draws a blank- because people that believe in this system do not understand economics. Period. I'm sorry to be that arrogant, but stuff like this pisses me off.

We should be spending more time/effort in to re-vamping the current system. Massive changes are needed, and focus and effort should be put there. Not theorycrafting pointless impossible economic models to follow.

Zeitgeist is just as stupid.

Come on people, tell me I'm a corporate blind puppet that listens to the mans propaganda. Yawn.

Your a corporate blind puppet that listens to the mans propaganda.


At least spell you're properly

That is propaganda grammar, puppet.


I laughed out loud.
Velocirapture
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States983 Posts
May 29 2012 03:33 GMT
#98
I watched the videos a bit (they are quite lengthy) and read up some on this topic and I have to say, it comes off a bit silly. Basically, from what I have seen it takes a principle of idealism, which is incredibly hard to realize in the world, and tries to apply it to all things.

I do no feel, like some, that we should accept and Ayn Rand-esque system modeled entirely after our baser instincts. It is, under very special circumstances, an important function of society to forsake individual interests in favor of a stronger collective well being. But this is far too extreme.

This all said...

On May 29 2012 12:22 Blennd wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2012 22:28 gold_ wrote:
On April 20 2012 22:26 Dr.Lettuce wrote:
On April 20 2012 22:26 gold_ wrote:
On April 20 2012 22:19 Dr.Lettuce wrote:
I see this posted on my facebook quite a bit.

Jeesus christ, I truly hope people don't believe in this venus project.

This is the most unsustainable unrealistic economy I've ever seen. Look at the models they've created, how on earth is that a feasible way to live? It's incredibly inefficient. It absolutely cripples any sense of incentive to work above average or for personal reasons. I admire the idea of parts of a collectivized state, but this really isn't feasible.

Additionally, whilst the current system is under justified scrutiny, I find it laughable that anyone who believes in this system stumbles at this question. 'Can you tell me any problems under the venus project resource based economy that will occur?' Always draws a blank- because people that believe in this system do not understand economics. Period. I'm sorry to be that arrogant, but stuff like this pisses me off.

We should be spending more time/effort in to re-vamping the current system. Massive changes are needed, and focus and effort should be put there. Not theorycrafting pointless impossible economic models to follow.

Zeitgeist is just as stupid.

Come on people, tell me I'm a corporate blind puppet that listens to the mans propaganda. Yawn.

Your a corporate blind puppet that listens to the mans propaganda.


At least spell you're properly

That is propaganda grammar, puppet.


I laughed out loud.


This entire exchange is golden.
GreenManalishi
Profile Joined July 2009
Canada834 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-29 03:34:52
May 29 2012 03:33 GMT
#99
On May 29 2012 11:58 DeliCiousVP wrote:
First of you need to look at the sources and discriminate them before you can go on a tangeem about how everything is wrong and every source ever provided to you must be lies.

And when you come to the philisophical argument what is knowledge? then you have reached the last defence put up by your static identity you are one step away from it. Just stop shaking your head from left to right and try to see it from my perspective no matter how insane it seems to you.

Maybe you should actually check out this guys sources before you "discriminate" them. He has over 100, some of them from reputable journals.
On May 29 2012 12:01 Zinnwaldite wrote:
dammit,, thought this project would be full of naked women for some reason... >_>

First thing that popped into my mind when I saw the thread name
tertos
Profile Joined April 2011
Romania394 Posts
May 29 2012 08:54 GMT
#100
Guys, listen.
Guys, I have the greatest ideea ever.
Guys stop arguing.
Guys, Guys, Guys
I am a self educated banker, give me your money and ill make you millions.

self-educated structural designer, architectural designer, philosopher of science, concept artist, educator, and futurist.


Ps, those are not real proffessions.
I was born this way
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 15 16 17 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 35m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 705
Barracks 37
LuMiX 2
Dota 2
XaKoH 470
League of Legends
JimRising 785
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K641
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor196
Other Games
summit1g9015
WinterStarcraft589
SortOf110
ProTech49
kaitlyn40
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH335
• Hupsaiya 103
• Sammyuel 48
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota267
League of Legends
• Lourlo1295
• masondota2691
• Stunt436
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
3h 35m
Clem vs Classic
SHIN vs Cure
FEL
5h 35m
WardiTV European League
5h 35m
BSL: ProLeague
11h 35m
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
1d 17h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV European League
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
FEL
6 days
FEL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 2v2 Season 3
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.